Disaster Jeffery Epstein has comitted suicide - Matt Groening got him

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1565442580806.png

Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein is dead, law enforcement sources said Saturday.

A gurney carrying a man who looked like Epstein was wheeled out of the Manhattan Correctional Center around 7:30 a.m. The ambulance went to New York Downtown Hospital.
 
Well there's plenty of irregularities, suggesting a criminal conspiracy. In a RICO case, if the prime party of interest died, would the investigation end? There ought to be some way to take things forward as a criminal case with a corpse at the center of it. Also, challenge for proof of death. If someone can get to the two guards they put on him, they can get to the county medical examiner too.
Knock it off, buddy. You're not going to get me to search "will RICO case end if suspect 'dies'". That's right up there with "inspire magazine backissues" in the Echelon wordlist.

But seriously though, while I'm sure something like that would be legally possible, noone involved has any interest in doing so. At best, these people are embarrassed that this intelligence agent was allowed to get away with doing all this sick, perverted shit to entrap their peers for such a long time. Those who had some association with the guy, like Trump, even if they didn't fuck any ephebes, just want the whole thing to go away so that their names are no longer mentioned in connection to him.

The only people who really want this to go on are Epstein's defence lawyers, but I'd be amazed if they can find a way to sue the federal government for all the money that they anticipated gaining in the course of defending Epstein.

The most prominent figure I'm aware of who's talking about Epstein is Tom Arnold, best known for being Roseanne's husband. This fucking guy is spitting out a mix of stuff that could be interesting if true (claims that Epstein financed a Trump project after 'Russian investors' backed out) and total bullshit- downplaying the surveillance setups, pretending Epstein wasn't Israeli intelligence, etc. Bizarre stuff.
 
The most prominent figure I'm aware of who's talking about Epstein is Tom Arnold, best known for being Roseanne's husband. This fucking guy is spitting out a mix of stuff that could be interesting if true (claims that Epstein financed a Trump project after 'Russian investors' backed out) and total bullshit- downplaying the surveillance setups, pretending Epstein wasn't Israeli intelligence, etc. Bizarre stuff.
https://soundcloud.com/qanonanonymous/episode-55-tom-arnold-pills-the-podcast

This is a man who also insists that the Trump piss tapes are real and that he has them, but when pressed for confirmation on live television freezes up like a six year old who just got caught stealing from his mom's purse. I wouldn't put any weight to anything he says, especially not Trump-related. He's legitimately insane.
 
Well there's plenty of irregularities, suggesting a criminal conspiracy. In a RICO case, if the prime party of interest died, would the investigation end? There ought to be some way to take things forward as a criminal case with a corpse at the center of it. Also, challenge for proof of death. If someone can get to the two guards they put on him, they can get to the county medical examiner too.

Not really. A criminal prosecution is against the defendant. If you continue to investigate and find other perpetrators you can prosecute them. If you have multiple defendants you can prosecute the ones living.
 
This is a man who also insists that the Trump piss tapes are real and that he has them, but when pressed for confirmation on live television freezes up like a six year old who just got caught stealing from his mom's purse. I wouldn't put any weight to anything he says, especially not Trump-related. He's legitimately insane.
He actually talks about this near the end. His take on it is that Trump is not into urolagia as such, which is really the big 'smear' involved in the piss tape thing*, but instead that at some point after he was done fucking some prossies he made a remark about Obama having slept in the bed and had them piss on the bed for a lark.

Seems like a fun joke as long as you aren't too worried about getting your platinum black card charged for replacement of a super-king mattress, I think it would be funny and I think Trump would think it funny. I'd have to see a tape to be sure, but it doesn't seem out of character or anything.

* it strikes me as odd that people would consider a little erotic urination more 'gross' than transexuals or homosexuals, who are widely accepted, but who am I to judge?
 
He actually talks about this near the end. His take on it is that Trump is not into urolagia as such, which is really the big 'smear' involved in the piss tape thing*, but instead that at some point after he was done fucking some prossies he made a remark about Obama having slept in the bed and had them piss on the bed for a lark.

Seems like a fun joke as long as you aren't too worried about getting your platinum black card charged for replacement of a super-king mattress, I think it would be funny and I think Trump would think it funny. I'd have to see a tape to be sure, but it doesn't seem out of character or anything.

* it strikes me as odd that people would consider a little erotic urination more 'gross' than transexuals or homosexuals, who are widely accepted, but who am I to judge?

This has always been the claim, and he autistically insists it's true and that he has evidence, but when backed into a corner admits he doesn't. You should look up videos of it, it's quite fantastic seeing him unravel more and more the longer the interview goes on.
 
This fucking guy is spitting out a mix of stuff that could be interesting if true (claims that Epstein financed a Trump project after 'Russian investors' backed out) and total bullshit- downplaying the surveillance setups, pretending Epstein wasn't Israeli intelligence, etc. Bizarre stuff.
It wouldn't be so bizarre coming from him if you took a second look at that little hat he's wearing. Not to mention that this guy is certifiable.
 
It's literally a rule in every single country that you can't prosecute dead people. What are they going to do, prop up his corpse and try it? Sentence it to life?
There was s Pope that did that to the corpse of another Pope. The sentence was bring thrown in a river IIRC.
 
Last edited:
There was s Pope that did that to the corpse another Pope. The sentence was bring thrown in a river IIRC.
Incidentally the common people are said to have reported riverpope rising from the dead and performing miracles and the mock trial pope was dethroned, imprisoned, and strangled to death.
 
Incidentally the common people are said to have reported riverpope rising from the dead and performing miracles and the mock trial pope was dethroned, imprisoned, and strangled to death.

Since nobody has any idea what kind of hideous "miracles" would be performed by an undead pedophile billionaire, it's best we don't tempt fate.
 
Victoria's Secret boss 'embarrassed' by Jeffrey Epstein ties
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49653273
Mr Wexner employed Mr Epstein as a close adviser, but cut ties in 2007.
They keep repeating the same lie over and over again.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/08/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-nyc-mansion.html?module=inline
Mr. Epstein said in the 1996 interview that the mansion was now his, though the transaction has never appeared in New York City records online. In 2011, he transferred ownership of the property from a trust connected to Mr. Epstein and Mr. Wexner to Maple Inc., a United States Virgin Islands-based entity under Mr. Epstein’s control, according to records.

The transfer document, from Nine East 71st Street Corporation to Maple Inc., did not list a purchase price, indicating that it did not involve any exchange of money.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Wexner said that he “severed ties” with Mr. Epstein about a decade ago. Erika Kellerhals, a lawyer in the Virgin Islands who handled the 2011 transfer for Mr. Epstein, did not return a phone call seeking comment.
He says that he cut ties in 2007 but it just isn't true.
 
FREEFAGS ETERNALLY BTFO!

Daily Beast:
Renowned MIT Scientist Defends Epstein: Victims Were ‘Entirely Willing’
MIT bigwig Richard Stallman dismissed Epstein’s underage victims in emails and defended child pornography on his blog.

While MIT engages in damage control following revelations the university’s Media Lab accepted millions of dollars in funding from Jeffrey Epstein, a renowned computer scientist at the university has fanned the flames by apparently going out of his way to defend the accused sex trafficker—and child pornography in general.

Richard Stallman has been hailed as one of the most influential computer scientists around today and honored with a slew of awards and honorary doctorates, but his eminence in the academic computer science community came into question Friday afternoon when purportedly leaked email excerpts showed him suggesting one of Epstein’s alleged victims was “entirely willing.”

An MIT engineering alumna, Selam Jie Gano, published a blog post calling for Stallman’s removal from the university in light of his comments, along with excerpts from the email in which Stallman appeared to defend both Epstein and Marvin Minsky, a lauded cognitive scientist and founder of MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab who was accused of assaulting Virginia Giuffre. Giuffre has alleged that sex offender and financier Epstein trafficked her to powerful men for sex, including Minsky, who died in 2016. She’s alleged that Epstein and his alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her at Mar-a-Lago when she was 16 years old.

