LGBTQiwis

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Patton said:
I feel like it's also more of a psychological thing than a sexuality.
Click to expand...
Yeah that's mainly it really. Like, asexuality is usually just some sort of thing where the aspects of sexual stuff doesn't outweigh whatever baggage the person has, meaning it's not appealing, OR the person is just straight up not hormonal enough to want sexual stuff. I would say the latter is more common with health problems, and the other is pretty much purely psychological. The former can also lead to something that isn't asexuality, but instead a weird sort of homosexuality where the person has had some sort of experience where their preference is now to be as repulsive to the opposite sex as possible. I've worked with some girls who stated this exactly. Perhaps its just a cope for past trauma, but its of the same line of logic as asexuality.
 
ReeTardSavant said:
Collective guilt is a big problem in the current political discourse. Leftoids use it to push their retarded predjudice + power definition of racism and anti-white sentiment. Rightoids go after da Joos and the homos.
Click to expand...
This is true. I've just lived too long to the point that I just don't want to hear or read the bullshit on either side. They can hate all they want, I'm just tired of the excuses made that is used to justify their opinions.

Tanuki Mixed Nuts said:
Yeah that's mainly it really. Like, asexuality is usually just some sort of thing where the aspects of sexual stuff doesn't outweigh whatever baggage the person has, meaning it's not appealing, OR the person is just straight up not hormonal enough to want sexual stuff. I would say the latter is more common with health problems, and the other is pretty much purely psychological. The former can also lead to something that isn't asexuality, but instead a weird sort of homosexuality where the person has had some sort of experience where their preference is now to be as repulsive to the opposite sex as possible. I've worked with some girls who stated this exactly. Perhaps its just a cope for past trauma, but its of the same line of logic as asexuality.
Click to expand...
That's true. I knew a few that just weren't into sex or relationships or cared to ever do them. Which, fair enough. But I don't think there's enough of it to really be some kind of sexuality.
 
General Patton said:
But I don't think there's enough of it to really be some kind of sexuality.
Click to expand...
This right here is the main thing that has taken over any sort of LGBTQ2S+123 space though. The compulsive need to label literally everything, regardless of how niche or pointless. I have always felt it was easier to describe one's self in a single sentence vs. having to understand all these fucking made up terms
 
Tanuki Mixed Nuts said:
This right here is the main thing that has taken over any sort of LGBTQ2S+123 space though. The compulsive need to label literally everything, regardless of how niche or pointless. I have always felt it was easier to describe one's self in a single sentence vs. having to understand all these fucking made up terms
Click to expand...
This is why "demisexuals" bug the shit out of me. They've turned waiting for an emotional attachment in a relationship? That's not a sexuality. A lot of people are that way when dating. That's what happens when you date someone and eventually you get an emotional bond. Then you go in long term relationships.
LOL, bitch please.
 
Tanuki Mixed Nuts said:
Are people self hating in here? I feel like there's a lot of "community" hating more than self hating.
Click to expand...
xxveoedxrv9d1.jpeg


Personally I think that one parade on one day was more than enough.
 
General Patton said:
This is why "demisexuals" bug the shit out of me.
Click to expand...
I think a large part of it is due to the "look how special and unique I am" label-chasers that Tumblr very tragically spawned, but I wonder if some of it is a very retarded response to hyper sexualization and hookup culture. Like people think the norm is to fuck people you don't know, so when they realize they don't want to do that and would rather form a real connection with someone first, they believe it's something unique and novel. I still believe it's absolutely retarded, but being as charitable as possible, it is a bit sad too.
General Patton said:
You know what's worse? Asexual, lol.
Click to expand...
In my experience this is very similar to demisexual in terms of attention-seeking + cope for not having 24/7 all the time horny whoever/wherever sex drive that they feel expected to have. Though, I've noticed people who claim to be asexual often have a weird persecution complex when in reality, most people either don't care or just think (and are probably right) that you just have a psychological or hormonal imbalance
 
kingcobrajfs would sometimes pretend to be an asexual during some of his dry spells for like a month lol
 
General Patton said:
This is why "demisexuals" bug the shit out of me. They've turned waiting for an emotional attachment in a relationship? That's not a sexuality. A lot of people are that way when dating. That's what happens when you date someone and eventually you get an emotional bond. Then you go in long term relationships.
LOL, bitch please.
Click to expand...
As a gourmetsexual (a person who feels attraction only towards people that are well versed in haute cuisine) i feel attacked by your posts and you're a bigot. I suggest checking your privilege before microagressing me
 
Fishnumm said:
i only like think about like 5 sexuality's honestly like straights (duh), gays, bi's, trannys, and metrosexuals

the metrosexual one is usually an insult
Click to expand...
Transgenderism doesn't have anything to do with sexuality/sexual orientation, but with "gender identity", so a trans female (identifies as female) could be attracted to men, women, or whoever (that would determine their sexuality).

See, I didn't get my degree in Lesbian dance for nothing!

Most of these sexual orientations you hear about are just labels, like shiny stickers: "oh my god, I think I'm pansexual, but demiromantic with men, although I used to be a sapiosexual with women, but now I'm just sapphic, oh, excuse me, gynosexual, I am a demigirl!"
 
California Newt said:
Most "sexualities" are just women abusing language.

To women, words are tools that you use to publicly pretend that you don't have rape fantasies.

fake sexualities like demisexuality, asexuality, and lesbianism.

These mostly only exist to make the rape fantasies rapier (steeper rape gradient), unless she was actually raped in which case it's a toss-up between that and a trauma response (possibly both).
Click to expand...
nigga can you elaborate
 
Leather Gliscor said:
nigga can you elaborate
Click to expand...
Lesbianism is certainly the iffiest, as I have seen too much circumstantial evidence in real life to point towards a lot of purported homosexual women being on advanced bisexuality. Though for the record I don't believe anyone is fully one thing or another, to the point of Witches, where sexuality, as a wholly personal phenomenon, has a difficult time being cleanly categorized. Aside from leather bara types, I believe they are wholly homosexual, and I respect them for it.
 
LovisXVI said:
Lesbianism is certainly the iffiest, as I have seen too much circumstantial evidence in real life to point towards a lot of purported homosexual women being on advanced bisexuality. Though for the record I don't believe anyone is fully one thing or another, to the point of Witches, where sexuality, as a wholly personal phenomenon, has a difficult time being cleanly categorized. Aside from leather bara types, I believe they are wholly homosexual, and I respect them for it.
Click to expand...
"Lesbians" describe their attraction to women in the same way a gay guy does who's trying to convince himself he's straight.

Leather Gliscor said:
nigga can you elaborate
Click to expand...
If you want a demonstration of the general principle, look at the portion of radfem BP posters who minimize yaoi as a cause of poonerism.

That kind of obfuscation is an extreme manifestation of the natural female instinct to control access to their sexuality—even to the point of pretending that it doesn't exist—as a form of soft power. The instinct itself isn't bad: it's necessary. Women need an instinctive mechanism to completely shut down interactions with weirdos. There are people that women are absolutely right to minimize their own sexuality around.

But here, it's twisted into a sort of deranged extreme.

Political lesbianism is the best example: in principle, all men are put into the "weirdo" category. The protocol is to treat all men as what manosphere types might call "invisible sub-7's": total cucked emasculated nothing-persons. Lesbianism as a pretense accomplishes that, so that's what political lesbians convince themselves that they are.

But it's not true, of course: they have sex with men anyways and find some kind of in-lore justification for it. The same goes for pooners: you'll be hard-pressed to find a pooner who doesn't have fantasies about getting "misgendered" and impregnated in a sun-dress. Asexuals have sex, but "that doesn't mean they experience sexual attraction".

I'd go so far as to say that it's the most psychologically feminine women who pick up these "queer" sexualities and identities, because they're the most beholden to this instinct. It's all lies and it probably only deters naive younger men and autists.
 
souschef said:
As a gourmetsexual (a person who feels attraction only towards people that are well versed in haute cuisine) i feel attacked by your posts and you're a bigot. I suggest checking your privilege before microagressing me
Click to expand...
I'm an anglosexual. I only fuck people with English accents.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom