Kevin Mann v. Encyclopedia Dramatica LLC, et al

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Kevin Mann, an exceedingly bald person, has sued Encyclopedia Dramatica LLC, some dude named Jacob Stellmach (I don't know if he's ED's current maintainer or what), and 5 different John Does for:

1. Defamation per se,
2. Intentional interference with prospective economic advantage,
3. False light,
4. Unreasonable publicity given to private facts,

Hoping to attain:

1. General damages of $15,000,
2. "Incidental and consequential" damages to be determined by trial,
3. Punitive damages,
4. The page being taken down,
5. Injunctive relief (restraining orders, I think),
6. Fees,
7. Anything else the Judge wants to give him.

https://encyclopediadramatica.wiki/index.php/Kevin_Mann (Archive)

9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-01.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-02.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-03.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-04.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-05.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-06.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-07.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-08.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-09.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-10.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-11.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-12.png 9-18-20_-_NV_-_Delivered_Service_of_Process_-_Encyclopedia_Dramatica_LLC-13.png
 
Imagine being an angry manlet and attracting attention to how bald you are this way.
 
I have no knowledge of law, but at its face this is like suing the Onion as if their articles were meant literally.

It won't be hard for encyclopedia dramatica to defend the idea that it's all satire and nonsense. If that's how the law works, anyways.

And the fact that his comments about not liking jews are probably a direct quote, means that it's not going to play well in an american court.
 
I mean the article itself is utter fucking gibberish. Genuinely one of the worst I've seen on ED, which is monumental. The quotes about tasty sprinkles within the fucking lawsuit are hilariously stupid.
 
You have successfully converted me, all I could think reading the ED article was 'where are all the archives and screenshots of the lolz?'
You'd think that after being taken down for the upteenth billionth time they would learn one of the basic internet rules of "ARCHIVE EVERYTHING", but nope... according to this, their plan is "oh, find those missing pics, reupload them to the site, clean up the articles, and hope that THIS time nothing will get lost". The most they ever talk about are "backups" which could mean anything.
 
You'd think that after being taken down for the upteenth billionth time they would learn one of the basic internet rules of "ARCHIVE EVERYTHING", but nope... according to this, their plan is "oh, find those missing pics, reupload them to the site, clean up the articles, and hope that THIS time nothing will get lost". The most they ever talk about are "backups" which could mean anything.

I'm reminded of a Ron White bit-

You can't fix stupid.PNG

Source / Archive

 
All I got out of reading his lawsuit is that he is bald and has an insatiable lust for giant ebony dicks. I look forward to the DMCA.
 
Is ED even worth going after anymore. Almost all of the articles are missing any real information. It's really just a wiki full of unproven shit talk at this point.
 
Is ED even worth going after anymore. Almost all of the articles are missing any real information. It's really just a wiki full of unproven shit talk at this point.
Wasn't that always the point of ED?
 
Why are there so many shyster lawyers around willing to bring obviously bullshit cases like this to court?
And why aren't they punished for it?
They're the reason our legal system is so fucking congested.
 
Back
Top Bottom