Leftist Memes - Or lack thereof...

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
That's just the tip of the iceberg for leftists' hatred of centrists; just check out r/ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM (a) for even more awful with-us-or-against-us takes.
nazis.png

Remember that even suggesting that the soviets were bad at all makes you an outright Nazi sympathizer
luv hitler.png

If Hitler only said hateful shit and never acted on any of it he would be on par with leftist heroes like Elijah Muhammad and Louis Farrakhan
t0oyxjcmos581.jpg

This last one is also an example of a terrible left-wing meme
Every time they have to make the right look as awful as possible ("we're soulless monsters who just want to kill other people for no reason") and the left look as good as possible ("we just want everyone to be happy pls :)") to make their centrist strawmen seem irrational. Compare that to how right-wingers make fun of centrists, where they either mock what they perceive to be smugness (like with Sargon) or cowardly non-committal stances (Joe Rogan, Tim Pool) i.e. observable traits deemed mockable outside of political allegiance.
NoTBiiP.png
 
That's just the tip of the iceberg for leftists' hatred of centrists; just check out r/ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM (a) for even more awful with-us-or-against-us takes.
View attachment 2810497

Remember that even suggesting that the soviets were bad at all makes you an outright Nazi sympathizer
View attachment 2810499
If Hitler only said hateful shit and never acted on any of it he would be on par with leftist heroes like Elijah Muhammad and Louis Farrakhan
View attachment 2810475
This last one is also an example of a terrible left-wing meme
Every time they have to make the right look as awful as possible ("we're soulless monsters who just want to kill other people for no reason") and the left look as good as possible ("we just want everyone to be happy pls :)") to make their centrist strawmen seem irrational. Compare that to how right-wingers make fun of centrists, where they either mock what they perceive to be smugness (like with Sargon) or cowardly non-committal stances (Joe Rogan, Tim Pool) i.e. observable traits deemed mockable outside of political allegiance.
View attachment 2810520
I hate to do the whole “democrats are the real x” bit but plebbit progressives like this are the real bigots. Its a form of bigotry that is arguably worse than nigra-hating Cletus or kill whitey Tyrone. It’s intellectual bigotry, an unwillingness to entertain opposing viewpoints. People possessed by ideology are so boring
 
FHJWUdjWQAYdzuQ.jpeg

Is there no greater myth than the one that says whites owe their success to the conquest and subjugation of non-whites? On its face it makes absolutely no sense. How could whites have conquered the world without already having accomplished great feats? How could whites have achieved such success if non-whites could be as successful as whites without having to conquer their neighbors? Why do non-whites continue to exist if they were ethnically cleansed? And what about non-white conquests and exploitation of other non-whites? Did those not enable the non-whites to achieve greatness?

Why shouldn't whites be proud of these conquests? Do the chinese shy away from their exploits? The mongolians have a gigantic statue of the greatest conqueror in history.

It simply makes no logical sense.

FHJWU20X0AkepHW.jpeg

Do they really expect those who are slightly aware on the topic of IQ to be swayed by this? I mean who says whites have better IQ then blacks and extrapolates that out to all races?

>Asian IQs: Already well known.

>Black Inventors: The existence of intelligent blacks doesn't disprove the genetic disparities between whites and blacks.

>Indian Americans: Seriously how stupid are you? Obviously legal immigrants are going to be choosen on their merits, higher IQ being selected for.

>Basic Common Sense: Ran out of points didn't we?

>Jews: Are jews white or not? I guess they are or aren't, if its convenient or not for leftists at that moment.

>More Endless Evidence: A few years ago none of these points would have been made. Even bringing up the idea of genetic IQ outside of a few select fields would have gotten one labeled a nut. Still does. Now of course things have shifted. Now they have to make these "memes" to assuage their cognitive dissonance.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2818108

Is there no greater myth than the one that says whites owe their success to the conquest and subjugation of non-whites? On its face it makes absolutely no sense. How could whites have conquered the world without already having accomplished great feats? How could whites have achieved such success if non-whites could be as successful as whites without having to conquer their neighbors? Why do non-whites continue to exist if they were ethnically cleansed? And what about non-white conquests and exploitation of other non-whites? Did those not enable the non-whites to achieve greatness?

Why shouldn't whites be proud of these conquests? Do the chinese shy away from their exploits? The mongolians have a gigantic statue of the greatest conqueror in history.

It simply makes no logical sense.

View attachment 2818109

Do they really expect those who are slightly aware on the topic of IQ to be swayed by this? I mean who says whites have better IQ then blacks and extrapolates that out to all races?

>Asian IQs: Already well known.

>Black Inventors: The existence of intelligent blacks doesn't disprove the genetic disparities between whites and blacks.

>Indian Americans: Seriously how stupid are you? Obviously legal immigrants are going to be choosen on their merits, higher IQ being selected for.

>Basic Common Sense: Ran out of points didn't we?

>Jews: Are jews white or not? I guess they are or aren't, if its convenient or not for leftists at that moment.

>More Endless Evidence: A few years ago none of these points would have been made. Even bringing up the idea of genetic IQ outside of a few select fields would have gotten one labeled a nut. Still does. Now of course things have shifted. Now they have to make these "memes" to assuage their cognitive dissonance.

"Only Europeans are white and only Europeans have had empires"
 
View attachment 2818108

Is there no greater myth than the one that says whites owe their success to the conquest and subjugation of non-whites? On its face it makes absolutely no sense. How could whites have conquered the world without already having accomplished great feats? How could whites have achieved such success if non-whites could be as successful as whites without having to conquer their neighbors? Why do non-whites continue to exist if they were ethnically cleansed? And what about non-white conquests and exploitation of other non-whites? Did those not enable the non-whites to achieve greatness?

Why shouldn't whites be proud of these conquests? Do the chinese shy away from their exploits? The mongolians have a gigantic statue of the greatest conqueror in history.

It simply makes no logical sense.

View attachment 2818109

Do they really expect those who are slightly aware on the topic of IQ to be swayed by this? I mean who says whites have better IQ then blacks and extrapolates that out to all races?

>Asian IQs: Already well known.

>Black Inventors: The existence of intelligent blacks doesn't disprove the genetic disparities between whites and blacks.

>Indian Americans: Seriously how stupid are you? Obviously legal immigrants are going to be choosen on their merits, higher IQ being selected for.

>Basic Common Sense: Ran out of points didn't we?

>Jews: Are jews white or not? I guess they are or aren't, if its convenient or not for leftists at that moment.

>More Endless Evidence: A few years ago none of these points would have been made. Even bringing up the idea of genetic IQ outside of a few select fields would have gotten one labeled a nut. Still does. Now of course things have shifted. Now they have to make these "memes" to assuage their cognitive dissonance.
I’m still trying to find who the fuck makes these, like I can never find a link.
 
Aside from the obvious things wrong with this, it's the thoughtful face of the guy in the last panel that gets me. They so want to be seen as intellectuals when we all know the rightist having a tantrum there is blatant projection.
They also consider every skin colour to be a monolith, disregarding how various African, Native American, Asian, and last, but not least, white ethnicities massacred each other throughout the centuries. The Tutsi Genocide, the Rwandan Genocide, the Armenian Genocide, or the various war crimes of Imperial Japan had nothing to do with fucking ypipo. I don't really know anything about Indigenous American inter-tribe relationships, but I'm fairly sure there were plenty of military conflicts between them.
 
Back
Top Bottom