Culture JDS Megathread - Jussay Smollett files fake hate crime report and doesn't get away with it lol

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
'Empire' star Jussie Smollett attacked in possible hate crime
By Sandra Gonzalez, CNN

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...tertainment/jussie-smollett-attack/index.html

Empire" actor Jussie Smollett was attacked in the early morning hours on Tuesday in what Chicago police are calling a possible hate crime.

Smollett was attacked by two people "yelling out racial and homophobic slurs" and "poured an unknown chemical substance on the victim," police said.

According to police, one of Smollett's alleged attackers also put a rope around his neck. Both fled the scene.

Smollett took himself to Northwestern Hospital and "is in good condition," police told CNN.

Later Tuesday, CNN's Don Lemon spoke to Smollett and a mutual friend who was at the hospital with the actor. Smollett confirmed the incident took place.

He was shaken and angry that an attack like this could happen. Smollett told CNN he fought back at the attackers.

"Given the severity of the allegations, we are taking this investigation very seriously and treating it as a possible hate crime," the police statement said.

Smollett has starred on Fox's "Empire" since 2015. He plays Jamal, a successful singer in the musical Lyon family. Like his character, Smollett identifies as gay.

"We are deeply saddened and outraged to learn that a member of our 'Empire' family, Jussie Smollett, was viciously attacked last night," a representative of 20th Century Fox Television and Fox Entertainment said in a statement to CNN. "We send our love to Jussie, who is resilient and strong, and we will work with law enforcement to bring these perpetrators to justice. The entire studio, network and production stands united in the face of any despicable act of violence and hate -- and especially against one of our own."

A representative for GLAAD told CNN the organization has reached out Smollett to offer assistance and support.

"Jussie is a true champion for LGBTQ people and is beloved by the community and allies around the world," a GLAAD spokesperson said in a statement.

Anyone with information is asked to call Area Central Detectives at 312-747-8382
 
Last edited:
At least smollet did his job and provided us with entertainment.
 
Last edited:
Sort of a legal question:

If you're on trial for like murder, even if you did it, even if everyone knows you did it, your defense is centered around something like "I didn't do it, you can't prove sufficiently that I did, I'm not required to have a burden of proof any level near the court's to prove I didn't do it" Everyone expects that right? Both sides are talking about completely the past too, you aren't presently murdering people in the courtroom.

If you're on trial for The Big Lie like bussy was, do you follow that I didn't do it you can't prove it model by bringing your Big Lie to the present and continuing to insist every bit is true? Reoffending in the courtroom the same crime he's on trial for. Would he have had any other way that could have looked better? How do you say dindu about a Big Lie other than just doubling down on it?
 
Last edited:
The fact there are "more important" things for the justice system and law enforcement to focus on is one of the many reasons why Bussy needed to be prosecuted.

When you intentionally lie to steer an investigation in the wrong direction, harass the prosecution, intimidate jurors, commit perjury, etc. you are held accountable for your actions for costing the state time, resources, and of course money. You make it harder on real victims. You waste time that could've been spent looking in the right direction. You could've contributed to an innocent party going to prison, or a guilty one walking free.

By faking a hate crime and/or assault, he took time away from LEOs that could've been spent investigating the 50th black man shot in Chicago that month or the dead black kid shot by a stray bullet while riding her bike. But who are we kidding? Nobody really cares about the dead black men of Chicago if they weren't killed by a white cop.
 
I'm seeing a bunch of leftist on Twitter seethe that a lower class kid defending himself from a pedo didn't go to jail but a Hollywood actor got convicted of faking a hate crime.

What a world. Communism really is dead. Leftists should just be classified as glowie/corpo dick suckers, lol
 
That is all communism ever was: communists just mad they weren't the ones running the means of production.
 
The Jussie Smollett saga may now be technically over after a Chicago jury found the actor guilty Thursday of five of the six counts he faced, but its impact will be — and has already been — felt for years to come. It doesn’t matter if the actor, who starred on “Empire,” really was beaten up by people yelling “This is MAGA country!” and is wrongly being punished or if he did stage an elaborate hoax, as the jury decided he did by finding him guilty of five counts of disorderly conduct.

Instead, the seemingly never-ending questions over the almost three years regarding the truthfulness of his account means the indisputable victims of hate crimes will now carry an even heavier burden of suspicion.

The only winners found as the dust settles are the members of the right who have declared themselves America’s real victims of hate and discrimination — people who have strategically made the Smollett case their go-to example for how the left operates and how it wrongly makes villains out of Donald Trump supporters.

Meaning Smollett's guilty verdict is their new crowning jewel as our culture wars rage on.

When the actor said in January 2019 that two men wearing masks subjected him to a racist and homophobic attack near his home in Chicago, an overwhelming outcry followed. The actor initially garnered sympathy across the political spectrum, which, during our current era, is uncommon.

Trump denounced the attack as “horrible,” activists took to the streets to march and Smollett's story was used to introduce new anti-lynching legislation on the floor of the U.S. Senate. For many, the reported attack on Smollett was par for the course in an America that was already seeing a rise of violent hate crimes from Charlottesville, Virginia, to Chicago amid Trump's presidency. Thus, Smollett’s story of being attacked was seen as a call to action.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tweeted that “the racist, homophobic attack on @JussieSmollet is an affront to our humanity,” and then-Sen. Kamala Harris labeled it a “modern-day lynching” before the passage of her historic legislation expanding federal penalties for hate crimes. The case was seen by many as evidence that no one was safe under Trumpism — not even celebrities.

But just as quickly as the story broke, it took a turn and then another as evidence produced by the Chicago police swayed supporters to abandon Smollett (who was charged with filing a false police report, then had those charges dropped, then was charged anew) just as fast as they had rushed to support him.

As the tide turned against Smollett, the right was excited that it had a smoking gun illustrating how "fake" the media is and how Democrats only cared about issues that would hurt the then-president.

Donald Trump Jr. launched an all-out social media campaign by taking over the hashtag #JusticeForJussie and perverting it.

When Smollett was first charged, Donald Trump Jr. launched an all-out social media campaign by taking over the hashtag #JusticeForJussie and perverting it by trolling seemingly every high-profile person who had defended Smollett: from Harris to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, of Massachusetts. Even now, #JusticeForJussie is used as a weapon against the left.

Trump followed his son’s lead and called Smollett's case a “disgrace to our nation” and an “embarrassment.” During his impeachment inquiry, Trump used the allegations against Smollett to describe how unfairly he had been and was being treated.

"Then you have the case of this wise guy Jussie Smollett, who beat up ... himself," Trump said in late 2019 to a group of police chiefs in Chicago, Deadline reported then. "And he said MAGA country did it. MAGA country. That’s a hate crime."

"It is a scam. A real big scam. Just like the impeachment of your president is a scam," he said.

Given Trump’s unchecked racism and his White House being hostile LGBTQ people, it’s obvious why the Trump family loved the case against Smollett: a "fake" hate crime reported by a high-profile Black, gay celebrity was the perfect shield in a country where identity is everything. Just like how in the beginning, the story Smollett told was the perfect weapon to attack Trump.

This case has been one I have found myself entrapped in for years. When Smollett reported being attacked, I was serving as editor-in-chief of The Advocate, the world's oldest and longest-running magazine for LGBTQ people. Smollett’s team had called me a few weeks before the alleged attack to pitch me on a cover for late 2020 in advance of a storyline on “Empire” where he’d marry an HIV-positive character.

The planned storyline was too far away for me to plan coverage, but we had created a channel of communication between us to keep the conversation going. So when news broke the morning of Jan. 29, 2019, that Smollett had been attacked in Chicago, a town in which I had spent years reporting on violence and police for The Guardian, we as a magazine were well situated and well sourced to make the alleged attack our biggest story.

We couldn’t help but cover the story of a Black, gay celebrity who said he’d been attacked by Trump supporters. This wasn't just because it was a story involving a famous member of the community we covered, but also because for many of us who had been reporting on anti-LGBTQ crimes for years, we believed his case might help shine a light on the fact that LGBTQ folks — especially trans people — were dying at historic rates in the streets. Smollett claimed to have been attacked in those same streets.

Since journalists began accurately reporting trans homicides in the early 2010s, we have consistently seen a rise in anti-LGBTQ violence, with 2021 being the deadliest year on record, specifically for trans people. Black people in this country, regardless of their sexuality, also find themselves over-represented in FBI data documenting hate crimes in the U.S. each year.

With this guilty verdict, it’s really those people who lost — not just Smollett — with the winners being people who are now more emboldened in demanding even more from victims before receiving justice. Sure, Smollett may have lied — or at least was found guilty of it. But statistically most people who report these cases do not lie and are rarely ever believed.

What is so important for us to do in this moment, as we look to what’s next, is to ensure work is done to stop the epidemic of hate facing folks who look like Smollett. Trump supporters are not being subjected to hate crimes for supporting Trump on any level — full stop.

Trump is an expert in gaslighting America, and if we continue to allow the Smollett case, no matter where one stands on it, to detract attention from everyday people impacted by hate in this country, it would be the greatest gaslight moment of all — and a signal of more to come.

The actor Jussie Smollett has been found guilty of lying to police in 2019 when he claimed he was the victim of a racist, homophobic attack in Chicago, bringing to a close one of the more bizarre high-profile celebrity cases in recent memory.

The Cook County State's Attorney's Office initially dropped all charges against Smollett, best known for his role on Fox’s “Empire." After a special prosecutor's review of the case, a grand jury indicted Smollett on similar charges last year.

Smollett told police in 2019 that he had been assaulted by two masked white men who shouted pro-Trump slogans, poured a bleach-like substance on him and tied a rope around his neck. But two brothers, Abimbola and Olabingo Osundairo, testified that Smollett asked them to stage the attack.

Abimbola Osundairo, who said he was friends with Smollett at the time, accused the actor of orchestrating the incident to draw media attention to actual hate mail he received in 2019. Olabinjo Osundairo told prosecutors that Smollett “had this crazy idea of getting attacked by two Trump supporters so he could post it on social media.”

Smollett held throughout the trial that the incident was not a hoax.

Nonetheless, the strange, seemingly ever-changing details in the case have provided nearly three years’ worth of material for comedians and online commentators. Some of it has been quite funny, in fact.

Even more comical, in my view, was the predictable conservative outrage over Smollett’s allegations. Conservatives took to social media in 2019 to express outrage over the dropped charges. How dare someone make such a heinous claim about followers of their dear leader, they screeched. Violent, masked white guys who shout Trump slogans and use chemical agents to attack victims?

Many on the right shamed those of us who knew such a claim was totally plausible — and then the Jan. 6 insurrection happened.
 
How the fuck was he guilty on the first five but NOT on the sixth charge?
Could certainly use some clarification, but I heard that the sixth charge was for an incident that occurred a long time after the fact while other five charges concern actions in the immediate moment that created the hoax hate crime.
 
>Even if it was a hoax, whitey is still mad and bad, and blacks should feel in danger

I see the media are taking this well.
 
Somebody explain to me how a B-list celebrity with more privilege than the average person gets CAUGHT faking a hate crime, yet Stans STILL blame White people for the result.

Ultimate delusion.
 
Could certainly use some clarification, but I heard that the sixth charge was for an incident that occurred a long time after the fact while other five charges concern actions in the immediate moment that created the hoax hate crime.
My understanding is that it is more a technicality. The sixth charge was one for him pushing the narrative they were masked, which would act to enhance the crime. But by this time the cops already had video footage and knew it was bullshit they were masked.

So possibly the jury just said "they coppers already saw the footage and had evidence the bros were not masked, thus jussy-pussy saying this to a copper at this point made no difference and did not fool the copper and therefore is not worth sentencing him for."
Jussie-pussie probably said a whole lot of other retarded shit too during the interviews. Only thing that matters now is that everyone can now call him "hey felon".
 
Sort of a legal question:

If you're on trial for like murder, even if you did it, even if everyone knows you did it, your defense is centered around something like "I didn't do it, you can't prove sufficiently that I did, I'm not required to have a burden of proof any level near the court's to prove I didn't do it" Everyone expects that right? Both sides are talking about completely the past too, you aren't presently murdering people in the courtroom.

If you're on trial for The Big Lie like bussy was, do you follow that I didn't do it you can't prove it model by bringing your Big Lie to the present and continuing to insist every bit is true? Reoffending in the courtroom the same crime he's on trial for. Would he have had any other way that could have looked better? How do you say dindu about a Big Lie other than just doubling down on it?
Technically yes. But it is not really worth it to go after him for it. He has already been convicted for the crime.
If he and his retarded affermative action lawyers want to continue fuel a blm attack on the judge in his home, then for sure shit will go by the letter but at this time, he has been found guilty and been convicted and no one really cares about the perjury or shit he spewed in court.
 
I'm actually surprised he got convicted. Thought for sure it would be brushed under the rug because lawlessness reigns in Chicago.
It was brushed under the rug. Then Jussie went on a screaming victory lap that dragged out a hefty amount of the bullshit involved in doing so into the light where it screamed and tried to slither back into cover but did so too slowly. Which is part of the reason Smollett's lawyers couldn't call KIm Foxx to testify, there was no way the legal lot in Chicago wanted her on the stand sinking them.
Sentencing is January 27th, because the court system is designed to abolish fun.
I dunno, if anyone in the family hates Jussie it's going to give them some mileage over Christmas.
"Think you'll be out for next year?"
(I know he's getting a slap on the wrist, it's still funny)
Somebody explain to me how a B-list celebrity with more privilege than the average person gets CAUGHT faking a hate crime, yet Stans STILL blame White people for the result.

Ultimate delusion.
Same reason BLM demanded he be believed against two other black men. Because he's from the sort of class that's not meant to be held to account for their actions. To use a metaphor Jussie would appreciate people like him are main cast, everyone else is extras. They're there to help telling his story, not real people in their own regards.

Amusing outcome, I look forwards to seeing how much Chicago manages to flay from his ass in damages.
 
Last edited:
1639125222315.png


"staged" in quotes?
 
So, serious question to our resident Lawyers, if you were to try to appeal this what would your tactic be? I know they intend to try to appeal, so I am curious... what the absolute fuck they -could- try.
 
So, serious question to our resident Lawyers, if you were to try to appeal this what would your tactic be? I know they intend to try to appeal, so I am curious... what the absolute fuck they -could- try.
If the trial had been streamed it'd be easier to predict, but if I'm guessing I'd say Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, since his attorney fled the courtroom at least once in a sobbing breakdown after an objection was overturned. Also since his attorney accused the judge of making faces and 'lunging' at her leads me to believe they may not have the most by-the-book practice. I don't think it would go anywhere, though, even the Appeals court is probably pissed off at this clumsy attempt to use the justice system for personal ends.

I believe the civil procedure in Illinois is to file after sentencing, which takes place on Jan 27th so we might not know for sure until then.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom