Jesus was a felon

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Joined
Jun 2, 2024
IMG_2545.jpeg
Do you really think it’s okay all these heroes were tried through politicized legal warfare? Take a stand for freedom.
 
It would be a stronger point if A; Jesus was found guilty under Roman law, which he wasn't and B, if not almost everyone on that pic was a piece of shit that changed the world for the worse.
 
when was elvis persecuted? and churchill? not even a criminal
 
my understanding is that Mother Teresa wasn't "good" by secular modern standards but I learned about it from penn and teller's Bullshit and don't know if they got things wrong as that show is heavily biased toward's penn's atheist and libertarian views.
I remember watching part of that too but I don't remember exactly why she wasn't nice. Something to do with refusing outside help, maybe? I skimmed wikipedia and critics say she received millions in donations yet her hospital lacked even basic things that hospitals require. Well, she was half Indian, so I can believe she had some shyster ways.
What did Elvis do to be a hero?
He was awesome and a cult of personality. People loved him.
 
Last edited:
my understanding is that Mother Teresa wasn't "good" by secular modern standards but I learned about it from penn and teller's Bullshit and don't know if they got things wrong as that show is heavily biased toward's penn's atheist and libertarian views.
The allegations come from Indians pissed off that she drew attention to how shit India was and Christopher Hitchens basically got cited as a source by a Canadian study that he cited as proof despite it just citing him and never going to Calcutta. That paper then got cited by the Lancet. Ultimately, Hitchens had an axe to grind.

I remember watching part of that too but I don't remember exactly why she wasn't nice. Something to do with refusing outside help, maybe? I skimmed wikipedia and critics say she received millions in donations yet her hospital lacked even basic things that hospitals require. Well, she was half Indian, so I can believe she had some shyster ways.

He was awesome and a cult of personality. People loved him.
The mismanagement was real, but it was literally the gutter of India and there’s more proof that Indian Government officials charged her out the ass for basic shit.

The biggest criticism was that her nurses and nuns weren’t trained as well as they should have been, but it was India during the 50-80’s and by the late 90’s they started getting palliative care. Everything else was pajeet seethe that she let the beggars die in an abandoned temple of Lakshimi.
 
The allegations come from Indians pissed off that she drew attention to how shit India was and Christopher Hitchens basically got cited as a source by a Canadian study that he cited as proof despite it just citing him and never going to Calcutta. That paper then got cited by the Lancet. Ultimately, Hitchens had an axe to grind.
It was exactly what he wanted to hear.
The mismanagement was real, but it was literally the gutter of India and there’s more proof that Indian Government officials charged her out the ass for basic shit.
Now that's not surprising at all. Despite her work directly benefiting and giving comfort to Indian people, they still behaved like greedy, ungrateful cunts.
The biggest criticism was that her nurses and nuns weren’t trained as well as they should have been, but it was India during the 50-80’s
She was a Saint just for caring for the sick in India during that time period. It's a nightmare in that part of the world in 2024, can you imagine how awful it must've been in the 1950s/1960s? They want to criticize yet nobody else was willing to step up and do what she did.
 
Back
Top Bottom