Science Large Boeing Satellite Suddenly Explodes Into Pieces

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A Boeing satellite belonging to multinational service provider Intelsat mysteriously blew into pieces in geostationary orbit over the weekend.

According to an official update, an "anomaly" caused the satellite — dubbed IS-33e — to be destroyed, resulting in what the company calls a "total loss."

"Migration and service restoration plans are well underway across the Intelsat fleet and third-party satellites," the update reads.

It's unclear what exactly caused the satellite to break up. The US Space Force announced it was "tracking around 20 associated pieces" but "observed no immediate threats."

US-based space tracking company ExoAnalytic Solutions told SpaceNews that it's tracking 57 associated pieces of debris.

While we have yet to find out the exact cause for the breakup, the incident serves as a reminder of the often limited life of satellites, as well as the ever-present threat of existing space debris colliding with our assets in orbit — a precarious situation that could potentially lead to a disaster.

The satellite, which weighed 14,600 pounds and was roughly the size of a minivan, was designed and manufactured by Boeing Space Systems and launched in 2016. It provided broadband services, including internet and phone communication services, to parts of Europe, Africa, and most of Asia.

IS-33e was the second satellite to be launched as part of Boeing's "next generation" EpicNG platform. The first, dubbed IS-29e, failed due to a propulsion system fuel leak. Intelsat declared the satellite a total loss in April 2019, later attributing it to either a micrometeoroid strike or solar weather activity.

What caused IS-33e to break up in orbit remains unclear, however. Intesalt officials did observe that it was using far more fuel than it should be to maintain its orbit shortly after launching eight years ago, shaving off 3.5 years of its 15-year lifetime.

source: https://futurism.com/the-byte/large-satellite-explodes-pieces
archive: https://archive.md/1U2Oz
 
What caused IS-33e to break up in orbit remains unclear, however. Intesalt officials did observe that it was using far more fuel than it should be to maintain its orbit shortly after launching eight years ago, shaving off 3.5 years of its 15-year lifetime.
Sounds like drag almost. IDK, not a astrophysicist, but if you need more fuel to stay in orbit than design specs say you should, maybe it was put up in the wrong spot to begin with and was getting tugged at? IDK.
 
Sounds like drag almost. IDK, not a astrophysicist, but if you need more fuel to stay in orbit than design specs say you should, maybe it was put up in the wrong spot to begin with and was getting tugged at? IDK.
Could it also be possible that it's a material failure? Or hell, even space debris. I know that space debris orbits the earth at speeds > Mach 5.
1729722422650.png
 
Last edited:
Could it also be possible that it's a material failure?
I mean you'd have to think about its enviroment at that point. Its space/low earth orbit. What its mostly dealing with is radiation and debris. Radiation would fuck over the computers far before it did the metal. Debris on the other hand... that is different. There are literally millions of tiny things that get tracked in orbit- things like lost screws and shit- that in theroy, going fast enough, could have smashed and slammed into it and annihilated it. Could also be internal. Fuel leakage, something along those lines. It would explain the fuel consumption- you have to pump more fuel through the fuel lines to make up for the loss. Something could have ignited it.
 
A geo orbit is very high - 35k kilometers. I would expect given the distance not as much junk up there and it really makes no sense why a satelite in geo orbit would be using more fuel than expected to maintain orbit. That just strikes me as very strange indeed

If their fuel thrusters tanks were anything like their helium tanks then well…
 
A geo orbit is very high - 35k kilometers. I would expect given the distance not as much junk up there and it really makes no sense why a satelite in geo orbit would be using more fuel than expected to maintain orbit. That just strikes me as very strange indeed

If their fuel thrusters tanks were anything like their helium tanks then well…
Even though he's an annoying shitlib, Scott Manley will almost certainly bring it up. He usually is pretty accurate on his explanations.
 
Could it also be possible that it's a material failure? Or hell, even space debris. I know that space debris orbits the earth at speeds > Mach 5.
View attachment 6554857
Almost certainly space debris, and we're only going to see more and more headlines like this as the Kessler effect progresses. Figuring out and implementing a way to get rid of it without creating more should be one of NASA's top priorities, if not its highest.
 
It provided broadband services, including internet and phone communication services, to parts of Europe, Africa, and most of Asia.
Oh no! Not Africa! I was just about to send the Prince of Ethiopia some money to get him out of a jam. Guess he'll have to wait until they get this fixed.
 
Back
Top Bottom