💼 Careercow Lindsay M Amer / Queer Kid Stuff - Makes LGBT SJW Style videos for children, complete with creepy music

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The pushback against this kind of shit is going to go on for years if not a decade.
 
The school should provide an alternative to forced tranny indoctrination on school time. It’s unacceptable and I hope whoever made the decision to show this gets fired.
 
A bit late on topic but why some of you called this man(?)Women thingy a pedophile and child groomers? I mean yeah she is gross but i haven't heard anything she said that indicates that she is a pedophhile beside confusing kids. I'am just asking, i don't agree with her a lot too.
 
I am absolutely disturbed by the amount of child "drag queens" that have appeared in the limelight in recent years.

I have nothing against drag queens; in fact, I think a lot of them can be hilarious and genuinely entertaining. However, the humor behind drag is that of being provocative and risque. Drag culture isn't child friendly at all, and I find it to be disturbing how the whole "drag kid" thing is being pushed SO hard in the mainstream. This isn't a simple case of kids playing dress up; these drag kids are dressed up like prostitutes with skimpy clothing and heavy makeup. And a lot of their parents are fully willing to take their kids to perform on stage in actual NIGHT CLUBS. What the fuck.

If these were a bunch of young girls being paraded around at night clubs for men, people would rightfully cause an uproar. But, because there's LGBT people involved with this particular subject, people are too afraid to say anything because they'd be labeled as bigots ... So we have all of the virtue signalers come out of the woodworks to actually make this a thing.

It's insanity.
 
I am absolutely disturbed by the amount of child "drag queens" that have appeared in the limelight in recent years.

I have nothing against drag queens; in fact, I think a lot of them can be hilarious and genuinely entertaining. However, the humor behind drag is that of being provocative and risque. Drag culture isn't child friendly at all, and I find it to be disturbing how the whole "drag kid" thing is being pushed SO hard in the mainstream. This isn't a simple case of kids playing dress up; these drag kids are dressed up like prostitutes with skimpy clothing and heavy makeup. And a lot of their parents are fully willing to take their kids to perform on stage in actual NIGHT CLUBS. What the fuck.

If these were a bunch of young girls being paraded around at night clubs for men, people would rightfully cause an uproar. But, because there's LGBT people involved with this particular subject, people are too afraid to say anything because they'd be labeled as bigots ... So we have all of the virtue signalers come out of the woodworks to actually make this a thing.

It's insanity.

If you watch any of the articles on these drag kids, It's always the mother, they always watched that Ru Paul show, and it's for the same reason that mothers push their daughters into beauty pageants. And as for "inclusivity" you only have to look at the furry community to see what unbridled inclusivity looks like.
 
I truly wish I hadn't clicked on this thread today, but I have a litre of wine to help with the memory loss.

Isn't it nice that we've gone from ''don't talk to strangers and don't take candy from people in weird vans'' to ''I'm a queer lesbian homosexual fagot lgbtq+ predator and I'm here to teach about love fellow toddlers''.

I'll sort myself out.
 
Last edited:
Didn't one of the "Drag Kids" actually do a photoshoot for an "adult" product magazine, too? Granted, I don't think the photoshoot in of itself was that bad (the kid was in a silver athletic suit; much more tame than what we've seen these kids dress like), but still ... What parent would allow their child to do a photoshoot for an adults only magazine? A bad one, obviously.

I really want kids in the future, but this kind of shit scares the crap out of me. These creepy people like Lindsay are bound to raise a generation of young kids who develop a plethora of identity crises before they even reach kindergarten. It's sick.
 
If a boy likes to dress up, then ... fine, I guess. But under 12 and LGBT issues would be beyond them, why force the idea that they're social crusaders when they just like dressing up? They probably wouldn't even see the connection.
 
Saw this on FB the other day, and thought of this thread. This is what these idiots want our society to become, just like this cereal. A confused, unappealing, unappetizing mess.

acerealkilling.png
 
When that little girl dressed up as a prostitute on Toddlers and Tiaras, that was considered controversial and in bad taste. When (the same?) little girl dressed up as Dolly Parton with a padded bra and a pillow over her rear end, that was considered controversial and in bad taste.

So...it's ok when boys dress up as inappropriately mature women? Because gender?

Why can't he just shop in the girls' section of Target or at Justice? Could still be excruciatingly feminine but age-appropriate. He can perform femininity wearing neon and glitter without looking like he's trying to be a 40 year old woman. That's the closest thing to kid-appropriate "drag" I can think of.
 
Saw this on FB the other day, and thought of this thread. This is what these idiots want our society to become, just like this cereal. A confused, unappealing, unappetizing mess.

View attachment 599370
I too believe in sorting everyone into narrow categories and strictly dividing those categories from each other.
Let's not get it twisted; dipshits taking advantage of the kindness of others isn't an argument against being kind.
 
A bit late on topic but why some of you called this man(?)Women thingy a pedophile and child groomers? I mean yeah she is gross but i haven't heard anything she said that indicates that she is a pedophhile beside confusing kids. I'am just asking, i don't agree with her a lot too.

Some people think that teaching LGBT stuff to kids means Lindsay is a pedophile because they think LGBT = sex. Like how some people complain about how there shouldn't be gay stuff in shows because it's not age appropriate when sex doesn't have to come into it. No one complains how having heterosexual parents on a show might imply sex because the parents must have had sex to have a child, or conflates a girl and a boy kissing each other with sex.

Other people have their own reasoning for thinking that about Lindsay, which if you go through the thread a bit, you'll see their reasons, but I'm pointing out one reason that I disagree with.

I don't like their videos for other reasons but I don't think they're a pedophile either. They're just a very bland person who makes incredibly mediocre videos. They talk about concepts that will go over children's heads, there's way too much sitting around and talking that will bore most children (also like what five year old is going to go out and do activism??) and using 'queer' in the title is stupid and will alienate members of the LGBT community who are uncomfortable with that word.
 
Some people think that teaching LGBT stuff to kids means Lindsay is a pedophile because they think LGBT = sex.
Why
Screen Shot 2018-11-23 at 5.02.41 PM.png
would
Screen Shot 2018-11-23 at 5.03.04 PM.png
anyone
Screen Shot 2018-11-23 at 5.03.17 PM.png
think
Screen Shot 2018-11-23 at 5.04.52 PM.png
that
Screen Shot 2018-11-23 at 5.09.28 PM.png
?

Everyone who makes their sexuality, or a fetish, their primary identity, or live it as a lifestyle, is a degenerate. If they quit blowing strangers other behind the Free Aids Testing tent at Pride Parades, maybe people will begin to stop thinking everything fags do is about sex.
 
Why
would
anyone
think
that
?

Everyone who makes their sexuality, or a fetish, their primary identity, or live it as a lifestyle, is a degenerate. If they quit blowing strangers other behind the Free Aids Testing tent at Pride Parades, maybe people will begin to stop thinking everything fags do is about sex.
Those people aren't all fags. I'm certain you wouldn't want swingers or urophiliacs to be used as the beacon of heterosexuality.
 
Yeah honestly I think folks need to mentally seperate general everyday faggots from the GAY COMMUNITY™ which seemingly exists solely to to make all gays look like repulsive and obnoxious creeps while also taking credit for gay rights advances they had zero fucking role in.

Its kind of like separating young people from the REEEEEEEEEE mobs or niggers from BLM riots. Sure a bunch of people in this demographic group are tarding out but the large majority are staying as far away as possible and trying their darndest to be boring normies same as everyone else

Ofcourse bringin this back to Lindsay, she is definitely part of the "LGBTQBBQXYZLOLKEKSSACDC FOLX ARE A HOLY SEPARATE CASTE AND I MUST BE ALLOWED IN SCHOOLS TO SELECT THREE YEAR OLDS WHO MIGHT ONE DAY WANT TO GET ASSFUCKED BY A BLACK GUY NAMED JIM!" fringe that will likely bring about 10 years of hard right fundie darkness and be cursed eternally by fags and dykes alike for this
 
Yeah honestly I think folks need to mentally seperate general everyday faggots from the GAY COMMUNITY™ which seemingly exists solely to to make all gays look like repulsive and obnoxious creeps while also taking credit for gay rights advances they had zero fucking role in.

Its kind of like separating young people from the REEEEEEEEEE mobs or niggers from BLM riots. Sure a bunch of people in this demographic group are tarding out but the large majority are staying as far away as possible and trying their darndest to be boring normies same as everyone else
It's understandably very hard for most people to make that separation when the activists themselves have no concept of a distinction existing. What they're essentially pushing is; "We are fighting for the rights of the LGBTQQIAAP Cum-unity™, which is supposed to be you. If that's not you, then you must be weird and regressive."
 
Last edited:
It's understandably very hard for most people to make that separation when the activists themselves have no concept of a distinction existing. What they're essentially pushing is; "We are fighting for the rights of the LGBTQQIAAP Cum-unity™, which is supposed to be you. If that's not you, then you must be weird and regressive."
Its cult behavior 101. Try to create a distance between the "flock" and the rest of humanity by any means necessary and then prey on their loneliness and fear, and if they actively reject you then its fair game to destroy their lives as they are obviously evil.
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again. All this is fucking stupid and pointless she's going for children that are still young enough to get blue and green confused and she expects them to understand this drivel? This shit was cringe at first but it's starting to look like some slaaneshi heresy shit. Also what is the point in this stuff most children if they saw a gay couple would just see them as friends or together like their parents I haven't seen many children acting like westboro members so tolerance isn't the answer here. I don't want to be too out there but it seems so that the sick fuck Lindsey may get off to this shit it's all an elaborate fetish play to appeal to her sick pleasure of corrupting innocence.

The targeting toward children too young and the creepy bear thing just makes me think more and more this is all a sick ploy to get off. We wouldn't tolerate a man having a children's show about how amazing tits and ass or stoner culture are so why do we tolerate this hotdog water smelling rat teaching our children her kinks and the like?
 
Back
Top Bottom