IslamQA.info - Batshit insane Islamic rulings

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Chris did nothing wrong said:
Seraphim (missing a few wings but you get the idea):

seraph_by_windsweptdemyx.jpg
Click to expand...
Are you sure that's supposed to be a seraphim? Two of its six wings are supposed to be on its feet and that thing doesn't have feet. Also it's not constantly on fire, which is where seraph get their names from.

My favourite angels are the cherubim, I like how they went from giant four winged cow footed warriors with four faces to fat babies with wings.

Anyway back on topic, I wanted to see if it was Muhammad's fault so many Muslims smell eye-wateringly atrocious all the time. And while there aren't any rules against deodorant specifically apart from all scents being forbidden during the pilgrimage to Mecca - which means that must be the worst smelling city in the universe - there is a fatwa on using anything with animal products in it, which hippies are always telling me includes most deodorants which is why they use that patchouli shit. So fuck you Allah for making public transport an even more miserable experience than it has to be.
 
Terrorist said:
(also how isn't the internet itself haram? isn't it a western invention, so you'd be following the infidels?)
Click to expand...
I assume it's the same justification that batshit insane fringe groups like Anarcho-Primivists (People who seriously want to live in the Stone Age) use to discuss about how evil the creation of language was on Internet forums.
 
AnOminous said:
This is exactly why we should not be importing people from Salafist cultures, especially single young men, who are vastly disproportionately more likely to be terrorists.
Click to expand...

Suicide bombing and terrorism isn't limited to Salafis, though they do it more than anyone else. Shia Islamists can also be violent, though they don't tend to target civilians as much.

During the mid 2000s in Iraq you could tell which sect had murdered somebody by looking at the wounds. The Sunnis beheaded people, while the Shias drilled through people's heads.
 
This site has been around for like 20 years, It's about time it has a damn thread on here.

I wonder how many inspired terrorist attacks you can tie to the fatwas on that site.
 
My Little Pony isn't allowed
https://islamqa.info/en/23445

There is nothing wrong with your house literally being full of bird shit as bird shit is as pure as breast milk.
https://islamqa.info/en/111786
As it is proven that the faeces of birds whose meat may be eaten is taahir, then it does not have to be washed off if it gets onto one’s clothes or body, or on the carpet, and there is nothing wrong with praying in these clothes or on this carpet.
Click to expand...

You are allowed to drink the breast milk of your wife (which is as pure as bird shit)
https://islamqa.info/en/2864

You are to clean your ass with stones after shitting, if you have toilet paper you must clean at least three times
https://islamqa.info/en/9645
 
Last edited:
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
The question is, is it being visited by Islamists or is it being visited by people who want to learn about Islam after losing a few limbs in a suicide bombing?
Click to expand...

It's visited by muslims who have nagging thoughts and ponder about questions such as mermaid flesh being halal or haram. Basically since Islam has so much influence on daily life there are people who worry about every step and action they make and therefore have to ask their mullahs and wise men about mundane things. Think of muslim Ned Flanders calling Mullah Lovejoy.
 
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
The question is, is it being visited by Islamists or is it being visited by people who want to learn about Islam after losing a few limbs in a suicide bombing?
Click to expand...
I checked 4chan's /pol/ archive and there was only 10 pages of discussion had links from this site, and some of it was Muslims using it. Which seems strange considering this would be a perfect way of making fun of Mudslimes. The other instances of it being used was to make fun of Mudslimes, in discussion with Mudslimes, and and in use against ISIS supporters on the board who painted ISIS as being the good guys.
 
ICametoLurk said:
You are to clean your ass with stones after shitting, if you have toilet paper you must clean at least three times
Click to expand...

Huh? Are you supposed to wipe off the rocks with toilet paper three times each and reuse the rocks? Is this the origin of the seashells?

The impurity of dogs is the greatest of animal impurities. The impurity of a dog can only be removed by washing seven times, one of which should be with earth. Even pigs, which the Qur’aan states are haraam and describes as an abomination (rijs) are not naajis (impure) to such an extent.

