Stupid ass hit piece. But to assassinate his character over fiction is foul.
I agree with you about the Miami Herald and the author.
But a broken clock is right twice a day.
You don't like the novel [about fucking dead bodies and children]? Don't buy it.
Based only on what you know about Gosney's public persona and the book... Would you let him watch your dog?
If not, then why should he get a position of public trust?
I still think the book burning shtick is played out.
I don't want to burn any book, let alone his trash book. But this guy is a very public Christian who claims to be a moral person, upstanding citizen, and believer in God.
Selling a degenerate book about fucking dead bodies and kids while claiming to be a Christian is narcissistic levels of hypocrisy and pure self-absorbed sickness.
Why should he get a position of public trust when no one would give him a position of private trust?
You can call it a "hit piece" all you want but it doesn't change the reality that the vast majority of people would not want the creepy weirdo who wrote the novel excerpted below training prosecutors in one of the most populous counties in America.
Exactly. Fortunately 'fucking dead bodies' is not yet the subject of pop songs.
Gosney has been nose-guarding Rekieta for a long time.
As Nick was going downhill, people were contacting Gosney (as Nick's friend and a Christian) asking him to intervene to help the Rekieta family. All the while, Gosney played dumb and insisted Nick wasn't an alcoholic or losing weight, because that willful blindness was in Gosney's financial interests.
> The necrophiliac perversity aspect of his lust did not even cross his mind.
Reading these excerpts, it's clear Gosney is a degenerate lunatic who is writing thinly-veiled fetish novels about sex with dead bodies and children.
He sounds like the Marquis de Sade. They are both writing snuff porn.
I guess this is what the 'based Christians' around Nick Rekieta do with their free time.