Left-wing prosecutors hit fierce resistance - An uptick in murders across the country is testing their resolve — and their electability.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

PHILADELPHIA — Larry Krasner’s election in 2017 was a triumph for progressives nationwide: The man who had sued cops 75 times, represented Black Lives Matter, promised to end cash bail — and was widely seen as the most liberal district attorney candidate in the country — won.
Four years later, Philadelphia’s top prosecutor — and one of the leading figures of the country’s criminal justice reform movement — is under siege.
Homicides are skyrocketing in the city, and local officials are grumbling. A former assistant district attorney backed by the local police union is challenging Krasner in the May primary. And in recent weeks, the Philadelphia Democratic Party broke with years of tradition and declined to endorse the incumbent.

The primary battle is a test of whether the left can maintain its successful campaign electing progressive district attorneys amid an uptick in murders in cities around the country. If Krasner wins, it could signal the arrival of a new era, one in which the public doesn’t recoil from liberal criminal justice policy — even when crime statistics go up. If he fails, it would be a jolt for politically beleaguered police unions, and a sudden halt to what has been a steady shift leftward in urban DA races.

“His reelection means everything,” said Shaun King, a civil rights advocate and former surrogate for Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign. “We always knew that Larry, a lifelong civil rights attorney, would come in and change the system from the inside out, and that doing so would make him a major target.”
Krasner isn’t the only big-city progressive prosecutor meeting fierce resistance. In California, both San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin and Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón are facing recall efforts. Opponents of the left-wing DAs have accused them of letting criminals loose on the streets and turning a blind eye to victims — all criticisms lobbed at Krasner, too.
Krasner has framed his reelection campaign as a choice between the future and the past, “a past that echoes with names like [Frank] Rizzo,” Philly’s former tough-on-crime, racially polarizing mayor, as he put it at a recent candidates forum. He says that he delivered on his campaign promises by lowering the jail population, exonerating the innocent and reducing the amount of time people are on probation and parole.


He has taken a tack against his Democratic challenger — ex-homicide prosecutor Carlos Vega, who was among the group of employees he fired when he became DA — that once might have been unthinkable. Krasner is using the local police union as a foil, and reminding voters that Vega is endorsed by the local chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, whose national union endorsed former President Donald Trump.
As for the spike in homicides — they are up 29 percent compared with this time in 2020, which was the most violent year in three decades — Krasner blames larger societal forces.
“What has happened, and essentially every criminologist agrees on this, is that the pandemic, closing of society and closing of so many different aspects of what protects and surrounds especially young men have disappeared,” Krasner said in an interview. “So in every single city, you have the elimination of high schoolers being in classrooms at least for periods of time, summer camp, summer job programs, open swimming pools, open recreation centers, organized sports in school, organized sports out of school and after-school programs."

In a demonstration of how much the Democratic Party has moved left on criminal justice issues, Vega is not actually campaigning as a tough-on-crime politician. He talks about diversionary programs and prohibiting cash bail for low-level offenders, and his website promises to deliver “real progressive reform.” His pitch in his launch video is that “we don’t have to choose between safety and reform,” and he places the wave of murders squarely on Krasner’s shoulders.
“I think the large amount of people want common-sense reform,” he told POLITICO. “They want that middle ground where we’re aware that communities of color are suffering the most with respect to violence, but also communities of color are suffering the most with respect to lack of opportunity.”

Murders rose last year in cities around the country, both big and small, suggesting that local explanations alone cannot explain the phenomenon. Asked whether it’s fair to blame Krasner amid a national trend, Vega said that “the issue is what is happening to our community, our city — he cannot and I cannot address all the ills happening across the nation.”
But Krasner’s approach of declining to accept any blame whatsoever has rubbed some voters and party officials the wrong way.

The politically influential Democratic ward leaders who declined to endorse Krasner were frustrated that “there’s an epidemic of gun violence here, everybody’s been touched by this, and Krasner takes no responsibility,” said a person familiar with their meeting with the district attorney.
At times, the election has gotten personal. Vega, who is Latino, called Krasner’s likening him to Trump “really rich … when this is coming from a person who’s white, elite, from an Ivy League school.” Krasner said Vega never championed reform while in the DA’s office, and that he “is doing what all kinds of people do during election cycles — which is they will say anything, they read the polls first.”
Krasner’s campaign said he brought in more than $420,000 during the first three months of the year, while Vega’s team said he reaped almost $340,000. In 2020, Vega kept pace with Krasner’s fundraising.
When Krasner first ran for office, a super PAC mostly funded by liberal billionaire George Soros spent nearly $1.7 million backing him. Some political insiders in Philadelphia said that whether Soros decides to get involved again could have a big impact on the race.

Others think Krasner is unlikely to be ousted because he is the incumbent, and primaries often attract more progressive voters than general elections. In this deep-blue city, the district attorney is effectively determined in the primary. There have been no public polls released in the race.
Krasner has expressed confidence in his prospects in the May 18 primary, pointing to the reelection of other liberal prosecutors around the country such as Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx and Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby. He doesn’t fear a 1990s revival of the tough-on-crime ethos due to the recent gun violence.

“I do not believe that people who have had the wisdom to elect progressive prosecutors all over the country, and increasingly, all of a sudden are going to get the stupids,” said Krasner, “and decide that a phenomenon that is affecting essentially every major city — and is affecting traditional prosecutors’ cities and Republican cities just as much as progressive prosecutors’ cities and Democratic cities — I do not believe all of a sudden they're going to get that stupid and go for this kind of dumb scapegoating.”


John McNesby, president of the local chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, sees a different mood in the city.
“Two years ago, it was just the FOP that was screaming and yelling about it. Now it’s every part of the city, every neighborhood and every background,” he said. “People are starting to resonate that in order for their children and their family members to be safe, they need change in the DA’s office.”
If Krasner lost, he said, it would mean that “we have some law and order back in the city — morale with the police is at an all-time low.”

One longtime observer of Philadelphia politics said that if Krasner is unsuccessful, though, it might be the result of old-fashioned politics and not a larger phenomenon.
“If Larry lost, I think it would be a personal loss,” said Larry Ceisler, a public relations executive based in Philadelphia. “I don’t think it would be because the electorate soured on criminal justice reform. And it’s just because Larry is not a politician. He doesn’t try to be a politician. I mean, he really doesn’t go out and try to sell what he does.”
---------------------------------
Reminder that Krasner let thousands of criminals go free and essentially legalized burning cop cars during BLM protests.
 
When Krasner first ran for office, a super PAC mostly funded by liberal billionaire George Soros spent nearly $1.7 million backing him. Some political insiders in Philadelphia said that whether Soros decides to get involved again could have a big impact on the race.
Why is Politico spreading false, dangerous, anti-Semitic conspiracy theories?
 
“I do not believe that people who have had the wisdom to elect progressive prosecutors all over the country, and increasingly, all of a sudden are going to get the stupids,” said Krasner, “and decide that a phenomenon that is affecting essentially every major city — and is affecting traditional prosecutors’ cities and Republican cities just as much as progressive prosecutors’ cities and Democratic cities — I do not believe all of a sudden they're going to get that stupid and go for this kind of dumb scapegoating.”
The voters didn't 'get the stupids'; they were stupid all along.
The type of people who brainlessly swallow feel-goods and platitudes and the magic of social alchemy (we can transform criminals with more muny/dem programz/diversion/therapy/counseling) are the type who vote for Larry Krasner without thinking "Gee, could it possibly create a perverse incentive to commit 'low-level' crimes if they won't be prosecuted? Nah, it'll be fine. And if it does go wrong, it's not my fault for voting for the candidate who releases criminals onto the streets. It's Orange Man's fault!"

yougetwhatyoufuckingdeserve.gif
 
Homicides are skyrocketing in the city, and local officials are grumbling.
The wording on this is so casual. Thats what city officials are doing in response to murders doubling? grumbling?

Edit:
“I do not believe that people who have had the wisdom to elect progressive prosecutors all over the country, and increasingly, all of a sudden are going to get the stupids,” said Krasner
This is how the left corals itself into staying on the ranch. "oh you're going to vote for the other guy? Did you suddenly catch the stupids?"
Its like how corporations advertise their shit on tv. "The smarts buy our product, the dumbs buy the other product", the only difference is that I don't think I've seen a commercial be so explicit as to diagnose people who don't but their product with "the stupids"
 
Last edited:
"Americans have begun to discover the downsides of cutting off their nose to spite their face"

Don't confuse this for some great enlightenment. This is the pain signal finally, years after the original injury, reaching what qualifies as their brain. Once the pain has subsided they'll do it again, having not realized the link between action and consequence.
 
Who cares? Cities like Portland, NYC, Washington D.C., LA, Frisco, Seattle, Austin, Nashville, Charlotte, Atlanta & Chiraq will still vote for them anyway.
D.As aren't going to lose any sleep over it.
Aspirants to their left are fringe maoists who the DNC will silently curbstomp, and the city denizens will never vote in anyone to their right. They're there to stay.
 
The wording on this is so casual. Thats what city officials are doing in response to murders doubling? grumbling?

Edit:

This is how the left corals itself into staying on the ranch. "oh you're going to vote for the other guy? Did you suddenly catch the stupids?"
Its like how corporations advertise their shit on tv. "The smarts buy our product, the dumbs buy the other product", the only difference is that I don't think I've seen a commercial be so explicit as to diagnose people who don't but their product with "the stupids"
That's what I can't stand about so-called progressives. Not only do their ideology and policies lead to negative results, but their condescending attitude to anyone who isn't as "enlightened" as they are is just too much. They're a bunch of sheltered, misguided, and delusional midwits who think they know what's best for everyone and anyone who thinks of other approaches is literally stupid and ignorant.
 
Without police to bring in criminals, what use will prosecutors be?
Prosecutors and trials will be useless in the utopia we are building. The gods of science will simply inform us what to do with dirty wrong thinkers.
 
“His reelection means everything,” said Shaun King, a civil rights advocate and former surrogate for Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign. “We always knew that Larry, a lifelong civil rights attorney, would come in and change the system from the inside out, and that doing so would make him a major target.”
Who knew we'd get a cow crossover, here, and a grifter at that!
 
People like this will never accept that they don't know what they're doing or that their ideas are bad. These people are like Biff Tannen in Back to the Future, who borrowed George McFly's car, drove drunk, wrecked it, and then blamed George for the wreck because George didn't tell him that his car had a 'blind spot'. Expect to hear all about how this latest uptick in murders is somehow everyone else's fault.

What we need in this situation... Is Batman.
One of my favorite things to do to people is to point out how Batman, a rich, white, ultra 'tough-on-crime' person would most likely be a conservative republican. It really breaks their brain.
 
As for the spike in homicides — they are up 29 percent compared with this time in 2020, which was the most violent year in three decades — Krasner blames larger societal forces.
You could probably diagnose those ‘social forces’ by looking at what ‘background’ most of the increased number of perps and victims comes from.
 
Surely the problems we said we could solve if you only gave us the chance can't possibly be our fault when they get worse under our watch.
 
Back
Top Bottom