- Joined
- Aug 27, 2025
Eh, maybe it's difference in experience. I definitely heard of wedgies in high school and even in adulthood.The only time I have ever heard anyone talking about a wedgie that wasn't a child was someone making a joke about childhood or in a sexual context.
I get your train of thought, but if I had sex with a trans woman, well, why would I be doing it? Because I get off to manly burly men wearing plaid? No, it's because I get off to a man wearing a dress. And as gay as it is to have sex with a trans woman, I'm having sex with that trans woman because I get off to dresses and makeup and long hair. Just like how, although you're NOT having sex with a child when participating in ABDL, you ARE getting off to diapers and bibs and baby stuff.That's just a completemy guy. No. Having sex with a person wearing a pup hood isn't zoophilia. A person pretending to be a dog isn't a dog. I am still on the site that takes the piss out of men pretending to be women and how they aren't actually women right?
Where's the zoophilia? Vore doesn't have to be about furries. I can see cannibalism but like, you're eating them whole, often with no fatal consequences. Seems more like a cartoon fetish.Diaper fetishism is as much paedophilia as vore is cannibalistic zoophilia.
Fair.No that's just because it was the same three things being repeated in a circle and doing nothing other than shitting up the thread and being a waste of time for everyone involved.
my guy. No. Having sex with a person wearing a pup hood isn't zoophilia. A person pretending to be a dog isn't a dog. I am still on the site that takes the piss out of men pretending to be women and how they aren't actually women right?