Okay but that doesn't explain why he wants to ruin every nation he encounters though, or why he specifically puts money into it.
There is money to be made from building and creating, but that’s hard in an end-state situation where pretty much everything’s been built and created.
There is more money to be made from manipulating events and controlling information.
Then there is another payoff in destroying and rebuilding a system, especially if it can be rebuilt to benefit you and your heirs (the Rothschilds were especially prescient about this).
Another good example of this was Olof Aschberg, a Swedish Jew media magnate who directly funded the communist uprising in Russia. His reward was the pick of the loot stolen from the Russian Orthodox Church by the commies. To this day, the Aschberg collection of Russian Orthodox icons is one of, if not the, biggest collections in the world. Funny thing is how little of this information shows up in his Wikipedia page. It’s all about control and enrichment.
Static systems lessen opportunities to gain control, power, and resources. Dynamic/chaotic systems increase these opportunities, especially when one is unconstrained by ethics or empathy.
Soros wants the world built into the old Soviet model of Absolute Leader and the Apparatchiks having total economic, social, educational, cultural, scientific, financial and productive control. Mostly because if not Supreme Leader he will definitely be one of the high-level apparatchiks himself.
So he destroys countries because it opens opportunities to achieve power. Not political figurehead power, but real, behind-the-throne type, rootless, internationalist, globalist power.