- Joined
- Oct 7, 2024
@unironicjudiaism there’s a lot of pilpul in your reasoning. You’re saying that people are using the wrong rhetoric right after claiming that right/wrong is subjective so please give examples of what rhetoric you think is appropriate from both sides to be using regarding these two scenarios that you have outlined; MN and J6.
Destroying random businesses and burning down cities is objectively wrong. The violence and destruction is directed at private business and people who have nothing to do with ICE.
I cannot say the same about J6 because the anger was directed at the people responsible for the issue; dirty politicians. And the property damage was literally public property paid for by Americans and it was minimal.
I am just trying to understand why you’re so concerned about the rhetoric people are using regarding these events and how you would change it.
Destroying random businesses and burning down cities is objectively wrong. The violence and destruction is directed at private business and people who have nothing to do with ICE.
I cannot say the same about J6 because the anger was directed at the people responsible for the issue; dirty politicians. And the property damage was literally public property paid for by Americans and it was minimal.
I am just trying to understand why you’re so concerned about the rhetoric people are using regarding these events and how you would change it.