Kamala Harris Megathread - Let's hear it for our lovely and gracious Vice President!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
4c027784-7d94-4da5-999a-3f4bff7126fc-1.jpg

Kamala Harris is one of the worst people ever to attain national office, and since this seems to be the week that the mainstream press is turning on her, it seems like a great time to start a megathread.
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
Francis York Morgan said:
I feel like we get this article every month. People are beginning to realize that the party is unbelievably fucked thanks to years of bad decisions and propping up the likes of Kamala.
Click to expand...
They're realizing it but they're not admitting it, I suspect not even to themselves:

“Her main problem is not being a woman or mixed race, her problem is she has low ratings just like President Biden,” said Larry Sabato, a professor of Politics at the University of Virginia.
Click to expand...
There's a lot of things you can blame on Joe Biden. Setting up a series of race and sexual requirements that could only be filled by the primary's biggest loser? Most certainly. But she accepted the job; everything after that is mostly on her.
“If Biden were riding sky high, she would be doing relatively well as well.
Click to expand...
Wait, if he were the most popular president evaaar, she'd be doing "relatively well"? I find that's an incredibly tepid descriptor of a member of a golden administration. It's almost like Professor Politics here realizes she's her own biggest stumbling block, but can't admit it.
She would be seen as a popular successor carrying on a popular president’s mandate.”
Click to expand...
Only if they shoved her in a closet and let this hypothetical popular and vital president do his thing so no one knew her. Is this genius really selling the idea that her entire staff is bailing just because Joe is polling poorly?
 
Woe-B-Gon (TM) said:
They're realizing it but they're not admitting it, I suspect not even to themselves:


There's a lot of things you can blame on Joe Biden. Setting up a series of race and sexual requirements that could only be filled by the primary's biggest loser? Most certainly. But she accepted the job; everything after that is mostly on her.

Wait, if he were the most popular president evaaar, she'd be doing "relatively well"? I find that's an incredibly tepid descriptor of a member of a golden administration. It's almost like Professor Politics here realizes she's her own biggest stumbling block, but can't admit it.

Only if they shoved her in a closet and let this hypothetical popular and vital president do his thing so no one knew her. Is this genius really selling the idea that her entire staff is bailing just because Joe is polling poorly?
Click to expand...
I just love that the response can be summarized as "They'd be doing so well if they weren't doing terribly!"
 
A Sentient Cloud said:
So at this point who is even the future of the Democratic party? No one likes Harris, Biden is demented, Bernie is old. Yang has never won an election, Buttigieg has only won a local election and has plenty of personal issues (gay, weird, Harvard, McKinsey, etc.), and Gabbard only won in a tiny, eternally blue state and has been sidelined for talking shit anyway. Warren? Klobuchar? Is Hillary gonna go for the anti-hat trick?
Click to expand...
They still have the squad. I think they are going to throw the presidency, but use every dirty trick in the book to win the house and senate. Their best bet would be to force an ineffective republican presidency, giving time for Americans forget Biden's administration while building up AoC or another young Democrat to run the next election.
 
They will never be able to admit to themselves that maybe having a dementia addled meat puppet and a diversity hire to be the stand in for the unelected bureaucracy was possibly a bad idea.

Not because they are doing a bad job mind you. Oh no. Its because they are so hopelessly inept its patently obvious to everyone they aren't the ones running the show. There are GS-14 and GS-15 federal "servants" awake right now, desperately terrified that even the most braindead American is starting to put 2 and 2 together.
 
FILTH Tourist said:
They still have the squad. I think they are going to throw the presidency, but use every dirty trick in the book to win the house and senate. Their best bet would be to force an ineffective republican presidency, giving time for Americans forget Biden's administration while building up AoC or another young Democrat to run the next election.
Click to expand...
You're saying this isn't the eternal strategy of both parties?
 
Screenshot_2022-07-09_15-43-57.png

“I think that, to be very honest with you, I do believe that we should have rightly believed, but we certainly believe that certain issues are just settled. Certain issues are just settled,” Harris said told CBS News’ Robert Costa Friday.

“Clearly were not,” Costa retorted.

“No, that’s right. And that’s why I do believe that we are living, sadly, in real unsettled times,” Harris added.
Click to expand...
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyy do they continue to make this bitch appear in front of cameras/reporters and speak???
 
This thread should be combined with the Biden thread since the fate of both retards are tied to each other.

VP Harris calls for 'assault weapons ban' on guns 'intentionally designed to kill' people (Archive)

Vice President Kamala Harris on Sunday called for the reinstatement of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, arguing that certain semi-automatic firearms are "intentionally designed" to kill people and only belong on the battlefield.

During an appearance on CBS News’ "Face the Nation," Harris spoke about her visit last week to Highland Park, Illinois, where a man armed with a semi-automatic rifle opened fire on a Fourth of July parade, killing 7 and injuring 46.

"When you meet with first responders, when you meet with families of these victims, you cannot avoid the reality of what the impact of this gun violence is on a community," the vice president said.

Harris said mass shootings keep happening across the country "because those weapons are available, and we have to stop allowing those weapons to be available to civilians living in communities of people who have a right to believe that they are not in a war zone."

"Assault weapons were specifically and intentionally designed to kill a lot of human beings quickly," she said. "It is a weapon of war. If you've ever looked at, if I may be so blunt, an autopsy photograph to see what it does to the human body. And the fact that we can't get Congress to renew – it's not like we're pulling something out of our hat. We've done it before as a nation – to renew the assault weapons ban, is outrageous.

"You can support the Second Amendment," she added. "I support the Second Amendment, but we should agree we should not have weapons of war on the streets of America."

The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which expired in 2004, specifically outlawed 19 types of semi-automatic firearms, as well as other rifles, shotguns and handguns that possess two or more of a certain set of features, including pistol grips, detachable magazines, and sound suppressors. The maximum capacity of a magazine was also set at 10 rounds.

A study released for the Department of Justice in 2004 found that its "impact on gun violence is likely to be small at best, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement."

President Biden, who was a senator when the ban was passed, has repeatedly called for its reinstatement in the wake of several mass shootings in recent months.

But while Democrats control both chambers of Congress, any major gun reform legislation would require 60 votes in the Senate, meaning that at least 10 Republicans would have to sign on to legislation for it to be viable.

Meanwhile, a recent Quinnipiac University poll found that 50 percent of registered voters support a nationwide ban on semi-automatic long guns compared to 45% who oppose, showing the lowest level of support since February 2013 when Quinnipiac began asking that question.
Click to expand...
 
"When you meet with first responders, when you meet with families of these victims, you cannot avoid the reality of what the impact of this gun violence is on a community," the vice president said.
Click to expand...
Why not? You happily ignore the reality of the impact nigger violence and crime has on communities.
 
🎩 but twitter needs to change their rules so you can tweet "kill yourself" in all caps at the khive. if they've got a yellow heart emoji, a bee emoji, and "THEE" in their display name, cyberbullying them is a moral duty.
 
thyme's up said:
Hooooooooow is she a worse speaker than a man with late stage dementia?

I didn't watch the debates but I can see how Gabbard knocked her out with one punch. She literally can't string a coherent sentence together.
Click to expand...
For me it's partially the tone like she's talking to a retarded kid.

That, coupled with the inability to say anything meaningful, comes off like she could give a shit.

Like I don't need my politicians to actually give a shit, but being able to convincingly pretend like you give a shit is a job requirement.
 
SSF2T Old User said:
This shit happened on Tuesday, and they're STILL making fun of her for it. That's both impressive and depressing.
3530787-4fc666b5792ca3ca32bace1b08e6240a.mp4
Click to expand...
I can see why, it's got so much to revel in. My thoughts on that scene, from one playthrough.

- She didn't mention she was VP or indeed anything about her role in this "discussion" about "pressing issues" with "leaders". She sounded like a TV show host or debate moderator, not one of the people who can Get Stuff Done. Her pronouns and fashion choices were more germane and important than being Vice President of the United States of America.

- She must be able to define what a woman is since she seems to be very sure she is one.

- She said "the table" like the existence of a table was established previously. I don't know if someone did but if not she was assuming blind people knew about the table because she can see it.

- Not only does no one care about her suit, her line is only relevant - but not helpful - to someone who lost their sight after early childhood. To someone blind from birth they have no conception of what the color blue is. Same with colorblindness, except most colorblind people can see it's blue just fine, red/green being the most common type of colorblindness. And I assume everyone, sighted or not, had the sense to realize she wasn't going to a meeting in a bathrobe.

I wonder if anyone on staff bothered to explain any of this to her.

(Was this discussion even about being blind? Because I'm not sure if that'd make it funnier or not. EDIT: NVM, just saw that "disability rights meeting" bit. So it was just her standard "'Ukraine is a country in Europe." everyone-is-retarded-but-me condescension.)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom