Opinion It’s time to stop skirting the issue - The truth is, however, that there is absolutely no legitimate reason – practical, social or otherwise – why men should not wear skirts on a regular, if not daily, basis.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

It’s time to stop skirting the issue​


Teo van den Broeke
8 August 2021
396DC8AA-C957-40C7-AAC3-C6F60406904D.jpeg

Now is the moment to bare more leg than ever before, says Teo van den Broeke, and he doesn’t mean short shorts...​

Having delved deep into the annals (minds out of the gutter, please) of sartorial history over the many years I’ve worked in menswear, one issue I’ve long grappled with is just where the Western aversion to modern men wearing skirts, dresses and tunics really comes from.

It’s important to note from the outset that I’m not tarring all cultures with the “men scared to wear open-bottomed garments” brush. Arabic men have worn breezy white kameez tunics as an antidote to the heat for centuries, while airy dhotis and lungis are worn by men across the subcontinent to this day.

I’ve come to the conclusion that the reason men in the West (in Britain specifically) don’t wear skirts and kilts as a matter of course is really down to the Victorians. An age of puritanical pedants with a penchant for all things sad and sober, the Victorian era saw a distinct diminishment in the use of colour in masculine clothing and plain trouser suits in black, grey, brown and blue became order of the, well, centuries now.

The truth is, however, that there is absolutely no legitimate reason – practical, social or otherwise – why men should not wear skirts on a regular, if not daily, basis. It’s a point that the great Scots knew well before the boring old English came along and ruined things. Indeed, to this day even the most masculine men who live above Hadrian’s Wall revel in the act of throwing on a kilt and it’s important to remember that it’s considerably colder up there than it is down here in balmy old Sasann.

Personally speaking, I’m slightly irritated that I don’t feel entirely free to wear a skirt. I’ve long envied my female friends who are able to sport floaty maxi dresses on hot holidays and don’t even get me started on muumuus – if I could wear a muumuu every day for the rest of my life, in seasonal-appropriate fabrics, of course (a cashmere muumuu for winter and something in silk for summer, perhaps), I absolutely would. But thanks to those long-lingering Victorian prejudices that permeate our trousers and shorts-dominated wardrobes, I just don’t feel like I can.

If I could wear a muumuu every day for the rest of my life I absolutely would
7EC99D71-AD4A-4653-B877-A0E4B6B68BD0.jpeg

The good news is that a wide array of influential men in the fields of music, fashion, film and beyond have started flying the flag for men wearing skirts in a meaningful way. Kid Cudi wore a party frock in the style of the late, great Kurt Cobain for his turn on SNL earlier this year and Harry Styles was pictured wearing a Gucci dress on last December’s cover of American Vogue. More recently, A$AP Rocky sported a tartan kilt by Vivienne Westwood for his shoot with American GQ, while a host of nonbinary trailblazers, including Harris Reed, Tommy Dorfman and Ezra Miller, have been flying the skirt-wearing flag for years.

And the even better news is the aforementioned style mavens aren’t just stealing their garments from the women’s section of the store (though there’s nothing wrong with that; buy yourself a pair of women’s carpenter jeans from Arket and you can thank me later). A whole host of totally legitimate designers have started producing breezy skirts and dresses designed specifically with men in mind. From Gucci’s crimp-topped party frocks, which come imbued with a grungy appeal, to Westwood and Thom Browne’s classic kilts and the forthcoming mini-skorts shown as part of Raf Simons and Miuccia’s second outing for Prada, there’s quite literally something for every leg type.

Listen, I’m not saying that it’ll be easy or that you won’t get some troglodyte commenting that you should have done a better job of shaving your legs if you do decide to go full skirt down the pub, but the benefits have got to be worth it. Just think of the freedom – and the breeze. If you do it, I’ll do it. G’wan! It’s exactly what those pesky Victorians wouldn’t have wanted. And if you can’t take my word for it, then listen to global style deity Harry Styles instead. Because if not him, then who?

“When you take away ‘There’s clothes for men and there’s clothes for women’, once you remove any barriers, obviously you open up the arena in which you can play,” Styles told Vogue in his cover interview last year. “It’s like anything – any time you’re putting barriers up in your own life, you’re just limiting yourself. There’s so much joy to be had in playing with clothes.”
 
PROS: - "Eat the Bugs" is no longer the hot new thing, the Powers That Be having discovered that no matter how many coordinated shill articles they pay for, people don't want to eat bugs.

CONS: - Rather than admit they do not have the powers of persuasion they think they do, they've doubled-down and gone full steam ahead with "Wear The Dress, Real Men"
 
Last edited:
Funnily enough, the Scots at that time considered the wearing of pants to be unmanly, weak, and worst of all, English. Given what the weather in Scotland is like, they might have had a point...
Kilts are mostly something that was worn for some celebration, not everyday wear. The idea of th ekilt wearing haggis chomper is mostly made up from English middle and upper class gobshites who wanted to fuck around on the north whilst the rest of the UK went into a soot infested shit sink.

Most lowlanders in Scotland thought the kilt wearing highlanders were fucking inbred weirdos who fucked sheep and shagged their sisters. Most people would wear trousers (or as you lot call them, pants) as the weather was harsh and you wanted to cover up for many other reasons related to work.

If anyone has any interest in how Scotland is mostly a English holiday park, created by worthless middle class cunts as a means to escape the dying of an empire, the information is out there.
 
That dark one is very nice, i will maybe get one for my evil space villain gathering next month-
 
Is this article somehow tied to that obnoxious video where they had a male tiktok whore parade around the white house in a skirt?
 
Nothing is stopping guys from wearing skirts or dresses outside the fact that they don't want to. Sure it's not fasion and there are dress codes against them at some working environments but those could be solved easily if there was a will and there just isn't. I, a lady, love dresses and skirts but pants are way more practical in most circumstances. Better leg protection, easier time with pockets and less chage to accidentally exposing yourself. Girls might be willing to take those downsides for nicer look and avoid hip waist ratio issues with pants fitting but guys will go easy to work with pants.
 
Most lowlanders in Scotland thought the kilt wearing highlanders were fucking inbred weirdos who fucked sheep and shagged their sisters. Most people would wear trousers (or as you lot call them, pants) as the weather was harsh and you wanted to cover up for many other reasons related to work.
After all, that's how Scottish music is made.

 
"...one issue I’ve long grappled with is just where the Western aversion to modern men wearing skirts, dresses and tunics really comes from."

This grappling apparently did not include asking many men their opinion.
 
There has always been at least a differentiation in colour or pattern for male vs. female clothing, they were almost never completely interchangeable in any society. These people clearly just want a blurring of gender signifiers to help enforce the continuous blurring of traditional gender (sex) roles.
Agreed. I've said it before and I'll say it again: You can wear whatever the fuck you want, but there's a difference between this:
46402083-9871831-Meskis_pictured_above_in_the_tie_dye_shirt_claimed_the_sign_was_-a-66_1628355...jpg

And this:
main-qimg-f607cd3915dba90ce63595adb050e825.jpg

And I'm sick of wokescolds telling us we need to pretend that there's not.
 
This
Agreed. I've said it before and I'll say it again: You can wear whatever the fuck you want, but there's a difference between this:
View attachment 2431379
And this:
View attachment 2431414
And I'm sick of wokescolds telling us we need to pretend that there's not.
Exactly this.
There's a huge difference between "wearing something comfortable that fits and suits my needs" and "peacocking for attention like a faggot". That's what they don't even seem to understand and they're trying to metro sexualize men as a whole. Men typically don't care about "fashion" beyond wanting to have at least a couple suits that look nice and don't look 40 years out of date - even then there are some dudes who like the retro fit. But most men's clothing choice, outside of the type of men* that read tripe like this and find it inspiring, is utilitarian.
Dresses, kilts, skirts etc, have their uses. I tried on a kimono type thing once on a homestay trip and it actually was quite comfy for casual lounging. The thing is there's a time and place. Even the famed Scottish kilts weren't very utilitarian for anything really other than fashion - they probably weren't even that comfortable considering they were made out of wool and not silk.
Stop trying to dress men up and just go back to your damn barbie dolls, girls.
 
Men regularly rode horses and then motorcycles. Skirts are not conducive to these activities. Pants are superior for action.

Plus Chad can't show off the bulge in a skirt.
I was going to post that

There's no way this clown could ride that bicycle in his man dress.

That's why girls bike have a lower top tube.

It's why Persians invented underwear with 2 legs, for riding horses.

1628632829269.png
 
Stop trying to dress men up and just go back to your damn barbie dolls, girls.
"Girls". This article was written by a man, almost certainly so gay as to be an outright faggot. The fashion world is nothing but gay men, which is why men's fashion shows are just gays playing dress-up with their latest rent boys and parading them around on a stage to show them off, and somehow fags and fag hags have decided that's what actual, straight men are going to be wearing.
 
Those clothes don't look good on any of the guys shown. I've never seen a guy in a skirt or dress and thought it look flattering. They're not flattering on male bodies/frames.

I don't care about gender roles, but dresses and skirts just look unflattering on guys. I've seen thin guys look good in tight jeans/pants and more fitted clothing, but not skirts or dresses.
 
Back
Top Bottom