Jonathan vs Amy Hamm (@preta_6) - Jonathan claims Post Millennial reporter sexually assaulted him in a courthouse restroom.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

33.png

11.jpg

22.jpg

44.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    249.1 KB · Views: 295
  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    219 KB · Views: 266
  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    169.9 KB · Views: 305
  • 8.jpg
    8.jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 304
So JY's gonna need a lawyer for this also....
I really doubt he paid for the one he had today (court appointed?) for the weapons
He's also gonna need one for his assault case
& I believe he'll need one when the table peep sue him....
It could be why he's been kinda quit...Burnin the midnight oil studyin his law books so he can pass the bar
 
I’d say that Yaniv could use a doll to demonstrate where the mean lady touched him, but I think he would be so triggered by the doll not being whatever gender it is he identifies as that he wouldn’t be able to. I feel like Yaniv fantasizes about being sexually assaulted by women about as much as he does having a woman come to him asking for advice on tampons. This is like the case where that landwhale in the UK accused 15 men of trying to rape her and they BELIEVED her. Who would want to touch yaniv willingly? With how crazy he is, it’s obvious no one has touched him sexually in a very long time that wasn’t in some way compensated.

View attachment 1104212View attachment 1104214
Not to mention the fact that women are less likely to sexually assault a hideous ape by groping or touch them. I mean, seriously, no one would touch Yaniv except for Sockness. This reminds me of OPL trying to show off the reverse cowgirl, it doesn't translate or make sense because they're not attractive women.
 
Not to mention the fact that women are less likely to sexually assault a hideous ape by groping or touch them. I mean, seriously, no one would touch Yaniv except for Sockness. This reminds me of OPL trying to show off the reverse cowgirl, it doesn't translate or make sense because they're not attractive women.
"Your Honour, nobody wants to touch this guy. I mean, he literally had to try to get the court to force women to touch him, that's how badly people dont want to touch him "

I honestly find his circular thinking amusing. "Touch my nuts or I'll sue". Scene change, "you touched my nuts, I'm going to sue".
 
Not to mention the fact that women are less likely to sexually assault a hideous ape by groping or touch them. I mean, seriously, no one would touch Yaniv except for Sockness. This reminds me of OPL trying to show off the reverse cowgirl, it doesn't translate or make sense because they're not attractive women.
My theory is him and ogre spoon every night discussing what they can do to draw attention to themselves.
 
Useless faggot set out to prove Troon policitics made someone unstoppable to sexually harass and silence anyone who called him out for being the ugly sex-pest in women's clothing he is. Now, he's facing criminal and civil repercussions all while exposing the horror of where making mentally ill a promoted/protected class leads too, I'm loving it. The only thing left to do is kill himself making everything he's ever done truly in vain and pointless.
 
Anyone wanna bet he just sits on it for three weeks?
 
I think Jon should file a counter suit and claim Amy is an alt-right nazi who misgendered him. The Oger had some luck with this approach.
 
I suppose they have to refer to it somehow.

"Unemployable oxygen thief" maybe
OK maybe I can see why I as counsel might refer to Hambeast as "she" but certainly NOT "transgender activist." At best, I might refer to "her" as "someone whom the BCHRT has found makes false claims of 'transphobia' to advance her extortionate and racist schemes." Amy's counsel would be entirely within his rights to refer to the Hambeast that way.*

*OK well maybe Califeces law differs from Canadian law so there is that.....
 
OK maybe I can see why I as counsel might refer to Hambeast as "she" but certainly NOT "transgender activist." At best, I might refer to "her" as "someone whom the BCHRT has found makes false claims of 'transphobia' to advance her extortionate and racist schemes." Amy's counsel would be entirely within his rights to refer to the Hambeast that way.*

*OK well maybe Califeces law differs from Canadian law so there is that.....

Repectfully, it's not about what you would do. There can be good reasons for using their language when you go after them legally. It makes you look reasonable and accomodating. When it comes to law, better to be smart than angry.
 
Back
Top Bottom