Disaster Jeffery Epstein has comitted suicide - Matt Groening got him

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1565442580806.png

Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein is dead, law enforcement sources said Saturday.

A gurney carrying a man who looked like Epstein was wheeled out of the Manhattan Correctional Center around 7:30 a.m. The ambulance went to New York Downtown Hospital.
Click to expand...
nypost.com

Jeffrey Epstein dead in apparent suicide

Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein died overnight in an apparent suicide, federal officials said Saturday. Epstein, 66, was found unresponsive in his cell in the Special Housing Unit of Manhattan …
nypost.com nypost.com
 
Click to expand...
ddlloo said:
Oh, I'm also absolutely positive he's read all those info-graphics, and I'm sure you have too. Probably multiple times before bed each night. My entire point is that he makes a long post about Hanks possibly being a pedo, which is FINE, but then appends 3 'Charlie in the Mailroom' tier infographics created, assumedly, by someone at the tailend of their 72 hour meth binge in the midst of that bizarre Wayfair chid trafficing 'scandal'. Making out and understanding all the details in those MSpaint monstrosities is hard enough, but just what the fuck relevance does it have to Clooney?


View attachment 1482034
Click to expand...
yeah the infographic about that actor who accused hanks and spielberg of rape and then mysteriously got suicided, that was fine
...but then, the next picture for some reason shows some federal reserve dude with a "MARK OF THE BEAST!!!" caption pointed at a scar on his head? like what the fuck dude how is this related in any way
might as well jump straight into pizzagate lol
 
It's HK-47 said:
View attachment 1482020

I'm loathe to be the wet blanket but what in the good Goddamn is someone even supposed to disprove in a picture like this when you can't even tell what the fuck they're trying to say?
Click to expand...
it's asserting that a $15,000 sofa was sold shortly after a child of the same name was abducted. they are circling the dates. it is showing it is being sold for $10,000 above the MSRP and is making sensational claims about the surrounding artwork. it is probably someone with an image editing program doing this on their phone.

I didn't follow the wayfair stuff because I don't think powerful people would move illegal shit this way. but I would like to see an archive of the ads if those edited book cases are legitimate.
ddlloo said:
Oh, I'm also absolutely positive he's read all those info-graphics, and I'm sure you have too. Probably multiple times before bed each night. My entire point is that he makes a long post about Hanks possibly being a pedo, which is FINE, but then appends 3 'Charlie in the Mailroom' tier infographics created, assumedly, by someone at the tailend of their 72 hour meth binge in the midst of that bizarre Wayfair chid trafficing 'scandal'. Making out and understanding all the details in those MSpaint monstrosities is hard enough, but just what the fuck relevance does it have to Clooney?


View attachment 1482034
Click to expand...
lol now you have to call me names. I'm super unimpressed with your bravado when you contribute jack shit. when I was interested in this stuff, I read similar dismissals of Epstein's island and they were, in fact, raping kids. these topics are purposefully polluted with disinformation and I'd love to see people debunk shit as you get in flat earth threads, but I guess you guys are too smart for that.
DumbDude42 said:
yeah the infographic about that actor who accused hanks and spielberg of rape and then mysteriously got suicided, that was fine
Click to expand...
why is that fine though? it's literally pizzagate.
 
Last edited:
Kaede Did Nothing Wrong said:
lol now you have to call me names. I'm super unimpressed with your bravado when you contribute jack shit. when I was interested in this stuff, I read similar dismissals of Epstein's island and they were, in fact, raping kids. these topics are purposefully polluted with disinformation and I'd love to see people debunk shit as you get in flat earth threads, but I guess you guys are too smart for that.
Click to expand...

Oh I don't HAVE to call you names, I'm just choosing to do that because you're being a dense fuck.

I'm not trying to debunk anything, I'm not refuting any claims, I'm not dismissing any allegations, I'm not posting misinformation. I'm also not avoiding replying directly to what has been stated, only to misdirecting any criticism as a personal attack on conspiracy theorists.

Again, my issue is the schizoid images about Wayfair thrown on at the end of what was otherwise a relatively straightforward post about George Clooney. Is that genuinely too hard to understand?
 
Kaede Did Nothing Wrong said:
why is that fine though? it's literally pizzagate.
Click to expand...
its fine because it relates to the guy that was just discussed here (tom hanks) and while the accusations may be dubious and questionable it's at least on topic and it doesn't look like outright bullshit or a forgery
the rest of the pictures on the other hand are schizo tier nonsense
 
DumbDude42 said:
its fine because it relates to the guy that was just discussed here (tom hanks) and while the accusations may be dubious and questionable it's at least on topic and it doesn't look like outright bullshit or a forgery
the rest of the pictures on the other hand are schizo tier nonsense
Click to expand...
it's just tom hanks posting a glove on instagram bro. stop reading schizo pizza gate stuff.
ddlloo said:
Oh I don't HAVE to call you names, I'm just choosing to do that because you're being a dense fuck.

I'm not trying to debunk anything, I'm not refuting any claims, I'm not dismissing any allegations, I'm not posting misinformation. I'm also not avoiding replying directly to what has been stated, only to misdirecting any criticism as a personal attack on conspiracy theorists.

Again, my issue is the schizoid images about Wayfair thrown on at the end of what was otherwise a relatively straightforward post about George Clooney. Is that genuinely too hard to understand?
Click to expand...
OP is a thread about a child trafficker implicating the whole government and getting iced in jail. this is destabilizing knowledge to internalize. some people go off the deep end and get super credulous in search of answers. other people act like you and talk shit without contributing shit.
 
DumbDude42 said:
its fine because it relates to the guy that was just discussed here (tom hanks) and while the accusations may be dubious and questionable it's at least on topic and it doesn't look like outright bullshit or a forgery
the rest of the pictures on the other hand are schizo tier nonsense
Click to expand...
>t. beastmark possessor
 
It's HK-47 said:
View attachment 1482020

I'm loathe to be the wet blanket but what in the good Goddamn is someone even supposed to disprove in a picture like this when you can't even tell what the fuck they're trying to say?
Click to expand...
I think it's saying that 10-year old Kumarie was kidnapped and forced to work as customer support for Wayfair. A fate worse than going to Epstein's island.

And that Wayfair is apparently overpriced.
 
Kaede Did Nothing Wrong said:
OP is a thread about a child trafficker implicating the whole government and getting iced in jail. this is destabilizing knowledge to internalize. some people go off the deep end and get super credulous in search of answers. other people act like you and talk shit without contributing shit.
Click to expand...
I'm confused, are you saying the poster has gone off the deep end, or just the person making the info-graphics? Wow, great job trying to white-ant the conspiracy theorists.
 
ddlloo said:
I'm confused
Click to expand...
don't let it stop you from making assumptions about me.

the real humor here imo is that most of you accept one of his infographics at face value while blasting him over the others. the tom hanks one would get your account flagged or suspended on most other websites and redditors would you put on blast the same as that poster got here. and you would respond by doubling down the same way that dude did.
 
Kaede Did Nothing Wrong said:
don't let it stop you from making assumptions about me.

the real humor here imo is that most of you accept one of his infographics at face value while blasting him over the others. the tom hanks one would get your account flagged or suspended on most other websites and redditors would you put on blast the same as that poster got here. and you would respond by doubling down the same way that dude did.
Click to expand...

How is what redditors would do relevant to anything?
 
AnOminous said:
And this makes crackhead Pizzagate shit credible somehow? Because even redditors would also see it as nonsense?
Click to expand...
lol I think you were rushing to get a burn in and your reading comprehension slipped. I'm poking at the posters here who agreed with the one pizzagate infographic while making fun of the other infographics as too far. it is relative and they shouldn't be so sanctimonious or insulting. christ it's not a complicated point.

enjoy your thread dudes 👌
 
Kaede Did Nothing Wrong said:
lol I think you were rushing to get a burn in and your reading comprehension slipped. I'm poking at the posters here who agreed with the one pizzagate infographic while making fun of the other infographics as too far.
Click to expand...

There are pretty clear differences between the first and the others. I don't buy the first either, but it's at least a coherent allegation and cites a source, although I personally think Kappy was probably just a nut. That said, the claim isn't absolute lunacy on its face. It sort of reminds me of Corey Feldman's fairly similar claims. I'm pretty sure Feldman was in a position to know things about what he's talking about, but I also think he's deeply unreliable.
 
ddlloo said:
I'm confused, are you saying the poster has gone off the deep end, or just the person making the info-graphics? Wow, great job trying to white-ant the conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...
Images were found on 4chan.
I said in a post prior I made, that things sounding way too off I will put in spoilers.
I did not make any infographics.
Why did I post them? Because spoiler posting those out of whack images I see as valuable as your fuckshit writing about my post.

If those posts in spoilers are in any way not allowed in this thread, tell me so, so I can change my posts accordingly.
 
Kaede Did Nothing Wrong said:
don't let it stop you from making assumptions about me.

the real humor here imo is that most of you accept one of his infographics at face value while blasting him over the others. the tom hanks one would get your account flagged or suspended on most other websites and redditors would you put on blast the same as that poster got here. and you would respond by doubling down the same way that dude did.
Click to expand...

And there you go making assumptions about me. Turn abouts fair play mm?

I've got no idea how credible the Kappy stuff is. As is said in the post above,Kappy was *probably* just a nut, but he did make specific allegations and the info graphic as a whole concisely links together a few threads and most importantly, as I seemingly have to keep pointing out, was actually relevant to the rest of the post.

Noideawhattopick said:
Images were found on 4chan.
I said in a post prior I made, that things sounding way too off I will put in spoilers.
I did not make any infographics.
Why did I post them? Because spoiler posting those out of whack images I see as valuable as your fuckshit writing about my post.

If those posts in spoilers are in any way not allowed in this thread, tell me so, so I can change my posts accordingly.
Click to expand...

Mate, it's got nothing to do with the last three infographic images 'not being allowed' and simple criticism of 1: they look like they were made by a crazy person, 2) had absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the post, which 3) helps make you look like a loon too.
 
Last edited:
Holy shit, these fucking government clowns! They fucked up the redacting!

I shit you not, you can copy-paste a redaction selection into a word program and see everything.

one of the classical blunders.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom