- Joined
- May 17, 2021
LawTube - Lawyers sperging at each other on YouTube
- Thread starter Least Concern
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
He is so close to making the correct decision to just stay offline it seems like. I don't get people not doubling down what they are good at and by all accounts he is a very proficient defense attorney (one that actually wins some cases) and not a good streamer or influencer
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
There's a fine line between "never gives up" and "doesn't know when to stop".
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2022
Anyone notice the snorting thing Kurt does? He hasn’t always done it, and no idea when it started. Now, often when he pauses in speaking, there is a reflexive echo of -snort, snort, snort-. What is that? Some medical condition? Add it to the list of things that need sorted, both for his stream listeners and any potential woman. That snort is asking love to be deaf as well as blind.
On a stream from Aug. 29th., Kurt showed a photo of himself at age 18.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Why would someone in an elected role expend any political capital on a guy who wrote a smut novel under his own name?
Why would someone at the office even if they're not in an elected role defend him if what they know about their new colleague is that he wrote a smut novel under his own name?
He's mad they never "stood behind [him]"?
He made himself look like a creep.
That's entirely his fault.
It would be one thing if the Miami Herald reporters spent thousands of hours digging into everything he ever said, but they appear to have gone to his website and clicked on the smut book that was still available for sale. Even after publishing he probably could have avoided it all by taking it down before his appointment was announced.
He's been studying King Phil now that there is an opening for Lawtube royalty.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
And the rents and home prices have still been falling precipitously.
- Joined
- May 5, 2022
I don't understand his living choices. He could move to better places but I guess he wants urban living and never really did the research. Or he could move to Dallas and feel at home with the copious carpetbaggers from NY and IL taking over Northern VA.
If he wanted dating, he shoud've moved to San Marcos, all the "beautiful but dumb as a brick women" (Local insult to the students there) are there since they go to Texas State University.
For fucks sake they call their Women's dance team the Texas State Strutters!
If he wanted low cost and legal work in a decent sized city move to Amarillo since it's large city and has a large Federal Court circuit presence. It's also first on the list to get nuked outside of D.C because of Pantex (Builds nuclear weapons) though and the weather there sucks in a different way than Austin.
If he wanted a bunch of legal work... San Antonio (W. District of TX), El Paso (Literally every fucking fed agency bar NASA maybe).
Austin rents are high because it's a state capital, califags, and that the city can't expand westward, and southwest of the city is the hood. He also picked the worst time to move to Texas economically speaking. Houston's not much better in the housing department unless he's living far far out or in the hood.
If he lived somewhere smaller inbetween Austin and Houston (I refuse to name specifics) it'd be manageable but that's still all run by the rural "good ole boys club"and with Kurt's temperament and lack of social skills he'd either:
A) Be run out of the town socially very fast (Except College Station, a well, major college town)
B) Back a "Yankee" somehow politically (Anyone who was born north of the Brazos valley areas) and piss off all the locals
College Station is an exception but it's also College Station. Have fun dealing with the worst of city slickers and rural college kids driving souped up F-350 duallies and copious retardation a university brings.
If he lived somewhere smaller inbetween Austin and Houston (I refuse to name specifics) it'd be manageable but that's still all run by the rural "good ole boys club"and with Kurt's temperament and lack of social skills he'd either:
A) Be run out of the town socially very fast (Except College Station, a well, major college town)
B) Back a "Yankee" somehow politically (Anyone who was born north of the Brazos valley areas) and piss off all the locals
College Station is an exception but it's also College Station. Have fun dealing with the worst of city slickers and rural college kids driving souped up F-350 duallies and copious retardation a university brings.
Allergies (Hay fever) are a bitch and very bad for some people in Texas, kinda how like some people can't take the London fog. His snort S=ounds like a sinus issue, but my fantasy is that he's learning how to snort lines like Nick Rekieta.
tl;dr: Kurt, go home to the Old Dominon State or you'll be carried back to Virginny in a casket from the allergies if you get them that bad already from being in TX a few years. And quit wearing that cowboy hat.
In 2016, Uncivil Law sued the Patent Office acting pro se. The cause of action arose from a workplace grievance when Kurt was working as a Patent Examiner. (That is his only substanial work experience, Kurt has negligible experience as an attorney). The genesis of Kurt's case was that he was deemed not competent to be entrusted with a particular level of authority despite completing the requisite training for that level. Kurt complained about this decision then kept complaining about how his initial complaint was handled. The Union got to a point where they declined to continue helping Kurt complain
Kurt continued to complain without the Union's help and eventually escalated his grievance to the point of suing the Patent Office in federal court. His preferred remedy was for the court to force the Patent Office to promote him to a much higher level of authority than the one for which he was found not to be competent.
The case did not go well for Kurt. In the dismissal, the judge warned him that trying to bring another version of the case in a court of the same jurisdiction could result in sanctions.
Details of the case:
Mueller v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Case number: 1:15-cv-00847
I was able to read Kurt's initial complaint, a memorandum in opposition to the Patent Office's motion to dismiss, and the judge's dismissal on site linked to below.
There are a lot of exhibits and filings not accessible at the site linked above. If someone is able to get hold of all the case information, I would be grateful.
Kurt continued to complain without the Union's help and eventually escalated his grievance to the point of suing the Patent Office in federal court. His preferred remedy was for the court to force the Patent Office to promote him to a much higher level of authority than the one for which he was found not to be competent.
The case did not go well for Kurt. In the dismissal, the judge warned him that trying to bring another version of the case in a court of the same jurisdiction could result in sanctions.
Details of the case:
Mueller v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Case number: 1:15-cv-00847
I was able to read Kurt's initial complaint, a memorandum in opposition to the Patent Office's motion to dismiss, and the judge's dismissal on site linked to below.
There are a lot of exhibits and filings not accessible at the site linked above. If someone is able to get hold of all the case information, I would be grateful.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Bought them and uploaded them to Courtlistener as well as here
- Joined
- May 5, 2022
Two zip files
https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh.../e-d-va-_1_15-cv-00847-lmb-tcb_7-zip.6428629/
and
Show a duplicate file warning (same name) when downloading. However, the files within are different and named differently when downloaded. Could you rename one of the archives? Thanks.
Hi, where in the document did you see this part? Or is this part of your out-of-case knowledge obtained given this appears to be a throw-away account?
I have included the dismissal note for those not wanting to read the PDF.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
They are identical files. My PC just uploaded them twice for some reason.
Outstanding! You are a gentleman and a scholar.
In Document 7-1, p. 120, the fun begins with a letter informing Kurt that he has been denied "Permanent Partial Signatory Authority" due to his unacceptably high rate of "clear error" during the probationary period. As anyone who has participated in Kurt's chat could anticipate, he does not take the unfavorable evaluation of his work well.
Kurt soon sets the Technical Director of his Unit straight about why SHE was the one in error. Consequently, Kurt demands the decision be reversed and all physical and electronic records suggesting he made any errors be "destroyed".
Still in Document 7-1, you can enjoy reading Kurt's superiors rebut his grievance and explain to him that his performance was, indeed, inadequate
Kurt is not detered by the consensus amongst his betters regarding his incompetence, nor by the union refusing to help him take his grievance further up the chain. Proceeding pro se, he pivots to complaining about the responses to his previous complaints taking too long. But that strategy is unsuccessful. The Assistant Deputy Commisioner for Patent Operations tells Kurt he "cannot get through a procedural issue what you are not entitled to on the merits" (Document 11-1, p. 2)
Next step? See you in federal court, Patent Office! Kurt asks the court to make his bosses give him FULL Perminant Signatory Authority rather than the partial authority he was denied.
Unfortunately for Kurt, his case is ultimately dismissed because the district court does not have jurisdiction. Despite cutting him some slack as a pro se litigant, the judge warns Kurt he may face sanctions if tries similar crap in the future.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Happy to help.
Kurk actually asked the court to grant a voluntary dismissal
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
I think it's safe to assume at this point that any lawyer who spends most of their time YouTubering is probably not a very successful and busy attorney
Kurk actually asked the court to grant a voluntary dismissal True, I glossed over that. Even though the judge granted Kurt's motion to dismiss voluntarily (rather than ruling on the defendant's motion to dismiss), she made a point of saying the court didn't have jurisdiction. And warned Kurt he could face sanctions if he brings a similar case.
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2024
Tourist here!
Chat GBT officially endorses Nick!
S1apSh0es
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
Obviously this must not be correct, but I thought I heard Kurt was possibly going to be litigating in front of SCOTUS soon?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
From the fact he asked for it to be without prejudice, it's pretty obvious he intended to shop around for another judge, something that excellent District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema had zero difficulty discerning and kindly warned him against.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
YouTube Lawyers... yes they are all cows. Every fucking one of them.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
Isn’t it interesting that once Kurt turned on Nick, a new account showed up to air some of Kurt’s dirty laundry? I’m a big fan of dirty laundry and of finding out more about Kurt’s origin story, so no quarrel there. But the timing and brand new account registered specifically to drag Kurt is pretty thunkful.