LawTube - Lawyers sperging at each other on YouTube

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
John Andrews Stan said:
He says “Nick got tangled up in some drug charges.”

The absolute refusal to acknowledge that Nick ACTIVELY fucked up his life and his children’s lives is absolutely sickening. These losers deserve each other.
Click to expand...
Amazingly Branca finally found a pig whose jackboots he wouldn't lick dog shit off.
 

1. Who writes an entire brief without getting the money first?

2. Did you ever think one of the reasons you have trouble getting clients is because of your dogshit attitude?
 
1745820560022.webp 1745820603513.webp
 
waffle said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=XoqMEZxAh80
1. Who writes an entire brief without getting the money first?

2. Did you ever think one of the reasons you have trouble getting clients is because of your dogshit attitude?
Click to expand...
Holy shit man...what a lunatic.
1745826263693.webp
If only you knew how bad things really are...

Also Kurt if you are reading this: Time to Bic it man. That is not hair it is the burned out wreckage of a once great empire. Shave that shit.
 
Bland Crumbs said:
Also Kurt if you are reading this: Time to Bic it man. That is not hair it is the burned out wreckage of a once great empire. Shave that shit.
Click to expand...
Oh Jesus. I don't think I've ever seen a hairline receed that far back before. I didn't even realize that was possible.
Schpoots said:
Bro is flying on something. Looks at them pupils.
Click to expand...
Yea. Pure, unadulterated autism.
 
When I first saw it, I thought he was playing up the theatrics for show, because he had mentioned earlier that it wasn't a big deal and that he got paid either way, but at the end of the rant he genuinely looks like he is on the verge of tears. How can you get that mad at AI? It isn't actually ranking the two briefs against each other, it is trying to predict what it thinks you want to hear.

He also has a bad habit of getting into arguments with his chat and having mini meltdowns like this when people question his analysis. He gets confused and then angry, and starts banning people left and right. Dude needs to calm down.
 
You know 10 years ago i would have said it takes a pretty smart and well adjusted person to become a lawyer but lawtube keeps proving to me it's all just coked out, mentally ill retards.
 
He should also have tried the chinese deepseek ai, I often compare those two. Escpecially when I question the output from one AI.

Now, about the citations thing, can someone legally knowledgeable tell us about the importance of these?
 
Kiwi Yuga said:
He also has a bad habit of getting into arguments with his chat and having mini meltdowns like this when people question his analysis. He gets confused and then angry, and starts banning people left and right.
Click to expand...
This is the entire reason I listen to his streams in the background, hoping for a melty. This one was great, especially when he was breathing hard and dripping sweat. Kurt needs to go viral for his authentic self.

I suspect in his home growing up, losing an argument meant violence or something that felt worse than being beaten. People who can’t easily say “I don’t know” are in the habit of avoiding making themselves vulnerable in that way.
 
squonken180 said:
You know 10 years ago i would have said it takes a pretty smart and well adjusted person to become a lawyer but lawtube keeps proving to me it's all just coked out, mentally ill retards.
Click to expand...
The fact that nearly every lawtuber and most of the lawyers and judges in the cases they cover are neurotic freaks with an above average amount of flaws makes me very sorry for anyone who gets wrapped up in any kind of legal situation. The legal world is clown town.
 
Guntsress Of Diabeteeze said:
What do you guys think of Emily. D Baker?

I enjoy how she tries to stay neutral (or so it appears to me) and tries to have reasonable conversations on both sides of an argument.
Click to expand...
she's kind of a cunt she and her mods will time out anyone for the tiniest bit of humor. Also something happen on Nick's show yesterday during Read that involved Sean? Something involving his likeness? Sean brought it up during his Read trial coverage but I had to step away.
 
waffle said:
1. Who writes an entire brief without getting the money first?
Click to expand...

Worse than that, I thought it was Law 101 to know you shouldn't ask a question you didn't already know the answer to?!

Dude should have checked this off camera first (pre-stream), now he just looks like a fool. His love quest has just gotten harder. Not only does he look like a chump, he argues law like one to!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom