Pathetic attempt to save face rejected faggot, you can't suck them off for months, Furiously defend them all day for Warski's CP Mishandling, and then do an about face after the majority of the thread (Even people who are on your side) has turned against you by spering out about Israel. Nice try, but no nigger.
That's my original anti-semetic thoughts and i have been aylawging on the same point and many others before and after deranged spics and newfags popped their heads in to generate 800 pages of absolute unreadable garbage.
Okay and what would you say now, having seen it yourself in the post I mentioned?
You literally already did. Here is the post.
Or are you going to claim some horseshit, like you just scrolled past this post really fast without really looking at it? When the retard nigger didn't even thumbnail it?
You also failed to give your opinion on whether or not this post constitutes a violation of federal law. As you are a preeminent expert in the field of alogging Andy Warski, I expected better.
Allow me to pose you the question again:
If you maintain that Andy Warski steamed CP in 2019, that streaming CP is a federal crime for which you hope he is punished, and that people in this thread have posted links to the livestream where this occurred, and that they have posted screenshots of it, and that these screenshots pass the official US standard - being the Dost standard - for determining what is and is not CP - Then:
1. Did you or did you not view CP today when what you claim is CP was posted in this thread?
2. Do you think what was posted in this thread is a violation of federal law?
These are simple questions. I am not tricking you.
The dost standard was some questions about what makes pornography and it was made ad-hoc for a court case half a century ago, still images from videos taken by some pedo.
It was specifically focused on a sample of verifiably preteen children as young as 10 years old, and the jury on the case already knew that.
Wikipedia implies that this test may have used for some years and was constantly changed by precedent set by other cases, one of them excluding swimwear on children, these days ths test is completely obsolete.
First I want to say that a lot has changed since then, the western society has sadly deteriorated a lot, kids these days are in the social media all day posting all sorts of pictures to all sorts of people and messaging apps, kids those days in western countries a lot less prude, there have been studies that have shown over 50% of school children consider themselves gay or trans,
Is this a good thing?
No
If I had it my way i would have white sharia, segregated schools by gender and death penalties to pedophiles, but sadly this is the world we are living in and public opinion has shifted to the worse.
Now, in regards to the questions in the test, even though its not necessary for all of them to be correct, I think its correct to say that a good number of them need to be if its going to convince a jury, additionally some of the questions hold disproportional weight compared to the others, one of them being actual genitalia nudity which never happens in the stream,
I also want to say that all of those pictures appear to be taken by the girl themselves, the girls for the most part don't appear to be tricked or abused into producing this content and they produce it on their own will, are they dumb for doing it?
Yes, and the only one to blame is the society that lets this happen.
In addition, there's maybe one picture that is bad, but there is no visible nudity in it, the girl in picture is not even identifiable and is intentionally censored by the girl themselves in order to prevent it from being what they think constitutes pornography, meaning the girl herself cesnored it for it to not be pornography and to not expose her real identity.
We also don't know her age, the picture is packaged with decorations and captions much like content meant for a wide audience of people like how an onlyfans seller advertises themselves on public, the biology of the girl itself appears to be of a woman that is really mature with possible surgical enhancements done to them that goes along with the idea that this is mature online sexworker and is unlikely to be a child.
Finally I want to say that this entire set of photographs was not generated by a pedo photographer like in the DOST case, it was directed by FBI glowies themselves, the fbi glowies could have easily went after tardsi, indigo troon, gunt and all other faggots in the stream but they did not, likely because the decoys used were for the most part of age and everything about this gayop being fake and gay, and in-fact there is a presumption from the streamers in this video that all of this is a gay and fake federal gayop, this is the sektur, the very fact we are having this discussion almost a decade after leaves no doupt that hundreds of people have reported andy and the rest, there's people possibly reporting them as we speak, yet no punishment has delivered to them, the only punishment that has been delivred is against this thread in the form of retarded schizos making this thread unreadable with constant sperging and their obsession with CSAM.
