KiwiMesh Complaint Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
seems like the captcha page is working now, however I still need to ctrl+f5 every time I switch pages on firefox. I do not need to do that on Brave.
 
>If the site loads really wonky, try clearing your cache (CTRL+F5)
Or Ctrl+Shift +R for us Xfce users.
By the way, this is what shows up when I try to load .net with Firefox:
f.png
Ctrl + Shift + R helps, but only to load the page I was loading. When I go to the next page, this shit happens again.
Guess I'll just stick with .st for now, even though it's kind of a crapshoot atm on whether it would load or not.
EDIT: http://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion works better for me than either .net or .st, so I'll just use that one for now.
 
Last edited:
Man RIP, .top. You were #1. (China #4, Taiwan #2, Hong Kong #3. Macau #3.5.)

I can't get .net to work for shit.

.st works for me, but I can't log-in. Always dies at 2FA with a forbidden page.

.onion has a few issues but has been the most reliable.
Edit: forbidden page on .st
1663258468074.png
 
Last edited:
Awesome, looks like .net is back? Good work, Josh! Hope it stays stable, I've been having off and on issues with both .st as well as with tor.
 
I get a certificate error on .net but it might be the old-ass laptop I'm currently using.
 
Zero issues so far with .net on mobile Brave. Loading pretty fast too. Captcha requiring it all to be lowercase feels a bit jank.
 
We really have to give it to you josh, you are going up against an army of nutless zombies and not taking no for an answer on what you believe in. That right there is the type of role model alot of people need in their lifes.
 
That robot chicken vid on the main page feels very appropriate. On a scale of Frankenstein to that one fursuit made from carpets and cumrags, hows the backend holding up.
 
Capsaicin Addict said:
Something I've been wondering about. I'm not terribly conversant with DDoSes, but shouldn't they generate substantial traffic with their repeated queries? Not just at the target site, but all along the route as well?

I swear, these idiots would burn down the entire Internet if it kept their crimes hidden (I strongly believe that's why KF has become their devil. They are trying to bury something).
Click to expand...
It depends on the type of DoS attack, and the target. Some, require you just to batter the fuck out of things with packets. Others, against certain types of server for example, can use things like exploiting the 3 way TCP handshake. If you don't know, whenever you make a connection from your mahcine to another using TCP it goes like this.
My machine: Gimme this page -> webserver: You sure -> My machine: yeah, I'm sure.
Now some DoS tools will purposefully hang on the "Are you sure?" part of the connection, which can take depending on your server settings 5 minutes to time out. if your server only has say 100 slots for users at once...it's trivial to send lots of those "Are you sure" attacks and let them just hang with no reply - without having to shovel packets down the pipe any more.
So it all depends really. Depends on the target, depends on the service, depends on this and that. There's loads of different types of attack.
 
Dot net was working great on Brave and dot st was not loading. Now dot net is hanging up on the Diamwall page,...but st is running like a champ. The stress tests continue.
 
Still unable to log in on the .net site as well, throws an error at 2FA. (I'm going to guess this will all get worked out once more important foundations are laid.) THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom