LGBTQiwis

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I always thought everyone can celebrate, gay, straight, bi, whatever lol
I think what they try to do is more about creating a tradition. Like Thanksgiving etc.

edit: Not saying it's necessarily a good thing, though.
 
Last edited:
My point was that people who do that know very well what they're doing and I don't think it's that bad of a kink.
IMG_6864.webp
I think what they try to do is more about creating a tradition. Like Thanksgiving etc.
IMG_6865.webp
 
I've never said all porn is good and cool and awesome. I've meant sending money to whores doesn't make them literal devils.

I haven't said making a pride month/parade into a tradition is a good thing. Stop putting things into my mouth. I don't think so. I think it's a money laundering scheme. And anyone who's weird around kids should be locked up for sure.

I would really appreciate if you'd start to read what I'm actually saying instead of using random pics you've found online.
 
Why do you seem to think lust is necessarily disgusting? It's noramal. People date because they wanna fuck as well (that's not the only reason, but that's a part of it). And it doesn't make it less wholesome.

I sense strong holier than thou energy.
You're missing the point, it's not just lust, if it was lust for your partner then it would be not just fine but wholesome, but when you lust over Internet whores where you'd spend money (specially massive amounts like coomer retards) while they don't respect you nor care about you, where they'd probably rejoice at the idea of you suiciding because you cannot be with her, while you know nothing about them other than how they look, is fucking disgusting.

You're a tool when you do that, there is no reciprocity.

There's no "holier than thou", I am posting my opinion on how repulsive this is to me, next time someone on this site does as well, you should post that brilliant remark.

So you said you're guilty of that as well, can you elaborate? Did you buy a gift for some girl online? Has she ever gifted you anything unprompted like you did?
 
I never understood the concept of a pride month. It always feels like gay people are enforcing everyone, including straight people, to like and respect them strictly for their sexual preference. Why can't it be turned into something like a month of love, without forced sexual or homosexual undertones?
Pride month isn't for us. It's for outsiders to profit off us socially and monetarily. They enter our spaces with their purse dog accessory faggots and tell us how to look and act. Not to mention the utter hate for masculinity. Retail also loves holidays and events because it means more stuff to buy. They want us to drain our wallets to fill theirs, enter our spaces with praise for "protecting us" with their savior complexes (despite causing much more trouble by haranguing us to ignore or completely deny our biggest problems) and tell us non-marketable fags that we're "not really gay," "not serious," or we're "just making a sick joke" because we're not some 'empathetic' dazzling hollywood-esque fruitcake twink with a lisp and vocal fry. >:( Just remember: even as a faggot destined for satan's fiery pits you'll NEVER hate globohomo enough. Don't trust anyone forcing "LGBT inclusivity" down your throat whether they really are queer or otherwise. Good intentions are not entitled to good outcomes. It's full of misrepresentation through misattribution, sanitization, and optimistic prejudice by outright denial of the real problems in our communities. Call ALL of it out because it makes us look like flaming dogshit and enables the troublemakers, as documented on this forum.

I might be a little worked up, seething, and grieving now. :( I'll go sneed about it over lunch.
 
Pride month isn't for us. It's for outsiders to profit off us socially and monetarily
I don't think I ever felt anything but annoyance which became disdain towards it. I still remember seeing a pride parade picture, and it was some dude with dildos glued allover his body, and people were still telling me "You're a bigot if you're not okay with that." The only I'm looking forward to this month is the final season of Squid Game (which I am going to be inevitably dissapointed by, and I got spoiled one of the deaths. The maze game looks really fucking cool though) And I don't really like how they forced a troon in. If you had to have something make it a fag, or better yet, keep it straight. I dread the American adaption of Squid Game knowing how it's probably going to fucking turn out.
I’m pretty sure sane homos who see all the absurdity of “pride” hate it with their homosexual hearts.
Indeed. The only ones who I see love pride month are hr ladies, troons, the random gender people, degenerate fags who dress sexually in public etc. For the longest time, I have been gaslit "There isn't much kink at pride, you're just seeing the wrong pictures" which played a role in my frustration. If there isn't "much kink", why the fuck are there people dressed up in animal outfits acting sexual, and trannies riding nude on bicycles?
 
If you don't support adding a D for Diaperfur to LGBTQIAAP2SN+, then you're a raging hateful Nazi bigot.
Diaperfurs built our community, throwing the first brick at Stonewall, and they're one of the most marginalized out of all of us.
IMG_8756.webp

As a relatively normie lesbian, sometimes I wish I lived in the times when being gay were still underground, just because I hate how many social media retards people are affiliating us with. You can get married if you're gay and you won't be fired anymore for being gay, so we already won. There isn't any more ""progress"" to be made, at least in America.

Pride parades are stupid. We don't need to normalize every degenerate sex act and allow them publicly. Seattle, Portland, and the entirety of California are disgusting. And I don't want toddlers having their dicks chopped off.

I have nothing in common with green-haired polyamorous genderfluid furries, and I'll gladly make fun of them with normies. I hate that they're trying to push for "queer" to be all about being against societal norms and pushing boundaries. I'm a firm believer in assimilation. Gay people shouldn't get special rights, they should just be treated the same as regular monogamous heteros. Immigrants coming from Islamic countries also shouldn't push their ideology here either. And as much as I hate trannies, I doubt they'll go away any time soon, so the ones that do exist should try their best to pass and assimilate, rather than being freakshows wearing fetish gear on the subway.

Lesbians booted NAMBLA pedophile degenerates out of the gay movement 40 years ago, and we'll gladly do it again.
 
Last edited:
What do the Kiwihomos think about I Don't Understand You? I am not offended by seeing your kind on the screen, but it's pretty tiring when they're always slightly femme and wholesome Queers or creepy hypersexualized RuPaul pre-trannies. This movie seems to play with the former sort of stock character in a way that was similar to Companion, which I also enjoyed, so I'm looking forward to seeing it.
 
There's no "holier than thou", I am posting my opinion on how repulsive this is to me, next time someone on this site does as well, you should post that brilliant remark.
Ok, fair enough.

Did you buy a gift for some girl online? Has she ever gifted you anything unprompted like you did?
Some did, some didn't. One of the girls I know irl did. The online one didn't. But I don't need them to do something in return. I don't see anything wrong with gifting a person you consider cute, or paying for the girl at the restaurant. Guys do this all the time. I do, my male friends do, people have been doing that for ages. Besides, some of the aforementioned girls come from poor families, so they're literally not able to buy much stuff for gifts.

Now that's a good point, considering we're in the gay thread, and you all know what that means...

You can get married if you're gay and you won't be fired anymore for being gay, so we already won.
Agree.

We don't need to normalize every degenerate sex act and allow them publicly.
Agree.

Seattle, Portland, and the entirety of California are disgusting.
That's because they're all blue ultra-left states.

And I don't want toddlers having their dicks chopped off.
Same.

I have nothing in common with green-haired polyamorous genderfluid furries
Same.

trannies, I doubt they'll go away any time soon, so the ones that do exist should try their best to pass and assimilate, rather than being freakshows wearing fetish gear on the subway.
Agree 100%. That's my point as well.
 
What do the Kiwihomos think about I Don't Understand You? I am not offended by seeing your kind on the screen, but it's pretty tiring when they're always slightly femme and wholesome Queers or creepy hypersexualized RuPaul pre-trannies. This movie seems to play with the former sort of stock character in a way that was similar to Companion, which I also enjoyed, so I'm looking forward to seeing it.
I hadn't heard of it until I saw your post, so I just watched the trailer. It seems like a movie I'll enjoy, so I'm gonna check it out when it releases. I do think it's funny the way it plays with the tropes. I hate the way a lot of gay characters are written in media as well, so I get what you mean.

On an ideological level, on the themes that the movie is about - surrogacy and the adoption of a baby from a foreign country - I think surrogacy is weird, and as someone who's against prostitution for exchanging money for the usage of poor women's bodies, I can't morally support surrogacy either, especially with all the risks involved in pregnancy and the fact they could just adopt an existing child.

I also think couples, regardless if heterosexual or homosexual, that adopt children from foreign countries are weird as well, especially since it usually is white couples adopting African children for virtue-signalling. I'm not against adoption as a concept though. I just think adoption of a child from your own country is the way to go if you're trying to be morally righteous.

But I don't think the movie is even trying to be pro-surrogacy with the way the couple is mocked. The surrogacy thing seems like more of a plot device for them to have shenanigans in a foreign country, or I guess it mocks how most surrogacy customers are gay men.
 
I also think couples, regardless if heterosexual or homosexual, that adopt children from foreign countries are weird as well, especially since it usually is white couples adopting African children for virtue-signalling. I'm not against adoption as a concept though. I just think adoption of a child from your own country is the way to go if you're trying to be morally righteous.
I always found international adoption shady, especially when some orphanages in third world countries have kidnapped children from their parents when they were babies and toddlers. It always made me feel suspicious no matter who adopts from an international country. I have a vague memory when China still allowed adoption from their country and there was a strange (I think mostly evangelical) thing where they believed "They were saving the kids from communist China."

And many of these adoptees wind up being abused by their new parents in their new country. I still remember the sexual abuse case that fag couple from Los Angeles did, and how they practically trafficked that boy. Don't know if the couple in Georgia did the same adopt from an international country as well. Other issues I can remember consist of the adoptee never feeling at home in their new country, and feeling an identity crisis.
 
I always found international adoption shady, especially when some orphanages in third world countries have kidnapped children from their parents when they were babies and toddlers. It always made me feel suspicious no matter who adopts from an international country. I have a vague memory when China still allowed adoption from their country and there was a strange (I think mostly evangelical) thing where they believed "They were saving the kids from communist China."

And many of these adoptees wind up being abused by their new parents in their new country. I still remember the sexual abuse case that fag couple from Los Angeles did, and how they practically trafficked that boy. Don't know if the couple in Georgia did the same adopt from an international country as well. Other issues I can remember consist of the adoptee never feeling at home in their new country, and feeling an identity crisis.
They view their international adopted child as a prop for "how good of a person they are". I forget the name of the family vlog YouTube channel, but there was a channel that adopted a disabled boy for virtue-signalling (on top of the fact they had too many other children already), and like a few months into parenting him, decided to "re-home" him to someone else. It was reminiscent of someone who adopts a pet and then returns the pet to the animal shelter, except it was with a human child. They did get a lot of backlash for it though. But I can't say I'm surprised that a family pimping their own kids out to YouTube for money would also adopt specific children to maximize diversity minority oppression points and then abandon him when they realized the hassle of caring for him outweighed the clout.

Yeah that's another thing I wanted to sperg about, but I felt like my rant was already long enough. If you're an African child that gets brought over to America to learn English and be raised by two white people, I imagine you'd feel pretty alienated and never quite like you fit in. Especially with all the "white people are the Devil and the cause of all issues" propaganda geared towards black Americans. Imagine raising a child from a third-world shit country only for them to hate you because "you're a colonizer oppressor".
 
Back
Top Bottom