Culture Life Among The Wokescolds - A college professor laments the rigid, incurious puritanism of his students

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A reader who is a college professor (and whose name I know) writes:

I thought you’d enjoy this signs-of-the-times story. It’s good for a laugh—or perhaps a cry.
In one of my classes yesterday we were talking about current events, and a student mentioned that the soldier in the famous Times Square kissing photo had died. “Yes,” I said. “Too bad. Such a beautiful image, and such a moment of joy.” One of my least favorite students, a smug know-it-all in the back row, piped up. “You actually like that photo?” she said. “Well, yeah,” I replied, a bit taken aback. “That’s an iconic image of a moment of unbridled joy.”
“And do you think she consented to that kiss?” she said icily. “No, no she did not. That is a photo of an assault. That man should have gone to jail.”
Now, this happens with some regularity in classes these days. I don’t use Twitter, but I’m familiar with the term “wokescold,” and it’s incredibly accurate. Most of my students are just pure scolds. They’re deeply puritanical (though they have no idea who the Puritans were, given their virtually nonexistent awareness of history). So I tried to play it off a bit.
“Well, okay…” I said. “I acknowledge that it may not hold up with our contemporary standards of morality—”
“What were we even celebrating?” interjected another student, a gay man who can’t get through a sentence without mentioning that identity.
I couldn’t help it: I laughed. “Uh, winning World War II?” I said. “Pretty big deal, no?”
He scowled. “Yeah, if colonialism’s your thing.”
I admit I was dumbfounded by this, and I figured the best thing to do was escape the situation quickly. But I couldn’t help it. “What was our colonial project in that war?” I asked. “Did we go over there to occupy France? I’m pretty sure it was something more like the opposite.” This got a couple laughs, which helped defuse the tension, and even the student in question chuckled and rolled his eyes. I turned back to the girl. “So,” I said. “You don’t like this photo, I take it.”
“No,” she said. “It should not be shown to people.”
“Hang on,” I said. “Because this feels like an important point. Do you mean this photo should be banned? Kept out of public view?”
“Exactly,” she said. “Why should I be forced to see a woman’s sovereignty violated? That’s a picture of a victim, and nothing else. There’s nothing to celebrate.”
I smiled and nodded, and moved on to the next topic.
Now, I’m not entirely sure what to think of this. Sure, we could laugh it off as the crazy ravings of college freshmen. But here’s the thing: the students I teach are in the university’s elite academic program. There are roughly 800 of them in our 30,000-person student body. Many of them received offers from Ivies but came to this university instead for the full scholarship. They are not cranks—they are the leaders of tomorrow.
You might recall that William Deresiewicz wrote a book a few years ago called Excellent Sheep, about his experience at Yale. I can’t think of a better term for today’s elite students. All of my students are very smart in a technical/regurgitating knowledge kind of way. They do the assignments, they email you outside of class, etc. But they are the most boring people I have ever known. Their whole lives have been curated purely to boost credentials. They do not understand—and I mean literally do not understand, as if you were speaking Latin—the language of morality, goodness, philosophy, justice, and so on. Sometimes we’ll be talking about the news and I’ll ask one of them something like “Hey, is the death penalty wrong?”
They can never reply. They just stammer something about personal opinion and individual choice. I say “Yeah, but is it wrong? Like, on a moral level?” They don’t even understand the question. I’m being totally serious. They don’t understand what it would mean to have a code of beliefs, or to believe in something outside of the individual. They have been brought up to believe in one thing: a vague notion of “success” that mostly involves accumulating credentials, racking up meaningless accolades, and making money. That’s it. They are philistines—smiling, pleasant, well-educated, quasi-totalitarian philistines.
I know you’re working on that book about the new socialism, and I think it will be timely. It seems to me that totalitarianism is not arriving in the U.S. via the stern face of Big Brother staring down from the screen. It’s coming from the college student who says we shouldn’t view a photo of pure, untrammeled joy. And the thing is that they can’t see that joy, not just because they’re puritans, but because they have no historical consciousness. They have no sense of what so many Americans sacrificed in the years leading up to that famous kiss because they never really learned it. I’m not a gung-ho America First guy—I’d be an expat in a second if I could get my wife on board—but the K-12 textbooks have gotten insane. They really do stress the failures of the country, the bad angle of every story, the endless aggressions-in-hindsight that form the modern wokescold.
Look, I get it: this country has done terrible things. We continue to do terrible things. But there are no pure good guys and pure bad guys. We are crazy if we don’t think for one second that the things we consider good and just today will be denounced as oppressive in 30 years. To say that we shouldn’t look at an image that shows the joy of having just defeated the f’ing Nazis is just insanity.
My students are generally pleasant, but they’re never any fun. Where’s the joy in their lives? They live to denounce. It’s like having 25 Robespierres around you three times a week. They’re always on the lookout for something to be outraged about. I’m never surprised when I hear that rates of sexual activity have decreased. It’s hard to imagine them letting their guard down for one second to cherish the company of someone else. What on earth will the romantic comedy films of the future be like? Zooming in on phone screens as two people exchange sexual consent notices on an app?
In the coming weeks I have to make a decision about whether to keep teaching in this elite program, and I doubt I’ll return. The non-elite kids at least have a sense of humor, a sense of joy. I’m not sure at what point we made elite education negative and puritanical, but take it from this professor: it sure isn’t any fun.
This letter, which I publish with the author’s permission, reminds me of a 2016 essay from Notre Dame professor Patrick Deneen, which I mentioned in The Benedict Option. If you want to read it, the whole essay is here. Excerpts:

My students are know-nothings. They are exceedingly nice, pleasant, trustworthy, mostly honest, well-intentioned, and utterly decent. But their minds are largely empty, devoid of any substantial knowledge that might be the fruits of an education in an inheritance and a gift of a previous generation. They are the culmination of western civilization, a civilization that has forgotten it origins and aims, and as a result, has achieved near-perfect indifference about itself.
It’s difficult to gain admissions to the schools where I’ve taught – Princeton, Georgetown, and now Notre Dame. Students at these institutions have done what has been demanded of them: they are superb test-takers, they know exactly what is needed to get an A in every class (meaning that they rarely allow themselves to become passionate and invested in any one subject), they build superb resumes. They are respectful and cordial to their elders, though with their peers (as snatches of passing conversation reveal), easygoing if crude. They respect diversity (without having the slightest clue what diversity is) and they are experts in the arts of non-judgmentalism (at least publicly).They are the cream of their generation, the masters of the universe, a generation-in-waiting who will run America and the world.
But ask them some basic questions about the civilization they will be inheriting, and be prepared for averted eyes and somewhat panicked looks. Who fought in the Peloponnesian war? What was at stake at the Battle of Salamis? Who taught Plato, and whom did Plato teach? How did Socrates die? Raise your hand if you have read both the Iliad and the Odyssey. The Canterbury Tales? Paradise Lost? The Inferno?
Deneen says this is not the fault of the students, or, in an ordinary sense, the failure of our educational system. They are what we have designed them to be. More:

My students are the fruits of a longstanding project to liberate all humans from the accidents of birth and circumstance, to make a self-making humanity. Understanding liberty to be the absence of constraint,forms of cultural inheritance and concomitant gratitude were attacked as so many arbitrary limits on personal choice, and hence, matters of contingency that required systematic disassembly. Believing that the source of political and social division and war was residual commitment to religion and culture, widespread efforts were undertaken to eliminate such devotions in preference to a universalized embrace of toleration and detached selves. Perceiving that a globalizing economic system required deracinated workers who could live anywhere and perform any task without curiosity about ultimate goals and effects, a main task of education became instillation of certain dispositions rather than grounded knowledge – flexibility, non-judgmentalism, contentless “skills,” detached “ways of knowing,” praise for social justice even as students were girded for a winner-take-all economy, and a fetish for diversity that left unquestioned why it was that everyone was identically educated at indistinguishable institutions. At first this meant the hollowing of local, regional, and religious specificity in the name of national identity. Today it has came to mean the hollowing of national specificity in the name of globalized cosmopolitanism, which above all requires studied oblivion to anything culturally defining. The inability to answer basic questions about America or the West is not a consequence of bad education; it is a marker of a successful education.
Read the whole thing.

Reading Deneen, and reading the professor depressed about the Wokescolds, makes me ever more grateful for my children’s classical Christian school, the Sequitur Classical Academy. This little school makes do on a shoestring budget, and is always hurting for money. But what it gives these kids is priceless.

Look at the cropped image at the top of this post. That’s a detail of a snapshot I took of my 12-year-old daughter going out the door on the first day of school this semester. Her seventh grade class is reading The Odyssey. Nobody told these kids that they’re too young to read Homer. She pretty clearly loves it, as you can tell by all the tabs. I’m not bragging on her; I’m bragging on the school and its teachers. When you get inside schools like Sequitur, and see what they are doing with and for these kids, it will knock you flat. Whatever else Sequitur is producing, it’s not Wokescolds. All that money wealthy conservatives give to political and religious causes might be fine, but man, many of y’all have no idea what kind of heroic battles for Western civilization and the hearts and minds of the young are being fought in classical schools in your own town. Given how scant the resources are, it’s a guerrilla war at this point.

If you have kids, and have a classical Christian school in your area, please consider it as a possibility for your children. If you are a donor with anything extra to give, please give generously to your classical schools. The stakes are high. Few others are doing the work that they are doing — and with so little in terms of resources. You can do a lot with faith, hope, and love — but it’s nice to have money too. Thus endeth the lesson.

source: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/life-among-the-wokescolds/
archive: https://archive.md/8iFRB
 
tenured college professors have a good job with impressive benefits including a pension that is paid for on the backs of the debt slavery of the young

I don't care if their students are a combination of furries and hamas, it's what they deserve
 
Reading the first part made me ponder something. If all you see is the negatives and want to tear stuff down. How do you work yourself out of that to turn things around? Those students who can't help but be wokescolds are impossible to redeem if they can't change how they are always on guard and ready to attack things. How do you change them or get them to change themselves?
 
Reading the first part made me ponder something. If all you see is the negatives and want to tear stuff down. How do you work yourself out of that to turn things around? Those students who can't help but be wokescolds are impossible to redeem if they can't change how they are always on guard and ready to attack things. How do you change them or get them to change themselves?

that's just what teenagers are like
 
Reading the first part made me ponder something. If all you see is the negatives and want to tear stuff down. How do you work yourself out of that to turn things around? Those students who can't help but be wokescolds are impossible to redeem if they can't change how they are always on guard and ready to attack things. How do you change them or get them to change themselves?
Same way you always do it: beat them down with real world experience.

The post-modern attitude he's describing is a combination of detailed grievances against the present/past, and hazy utopian futures based on lofty ideals. You can't crack that combination until their ideals are shattered by contact with the real world. That makes them question the utopia, which makes them wonder if the criticism--whose sole purpose is to demolish civilization and pave way for the utopia--was as misguided as their ideals.
 
They are not cranks—they are the leaders of tomorrow.
The only way that feminist harpy, or that fag concerned about colonialism are the "leaders of tomorrow" is if they are installed via HR departments, and discriminatory hiring practices. Nobody but fellow cultists will want to work with them, or under them. They will run their respective companies straight into the ground if given a chance.
 
The post-modern attitude he's describing is a combination of detailed grievances against the present/past, and hazy utopian futures based on lofty ideals. You can't crack that combination until their ideals are shattered by contact with the real world. That makes them question the utopia, which makes them wonder if the criticism--whose sole purpose is to demolish civilization and pave way for the utopia--was as misguided as their ideals.
Look past the ideology here. Them as a person has this constantly under attack mentality. We see it all over the internet now as the default human experience. How do you change that type of personality to become something less hostile?
 
I decided I've had enough doing software so i am going back to community college for graphic design. Terrifies me. I bought a house in a pretty conservative area, but I'm very sure I'll run into wokescolds. The only way i know to deal with these people or new people in general is to be a neutral mystery. Never share my true opinion on everything and when directly asked, say "I have no clue". Its frustrating, but having dealt with years of listening to things i outright find enraging, you're able to keep cool. Something these wokescolds haven't had to do. They had/have everything. The media, the schools, the larger part of the internet and they've gone to huge lengths to make these enormous echo chambers. Reading the politics thread its like a lot of white pills that discourse can now not be so one sided.
 
I’ve found this as well. Absolutely empty inside. No context for anything. People on here, on the farms, they’ll make some obscure joke and I’m sure plenty of it goes over my head but some of it I’ll get and it’s basically the context of civilisation. A quote from a book, an analogy of something that happened in 1950, or 1950BC. A Nixon quote, a Greek joke. Stuff like that. These kids (I say kids but it’s everyone late twenties down) they have NONE of that. And they don’t care either. I chat with my boomer parents and they’re able to flip back and forth through culture and time. They’re funny, they have a deep sense of right and wrong. They aren’t academically educated at all but they come across as ten times more erudite than these supposedly elite graduates.
It’s like their cores have been scooped out. The part where he talks about a lack of a core of beliefs - thats deliberate. We’ve engineered this generation to have no self derived/culturally derived beliefs other than what theyve been TOLD to believe. They’re stuck as the Kohlberg morality scale of a child. This is deliberate, because people like that can be moulded and aimed at whatever you want. They’re attack dogs for the system. They will never rebel, because they have no core, no soul. They’re CS Lewis’s ‘men without chests.’
Reading the first part made me ponder something. If all you see is the negatives and want to tear stuff down. How do you work yourself out of that to turn things around? Those students who can't help but be wokescolds are impossible to redeem if they can't change how they are always on guard and ready to attack things. How do you change them or get them to change themselves?
You can’t. I think they’ve been spiritually neutered. They simply are not developed enough to care. A very small number seem to be able to break free from it and derive a morality from first principles and what the see around them, but the majority are unable to and derive their morality from what they are told is right.
They cannot reality test. This is why they’re neurotic messes as well. They are like anti-CBT personified. They cannot and will not test their shrill thoughts against reality. That’s why troons are convinced everyone’s out to murder then, and all flavours of woke are victims. The victimhood is antithetical to be able to reality test your thoughts. It’s a very powerful way of training people to be this mix of cowed and yet aggressive within very strict bounds (which can be controlled by whomever feeds them their instructions.)
The only way that feminist harpy, or that fag concerned about colonialism are the "leaders of tomorrow" is if they are installed via HR departments, and discriminatory hiring practices. Nobody but fellow cultists will want to work with them, or under them. They will run their respective companies straight into the ground if given a chance.
The problem is that these are the majority now coming out of universities. They’re all like this. They rule the HR departments. They set the tone, and the rules. They are dreadful to work with, incompetent, shrill, and constantly threatening. They wreck places, and they’re the majority. I hate it, and I wish there was a sufficient pushback
The only way i know to deal with these people or new people in general is to be a neutral mystery. Never share my true opinion on everything and when directly asked, say "I have no clue".
This is how I do it too. I’m a grey rock. Oh I know nothing about that. Pronouns? Oh I don’t know about all that dear. The what now? Oh I don’t watch TV news it’s all so depressing isn’t it, I just don’t watch it.. no I’ve not heard of her is she a pop star?
Best of luck with it anyway. Remain a cipher and keep your head down.
 
Look past the ideology here. Them as a person has this constantly under attack mentality. We see it all over the internet now as the default human experience. How do you change that type of personality to become something less hostile?
You can't convince them they aren't under attack, because of the ideology.

There is no kindness you can show them that changes their mind: "well, he is nice, but others are attacking me and my kind".
There is no attack that works: "see, I am under attack!"
There is no logic that sways them: "subversion! You have a hidden agenda!"
There is no emotional appeal: "I hear you, but my lived experience is equally as valid."
And the lesson of the last 10 years is, there is no bargaining to a compromise position. They won't settle for half measures, because that leaves an opening for attack, which keeps them feeling threatened.

The ideology creates the attack mentality, and the attack mentality is constantly reinforced by viewing interactions as "attacks" through the ideological lens. This part is key: the ideology requires the lens, and a rejection of critical thinking, because an objective lens breaks the ideological illusion. You can not get them into an analytical, truly critical mindset without rejecting the demands of their ideology. For all our pretenses to rational thought--and college is ground zero for such pretensions--people tend to cling to the ideology that resonates with them emotionally.

The good news is it's not a catch-22, you just have to break the ideology in their eyes before you break them personally. Experience and the real world is an effective way to do this, depending on how deeply they're invested in the ideological lens. It's also an inevitable way, so long as you can force them to experience the real world.

But college is the opposite of the real world, and therefore incapable of wielding experience as a tool. By definition, no college education will be able to reverse the wokescold ideology that infects its student.
 
I decided I've had enough doing software so i am going back to community college for graphic design. Terrifies me. I bought a house in a pretty conservative area, but I'm very sure I'll run into wokescolds. The only way i know to deal with these people or new people in general is to be a neutral mystery. Never share my true opinion on everything and when directly asked, say "I have no clue". Its frustrating, but having dealt with years of listening to things i outright find enraging, you're able to keep cool. Something these wokescolds haven't had to do. They had/have everything. The media, the schools, the larger part of the internet and they've gone to huge lengths to make these enormous echo chambers. Reading the politics thread its like a lot of white pills that discourse can now not be so one sided.
They're actually pretty easy to avoid. Nearly everyone in a tertiary educational setting mouths the platitudes, but the true believers are always a loud minority who identify themselves immediately. Just be boring, and if you have some sort of card to play in the oppression stack, don't be afraid to play it if you get into a jam, which shouldn't happen all that often if you keep good opsec (by being boring and not powerleveling your actual beliefs). You probably aren't going to be running into many true believers at the faculty level in graphic design anyways. It's too plebeian and trade-like for their tastes. Pick your classmates for groupwork carefully, though.
 
I phrased my post poorly. Lets assume a scold is reading this post and they recognize some of the personality traits described here in themselves. They want to reverse it and don't know what steps to take. How do they move forward?

You probably aren't going to be running into many true believers at the faculty level in graphic design anyways. It's too plebeian and trade-like for their tastes. Pick your classmates for groupwork carefully, though.
Graphic design is absolutely full of these people and the pronoun crowd. Artists are some of the worst leftists possible and they are all deep on Twitter so this comes naturally to them.
 
Look past the ideology here. Them as a person has this constantly under attack mentality. We see it all over the internet now as the default human experience. How do you change that type of personality to become something less hostile?
Well there's a two parter here. Some people are just dullards and they're repeating things some sort of vague ingroup says, so they're actually pretty manageable - "I don't really agree with that, but let's not argue because it's really boring, tell me about your holiday plans". The main hostility you'd get from them is mostly because they don't understand what they're defending, so they get confused and just know you're not supposed to say that, you're supposed to say this.

The hysterical ones are basically in a cult. You're not going to be able to reach them without deprogramming tactics, and they will try to blow up anyone attempting to deprogram them (which is the nature of being in a cult). If you try and challenge their viewpoints, you're running into their defence mechanism because they've already made themselves neurotic through trying to thought police themselves out of questioning dogma. Whether or not they leave the cult will depend on a few factors - I'd say the biggest one, if you're looking at uni students like this article, is what happens when they leave uni and start meeting people outside the bubble. If they've no longer got access to "the bubble" then often their viewpoints soften. The thing we're seeing here is social media algorithms spoonfeed access to the bubble, and increasingly the sort of things that make people shift their views (career progression, getting married and starting a family, home ownership) are taking longer and longer to happen, if at all.
 
Graphic design is absolutely full of these people and the pronoun crowd. Artists are some of the worst leftists possible and they are all deep on Twitter so this comes naturally to them.
Of course they will all be leftists to a man (or whatever fucking pronoun they use for general purposes now). I'm speaking of the distinction between those who are just doing it because it's what socially expected of them to say/teach, and are easily dealt with by nodding your head silently at the BS and turning in your competent yet uncontroversial work, and those who see it as a holy mission to act as witchfinder generals and do ideological litmus testing of their students, or worse, turn classes into struggle sessions. Those folks are in the minority, and it's easy to find out who they are. There's more witchfinders in the Fine Arts, because its a fucking useless sinecure filled with people who have never had to interact with normal humans.
 
Same way you always do it: beat them down with real world experience.

The post-modern attitude he's describing is a combination of detailed grievances against the present/past, and hazy utopian futures based on lofty ideals. You can't crack that combination until their ideals are shattered by contact with the real world. That makes them question the utopia, which makes them wonder if the criticism--whose sole purpose is to demolish civilization and pave way for the utopia--was as misguided as their ideals.
When asked what they plan to be in their new communist Utopia? There's a reason every single one of these idiots says 'artist'
 
It's just NPC production in progress. It probably makes modern colleges hellish (boy am I glad I graduated a long time ago), but in the long run, these graduates will run into the hard wall of reality. I don't mean it in the boomercon sense of "look at them getting a job with their useless woke degrees", but rather in the sense that the entire world they inhabit will be shattered at one point. They are creatures adapted to a very specific ecosystem where their bullshit cannot be challenged (the professor would lose his job and future career prospects if his identity became known). Once that goes, everything does, and they'll be left with nothing to help their survival. They are the final cohort of an evolutionary dead end.
 
I phrased my post poorly. Lets assume a scold is reading this post and they recognize some of the personality traits described here in themselves. They want to reverse it and don't know what steps to take. How do they move forward?

learn another language or a musical instrument. read extensively about the history and culture that produced it. make online friends based on this affinity. open your mind to God's glorious world. ignore haters.

also lol there's sure a lot of angry professors downrating me. you're all participating in an evil system, I get it, you want that pension and the discount on tuition for your kids, but don't lie to yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom