💼 Careercow Lindsay M Amer / Queer Kid Stuff - Makes LGBT SJW Style videos for children, complete with creepy music

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Benny Liggins said:
Have you ever spoken to them about this in detail? It seems like they haven't really considered the kids' futures.
Click to expand...

Oh it's been brought up before, but like all SJWs, they are right and we are wrong regardless of the argument. And it's not like it's ever been nasty at all, we're all pretty chill as far as politics and social shit is concerned, but as soon as it's brought up in any way, J&T are "triggered" lecture everyone on how stupid and bigoted we are and leave. It's hopeless and completely heart breaking. They're little boys, and they want to do little boy stuff. I even tried to bring it up this summer in their language by saying that Trevor (the older one) "is choosing his role" by playing football with his cousins. Didn't work, football is "too masculine" and the other boys are far to influential. Packed up and took them home.
 
Pocket_Sand! said:
Any time one of the boys shows what J&T (in-laws) define as "male tendencies" (playing with G.I. Joe type toys, wanting to be Superman/Spiderman for Halloween) it is relentlessly suppressed. They're told they can't wear what they want or play with what they want because they don't understand their "roles" yet.
Click to expand...
Or maybe, shock of all shocks, they should allow their boys to be boys.

In saying that they don't know their identities yet, the parents are now making decisions for them and deciding what their identity is. The question is however, if said boys were to play with dolls and want to dress up like Disney princesses would their parents react the same way? And if not, why not?
 
PortsideDave said:
Wait a second, I think I recognize that guy. I believe he said at one point that egalitarianism was MRA nonsense. Sargon vid talking about him:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=seq7EYDyIGE
Click to expand...
fucking shit he have a nina hagen poster, now I understand the punk cultural appropriation ( it wasn't that obvious to me ), it's incredibly rustling my jimmies for some reason, maybe because if sjw look at her clip they would be yelling cultural appropriation.
 
Phil Ken Sebben said:
The question is however, if said boys were to play with dolls and want to dress up like Disney princesses would their parents react the same way? And if not, why not?
Click to expand...

Good question, and I unfortunately have no idea. We haven't talked to them since the beginning of the school year after Trevor wanted to bring me to school for career day. I made up what I thought was a pretty cool presentation for 8 year old kids, and even convinced the roadmaster to let the work train come into town in the afternoon and tie it down on the industrial track in town (which is visible and within two blocks of the school) so the kids could come up in the cab and see what an engineer does to run the train. This all went well until J&T reviewed my presentation and decided it was too gender specific and pulled Trevor from class that day.

So I ended up giving a presentation to my nephew's class about being an engineer and how working for the railroad is a great career, without my nephew being there.
 
Pocket_Sand! said:
Good question, and I unfortunately have no idea. We haven't talked to them since the beginning of the school year after Trevor wanted to bring me to school for career day. I made up what I thought was a pretty cool presentation for 8 year old kids, and even convinced the roadmaster to let the work train come into town in the afternoon and tie it down on the industrial track in town (which is visible and within two blocks of the school) so the kids could come up in the cab and see what an engineer does to run the train. This all went well until J&T reviewed my presentation and decided it was too gender specific and pulled Trevor from class that day.
Click to expand...
Are they saying that women can't be engineers? Sounds pretty sexist to me.

They're actually going about this all wrong by denying him aspects of "maleness". If he's not exposed to it, then what makes them think it's going to change later?
 
Phil Ken Sebben said:
Or maybe, shock of all shocks, they should allow their boys to be boys.

In saying that they don't know their identities yet, the parents are now making decisions for them and deciding what their identity is. The question is however, if said boys were to play with dolls and want to dress up like Disney princesses would their parents react the same way? And if not, why not?
Click to expand...

This is exactly what I was going to say - you just know that "gender neutral" is code for "not anything we identify as being masculine."
 
Phil Ken Sebben said:
Are they saying that women can't be engineers?
Click to expand...

Their main criticism of my presentation was that there were no female engineers, conductors, MoW workers, etc. featured in the pictures I used. Most of them are pics of me and my co-workers and old pics of my grandfather and his co-workers back in the 50's and 60's. Railroading is a male dominated industry, no disputing that, and even more so 50+ years ago. It's not that I went out of my way to feature men, there's just a very little example of women in the operations side of the industry.

chocolatesaltyballs said:
you just know that "gender neutral" is code for "not anything we identify as being masculine
Click to expand...

Oh without a doubt, what ever mommy doesn't like, we don't do. Want to play football? How about reading Noam Chomsky instead? Want to watch Spongebob? How about listening to some NPR?
 
Pocket_Sand! said:
Oh without a doubt, what ever mommy doesn't like, we don't do. Want to play football? How about reading Noam Chomsky instead? Want to watch Spongebob? How about listening to some NPR?
Click to expand...

If the boys say they want to try mommy's lipstick, she'd weep tears of joy.
 
Pocket_Sand! said:
Their main criticism of my presentation was that there were no female engineers, conductors, MoW workers, etc. featured in the pictures I used. Most of them are pics of me and my co-workers and old pics of my grandfather and his co-workers back in the 50's and 60's. Railroading is a male dominated industry, no disputing that, and even more so 50+ years ago. It's not that I went out of my way to feature men, there's just a very little example of women in the operations side of the industry.
Click to expand...
Did they make any comments on the actual content or were they just looking for females in the photos?
Depending on their age, the kids probably wouldn't really notice there weren't any women in those photos because that would not be on their mind at all. And even if they were old enough to notice they probably wouldn't even care.
The parents' technique here will just make the children even more aware of gender differences because they're relating everything to gender. Instead of having football be a sport which either gender can play they're associating it solely to males and I'd be surprised if the kids won't notice since this type of shit dictates their lives.
Another question: Do they get called "they" rather than "him"?
 
Pocket_Sand! said:
Oh it's been brought up before, but like all SJWs, they are right and we are wrong regardless of the argument. And it's not like it's ever been nasty at all, we're all pretty chill as far as politics and social shit is concerned, but as soon as it's brought up in any way, J&T are "triggered" lecture everyone on how stupid and bigoted we are and leave. It's hopeless and completely heart breaking. They're little boys, and they want to do little boy stuff. I even tried to bring it up this summer in their language by saying that Trevor (the older one) "is choosing his role" by playing football with his cousins. Didn't work, football is "too masculine" and the other boys are far to influential. Packed up and took them home.
Click to expand...
Those kids are going to grow up and completely cut their parents out of their lives, and rightly so. Hope Mom and Dad have made other arrangements as to who is going to take care of them when they can't take care of themselves, because it sure as shit won't be their own children.

Also, I can guarantee that any grandchildren that might be in the picture will never, EVER be allowed to be in contact with their grandparents... Those boys are going to remember how fucked up their own upbringing was, and will make goddamned sure that their parents don't have an opportunity to screw up their kids as well.

Sad situation all around, really. SJW - Not even once.

InLivingTuna said:
That's the PBS Idea Channel guy, and also rumored to be the boyfriend of the Nostalgia Chick. I like this video of his:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=IFFPguIXI6o
Click to expand...
Of course he has a Twitter and a Tumblr. Of course...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Benny Liggins said:
Did they make any comments on the actual content or were they just looking for females in the photos?
Click to expand...

Just looking for women being represented.

Benny Liggins said:
Do they get called "they" rather than "him"?
Click to expand...

Yes, although not consistently, "he" or "his" will be used occasionally.

JULAY said:
Those kids are going to grow up and completely cut their parents out of their lives, and rightly so. Hope Mom and Dad have made other arrangements as to who is going to take care of them when they can't take care of themselves, because it sure as shit won't be their own children.

Also, I can guarantee that any grandchildren that might be in the picture will never, EVER be allowed to be in contact with their grandparents... Those boys are going to remember how fucked up their own upbringing was, and will make goddamned sure that their parents don't have an opportunity to screw up their kids as well.

Sad situation all around, really
Click to expand...

Oh we've already gone through that, the older one has already asked to live with us, and his friends parents a couple of times. I guarantee when he's old enough, he'll be out and gone, and he wont look back that's for sure. The younger one, I don't know. He's 5 so it could change, but he seems a bit more submissive to Mommy's demands.



And I've caused the thread to derail which is never a good thing, and for that, I apologize. Reading through this, and becoming aware of this idiot really kind of hit home for me, because I could absolutely see this drivel being forced down the boy's throats, and it set me off.

Enough of my sperging, pissing, bitching, and moaning, back to laughing at the dumbass.

And Lindsay, go stand on some train tracks.
 
Pocket_Sand! said:
And I've caused the thread to derail which is never a good thing, and for that, I apologize. Reading through this, and becoming aware of this idiot really kind of hit home for me, because I could absolutely see this drivel being forced down the boy's throats, and it set me off.

Enough of my sperging, pissing, bitching, and moaning, back to laughing at the dumbass.
Click to expand...

It's still relevant since Lindsay clearly wants kids to grow up the same way as your nephews, and you're proving that it's a fucking awful idea.

Anyway, here's a quote from her "Explaining the Gender Binary to Young Children" article on My Kid Is Gay:
"The gender binary can be really complicated! And it’s totally daunting to figure out how to explain it to a young kid in a way that honors that complexity while still being simple enough to grasp."
Then why are you trying to teach it to them? They're fucking kids, they don't give a shit.
Considering that the vast, vast majority of people are not transgender it seems incredibly unlikely that any kid will need to learn this especially in the 3-7 year age group she aims for.

Another Lindsay quote:
"So here’s how I like to explain gender to kids in a way that includes non-binary identities: With a stuffed animal!"
Someone call the police please.
 
Last edited:
We're dealing with these kind of people, folks:


https://twitter.com/AmirSariaslan/status/807731113175252992


CzWiYDHWEAAp6-7.jpg



Reverse pedophilia

Reverse pedophilia






Reverse pedophilia




R-E-V-E-R-S-E P-E-D-O-P-H-I-L-I-A
 
So do these people who analyse "reverse pedophilia" think that the local pre-schoolers want to fuck them?
It's scary to think these people might have their own children...
 
Keep in mind that it's very common for pedophiles, as with any other type of abuser, to project their sexual desires onto children. It's also quite common for pedophiles to delude themselves into thinking their fetishism is normal and experienced by most of the population.

Normally I'd brush this stuff off as progressives having no idea how to relate to kids, but I'm getting increasingly convinced the pedo angle is legit. No way there hasn't been some kind of abuse going on in this circle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom