💊 Manosphere Jordan Peterson - Internet Daddy Simulator, Post-modern Anti-postmodernist, Canadian Psychology Professor, Depressed, Got Hooked on Benzos

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Considered HARMful said:
This is grasping at the straws - a mostly-informal conversation is not a scientific discourse where one needs to have a handy reference to peer-reviewed papers to make a point in the discussion.
Click to expand...
The video is literally called 'The sad truth I've learned about covid policy'. There is a difference between the truth and opinion of some JP's friend, most likely imaginery.
 
marfusha said:
The video is literally called 'The sad truth I've learned about covid policy'. There is a difference between the truth and opinion of some JP's friend, most likely imaginery.
Click to expand...
The title of the podcast (which might've not even be set up by JBP himself, as it is on Rubin's channel) has nothing to do with what I've written, that is: that was not a formal debate or attempt to prove anything. Podcasts are mostly entertainment with some information sprinkled here and there and if anyone wants to use them to prove something, there should be copius receipts provided. You used the words "scientific basis", not me. Even if the phrase "no scientific basis" came up in the podcast (it might've, I don't remember), that does not change a thing.

I mean: I see where you're coming from and you may be 100% right that the conversation that JBP was recalling resides in the territory of Things That Didn't Happen. Still, this is a rather petty and disingenuous thing to grasp at, especially since the premise he presented is at least plausible, if not likely (in my opinion).
 
Considered HARMful said:
The title of the podcast (which might've not even be set up by JBP himself, as it is on Rubin's channel) has nothing to do with what I've written, that is: that was not a formal debate or attempt to prove anything. Podcasts are mostly entertainment with some information sprinkled here and there and if anyone wants to use them to prove something, there should be copius receipts provided. You used the words "scientific basis", not me. Even if the phrase "no scientific basis" came up in the podcast (it might've, I don't remember), that does not change a thing.

I mean: I see where you're coming from and you may be 100% right that the conversation that JBP was recalling resides in the territory of Things That Didn't Happen. Still, this is a rather petty and disingenuous thing to grasp at, especially since the premise he presented is at least plausible, if not likely (in my opinion).
Click to expand...
Thanks for explaining what a podcast is, you're very smart, your iq must be in excess of 150
 
Mikhaila has been boring and she scraped her tiktok of her more personal and candid videos, now she mostly shills her podcast and her diet plan. Her dad has been somewhat more interesting. A few pages ago in this thread I believe a video was linked by a channel called Carefree Wandering about the way Jordan Peterson is somewhat of a prophet of American civil religion not unlike the woke but in the opposite denomination complete with his absolute truths and moral righteousness. The person is a German philosophy professor and the criticism is not particularly harsh or so I thought. But it compelled Peterson to write this mess:

1636767671795.png

1636767733407.png

Idk, it seemed like a massive overreaction and half of it isn't even pertinent to the critique or coherent with the tone of the discussion.
 
Yeah, I'm pretty sure he's brain-damaged after reading some of these post-coma tweets. He wasn't the smartest or most composed person before the whole benzo ordeal, but since then he hasn't done much besides dress up whatever banal thoughts come to him with a thesaurus and tweeting
 
Last edited:
Jordan is acting so gangsta on twitter when in reality he's a frail old man that could be taken down by a single slap. I bet he's never been in a psychical fight.
 
Peterson's latest appearance on Question Time is one of the worst ones I've ever seen of him. As well as appearing agitated, he spends most of his energy muddying the waters of each topic under discussion with the singular platitude that "it's complicated", only to then spend the rest of his airtime acting as an apologist for corruption and incompetence on the part of our politicians (whom he can apparently only meagerly defend). If I were more conspiratorially minded, I'd be inclined to say that he's controlled opposition.
 
Last edited:
Hellbound Hellhound said:
Peterson's latest appearance on Question Time is one of the worst ones I've ever seem of him. As well as appearing agitated, he spends most of his energy muddying the waters of each topic under discussion with the singular platitude that "it's complicated", only to then spend the rest of his airtime acting as an apologist for corruption and incompetence on the part of our politicians (whom he can apparently only meagerly defend). If I were more conspiratorially minded, I'd be inclined to say that he's controlled opposition.
Click to expand...
his brain is mush it is like he is the shadow of a former JP or a robot trying to pretend to be him
 
Hellbound Hellhound said:
Peterson's latest appearance on Question Time is one of the worst ones I've ever seem of him. As well as appearing agitated, he spends most of his energy muddying the waters of each topic under discussion with the singular platitude that "it's complicated", only to then spend the rest of his airtime acting as an apologist for corruption and incompetence on the part of our politicians (whom he can apparently only meagerly defend). If I were more conspiratorially minded, I'd be inclined to say that he's controlled opposition.
Click to expand...
The Canadian Question Time news show? Where can I watch it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom