if warski did not stutter, then the show would be 30% better.
That's like saying MATI would be twice as good if Josh didn't sound like he was about to cry the whole time. I just don't get how this is the first thing that comes to your mind when it comes to The Casino's weak points. I think speech impediments are just your rage trigger.
a lot of insights from warski is just repeated things that ppp already have said
I actually think this is intentional and part of their show format. I think PPP said "there's no ball-passing" when criticizing another show. Passing the Ball is an improv technique where you take what your partner said and support it. It's very obvious when you start paying attention to their exchanges.
1: "This guy's a bum!"
2: "He's a homeless CRACK-HEAD!"
1: "He lives in a tent filled with used needles there buddy."
2: "He pisses himself while p-p-passed out in a fucking DITCH."
etc
It's actually very fun to watch how they work this technique into their show imo. Also, they
HATE dead air, and rightly so. This technique helps prevent that. Although, I agree with you that it goes on for too long and drags out segments for longer than they need to be. They seem to be aware of it as well, because they bring it up often.
when ppp is lit up on rant, warski tends to interrupt ppp with a retard comment that does not contribute with rant. it is almost as if warski is jealous of ppp's rant and wants to one up him
I agree with you on this one. Although I'm not sure about the reasoning. It feels to me like Warski just doesn't understand that his co-host is off on a fire and brimstone rant, and this is the one time he's supposed to actually let dead air happen. Or you could be right, I'm not sure.
ppp is an entertaining and charismatic showman, but he is not a good storyteller. ppp is an "and then" storyteller instead of a "but or therefore" storyteller. so when ppp tells a story, it tends to be a series of scenes without any through line connection the narrative. for example, when he and warski was on the alex stein show, they tried to talk about the sektur and nothing made any sense if you were unfamiliar with the sektur. the other example was the mutahar guest appearance on the casino. ppp gave a linear scene by scene about rekieta but did really explain the why with rekeita's story and why it was worth telling.
I agree with this one as well. When PPP was trying to bring Mutahar up to speed on Rekieta, he was absolutely floundering. It's like when Josh gets little details wrong, except they're not unimportant little details, they're entire chunks of information about the why and how. Granted, it did feel like PPP was caught off guard by the question and didn't have notes prepared (he did for everything else), but it posed a big problem for that show.
Overall, I think they should keep honing their skills rather than make big changes to the format.