KiwiMesh Complaint Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Am on mobile, thank you Null for fixing the .st domain as it looked broken on mobile (css issue?). Unlike others the .net domain doesn't work for me.
 
Pig Boss said:
Is there a reason the .tor version is asking me to confirm if I want to give reactions to people?

View attachment 3693855
Click to expand...
LurkTrawl said:
I've had that happen on tor for ages now, long before this keffals shit started, when the site is loading super, super slow. Dunno what other than that does it though.
Click to expand...
That happens when the Javascript doesn't load properly. Ordinarily the script intercepts the click and applies the reaction without navigating you to that other page.
Canebrake said:
I searched and didn't find any previous discussion of this issue, so:

My sole grievance is that we don't have some kind of domain-agnostic solution for internal links. People should be able to link to other posts or threads on KF in a way that matches whatever domain (or onion service) the page is being served on.
Given the speed at which we're going through domains lately, manually editing URLs (either to avoid having to log in again or because they're dead) has been a real pain.

(This isn't too bad browsing from Tor, because you can configure the Tor Browser to redirect to the corresponding onion service from every clearnet site. But that doesn't work on dead URLs, or when the clearnet is up but the onion service is down.)

I'm sure it's technically possible to insert special handling for internal links in the BBCode-to-HTML renderer; I'm not sure it's worth the effort at the moment... but it would be really nice to have.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's annoying. I made my userscript automatically correct the links that point to some other KF domain.
Near said:
So anyone found a workaround for this? I tried different browsers but .st is down and .net gives this. I use Brave.
View attachment 3693901
Click to expand...
This was happening to me earlier, but .net is working for me now.
 
using .net on Brave.
IDK if its just me but when I try to enlage a picture thumbnail, the image opens in the viewer with out it being enarged and then proceeds to disappear from the post. As an example I used a post from the previous page.
1663268760653.png 1663268772647.png Obviously this isnt urgent but Ill still bring it to your attention for later. Keep up the good work!
 
I switched to .net because .st suddenly stopped working. I dunno what was meant by the mesh being retarded but hopefully it can be fixed.

Edit: lol I retried .st right after posting this and it worked. Must've just been unlucky.
 
.net works but only after hopping through a few VPN servers. It probably works better on a normal connection but I'll not access the farms without a VPN or TOR at all, lol.
 
Matt Damon said:
Agreed. I can't believe one of the biggest white pills in my life in recent years is a fat kid living in Serbia who runs a message board.

His resoluteness in the face of whatever is thrown his way is infectious and inspiring. It's so much easier to keep fighting when you can clearly see other people who haven't given up yet.
Click to expand...
Completely agree. He posted this on telegram while we were down, but it bears repeating.

 
fun fact, if Diamwall doesnt flake up on the site, it will mark the third time that Ralph has been beat down by something relating to Portugal lmao.
 
shortroomba said:
DropKiwifarms and Elliot Fong Jones try to get TLS certificate banned for Kiwifarms. Could they succeed with it?
Click to expand...

Getting the TLS certificate revoked by its provider...
Having the site added to all web browsers' lists of malicious sites...

These things would be unprecedented in our specific situation, but many of the things that have happened to this site were unprecedented, and their hubris has no limitations.
 
I tried to press like on a comment on my personal profile wall, but I got this confirmation prompt, which I have never gotten before:

ConfirmLikePrompt.jpg

Is this necessary? I just want to press thumbs up on a friendly comment. Seems like a waste of bandwidth to generate a whole confirmation prompt just for a single like.
 
Nykysnottrans said:
I tried to press like on a comment on my personal profile wall, but I got this confirmation prompt, which I have never gotten before:

View attachment 3694026

Is this necessary? I just want to press thumbs up on a friendly comment. Seems like a waste of bandwidth to generate a whole confirmation prompt just for a single like.
Click to expand...
I was getting that for a little while a few days back on mobile (either on .top or .st, I don't remember which). The site was also loading a bit differently on mobile at the time, sort of like a compressed desktop view rather than the regular mobile view.
 
Nykysnottrans said:
I tried to press like on a comment on my personal profile wall, but I got this confirmation prompt, which I have never gotten before:

View attachment 3694026

Is this necessary? I just want to press thumbs up on a friendly comment. Seems like a waste of bandwidth to generate a whole confirmation prompt just for a single like.
Click to expand...
This happens when the Javascript didn't load properly.
 
Nykysnottrans said:
I tried to press like on a comment on my personal profile wall, but I got this confirmation prompt, which I have never gotten before:

View attachment 3694026

Is this necessary? I just want to press thumbs up on a friendly comment. Seems like a waste of bandwidth to generate a whole confirmation prompt just for a single like.
Click to expand...
The confirmation page was always there - it shows up if you right-click on the thumbs-up icon and open in new tab.
However, I am also getting it randomly on Tor lately when I try to like posts normally.
 
TheSkoomer said:
Getting the TLS certificate revoked by its provider...
Having the site added to all web browsers' lists of malicious sites...

These things would be unprecedented in our specific situation, but many of the things that have happened to this site were unprecedented, and their hubris has no limitations.
Click to expand...
This would be another ridiculous over-reach by Internet infrastructure providers (Let's Encrypt) and likely mire them in more requests from other entities to revoke certificates for other 'problematic' entities. They would be very wise to not get into that business, because it will snowball into a complete shitshow for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom