🪦 Deceased Julie Terryberry - Canadian Autist Living in a Shed II

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did she meet ugly bra mike on FetLife? A quick scan through the entire thread did not yield the answer but admittedly I could have missed it.
 
Would dropping the douche and his ugly bra...

Did she meet ugly bra mike on FetLife?
I'm pretty sure she did and, since FetLife requires its users to be 18, Julay likes to use it as proof that Mikey didn't pick her up when she was underage. (Of course, as a couple of of folks pointed out, it's not like you can't lie about your age to access the site.)

And can you *please* stop talking shit on my avatar and her haute couture?!? :lol:
 
ODSP is extremely hard to get on, and takes about 5 years of advocacy by a lawyer, or someone willing to fight Ontario Health.
Their default ruling on applications regarding invisible disabilities (ie. mental health, autism, etc) is to deny them, then the patient can appeal the decision.
Isn't she already on ODSP though? Meaning she had to do all that crazy shit. What's she applying to now is there like another disability type thing that's a national thing rather than provincial?
 
Sweet Jesus.
Screenshot_2016-04-19-22-29-02-1.png
Screenshot_2016-04-19-22-29-06.png

NSFW :surprised:
000530df-ef05-67fb-5182-595f9fdddd14_958.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
while mike is massively creepy and abusive on his own, the idea that julie is being raped by this guy would not hold water in a criminal complaint. julie would say she consented to every single thing, and probably genuinely feels like she did/does. it should be fairly obvious from the onset of this thread that this girl isn't interested in "safe bdsm" as fetish advocate people always talk about.

Apparently, under Ontario law, there are some things that you cannot consent to. You could have consent on video and/or in-writing and still get hit with rape charges. Bear in mind, I'm not a lawyer, so take that with a grain of salt.
 
Isn't she already on ODSP though? Meaning she had to do all that crazy shit. What's she applying to now is there like another disability type thing that's a national thing rather than provincial?
I don't think she is. I think Mike is. In the OKC chat with her doomed date, she said she gets $200 a month, but it's contingent on her being with Mike. It sounds like Mike is paying her to be his girlfriend.
 
Isn't she already on ODSP though? Meaning she had to do all that crazy shit. What's she applying to now is there like another disability type thing that's a national thing rather than provincial?

I'm not sure how it works since she's just recently become an adult. I think ODSP is sent to the legal guardian while the patient is below age of majority, but don't know whether it makes it easier to apply for adult benefits or not. I do know that if she's planning on moving in with someone else on any form of social assistance, they have to update their file.
Because Mike's also on ODSP (I'm assuming he's not just on EI), it can cause a whole shitload of logistical stuff. I think what happens is they would both get a lower amount than if they were living alone.
Co-habitation, like I said, is really tricky when it comes to benefits.

Apparently, under Ontario law, there are some things that you cannot consent to. You could have consent on video and/or in-writing and still get hit with rape charges. Bear in mind, I'm not a lawyer, so take that with a grain of salt.

There would have to be irrefutable proof.
Remember, a newscaster here just got away with three counts of rape because of technicalities. Specifically overcoming by force (choking).
 
Remember, a newscaster here just got away with three counts of rape because of technicalities. Specifically overcoming by force (choking).

If you mean Jian Ghomeshi, the judge was pretty clear he flat out didn't believe the accuser and all but called her a liar. Whether he was right about that or not, it is hardly a technicality.
 
Remember, a newscaster here just got away with three counts of rape because of technicalities. Specifically overcoming by force (choking).

Ghomesi is how I found out about that law, but again, not a lawyer, all I know is that it is apparently a thing here.
 
Is he gonna kick her ass? Or does he get off on watching her date other dudes? It's really hard to tell.

I kind of hope this other (seemingly sane) dude gets out while he can or reforms her. It's already proven she will do anything for dick. Maybe this new guy will use that to get her out of her grandma's and working at McDonalds or something.

Edit: goddamn that is a loose vagina. I thought the whole "hotdog down a hallway" thing was a myth but my god, she's trying so hard to make it reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom