🪦 Deceased Julie Terryberry - Canadian Autist Living in a Shed II

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Found a photo of julay I've never seen before
Picture_20165006025017.jpg
 
Jesus Christ this thread was a ride from start to finish.
Batman VS Tony Danza said:
"I'd tell you to say that to my face instead of online but I don't know my own address"
Click to expand...
Julie Terryberry
The Shed Behind Gramma's
London, Ontario, CA
Feculent Emesis said:
Mike updated his Fetlife profile, and insinuates that he broke up with Julie because of the Farms. Julie's profile has disappeared.

View attachment 91578
Click to expand...
He can't be with someone whose emotions cloud there [sic] judgement? I didn't even realize I had an irony meter until it shattered.

Bob's Axe said:
A little late, but I just finished the thread. Holy shit it's been an awful ride. I am not the same person I was before I started this thread.
Click to expand...
You're just a gluten for punishment.
 
julie is around my age which makes me want to :powerlevel::powerlevel::powerlevel: but i would like to just point out why julie should be ashamed to think she's a makeup artist
terri.jpg

1: Julie smeared eyeliner all up to her brow bone. While most drag queens do this as part of their style, drag queens usually also fill in their eyebrows so that the eyebrows actually tie in to the rest of her face. Because she didn't use a lighter eyeshadow at all, it makes her eyes look like big blue puddles with patches of dirt (her unfilled eyebrows) on top.
2: she won't use eyeliner or mascara with this look. A bit of definition around her lashes could have made her eyeshadow look a little more presentable, as opposed to the big blue puddles.
3: two tone lipstick like that can look pretty cool, provided that they're colours which are not similar. lavender and dark purple? that's a cool look! red and orange? that would be cool too! but shimmery pink and slightly darker not shimmery pink makes it look like you did your makeup in the dark.
4: the placement of the gems does nothing to highlight bone structure. normally if a makeup artist is wild enough to use gems in a look, they'll make it bring out the bone structure of the model.
5: the random shit everywhere just looks like blemishes.
6: I'm pretty sure all of her makeup is old and budget. the table she keeps her makeup on is dirty and reminiscent of Crafty Beauty Diva. theres a picture in her bathroom of makeup on the bathroom sink without lids on, leaving marks on the counter. that's very unsanitary.

anyways, if you need to look like emo craftybeautydiva, she'd be a great make up artist!
 
Coldgrip said:
Breath play.

Though it's a good chance that Mike was actually choking her and they were not engaging in actual BDSM.
Click to expand...

Not legal in Ontario.
And yes, there are cases about it. There was a very public one that was already discussed earlier in this thread.
 
Maybe shit like this shows why Ontario has laws like that. In my experience, the only young women who allow their boyfriends to do "breath play" and choke them out like this are basically like JULAAAAY here: desperate for approval and willing to actively endanger their health and well-being to show that they're sexually desirable.

It's pretty clear what happened with her, right? Started out as a fat girl in school, probably got made fun of all the time and told no one would fuck her with a borrowed dick. She loses the weight and immediately decides the best way to show all of them who made fun of her before is to sleep around, the more dicks the better. That way she can show they were all wrong, she is desirable after all, look how many men she can get to fuck her!

Girls like Julay always make a bad call because they don't realize just how low male standards can go. The fact that a few abusive unemployed freaks want to fuck you without a condom doesn't mean you're beautiful, accomplished, or in control of your life.
 
Abortions4All said:
Maybe shit like this shows why Ontario has laws like that. In my experience, the only young women who allow their boyfriends to do "breath play" and choke them out like this are basically like JULAAAAY here: desperate for approval and willing to actively endanger their health and well-being to show that they're sexually desirable.

It's pretty clear what happened with her, right? Started out as a fat girl in school, probably got made fun of all the time and told no one would fuck her with a borrowed dick. She loses the weight and immediately decides the best way to show all of them who made fun of her before is to sleep around, the more dicks the better. That way she can show they were all wrong, she is desirable after all, look how many men she can get to fuck her!

Girls like Julay always make a bad call because they don't realize just how low male standards can go. The fact that a few abusive unemployed freaks want to fuck you without a condom doesn't mean you're beautiful, accomplished, or in control of your life.
Click to expand...

All this plus her mental disability and instability, throw some neglectful parenting and sexual abuse in there, and you've got julay's portrait.
 
I'm of the opinion that like 90% of this is Julie desperately trying to outrage her parents so much that they're forced to finally give a shit about her. It's why she bragged about dating a man ten years her senior, babbled on about the frequent kinky sex she was having with said man, and posted constant pictures of herself covered in bruises and bite marks. Most parents would hit the roof just to learn that their daughter was sexually active; the Terryberry clan, on the other hand, did a collective "meh" in response to finding out that their kid was being smacked around by a scuzzy NEET who wears a bra. It's so goddamn tragic.
 
bitternuga said:
Julie's latest profile picture......... Truly, I didn't expect her to top her others but holy shit this one is just horrifying.

oNLbK4H.png
Click to expand...

I'm guessing ~Goddess Dez~ did that? Or is Tyler/other rando into biting girls so hard it leaves marks too? :(

I wonder what Gramma Terryberry thinks when she sees Julay wondering around like that...I feel bad for anyone else who's eyes will be forced to see it.
 
bitternuga said:
Julie's latest profile picture......... Truly, I didn't expect her to top her others but holy shit this one is just horrifying.

oNLbK4H.png
Click to expand...

The funny thing about this pic is that bite didn't seem to break skin. That means right after it happened she rushed to take a picture.

Also it looks like a mortician did a shitty job applying make up to a corpse. Is there another bite on the upper side of the right cheek or did she legit put blush on only one cheek? This is a train wreck.
 
Petronella said:
I'm of the opinion that like 90% of this is Julie desperately trying to outrage her parents so much that they're forced to finally give a shit about her. It's why she bragged about dating a man ten years her senior, babbled on about the frequent kinky sex she was having with said man, and posted constant pictures of herself covered in bruises and bite marks. Most parents would hit the roof just to learn that their daughter was sexually active; the Terryberry clan, on the other hand, did a collective "meh" in response to finding out that their kid was being smacked around by a scuzzy NEET who wears a bra. It's so goddamn tragic.
Click to expand...

That's been my thought since I started following this thread. Julie's everything has been smeared across the internet for years now, and her family's response has been "Meh." It's even more fucked up when you consider that Julie's Facebook is wide open. If someone searches for a specific relative of Julie Terryberry, chances are good she'll come up as a relative or at least be in the notification "someone you may know" bar. Do they care that a potential spouse, friend, employer, employee are highly likely to see her? Nah. There is something profoundly wrong in that family. Julie's the equivalent of a twelve year old that waltzes stark naked into the drawing room while the vicar is over for afternoon tea and asks him to do something that goes so far beyond inappropriate that it's downright terrifying. And then the relative rolls their eyes and tells the vicar to just ignore her and goes back to asking him whether he'd like sugar in his tea, completely oblivious to his gobsmacked face.

A number of people have said that they think Julie has been sexually abused. I disagree with this, but it is a thoroughly legit conclusion to make. My thoughts have been all along that Julie is severely neglected and has been all her life. If stripping naked for the vicar at age twelve gets some kind of response, any kind of response, it means that her existence has been acknowledged for that week. It's a win in her book. When she reached a certain age and began to attract a genuine response to her behaviour, bang! Instant validation! She exists! Someone knows she's alive! And as far Julie's concerned, the losers that latch onto her for sex give her the most attention that she's probably ever got. Ever. And it's perfectly natural that she'd latch onto it.

Not only do her family not give a shit about Julie, they give no shits about anyone they know seeing her covered in blood and bruises and filth. Okay, fine, her grandmother gives her a place to live and does make efforts to interact with her, but if her grandmother is trying so hard to reach her, where was that grandmother when Julie needed her before now? Did her grandmother neglect her own family? Or did her grandmother's own family treat her exactly the same way as they treat Julie?

What the fuck is wrong with these people? If absolutely nothing else, do they not care who sees them treating Julie like she's disposable? Do they worry about their reputation? Do they worry about anyone thinking that they're just as fucked up as Julie to not intervene when it's clear that not only her behaviour is wildly inappropriate, she's in genuine danger for her life?

No, no, and no.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Julie is a nasty little bitch in so many different definitions of the word. But it's clear that she's been severely neglected all her life and that she just has no fucking concept of what's appropriate, how to conceive that others can be hurt by her actions, and that there is such an animal as positive emotional attachment. If she gets murdered on the street I'd be amazed if they'd even bother to collect the body. Julie's never made any reference to drugs in her family (that I can remember anyway) but I'll lay money on nearly all of them being a pack of losers that go through enough alcohol a week to keep an entire Russian platoon in a happy hangover for a year, and that it snows all year round for them.

A lot of people in this thread define Julie as a horrorcow. This is another legit conclusion to make, along with that of her being a victim of sexual abuse, and that I disagree with even though there's a good argument to made that both or either is the case. But for me, she's just sad. She's lived an awful life and she'll die an awful death. And what's saddest of all is that she's too cognitively impaired to ever understand either of these things.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to find someone that does deserve their nasty little life because I really need some serious schadenfreude right now.
 
glass_houses said:
That's been my thought since I started following this thread. Julie's everything has been smeared across the internet for years now, and her family's response has been "Meh." It's even more fucked up when you consider that Julie's Facebook is wide open. If someone searches for a specific relative of Julie Terryberry, chances are good she'll come up as a relative or at least be in the notification "someone you may know" bar. Do they care that a potential spouse, friend, employer, employee are highly likely to see her? Nah. There is something profoundly wrong in that family. Julie's the equivalent of a twelve year old that waltzes stark naked into the drawing room while the vicar is over for afternoon tea and asks him to do something that goes so far beyond inappropriate that it's downright terrifying. And then the relative rolls their eyes and tells the vicar to just ignore her and goes back to asking him whether he'd like sugar in his tea, completely oblivious to his gobsmacked face.

A number of people have said that they think Julie has been sexually abused. I disagree with this, but it is a thoroughly legit conclusion to make. My thoughts have been all along that Julie is severely neglected and has been all her life. If stripping naked for the vicar at age twelve gets some kind of response, any kind of response, it means that her existence has been acknowledged for that week. It's a win in her book. When she reached a certain age and began to attract a genuine response to her behaviour, bang! Instant validation! She exists! Someone knows she's alive! And as far Julie's concerned, the losers that latch onto her for sex give her the most attention that she's probably ever got. Ever. And it's perfectly natural that she'd latch onto it.

Not only do her family not give a shit about Julie, they give no shits about anyone they know seeing her covered in blood and bruises and filth. Okay, fine, her grandmother gives her a place to live and does make efforts to interact with her, but if her grandmother is trying so hard to reach her, where was that grandmother when Julie needed her before now? Did her grandmother neglect her own family? Or did her grandmother's own family treat her exactly the same way as they treat Julie?

What the fuck is wrong with these people? If absolutely nothing else, do they not care who sees them treating Julie like she's disposable? Do they worry about their reputation? Do they worry about anyone thinking that they're just as fucked up as Julie to not intervene when it's clear that not only her behaviour is wildly inappropriate, she's in genuine danger for her life?

No, no, and no.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Julie is a nasty little bitch in so many different definitions of the word. But it's clear that she's been severely neglected all her life and that she just has no fucking concept of what's appropriate, how to conceive that others can be hurt by her actions, and that there is such an animal as positive emotional attachment. If she gets murdered on the street I'd be amazed if they'd even bother to collect the body. Julie's never made any reference to drugs in her family (that I can remember anyway) but I'll lay money on nearly all of them being a pack of losers that go through enough alcohol a week to keep an entire Russian platoon in a happy hangover for a year, and that it snows all year round for them.

A lot of people in this thread define Julie as a horrorcow. This is another legit conclusion to make, along with that of her being a victim of sexual abuse, and that I disagree with even though there's a good argument to made that both or either is the case. But for me, she's just sad. She's lived an awful life and she'll die an awful death. And what's saddest of all is that she's too cognitively impaired to ever understand either of these things.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to find someone that does deserve their nasty little life because I really need some serious schadenfreude right now.
Click to expand...

Julie herself said she was involved in a sexual relationship with her slightly older brother. It didn't go full intercourse, but they had sexual contact as kids apparently. Just fyi.

I'm not trying to imply that all people who are sexually abused are super fucked uo, I'm just saying that it isn't a guess that she experienced it.
 
glass_houses said:
That's been my thought since I started following this thread. Julie's everything has been smeared across the internet for years now, and her family's response has been "Meh." It's even more fucked up when you consider that Julie's Facebook is wide open. If someone searches for a specific relative of Julie Terryberry, chances are good she'll come up as a relative or at least be in the notification "someone you may know" bar. Do they care that a potential spouse, friend, employer, employee are highly likely to see her? Nah. There is something profoundly wrong in that family. Julie's the equivalent of a twelve year old that waltzes stark naked into the drawing room while the vicar is over for afternoon tea and asks him to do something that goes so far beyond inappropriate that it's downright terrifying. And then the relative rolls their eyes and tells the vicar to just ignore her and goes back to asking him whether he'd like sugar in his tea, completely oblivious to his gobsmacked face.

A number of people have said that they think Julie has been sexually abused. I disagree with this, but it is a thoroughly legit conclusion to make. My thoughts have been all along that Julie is severely neglected and has been all her life. If stripping naked for the vicar at age twelve gets some kind of response, any kind of response, it means that her existence has been acknowledged for that week. It's a win in her book. When she reached a certain age and began to attract a genuine response to her behaviour, bang! Instant validation! She exists! Someone knows she's alive! And as far Julie's concerned, the losers that latch onto her for sex give her the most attention that she's probably ever got. Ever. And it's perfectly natural that she'd latch onto it.

Not only do her family not give a shit about Julie, they give no shits about anyone they know seeing her covered in blood and bruises and filth. Okay, fine, her grandmother gives her a place to live and does make efforts to interact with her, but if her grandmother is trying so hard to reach her, where was that grandmother when Julie needed her before now? Did her grandmother neglect her own family? Or did her grandmother's own family treat her exactly the same way as they treat Julie?

What the fuck is wrong with these people? If absolutely nothing else, do they not care who sees them treating Julie like she's disposable? Do they worry about their reputation? Do they worry about anyone thinking that they're just as fucked up as Julie to not intervene when it's clear that not only her behaviour is wildly inappropriate, she's in genuine danger for her life?

No, no, and no.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Julie is a nasty little bitch in so many different definitions of the word. But it's clear that she's been severely neglected all her life and that she just has no fucking concept of what's appropriate, how to conceive that others can be hurt by her actions, and that there is such an animal as positive emotional attachment. If she gets murdered on the street I'd be amazed if they'd even bother to collect the body. Julie's never made any reference to drugs in her family (that I can remember anyway) but I'll lay money on nearly all of them being a pack of losers that go through enough alcohol a week to keep an entire Russian platoon in a happy hangover for a year, and that it snows all year round for them.

A lot of people in this thread define Julie as a horrorcow. This is another legit conclusion to make, along with that of her being a victim of sexual abuse, and that I disagree with even though there's a good argument to made that both or either is the case. But for me, she's just sad. She's lived an awful life and she'll die an awful death. And what's saddest of all is that she's too cognitively impaired to ever understand either of these things.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to find someone that does deserve their nasty little life because I really need some serious schadenfreude right now.
Click to expand...

(:_(

I do really agree with this. I know I've made fun of Julie a couple times in this thread, and her behavior really is unacceptable, but I do seriously care about the kid. I really hope she eventually gets the help she needs, as unlikely as that is. A lot of people have trouble with self esteem and go looking to other people for validation. If she really wants to go anywhere in her life, she needs to clean up, start taking care of herself, and finding happiness in herself instead of other people. And some therapy, because she really needs some medical attention.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom