- Joined
- Feb 5, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know right? You'd have to be a total fag to like clitsThis is just as weird as liking feet.
For flatties are OK, but she must atleast have a potbellyNot if you date a flattie.
I mean you get nipples, but you don’t get BOOBIES.
Expression lines are kinda underrated, well, I don't know about othersm but I enjoy it a bunchA beautiful smile.
noWould you be happy if some scientists out there genetically engineered asstits?
disgustingA beautiful smile.
Ah the partrician's choice; for what are tits without the thighs to back them up.Realistic you need both, but I will settle with tits and legs, people alway forgot about the legs.
I'm sad that nobody responded to my effortpostThis is reductionist. Ass countries have higher fertility rates and are uncivilized. South and Central America, Africa, the middle east -- they're exactly the people you don't want more of. Meanwhile, what do breast countries have in common? Europe, Asia, and the rest of the anglosphere? They're hotbeds of civilization, technological advancement and economic prosperity -- probably because they're discerning about whether or not to breed and how to allocate resources instead of polluting the world with offspring indiscriminately like fucking animals. The notable exception being India, which I'm attributing to either A) westaboo obsession with Britain B) worshipping milk or C) the fact that all the asses have shit on them.
I have further thoughts on this, a loose hypothesis. The general consensus in human behavioral biology, at least back when it was allowed to be discussed in an academic setting, is that mankind is in the process of evolving from a tournament species (nonmonogamous, unbalanced ratio of sexes, high intrasexual competition, dominant males breed with multiple partners, males don't take part in raising offspring, high violence) to a pair bonding species (monogamous, balanced ratio of sexes, comparatively low intrasexual competition, both parents raise offspring, low violence). Given that hypothesis, I think it's fairly obvious which countries are the vanguard of this evolution (interestingly signs point to Asia being farther along since one of the hallmarks of tournament species is sexual dimorphism, i.e. visible differences between sexes, and... I mean come on, just look at 'em). I posit that the correlation between tit men and civilized society isn't coincidental, rather it's a symptom of this evolutionary shift from literal monkeys to a species that raises our fucking kids.
In short, you're a nigger.