Stallman also wrote in the email exchange that “it is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.”

A deep dive into his writings shows this isn’t the first time Stallman has expressed such questionable views, however. He has written dozens of posts on his personal website in favor of legalizing pedophilia and child pornography for more than 15 years.

“This ‘child pornography’ might be a photo of yourself or your lover that the two of you shared. It might be an image of a sexually mature teenager that any normal adult would find attractive. What’s heinous about having such a photo?” Stallman wrote in 2011 on his personal site, stallman.org, in an argument in favor of Congress limiting laptop searches at the U.S. border.

Stallman currently works as a visiting scientist at MIT, according to the website of the university’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL), and as the president of the Free Software Foundation, which he founded in 1985. Stallman has been seen as a pioneering computer scientist for decades, especially in his creation of and advocacy for new kinds of freely available software. Much of his work underpins modern computer science. He’s worked at MIT on and off since the 1980s, and he spoke at a Microsoft computer science research center just last week. The Free Software Foundation, Microsoft, and MIT did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Stallman’s remarks.

Stallman also did not respond to a request for comment from The Daily Beast.

Stallman commented on the news of Epstein at length on his personal site. In April of this year, the programmer wrote of one story, “I disagree with some of what the article says about Epstein. Epstein is not, apparently, a pedophile, since the people he raped seem to have all been postpuberal.” He preferred to call Epstein a “serial rapist.”

Chafing at the idea of a legal age of consent was a favorite theme of his, per his earlier blog posts. In 2003, he said, “I think that everyone age 14 or above ought to take part in sex, though not indiscriminately. (Some people are ready earlier.)”

Alan Dershowitz, one of the lawyers who helped broker Epstein’s 2008 sweetheart plea deal, has also argued against age of consent laws, calling statutory rape an “outdated concept” in a 1997 op-ed and suggesting on Twitter in July that a 16-year-old should have the “constitutional right” to consensual sex.
 
Several people returned Epstein's donations, including Eliot Spitzer and Bill Richardson. Harvard did not.


img
 
Lemme guess, all interest in the people listed in his little black books, labeled videos, and all other evidence from his house has disappeared. Nothing to see here, no big circle of human trafficking, no reason not to shred everything that was collected.

It's done and over with. There will be no further investigations, I would bet on it.
 
Lemme guess, all interest in the people listed in his little black books, labeled videos, and all other evidence from his house has disappeared. Nothing to see here, no big circle of human trafficking, no reason not to shred everything that was collected.

It's done and over with. There will be no further investigations, I would bet on it.

Anybody that does will be called crazy or end up dead if they come forward too.
 
Haven't checked this thread in weeks and I come back to a big fat nothing.
This is where we post those dumb boomer reaction gifs of "pretends to be shocked"?

1568883023028.png
 
Here’s some articles are worth keeping in mind regarding the ongoing question of who Jeffrey Epstein was coordinating with in his Silicon Valley investments and the people involved with rehabilitation of Epstein’s reputation in recent years. We’ve already seen how one of Epstein’s co-investors in Carbyne911 — the Israeli tech company that makes emergency responder communication technology with what appears to be possible ‘dual use’ intelligence capabilities — is Peter Thiel. Epstein was reportedly the financier behind the 2015 investments in Carbyne by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Thiel’s Founders Fund invested in Carbyne in 2018. But as the following article describes, Epstein was getting introduced to major Silicon Valley financiers like Thiel back in 2015. And it was apparently Silicon Valley investor Reid Hoffman, a member of the ‘PayPal Mafia’, who arranged for an August 2015 dinner where Epstein was a guest along with Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Peter Thiel.
Hoffman has subsequently publicly apologized for inviting Epstein to this dinner, saying in an email, “By agreeing to participate in any fundraising activity where Epstein was present, I helped to repair his reputation and perpetuate injustice. For this, I am deeply regretful.” So Hoffman acknowledges that this dinner helped repair Epstein’s reputation.
Hoffman also acknowledges several interactions with Epstein that he says were for the purpose of fundraising for MIT’s Media Lab, which has been reeling for the revelations of the extensive donations it received from Epstein even after his 2009 child sex trafficking convictions. Hoffman asserts that Epstein’s presence at this dinner was at the request of Joi Ito, then the head of Media Lab, for the purpose of fund-raising for Media Lab. Given that Epstein had already been donating to MIT Media Lab for years, it’s unclear how Epstein’s presence at the dinner would assist in that fundraising effort. Was Epstein supposed to convince Musk, Thiel, and Zuckerberg to donate too?
Recall that Hoffman was reportedly the figure who financed the operation by New Knowledge to run a fake ‘Russian Bot’ network in the 2017 Alabama special Senate race. Also recall how, while Hoffman’s political donations are primarily to Democrats, he’s also expressed some views strongly against the New Deal and government regulations. If he’s a real Democrat, he’s decidedly in the ‘corporate Democrat’ wing of the party.
So Hoffman invited Epstein to an August 2015 dinner with leading Silicon Valley investors like Thiel, Zuckerberg, and Musk, apparently at the request of the head of the MIT Media Lab to help with fundraising despite Epstein having donated to the lab for years. At least that’s the explanation we’re being given for this August 2015 dinner:
Business Insider
LinkedIn founder and Greylock partner Reid Hoffman apologizes for his role in rehabbing Jeffrey Epstein’s public image in 2015
* In an email to Axios on Thursday, LinkedIn founder and Greylock partner Reid Hoffman apologized for his role in helping repair Jeffrey Epstein’s image in 2015.
* Hoffman invited Joi Ito, director of the MIT Media Lab, and Epstein to an August 2015 dinner in Palo Alto with Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Peter Thiel.
* Epstein had financially backed Ito’s Media Lab in addition to personally helping fund Ito’s venture capital fund.
* In the email, Hoffman says his interactions with Epstein “came at the request of Joi Ito, for the purposes of fundraising for the MIT Media Lab.”
Megan Hernbroth
09/13/2019
Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn and one of Silicon Valley’s most high-profile venture capital investors, apologized on Thursday for his role in helping to repair the image of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
In an email to Axios, Hoffman acknowledged several interactions with Epstein, which he said were for the purpose of fundraising for MIT’s renown Media Lab. Hoffman said he had been told that MIT had vetted and approved Epstein’s participation in fundraising, but said his decision to be involved with Epstein was nonetheless a mistake.
By agreeing to participate in any fundraising activity where Epstein was present, I helped to repair his reputation and perpetuate injustice. For this, I am deeply regretful,” Hoffman said in the email.
Epstein’s ties to Silicon Valley and to MIT have come under scrutiny in recent weeks, following the financier’s arrest on sex trafficking charges and his subsequent death by suicide.
Hoffman invited Joi Ito, director of the MIT Media Lab, and Epstein to an August 2015 dinner in Palo Alto with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Palantir founder Peter Thiel.
“My few interactions with Jeffrey Epstein came at the request of Joi Ito, for the purposes of fundraising for the MIT Media Lab. Prior to these interactions, I was told by Joi that Epstein had cleared the MIT vetting process, which was the basis for my participation,” Hoffman wrote.
In addition to backing MIT Media Lab, Epstein also reportedly helped personally finance Ito’s venture capital fund. Greylock, the venture capital firm at which Hoffman is a partner, has denied that Epstein had invested in any funds as a limited partner. There remains the possibility, however, that Epstein invested in Greylock and others through a ”fund of funds,” which does not have to disclose its investors to venture firms it backs.
According to Axios, Hoffman funded the Media Lab’s Disobedience Award for “individuals and groups who engage in responsible, ethical disobedience aimed at challenging norms, rules, or laws that sustain society’s injustices,” which last year went to leaders of the #MeToo movement.
Hoffman’s email was made public only minutes after a letter from MIT president L. Rafael Reif, which also blamed Ito for the university’s oversight of Epstein’s involvement. The letter reported “preliminary” findings of an investigation that was sparked by revelations that Epstein had funded Ito’s Media Lab in addition to his venture capital fund.
...
———-
“LinkedIn founder and Greylock partner Reid Hoffman apologizes for his role in rehabbing Jeffrey Epstein’s public image in 2015” by Megan Hernbroth; Business Insider; 09/13/2019
““By agreeing to participate in any fundraising activity where Epstein was present, I helped to repair his reputation and perpetuate injustice. For this, I am deeply regretful,” Hoffman said in the email.”
So the way Hoffman is spinning this, he was helping to repair Epstein’s reputation by having him present at this august 2015 meeting for “fundraising activities” for MIT’s Media Lab. And Epstein’s involvement in this fundraising was done at the behest of Joi Ito:
...
Hoffman invited Joi Ito, director of the MIT Media Lab, and Epstein to an August 2015 dinner in Palo Alto with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Palantir founder Peter Thiel.
My few interactions with Jeffrey Epstein came at the request of Joi Ito, for the purposes of fundraising for the MIT Media Lab. Prior to these interactions, I was told by Joi that Epstein had cleared the MIT vetting process, which was the basis for my participation,” Hoffman wrote.
...
But, again, Epstein has been donated to the Media Lab for years. So why would he need to attend another fundraising dinner? Was Epstein making future donations contingent on Media Lab somehow rehabbing his reputation? Or was he at this meeting to make a pitch to Musk, Zuckerberg, and Thiel for why they should donate to Media Lab too?
Note that, in addition to Hoffman funding the Media Lab’s Disobedience Award, he also sites on Media Lab’s advisory council. So he’s more than just a donor and fundraiser for Media Lab.
It’s also worth noting that, as the following article describes, someone in Silicon Valley appeared to be trying to assist Epstein in the public rehabilitation of his reputation as late as this summer, after the Miami Herald’s explosive reporting on him in December. So Epstein has some pretty huge mystery fans in Silicon Valley:
Business Insider
Jeffrey Epstein was meeting with Silicon Valley reporters before his arrest, ‘rambling’ about all the people he knew in tech
* Jeffrey Epstein met with at least three reporters, two of them for The New York Times, in the months leading up to his arrest on child-sex-trafficking charges.
* The interviews seemed to touch on Epstein’s relationship with Silicon Valley, suggesting that he was trying to rehabilitate his image and become known as a tech investor.
* Yesterday, The New York Times published a year-old interview that Epstein gave to the columnist James B. Stewart, but it has not published a separate interview that the Times reporter Nellie Bowles conducted at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion before his arrest.
* A reporter for The Information interviewed Epstein in June about “technology investing.” The site’s editor-in-chief said Epstein “rambled about people he knew in the industry” but that she wasn’t publishing the interview because it “wasn’t newsworthy.”
John Cook
Aug. 13, 2019, 2:33 PM
The newly deceased sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein spoke from beyond the grave yesterday, thanks to report from the New York Times columnist James B. Stewart, who spilled his notebook from a year-old “background” interview Epstein had given at his Manhattan mansion.
Business Insider has learned that Stewart isn’t the only reporter that visited Epstein in recent months. The sex offender also granted interviews to another New York Times reporter, Nellie Bowles, and a reporter for tech site The Information in the weeks and months leading up to his most recent arrest on child-sex-trafficking charges in July. Neither The Times nor The Information has yet published the fruits of those interviews, and the editor-in-chief of The Information said she had no plans to do so.
Epstein’s meetings with reporters, one of which took place as recently as June, suggest that the disgraced financier was trying to rehabilitate his image — or at least foster relationships with news outlets — even as federal prosecutors were closing in.
All three interviews seem to have touched on Epstein’s relationship with Silicon Valley. Stewart wrote that he contacted Epstein to confirm a rumor that Epstein was advising Tesla founder Elon Musk, and both The Information and Bowles cover the tech sector. Stewart reached out directly to Epstein, but it’s unclear who brokered the other meetings. The tech focus suggests that someone in Silicon Valley may have been trying to help Epstein connect with reporters.
A journalist for The Information met with Epstein in June to discuss “technology investing,” Jessica Lessin, the site’s editor-in-chief, confirmed to Business Insider. That was just weeks before his July arrest and seven months after the Miami Herald’s brutal investigation laid bare the extent to which Epstein escaped accountability for his crimes against underage victims.
“One of our reporters met with Jeffrey Epstein, in June, to talk about technology investing,” Lessin said in a statement to Business Insider. “This was before his July arrest. She was introduced to him because he was believed to be an investor in venture capital funds, which we could not verify. The discussion wasn’t newsworthy; he rambled about people he knew in the industry. His death has not changed our judgment about the newsworthiness.”
Since Epstein’s arrest in July, his connections to figures in the tech, financial, philanthropic, political, and scientific worlds have become of intense interest to reporters, who have spent thousands of hours attempting to determine whom, precisely, Epstein knew and where, precisely, he invested his money.
Stewart, who believes that Epstein’s death released him from an obligation to consider the interview “on background” and thus anonymous, revealed that Epstein claimed to have ongoing relationships with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the disgraced director Woody Allen, the former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, and the journalist Michael Wolff.
Business Insider has also learned that Stewart’s Times colleague Bowles, who has made a name for herself skewering tech oligarchs and identifying Silicon Valley cultural trends, also recently met with Epstein in his Manhattan townhouse for an interview. It’s unclear if that interview was on or off the record, and it’s unclear precisely when it occurred. Bowles was listed as a contributing reporter on a July Times story featuring architectural and design details about the interior of Epstein’s $56 million townhome, but The Times does not appear to have published any other reporting from Bowles’ conversation with Epstein.
...
The Times and other outlets have covered Epstein’s efforts, in the wake of his 2008 plea deal, to rehabilitate his image as a sex offender by paying freelance writers and publicists to write positive stories about him on sites like HuffPost, National Review, and Forbes. He also leveraged a friendship with Peggy Siegal, a publicist for A‑list celebrities, to introduce him to a social network that included George Stephanopoulos and Katie Couric.
Town & Country reported that Epstein also sought the public-relations advice of the New York publicist R. Couri Hay, though Hay never signed him as a client. Hay’s free advice, the magazine reported, was that Epstein should offer himself up as an exclusive interview to The Times. Hay declined to comment for the record; Siegal did not return a message seeking comment.
———-
“Jeffrey Epstein was meeting with Silicon Valley reporters before his arrest, ‘rambling’ about all the people he knew in tech” by John Cook; Business Insider; 08/13/2019
All three interviews seem to have touched on Epstein’s relationship with Silicon Valley. Stewart wrote that he contacted Epstein to confirm a rumor that Epstein was advising Tesla founder Elon Musk, and both The Information and Bowles cover the tech sector. Stewart reached out directly to Epstein, but it’s unclear who brokered the other meetings. The tech focus suggests that someone in Silicon Valley may have been trying to help Epstein connect with reporters.
Was Hoffman the mystery person who may have been brokering interviews with Epstein? Recall that Peter Thiel became an Epstein co-investor in Carbyne911 last year. Might Thiel have been the mystery broker? We have no idea, and given the number of contacts Epstein has in Silicon Valley it’s not like Hoffman or Thiel are the only suspects. As the following article by Epstein’s biographer, James B. Stewart, describes, Epstein was allegedly involved with helping Elon Musk find a new Tesla chairman (something Musk denies). Beyond that, Epstein told Stewart during an interview last year that he had personally witnessed prominent tech figures taking drugs and arranging for sex. So when we think about the potential blackmail Epstein’s probably had a Silicon Valley figures, the number of possible figures who may have willingly or unwillingly been working to rehabilitate Epstein’s reputation is a pretty long list:
The New York Times
The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People
By James B. Stewart
Aug. 12, 2019
Almost exactly a year ago, on Aug. 16, 2018, I visited Jeffrey Epstein at his cavernous Manhattan mansion.
The overriding impression I took away from our roughly 90-minute conversation was that Mr. Epstein knew an astonishing number of rich, famous and powerful people, and had photos to prove it. He also claimed to know a great deal about these people, some of it potentially damaging or embarrassing, including details about their supposed sexual proclivities and recreational drug use.
So one of my first thoughts on hearing of Mr. Epstein’s suicide was that many prominent men and at least a few women must be breathing sighs of relief that whatever Mr. Epstein knew, he has taken it with him.
During our conversation, Mr. Epstein made no secret of his own scandalous past — he’d pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution from underage girls and was a registered sex offender — and acknowledged to me that he was a pariah in polite society. At the same time, he seemed unapologetic. His very notoriety, he said, was what made so many people willing to confide in him. Everyone, he suggested, has secrets and, he added, compared with his own, they seemed innocuous. People confided in him without feeling awkward or embarrassed, he claimed.
I’d never met Mr. Epstein before. I had contacted him because my colleagues and I had heard a rumor that he was advising Tesla’s embattled chief executive, Elon Musk, who was in trouble after announcing on Twitter that he had lined up the funding to take Tesla private.
The Securities and Exchange Commission began an investigation into Mr. Musk’s remarks, which moved markets but didn’t appear to have much basis in fact. There were calls for Mr. Musk to relinquish his position as Tesla’s chairman and for Tesla to recruit more independent directors. I’d heard that Mr. Epstein was compiling a list of candidates at Mr. Musk’s behest — and that Mr. Epstein had an email from Mr. Musk authorizing the search for a new chairman.
Mr. Musk and Tesla vehemently deny this. “It is incorrect to say that Epstein ever advised Elon on anything,” a spokeswoman for Mr. Musk, Keely Sulprizio, said Monday.

When I contacted Mr. Epstein, he readily agreed to an interview. The caveat was that the conversation would be “on background,” which meant I could use the information as long as I didn’t attribute it directly to him. (I consider that condition to have lapsed with his death.)
He insisted that I meet him at his house, which I’d seen referred to as the largest single-family home in Manhattan. This seems plausible: I initially walked past the building, on East 71st Street, because it looked more like an embassy or museum than a private home. Next to the imposing double doors was a polished brass plaque with the initials “J.E.” and a bell. After I rang, the door was opened by a young woman, her blond hair pulled back in a chignon, who greeted me with what sounded like an Eastern European accent.
I can’t say how old she was, but my guess would be late teens or perhaps 20. Given Mr. Epstein’s past, this struck me as far too close to the line. Why would Mr. Epstein want a reporter’s first impression to be that of a young woman opening his door?
The woman led me up a monumental staircase to a room on the second floor overlooking the Frick museum across the street. It was quiet, the lighting dim, and the air-conditioning was set very low. After a few minutes, Mr. Epstein bounded in, dressed casually in jeans and a polo shirt, shook my hand and said he was a big fan of my work. He had a big smile and warm manner. He was trim and energetic, perhaps from all the yoga he said he was practicing. He was undeniably charismatic.
Before we left the room he took me to a wall covered with framed photographs. He pointed to a full-length shot of a man in traditional Arab dress. “That’s M.B.S.,” he said, referring to Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia. The crown prince had visited him many times, and they spoke often, Mr. Epstein said.
He led me to a large room at the rear of the house. There was an expansive table with about 20 chairs. Mr. Epstein took a seat at the head, and I sat to his left. He had a computer, a small blackboard and a phone to his right. He said he was doing some foreign-currency trading.
Behind him was a table covered with more photographs. I noticed one of Mr. Epstein with former President Bill Clinton, and another of him with the director Woody Allen. Displaying photos of celebrities who had been caught up in sex scandals of their own also struck me as odd.
Mr. Epstein avoided specifics about his work for Tesla. He told me that he had good reason to be cryptic: Once it became public that he was advising the company, he’d have to stop doing so, because he was “radioactive.” He predicted that everyone at Tesla would deny talking to him or being his friend.
He said this was something he’d become used to, even though it didn’t stop people from visiting him, coming to his dinner parties or asking him for money. (That was why, Mr. Epstein told me without any trace of irony, he was considering becoming a minister so that his acquaintances would be confident that their conversations would be kept confidential.)
If he was reticent about Tesla, he was more at ease discussing his interest in young women. He said that criminalizing sex with teenage girls was a cultural aberration and that at times in history it was perfectly acceptable. He pointed out that homosexuality had long been considered a crime and was still punishable by death in some parts of the world.
Mr. Epstein then meandered into a discussion of other prominent names in technology circles. He said people in Silicon Valley had a reputation for being geeky workaholics, but that was far from the truth: They were hedonistic and regular users of recreational drugs. He said he’d witnessed prominent tech figures taking drugs and arranging for sex (Mr. Epstein stressed that he never drank or used drugs of any kind).
I kept trying to steer the conversation back to Tesla, but Mr. Epstein remained evasive. He said he’d spoken to the Saudis about possibly investing in Tesla, but he wouldn’t provide any specifics or names. When I pressed him on the purported email from Mr. Musk, he said the email wasn’t from Mr. Musk himself, but from someone very close to him. He wouldn’t say who that person was. I asked him if that person would talk to me, and he said he’d ask. He later said the person declined; I doubt he asked.

When I later reflected on our interview, I was struck by how little information Mr. Epstein had actually provided. While I can’t say anything he said was an explicit lie, much of what he said was vague or speculative and couldn’t be proved or disproved. He did have at least some ties to Mr. Musk — a widely circulated photo shows Mr. Musk with Ghislaine Maxwell, Mr. Epstein’s confidante and former companion, at the 2014 Vanity Fair Oscars party.
“Ghislaine simply inserted herself behind him in a photo he was posing for without his knowledge,” Ms. Sulprizio, the spokeswoman for Mr. Musk, said.
It seemed clear Mr. Epstein had embellished his role in the Tesla situation to enhance his own importance and gain attention — something that now seems to have been a pattern.
About a week after that interview, Mr. Epstein called and asked if I’d like to have dinner that Saturday with him and Woody Allen. I said I’d be out of town. A few weeks after that, he asked me to join him for dinner with the author Michael Wolff and Donald J. Trump’s former adviser, Steve Bannon. I declined. (I don’t know if these dinners actually happened. Mr. Bannon has said he didn’t attend. Mr. Wolff and a spokeswoman for Mr. Allen didn’t respond to requests for comment on Monday.)
Several months passed. Then early this year Mr. Epstein called to ask if I’d be interested in writing his biography. He sounded almost plaintive. I sensed that what he really wanted was companionship. As his biographer, I’d have no choice but to spend hours listening to his saga. Already leery of any further ties to him, I was relieved I could say that I was already busy with another book.
...
———-
“The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People” by James B. Stewart; The New York Times; 08/12/2019
“Mr. Epstein then meandered into a discussion of other prominent names in technology circles. He said people in Silicon Valley had a reputation for being geeky workaholics, but that was far from the truth: They were hedonistic and regular users of recreational drugs. He said he’d witnessed prominent tech figures taking drugs and arranging for sex (Mr. Epstein stressed that he never drank or used drugs of any kind).”
Having Jeffrey Epstein witness you arranging for sex is probably the kind of situation that will make you highly compliant when it comes to helping his reputation. Or make donations...might that be part of the value Epstein provided for that 2015 dinner party that was ostensibly a fundraising operation for Media Lab? Epstein’s presence could presumably make any former ‘clients’ of his much more likely to open their checkbooks.
It’s also worth noting that Mohammed bin Salman could arguably be considered a prominent Silicon Valley individual given the extensive Saudi investments in Silicon Valley companies:
...
Before we left the room he took me to a wall covered with framed photographs. He pointed to a full-length shot of a man in traditional Arab dress. “That’s M.B.S.,” he said, referring to Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia. The crown prince had visited him many times, and they spoke often, Mr. Epstein said.
...
So when Epstein talks about M.B.S. speaking to him often and visiting him many times, while part of the nature of those visits could obviously include prostitution, it’s also very possible M.B.S. was using Epstein as a kind of Silicon Valley investment front too.
And that’s part of what makes the mystery of the identity of Epstein’s main Silicon Valley benefactor so mysterious: there are just way too many viable suspects.
 
Back
Top Bottom