Jonathan Yaniv the Pedophile - Pedophilia-related updates and evidence.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Satchels_of_Gold said:
This nigga is trying to single-handedly bring back NAMBLA style pedo pride with his 'little girl topless swim parties'. The actual fuck is taking them so long to arrest him? Please don't tell me the actual victim of his PM's has to "press charges" or I'll puke. There's evidence in audio & multiple writings over many years that he's perving on underage girls. It speaks for itself.

IDK what Canada's pedophilia/sex offense laws are like, but if this guy is a reflection of "the norm" up there...yikes. The only other high-profile Canadian case that's coming to mind is the Ken & Barbie murders in which the murderous, raping bitch who killed her own baby sister so her husband could rape her is walking free after a short sentence & now has her own kids. (Karla Homolka & Paul Bernardo IIRC). As much as I hate America's justice system, we don't really play that here which is good. Yaniv would at least be detained & questioned by now.
Click to expand...

Some thoughts.
  • NAMBLA never really went away. BAMN (think "Antifa, only even more insane") has direct ties to them, and BAMN has ties to a shitload of stuff. For example, those caravans coming up from South America? BAMN had a hand in them. NAMBLA has direct ties to Trotskyist infiltration cells in the US; they are quite literally a sleeper plot to destabilize the west.
  • And speaking of Marxists -- Ayadin Paladin covered why Lefties keep turning out to be pro-pedophilia in a two video series. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iOyOGsWrOM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJEETweYMyI. TL;DR: People that inspired Marx, or people that directly followed Marx, held the theory that the evils of capitalism are what keep us, as a society, from just walking around naked in a constant, 24x7 orgy, having sex with whomever we want, whenever we want. Including kids. That glorious communist utopia? A lot more child fuckin' than advertised.
  • Technically speaking, being topless in Canada is legal for women, explicitly so in Ontario and Toronto. I'm 99% sure this would also apply to girls. SJWs and Nudists in Canada call it being "topfree," however.
    • Opinions on this vary a lot -- some radical feminist sects alongside some nudist groups make a strong argument that breasts are only considered lewd because men enjoy them, and when you take that out of the consideration there's no real reason to force women to wear shirts. I imagine this is probably the lingering leftist social conditioning in me speaking, but I almost agree with the sentiment -- although I imagine that would change if "topfree" women started walking around my town, and I'm pretty sure I'd call the cops on an underage topless swim party.
  • While Jonny Y isn't "the norm," he's preying on the left's inability to police their own ranks. No one on the left wants to be the first to call out Jonny, because the second they admit that Jonny has crossed the line, they have to admit there's a line to be crossed, and the right will start demanding they define said line. (This is one of the salient points that Dr. Jordan Peterson keeps bringing up, and it's one of the many reasons the extreme left want him fucking dead.)
    • The left is absolutely desperate to avoid having to do so because the longer they keep from doing so, the further and further out said line will be when it happens. Just watch. The left will do whatever it takes to NOT talk about Jonny Y, or to pretend he's a conservative, or a troll, or something else.
    • You can feel this vibe in Ogre's blog post about Jonny -- she flat out states that she absolutely dreads having to talk about him and call him out. She obviously feels that him claiming to be trans should make him exempt from criticism.
  • America has the same exact problems. Desmond is Amazing is very obviously the victim of child abuse. They have done nothing and will do nothing about it, until he's dead, because he's a poster-boy for the extreme left and the LGBTP lobby. Sorry Des, you're going to have to be sacrificed for progress.
And here's the most controversial thought. I'm not exactly certain Jonny Y has ... broken any laws? At least not with the swim party thing.

Consider: If it's not illegal for women (and girls) to go topless in Canada, then it's certainly not illegal to suggest a topless swim party. It's just creepy as fuck, but that might be because it's Jonny. If it was some actually female SJW suggesting it, or a nudist club in Canada suggesting a youth event (which happen -- the AANR even has special discounted memberships and outreach programs for young adult nudists, and many nudist clubs / nudist colonies allow parents to bring their kids for free) ... I'm not sure outside of some "wow, that's nuts" thought it would have even registered. Hell, didn't Jonny steal the idea from some woman and and is trying to "revive" it?

Him sending porn to minors, I'm not sure what Canada's laws are on that. And it would have to actually be porn, if it's just bikini pictures or something, that's... well, it's creepy as fuck, like everything Jonny does. But like everything Jonny does, it also seems to be just up to the very edge of what he can get away with. Could he have miscalculated, possibly due to thinking those chats would never get out and the Human Rights Tribunal would help him to keep people from talking about him forever? Maybe.

Of course, if he really has child porn, he won't even live long enough in prison to make his first appeal.
 
Last edited:
HTTP Error 404 said:
I'm not exactly certain Jonny Y has ... broken any laws?
Click to expand...

Canadian Laws on confirmed and documented actions: (Assumptions of Distributing and Owning Child Pornography not included until confirmed)
Source: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Criminal_Law/Offences/Solicitation
(For additional crimes, please scroll to the bottom and go through the list of sexual offenses.)

1. Luring a child
172.1 (1) Every person commits an offence who, by means of a computer system within the meaning of subsection 342.1(2), communicates with

(a) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of eighteen years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under subsection 153(1), section 155 or 163.1, subsection 212(1) or (4) or section 271, 272 or 273 with respect to that person; (b) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 16 years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under section 151 or 152, subsection 160(3) or 173(2) or section 280 with respect to that person; or (c) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 14 years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under section 281 with respect to that person.
(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1)
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of 90 days

2. Accessing child pornography
(4.1) Every person who accesses any child pornography is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of 90 days.

3.Making sexually explicit material available to child
171.1 (1) Every person commits an offence who transmits, makes available, distributes or sells sexually explicit material to

(a) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 18 years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under subsection 153(1), section 155, 163.1, 170 or 171 or subsection 212(1), (2), (2.1) or (4) with respect to that person; (b) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 16 years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under section 151 or 152, subsection 160(3) or 173(2) or section 271, 272, 273 or 280 with respect to that person; or (c) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 14 years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under section 281 with respect to that person.
Punishment
(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1)

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of 90 days; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than six months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of 30 days.
Presumption
(3) Evidence that the person referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) was represented to the accused as being under the age of 18, 16 or 14 years, as the case may be, is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, proof that the accused believed that the person was under that age.

Definition of “sexually explicit material”
(5) In subsection (1), “sexually explicit material” means material that is not child pornography, as defined in subsection 163.1(1), and that is

(a) a photographic, film, video or other visual representation, whether or not it was made by electronic or mechanical means, (i) that shows a person who is engaged in or is depicted as engaged in explicit sexual activity, or (ii) the dominant characteristic of which is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of a person’s genital organs or anal region or, if the person is female, her breasts; (b) written material whose dominant characteristic is the description, for a sexual purpose, of explicit sexual activity with a person; or (c) an audio recording whose dominant characteristic is the description, presentation or representation, for a sexual purpose, of explicit sexual activity with a person.

4. Agreement or arrangement — sexual offence against child
172.2 (1) Every person commits an offence who, by a means of telecommunication, agrees with a person, or makes an arrangement with a person, to commit an offence

(a) under subsection 153(1), section 155, 163.1, 170 or 171 or subsection 212(1), (2), (2.1) or (4) with respect to another person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 18 years; (b) under section 151 or 152, subsection 160(3) or 173(2) or section 271, 272, 273 or 280 with respect to another person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 16 years; or (c) under section 281 with respect to another person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of 14 years.

(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1)

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of 90 days.

(3) Evidence that the person referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) was represented to the accused as being under the age of 18, 16 or 14 years, as the case may be, is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, proof that the accused believed that the person was under that age.
(4) It is not a defence to a charge under paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) that the accused believed that the person referred to in that paragraph was at least 18, 16 or 14 years of age, as the case may be, unless the accused took reasonable steps to ascertain the age of the person.
(5) It is not a defence to a charge under paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c)

(a) that the person with whom the accused agreed or made an arrangement was a peace officer or a person acting under the direction
of a peace officer; or

(b) that, if the person with whom the accused agreed or made an arrangement was a peace officer or a person acting under the direction of a peace officer, the person referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) did not exist.

Social laws broken:
1. Don't be a dick and brag about it
2. Don't be a creep.
3. Don't hide behind protections to get away with your actions.

Humanity:
1. Calling yourself a woman when you are obviously a man.
2. Dressing like a woman when you are obviously a man.
3. Continuing to exist in society and saying that society should revolve around this.
 
HTTP Error 404 said:
Of course, if he really has child porn, he won't even live long enough in prison to make his first appeal.
Click to expand...

I'd imagine he's be segregated with like-minded perverts so he'd be pretty well safe and no doubt lauded. His worry would be if he were to be into the general populace where his notoriety would probably catch up with him.

Not to worry though, Bubba would ease him into prison life I'm sure. Bubba likes fresh meat.
 
pr3nt177 said:
I'd imagine he's be segregated with like-minded perverts so he'd be pretty well safe and no doubt lauded. His worry would be if he were to be into the general populace where his notoriety would probably catch up with him.

Not to worry though, Bubba would ease him into prison life I'm sure. Bubba likes fresh meat.
Click to expand...
He'd be in a woman's prison. This is Canada we're talking about. The same country that allowed Clifford Olson, a sadistic child serial killer and rapist, to send graphic, disturbing letters to his victims' parents several times before the prison managed to stop him.

Same country that allowed Karla Holmolka a sweetheart deal and a new name so she now has daughters around the age of the sister she helped rape and murder (not to mention access to their friends and schoolmates).

Crazy Greyhound Bus Guy that decapitated a man in public is now roaming the streets after a brief stint instead of being in a Maximum Security mental facility for life.

My bets are if anything happens with Yaniv it'll be 3-4 and out in 2 with parole if he manages not to molest a female inmate.

tl;dr: Canada fucking sucks when it comes to dealing with violent offenders and/or perverts.
 
Skitty Tittles said:
He'd be in a woman's prison. This is Canada we're talking about. The same country that allowed Clifford Olson, a sadistic child serial killer and rapist, to send graphic, disturbing letters to his victims' parents several times before the prison managed to stop him.

Same country that allowed Karla Holmolka a sweetheart deal and a new name so she now has daughters around the age of the sister she helped rape and murder (not to mention access to their friends and schoolmates).

Crazy Greyhound Bus Guy that decapitated a man in public is now roaming the streets after a brief stint instead of being in a Maximum Security mental facility for life.

My bets are if anything happens with Yaniv it'll be 3-4 and out in 2 with parole if he manages not to molest a female inmate.

tl;dr: Canada fucking sucks when it comes to dealing with violent offenders and/or perverts.
Click to expand...

Suddenly I'm looking forward to the inevitable hard times that will turn Society into an eugenic system once more.
 
Skitty Tittles said:
He'd be in a woman's prison. This is Canada we're talking about. The same country that allowed Clifford Olson, a sadistic child serial killer and rapist, to send graphic, disturbing letters to his victims' parents several times before the prison managed to stop him.

Same country that allowed Karla Holmolka a sweetheart deal and a new name so she now has daughters around the age of the sister she helped rape and murder (not to mention access to their friends and schoolmates).

Crazy Greyhound Bus Guy that decapitated a man in public is now roaming the streets after a brief stint instead of being in a Maximum Security mental facility for life.

My bets are if anything happens with Yaniv it'll be 3-4 and out in 2 with parole if he manages not to molest a female inmate.

tl;dr: Canada fucking sucks when it comes to dealing with violent offenders and/or perverts.
Click to expand...
As stated in another thread though, do you think those women, a number of them brown, natural women, and mothers will take kindly to mr.immigrant hating child grooming sexual deviant? I bet some no nonsense man hating alpha dyke breaks his funny bucket, if not that some mother who could just imagine finding out her little daughter got feminine hygiene advice and aid from him on the ferry.

I think he would do worse in a woman's prison than he would in a male prison. He clearly isn't in good enough shape to fight off at least some of the women in prison, and im sure some of those women won't want to look at his jabba the hut face with his shit eating pedo grin.
 
Skitty Tittles said:
He'd be in a woman's prison. This is Canada we're talking about. The same country that allowed Clifford Olson, a sadistic child serial killer and rapist, to send graphic, disturbing letters to his victims' parents several times before the prison managed to stop him.

Same country that allowed Karla Holmolka a sweetheart deal and a new name so she now has daughters around the age of the sister she helped rape and murder (not to mention access to their friends and schoolmates).

Crazy Greyhound Bus Guy that decapitated a man in public is now roaming the streets after a brief stint instead of being in a Maximum Security mental facility for life.

My bets are if anything happens with Yaniv it'll be 3-4 and out in 2 with parole if he manages not to molest a female inmate.

tl;dr: Canada fucking sucks when it comes to dealing with violent offenders and/or perverts.
Click to expand...
Fair point, whether female or male prison there's bound to be someone who'll take exception to jonny's behaviour. I wouldn't underestimate the hatred that many female prisoners have for sex offenders.

There's bound to be at least a Bubba big, butch lesbian who takes a shine to jonny. He's not exactly fit, fighting material.
 
Skitty Tittles said:
if he manages not to molest a female inmate.
Click to expand...

Not a chance of that happening. The gals he'd be dealing with would by and large be experienced in dealing with pimps, cops, drug dealers, johns, gang members and other assorted toughs, and surviving. Fatboy Jon would be eaten up alive in their world.
 
Last edited:
Slightly OT: Here's someone who sounds similar to jonny when it comes to his trans rights:

“She seemed like somebody who was very much going to plough her own furrow regardless of the community advice, and she was going to demand her rights. She insisted people referred to her in her acquired gender without trying terribly hard to present as a woman.

“She would report people for a hate crime if they stumbled over which name to use for her – it was not a way to get yourself absorbed into the community. She was a person who would not compromise.”

"Frances Crook, the chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said grave mistakes were made in the White case and the safety of vulnerable women should be paramount. " “In my view, any man who has committed a serious sexual or violent offence against women, who then wants to transfer but has not gone through the whole process, still has a penis and still has male hormones, should not be put into a women’s prison. There may be a case for having separate provision; that is a debate to be had.” " https://www.theguardian.com/society...ng-offender-attacked-again-transgender-prison

Archive: http://archive.fo/gz2q1

I couldn't agree more Frances Crook.
 
Last edited:
Abortions4All said:
In a way, it's comforting to realize that the fact that these things have happened to so many girls doesn't actually mean there's a gigantic population of online groomer pedos, percentage-wise. Just a smaller number of mass-scale serial predators.
Click to expand...
Definitely. That's one angle where r/gc takes the "all men are shit" shtick too far, IMO. There are creepy dogshit men, and they have disproportionate influence when it comes to ruining womens' lives, but they're a tiny minority and they do best when they dodge attention.

cattle rancher said:
I think he would do worse in a woman's prison than he would in a male prison. He clearly isn't in good enough shape to fight off at least some of the women in prison, and im sure some of those women won't want to look at his jabba the hut face with his shit eating pedo grin.
Click to expand...
I think you're really underestimating female socialization. Most ladies in jail are not there for violent crimes and cannot take a 6' dude with 300lbs of inertia in a fight. It's a comforting fantasy but I have a real hard time believing it. Would he be friendless? Sure. No extras from the canteen? Sure. But those women mostly have kids and drug habits to get back to, they're not going to risk years of their free time just to kick some idiot in the nuts. They couldn't take out Karen White and he was actually raping them.
 
Skitty Tittles said:
He'd be in a woman's prison. This is Canada we're talking about. The same country that allowed Clifford Olson, a sadistic child serial killer and rapist, to send graphic, disturbing letters to his victims' parents several times before the prison managed to stop him.

Same country that allowed Karla Holmolka a sweetheart deal and a new name so she now has daughters around the age of the sister she helped rape and murder (not to mention access to their friends and schoolmates).

Crazy Greyhound Bus Guy that decapitated a man in public is now roaming the streets after a brief stint instead of being in a Maximum Security mental facility for life.

My bets are if anything happens with Yaniv it'll be 3-4 and out in 2 with parole if he manages not to molest a female inmate.

tl;dr: Canada fucking sucks when it comes to dealing with violent offenders and/or perverts.
Click to expand...
I'm going to be sick, fucking hell i just keep being more and more ashamed i am Canadian
 
HTTP Error 404 said:
  • Technically speaking, being topless in Canada is legal for women, explicitly so in Ontario and Toronto. I'm 99% sure this would also apply to girls. SJWs and Nudists in Canada call it being "topfree," however.
    • Opinions on this vary a lot -- some radical feminist sects alongside some nudist groups make a strong argument that breasts are only considered lewd because men enjoy them, and when you take that out of the consideration there's no real reason to force women to wear shirts. I imagine this is probably the lingering leftist social conditioning in me speaking, but I almost agree with the sentiment -- although I imagine that would change if "topfree" women started walking around my town, and I'm pretty sure I'd call the cops on an underage topless swim party.
Click to expand...

The legality of women going topless and the social acceptability of it are two entirely unrelated things, no matter what the dedicated leftists may tell you. Here's the best example I can think of. In New York State it has been technically legal for women to go topless (for non commercial purposes only!) on any public beach or recreational sunbathing location such as Central Park, since the Ronald Reagan Administration. New York City further expanded this such that wandering the streets topless (so long as it isn't a commercial act) is perfectly legal. Yeah... so how famous is New York for it's Mediterranean style topless beaches, outside of some select stretches of Fire Island? How often does one encounter a bare boobie on the streets of New York that isn't attached to what would charitably be called a local crazy person or some ill thought out political protest? New York Free'd the Boobies. New Yorkers said "yeah sure, you go first!" and "Hell No!" Canukistani's are much the same.
 
HTTP Error 404 said:
SJWs and Nudists in Canada call it being "topfree," however.
Click to expand...

I always got the impression that nudists were like hippies and their nudity never really seems sexual in nature ( from my perception )

Yaniv's interest in nudity definitely comes across as sexual in nature.
 
The legality of women going topless and the social acceptability of it are two entirely unrelated things
Click to expand...

Those of you who are inflamed about Johnny seeing topless 12 year-old girls in a pool are looking in the wrong direction. What Johnny wants is the right to access girls' changing rooms and showers at the pool. That's where he will get to exercise his rights as a brave and stunning transwoman to access female private spaces and get to see adolescent girls in bathrooms.
 
RodgerDodger said:
The legality of women going topless and the social acceptability of it are two entirely unrelated things, no matter what the dedicated leftists may tell you. Here's the best example I can think of. In New York State it has been technically legal for women to go topless (for non commercial purposes only!) on any public beach or recreational sunbathing location such as Central Park, since the Ronald Reagan Administration. New York City further expanded this such that wandering the streets topless (so long as it isn't a commercial act) is perfectly legal. Yeah... so how famous is New York for it's Mediterranean style topless beaches, outside of some select stretches of Fire Island? How often does one encounter a bare boobie on the streets of New York that isn't attached to what would charitably be called a local crazy person or some ill thought out political protest? New York Free'd the Boobies. New Yorkers said "yeah sure, you go first!" and "Hell No!" Canukistani's are much the same.
Click to expand...

Ah, ya. Mild PL but I encountered one such woman, bowling shirt misbuttoned to the waist (this is two buttons), in Rockaway yowling to no one in particular about how people were looking at her saggy flappy tits that she tried to have in full view despite misbuttoning her shirt as it was getting chilly. It's like the gay guy on Baker Beach in SF wearing a patagonia jacket and skier hat in 52 degree temperatures sunning his erect cock while norms walk by.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom