Opinion Jesus’ Transfiguration: What a Queer Story!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Jesus’ Transfiguration: What a Queer Story!​

Today’s Gospel story shines with the light of Jesus’ Transfiguration. But what relevance does this story have for all of us as disciples of Christ, here in the second week of Lent, and for us as LGBTQ+ Catholics and allies, in particular?

The most basic reading of Jesus’ transfiguration says that these texts reveal who Jesus is, what Jesus did, and what he is still doing for us. Rather than a big announcement or demonstration to all of his disciples, Jesus brings three of his apostolic besties, Peter, James, and John, to join him in experiencing his relationship with God. Instead of going alone up the mountain, as he usually does, Jesus invites them to join him in the cloud(s). And, not surprisingly, the disciples are first confused, and then terrified. Poor Peter, as usual, feels the need to say something to fill the silence, and then all three hit the decks until their friend gently nudges them back to awareness and tells them, implausibly, not to be afraid.

This basic reading follows the pattern of a classic LGBTQ+ coming out story: Jesus lets himself be seen, really seen, as the Christ, as God’s Beloved Child, as our Lord and Savior. And, as in a classic coming out story, his friends’ reactions range from awkward attempts to be present, amazement, fear, and – eventually – a greater understanding of who Jesus is. In that sense, this story, with its images of Jesus’ face shining “like the sun” and of his clothing “white as light” completes the trajectory of light imagery going back to Epiphany and to all of the stories in which Jesus gradually is revealed to God’s Beloved Son and “the true light, which enlightens everyone, [that] was coming into the world.” (John 1:6) The Transfiguration is a sneak preview of the reality of the glorified Christ, a lamp shining in the darkness to comfort his disciples, and us, as we wait for the full dawning of his glory (Cf. 2 Peter 1:19).

This important starting point can comfort us in our dark and frightening world. As LGBTQ+ Catholics and allies, we might take special comfort in remembering Jesus as the Holy One who stays close, who meets us where we are with a gentle word, a loving touch, and a call to see him as he truly is, to rise up, and to not be afraid.

A second aspect of this story also has particular relevance for us as LGBTQ+ Catholics and allies: the Transfiguration isn’t just about revealing who Jesus is, but also about who we are. This moment isn’t just about the presence of God in the life of Jesus, but about the potential presence of God in our own humanity.

Our Eastern Christian siblings have often done a better job of preserving St. Athanasius’ (and countless others’) teaching that “God became human so that humans could become God.” This idea of theosis or divinization suggests that what is revealed in the life of Jesus is not simply Jesus’ particular mission and identity, but also the capacity of a human being – and by extension, of all human beings – to be restored and elevated images of God. When we become adopted children of God, we are brought into a relationship with God Jesus’ relationship with God. St. Augustine writes, “If we have been made sons [children] of God, we have also been made gods.”

That’s shocking language, and it’s meant to be, because it’s language that’s trying to point to the new idea of the relation between God and creation that Jesus’ incarnation exemplifies. It’s odd language. Queer language, even.
ADB341E9-341E-4B4C-8274-C2E2DCAA5689.jpeg
Use “queer” here intentionally, drawing upon the scholarship of my friend Andy Buechel, and his book That We Might Become God: The Queerness of Creedal Christianity (from which the quotations from Athanasius and Augustine above are taken). Andy draws upon the meanings of “queer” as strange, as LGBTQ+, and as breaking apart easy identities and seemingly fixed boundaries to unpack the ultimate boundary-breaking of God becoming human – and, by extension, the boundary-breaking of humans becoming divine through their participation in Christ.

From this queer perspective, the story of Christianity is a story of a God who wants to be close to us, breaking through the categories of identity in which we have sought comfort and convenience. What could be more queer, Buechel suggests, than the idea of God become human? Or the idea of humanity and creation as a whole participating so intimately in the life of God?

From this angle, the Transfiguration is not only a story about Jesus revealing something about himself to his friends, but it’s also a story about Jesus revealing something about us, and about who we are called to be. This is why, I think, we hear this story towards the beginning of our Lenten journey – not only to remind us of what Jesus has done for us, but also to remind us of what we are capable of, and what our God is hoping of each of us to become as we are graced into being children of God. If we hold on to that possibility, then this is not only a story about Jesus’ past, but also a story about our–about your–future.

That capacity to see ourselves as capable of holiness, as capable of being the real presence of Christ in the world, is one often denied to LGBTQ+ folks, and yet here we can not only affirm that possibility, but think about how our experience helps us better understand the Incarnation. LGBTQ+ experience opens up the category of queerness in such a way that we can better understand the boundary-transgressing relationship of the divine and the human in Christ, and of our own boundary-transgressing potential as adopted children of God. This is good news for all of us, and not just LGBTQ+ Catholics – God calls everyone to the always more beyond our limits, and God in this Lent is calling us to let go of everything that hinders God’s presence in our hearts and lives.

The transfigured Christ is always already touching us to heal us, to free us from our fear, and, in the fullness of God’s time, to transfigure us in his love. We see in today’s Gospel the deep truth of Jesus’ identity, and the call to listen to him more than to our own fear.
 
Ladies and gentlemen. These are heretics. And the only reason they're doing this is because they're too pussy to take on Islam.
 
Wickedness! He quotes a saint and describes the Lords Glorious Transfiguration, but misses the heart of the Gospel entirely.

The Word did not become flesh and live among us, dying that we might inherit eternal life, because all is right with the world and we are free to do as we feel.

Mark 1:15 ...“The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and believe in the gospel.”​


That "repent" in Jesus' opening words of the Gospel according to Mark means turning away from sin, it means resisting temptation as he did in the desert (for 40 days, hence the length of Lent).
Those claiming to be LGBTQ+ or any other false identity are taking wicked temptation and claiming it is who they are. They are created in the image and likeness of God. That is their true identity and dignity. The heart of the Gospel is mercy for repentant sinners, you can't access that mercy if you refuse to repent.

Ladies and gentlemen. These are heretics. And the only reason they're doing this is because they're too pussy to take on Islam.
They are heretics, or are at least very perverse in what they leave out in their writing. "God in this Lent is calling us to let go of everything that hinders God’s presence in our hearts and lives" should mean that those enslaved to sexual sin or living lives defined by a particular temptation or lifestyle would break those chains by God's grace. But here the author appears to be more concerned with feelings of holiness, and other lesser concerns.
I think they are going after a different audience than Islam. They are both doing the work of the devil as far as I can tell. A house divided...
 
"Beware the false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire."

The Gospel of St. Matthew, 7:15-19.
 
The eucharistic is pretty fucking gay. Why else would you drink another man's bodily fluids?
I'll refer you to the Gospel according to Saint John, Chapter 6, especially from verse 25 to 71.

I would say it's pretty disordered to reject our creators invitation to spend eternity with him free of pain and death, no longer enslaved to sin. I presume you use the word "gay" to mean homosexual or inferior, not happy or merry.
 
What exactly does the story have to do with gay sex? The author didn't explain that part well. He rambles on about "queer language" for some reason as if the Bible was written by Jesus when it was written by an anonymous author decades after the fact and is a translation of a translation of a translation.
 
What exactly does the story have to do with gay sex? The author didn't explain that part well. He rambles on about "queer language" for some reason as if the Bible was written by Jesus when it was written by an anonymous author decades after the fact and is a translation of a translation of a translation.
"The Bible" is a collection of documents of various genres, some of them the codifications of oral traditions, written over the course of centuries by several authors.

Only a few of these documents (Wisdom of Sirach, possibly Matthew) were translations.
 
What exactly does the story have to do with gay sex? The author didn't explain that part well. He rambles on about "queer language" for some reason as if the Bible was written by Jesus when it was written by an anonymous author decades after the fact and is a translation of a translation of a translation.
The author is preaching to the choir, assuming they are on the same page as he when it comes to LGBTQ+ maddness.
Biblical authorship is like much ancient authorship, it's tied up in the histories written about the texts, as much as the earliest fragments and whole copies. We have early names associated with the four Gospels, that agree in places remote from each other, in contrast to seemingly anonymous New Testament scriptures like Hebrews, which is contested to this day.
We have very early fragments of some of the New Testament books and once the worst of the persecution and burnings stopped we have whole New Testaments in what is as far as we know the exact original Greek.
The Old Testament is a much more complex topic, but we have reason to believe the bulk was written in Ancient Hebrew, then translated once into Greek, or into more Modern Hebrew. Modern translations into English etc. are not generally counted since so many people can learn the Greek or Hebrew.
and for us as LGBTQ+ Catholics and allies,
LGBTQ and allies
Catholics
Pick one, and only one.
The ironic tragedy is the Catholics, other Christians, and even non-Christians who call these lost souls to turn from their wicked ways are far greater allies than those enabling and encouraging them to live in ways contrary to their dignity as creatures in God's image.
"The Bible" is a collection of documents of various genres, some of them the codifications of oral traditions, written over the course of centuries by several authors.

Only a few of these documents (Wisdom of Sirach, possibly Matthew) were translations.
Several authors and one. God, if he is the God of the scriptures, has inspired the authors of the scriptures, making God the common author of it all, through the inspired authors writing.
I've also heard that the opening of the Gospel according to Saint Luke, when some Greek and Aramaic experts examine it, reads like a translation from Aramaic, leading some to argue it's probably Luke incorporating an earlier source in Aramaic, or possibly from personal interviews with the Virgin Mary or Aramaic speakers who knew her and passed on an Aramaic oral tradition to Saint Luke.
 
Back
Top Bottom