Jacob Stuart Harrison Storytelling Thread - FSTDT Forums Ex-Pet Lolcow

[Queen Elizabeth II]

My family knows that I am into English history but doesn’t know about my plan. The college I attend is so close, that I commute there instead of living in a dorm, so if my parents found out, I fear that they would take my electronic devices from me.

That probably wouldn't be a bad thing.

Have you ever had homosexual thoughts? Of all the great evils you could decry, you're awfully fixated on sex. That and fans of the monarchy here tend to be old women and gays.

 

[MW 590]

That probably wouldn't be a bad thing.

Have you ever had homosexual thoughts? Of all the great evils you could decry, you're awfully fixated on sex. That and fans of the monarchy here tend to be old women and gays.

No, I am fixated on sex because of the great amount of sexual immorality these days due to the sexual revolution and how it affected me by giving me a bizarre fetish about women's asses in jeans. And you previously said that most Brits are fans of the monarchy.

 

[Foltest]

Most brittons are fan of the monarchy, but I don't think they would be fans if you became a king.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

I said they're "fans" in so much that they seem content with the institution, but the only ones who actually go and buy the branded plates, goes to stand outside Westminister when someones dead or getting married or indeed joins one of the royal themed groups like the Richard III society are old women and gays.

Nobody really cares though who's sat on the throne. Sans Camila as Queen, and that's because nobody likes a cheat.

There's nothing bizarre about having something that turns you on. If nobody had sexual urges we'd go extinct after all. Jeans are probably the most innocent kink I've seen on here.

What sorts of jeans do you like then?

 

[soy_king]

No, I am fixated on sex because of the great amount of sexual immorality these days due to the sexual revolution and how it affected me by giving me a bizarre fetish about women's asses in jeans.

Yes, it's so bizarre to have a fetish where you're attracted to a woman's ass. It clearly couldn't be because you're biologically predisposed to being attracted to physical female qualities that help indicate the rearing of healthy offspring...

 

[MW 590]

I said they're "fans" in so much that they seem content with the institution, but the only ones who actually go and buy the branded plates, goes to stand outside Westminister when someones dead or getting married or indeed joins one of the royal themed groups like the Richard III society are old women and gays.

Nobody really cares though who's sat on the throne. Sans Camila as Queen, and that's because nobody likes a cheat.

There's nothing bizarre about having something that turns you on. If nobody had sexual urges we'd go extinct after all. Jeans are probably the most innocent kink I've seen on here.

What sorts of jeans do you like then?

I like general women's jeans because they are shaped in a way that makes their asses stand out. But being attracted to women's asses is unnatural because it is the vagina not the ass that is needed for reproduction.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

I like general women's jeans because they are shaped in a way that makes their asses stand out. But being attracted to women's asses is unnatural because it is the vagina not the ass that is needed for reproduction.

Being attracted to the ass is completely natural; an ample and shapely ass is a sign that a woman is healthy and fertile, and therefore will be a good partner for reproduction. The attraction to asses goes back to our primate ancestry, when coupling involved mounting from the back. When humans began mounting face-to-face, the mammae emerged as another secondary indicator of sexual fitness.

 

[Jan_Hus]

As if I'd ever support a filthy, dirty catholic for any royal throne.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

I like general women's jeans because they are shaped in a way that makes their asses stand out. But being attracted to women's asses is unnatural because it is the vagina not the ass that is needed for reproduction.

Not really, because like @Senior Lexmechanic pointed out it's a sign of health and youth, both quite important to fertility.

There is also the matter of important sexual behaviours practised notably by primates and the Mammal kingdom as a whole that are not geared towards procreation. What aspect of Biology are you focused on anyway? Unless it's really niche, by Sophomore level you must have come across stuff that shows the Catholic/Aristotelian view on sex is bunk by now.

 

[MW 590]

Not really, because like @Senior Lexmechanic pointed out it's a sign of health and youth, both quite important to fertility.

There is also the matter of important sexual behaviours practised notably by primates and the Mammal kingdom as a whole that are not geared towards procreation. What aspect of Biology are you focused on anyway? Unless it's really niche, by Sophomore level you must have come across stuff that shows the Catholic/Aristotelian view on sex is bunk by now.

Right now one of the classes I am taking is Molecular Biology, and last semester, I taken Microbiology. I learned about evolution and that early organisms evolved to have the ability to have sex in order to create genetic diversity which is beneficial for a species. So the evolution of sex was for reproductive purposes. Mammals don't use condoms, so any sex will lead to reproduction, unless if you are referring to homosexual behaviors and those are rare abnormal cases caused by mutations.

 

[soy_king]

I like general women's jeans because they are shaped in a way that makes their asses stand out. But being attracted to women's asses is unnatural because it is the vagina not the ass that is needed for reproduction.

A large ass is both a sign of wide birthing hips and ample fat supplies that would help a woman survive through pregnancy and in general show the person receives sufficient food. It's a shame the religious spend so much time reading a 2000 year old book on morality and not enough time on basic biology.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

Right now one of the classes I am taking is Molecular Biology, and last semester, I taken Microbiology. I learned about evolution and that early organisms evolved to have the ability to have sex in order to create genetic diversity which is beneficial for a species. So the evolution of sex was for reproductive purposes. Mammals don't use condoms, so any sex will lead to reproduction, unless if you are referring to homosexual behaviors and those are rare abnormal cases caused by mutations.

Is it a Catholic College you attend? Thats bullshit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals#Some_selected_species_and_groups

The Eternal Child by Dr Clive Bromhal is worth a read on the subject. Not the best, but he might be more up your street because while he is an evolutionary biologist, he's not "pro gay" and has been heavily criticised for linking homosexuality to a greater susceptibility to autism.

This isn't revolutionary. Even the Catholic Church admits there are additional functions such as bonding; and some animals like Gibbons for instance rely on this to keep large groups of males in a pack without them murdering each other.

There's also the fact genetic diversity has also resulted in several species in "breeder" and "worker" classes, the latter which still engage in sexual behaviours that don't result in offspring.

I know the Liberal Arts in the US have turned into a propaganda fest but I'd hoped STEM might have fared better.

 

[Tempest]

@Jacob Harrison how did you discover this forum, and what made you want to join?

 

[DNJACK]

This is why Quebec should be it's own country and not under the British monarchy.

 

[DangerousGas]

This thread is an excruciating read - great find, OP.
Wait, hold on - OP is the subject? Jesus shit, this one is a winner in the making.

 

[MW 590]

Is it a Catholic College you attend? Thats bullshit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals#Some_selected_species_and_groups

The Eternal Child by Dr Clive Bromhal is worth a read on the subject. Not the best, but he might be more up your street because while he is an evolutionary biologist, he's not "pro gay" and has been heavily criticised for linking homosexuality to a greater susceptibility to autism.

This isn't revolutionary. Even the Catholic Church admits there are additional functions such as bonding; and some animals like Gibbons for instance rely on this to keep large groups of males in a pack without them murdering each other.

There's also the fact genetic diversity has also resulted in several species in "breeder" and "worker" classes, the latter which still engage in sexual behaviours that don't result in offspring.

I know the Liberal Arts in the US have turned into a propaganda fest but I'd hoped STEM might have fared better.

I attend a regular college but none of the classes talked about homosexuality in animals. I looked at the article and while Bonobos, and Orangutans seem to have a large amount of homosexual behavior, our closest relatives, Chimpanzees were not on the list of primates with significant homosexual behavior, indicating that homosexuality in hominins is an unnatural occurance that is caused by environmental factors rather than evolutionary factors. What evolutionary benefit is there for homosexuality in the human species?

And the human species does not have special "worker" classes that do not engage in reproduction so that is not a good argument.

 

[DangerousGas]

What evolutionary benefit is there for homosexuality in the human species?

Off the top of my head, social bonding, population limitation, non-breeding childcare availability. AFAIK it's a trait that primarily manifests in socially collaborative species. I'd see it as more of an evolutionary safeguard against environmental pressures. Chimps are more combative and antagonistic than bonobos or orangutans.

 

[MW 590]

Off the top of my head, social bonding, population limitation, non-breeding childcare availability. AFAIK it's a trait that primarily manifests in socially collaborative species. I'd see it as more of an evolutionary safeguard against environmental pressures. Chimps are more combative and antagonistic than bonobos or orangutans.

I did research into the theory of population control and childcare availability(called the gay uncle hypothesis) and while that could be true, it means that for homosexuals, the sexual hormones is a useless evolutionary holdover like the appendix, and that they should be helping take care of their kin instead of having pointless sex that does not produce offspring which is the reason why God does not approve of homosexual sex and false same sex "marriages" since reproduction is the traditional purpose of marriage.

 

[DangerousGas]

I did research into the theory of population control and childcare availability(called the gay uncle hypothesis) and while that could be true, it means that for homosexuals, the sexual hormones is a useless evolutionary holdover like the appendix, and that they should be helping take care of their kin instead of having pointless sex that does not produce offspring which is the reason why God does not approve of homosexual sex and false same sex "marriages" since reproduction is the traditional purpose of marriage.

Sex is recreational as much as procreational, though. At least, it is for those of us who aren't on the spectrum.

 

[MW 590]

Sex is recreational as much as procreational, though. At least, it is for those of us who aren't on the spectrum.

But God wants it to be used for procreation. Homosexuals therefore need to repent and abstain from having homosexual relations in order to enter the kingdom of heaven. Since I want to save their souls, I came up with a proposal that England under the true monarchy provides chemical castration drugs in order to make them asexual so that they are not tempted. It is an act of love towards them because it increases their change of salvation.