Dogs are impure and filthy, but unfortunately we find that some people are attracted to the ways of the kuffaar and their filthy habits, so they have started to keep dogs unnecessarily for no reason, keeping them, training them and cleaning them even though they can never be clean, even if they were washed with the waters of the ocean, because they are essentially impure.
Click to expand...

The words of a man who knows the smell of wet dog.
 
Last edited:
DrainRedRain said:
Muslim couple living in Sweden is bothered with christian symbols and if possible, they should remove them.
https://islamqa.info/en/269272
Click to expand...

This honestly pisses me off. They're refugees from Syria who were graciously taken in by Sweden and then by a Swedish church, but all they care about is pushing their religion on the Christians who saved them:

"We also have a good relationship with the church and its attendees, but our goal is to get to know them in an attempt to call them to Islam, and we never meet any Christian person but we try to call him to Islam, directly or indirectly."

I dunno, it just rubs me the wrong way. I know that they believe that Islam is the One True Religion and Christians will go to Hell, so they're probably doing this with good intentions. But I would still be pissed if my parish helped out some Muslims, only for them to get to know us for the sole intention of proselytizing Islam.

Cake Farts said:
Women smiling at men is a form of seduction
Click to expand...

Oh hey, more rage-inducing bullshit.

Women should cover their faces in front of non-mahram men, because of a great deal of evidence that has been quoted in the answer to question no. 11774. Based on this, she should not be smiling in this manner in the first place.

Secondly:

A great deal of shar’i evidence indicates that it is not allowed to do that which may cause men to be tempted by women and vice versa, such as shaking hands, being alone with a member of the opposite sex, speaking in a soft voice, a woman going out wearing perfume so that its fragrance may be smelt, a man looking at women and a woman looking at men if that is with desire.
Click to expand...

Whenever morons try to act like fundamentalist Christianity and fundamentalist Islam are the same thing, I want to pull out Salafi bullshit like this. Have you ever seen Christian women dress like this?

9ac125d2204c0142260756e95ed85a84--muslim-girls-muslim-women.jpg


All religious fundamentalism sucks, but come on, there's no ideology that's more misogynistic than radical Islam. Women have to cover their faces in front of men. Women aren't allowed to talk to men. Women aren't allowed to shake hands with men. It's disgusting.

ICametoLurk said:
I checked 4chan's /pol/ archive and there was only 10 pages of discussion had links from this site, and some of it was Muslims using it. Which seems strange considering this would be a perfect way of making fun of Mudslimes. The other instances of it being used was to make fun of Mudslimes, in discussion with Mudslimes, and and in use against ISIS supporters on the board who painted ISIS as being the good guys.
Click to expand...

A lot of Muslims actually consider IslamQA to be a good source, at least some of the time. I did a search of IslamQA on the /r/Islam subreddit, and while a lot of people were thankfully like "No, don't use that website, it's disgusting," others considered it to be a reliable source. As they point out, it cites reputable Hadith and rulings by reputable scholars.

Save the Loli said:
Fun fact: IslamQA is banned in Saudi Arabia.
Click to expand...

It's really important to point out that IslamQA isn't banned in Saudi Arabia because it's bad or too extreme. It's banned because it issues fatwas, and in Saudi Arabia only the approved council can issue fatwas. The Saudis probably agree with everything IslamQA says, it's just that they're not an approved authority.
 
Cosmos said:
This honestly pisses me off. They're refugees from Syria who were graciously taken in by Sweden and then by a Swedish church, but all they care about is pushing their religion on the Christians who saved them:
Click to expand...

They're like a disease that thinks everything else is a disease, all they know is to spread and purge.
 
Cosmos said:
This honestly pisses me off. They're refugees from Syria who were graciously taken in by Sweden and then by a Swedish church, but all they care about is pushing their religion on the Christians who saved them:

"We also have a good relationship with the church and its attendees, but our goal is to get to know them in an attempt to call them to Islam, and we never meet any Christian person but we try to call him to Islam, directly or indirectly."

I dunno, it just rubs me the wrong way. I know that they believe that Islam is the One True Religion and Christians will go to Hell, so they're probably doing this with good intentions. But I would still be pissed if my parish helped out some Muslims, only for them to get to know us for the sole intention of proselytizing Islam.



Oh hey, more rage-inducing bullshit.



Whenever morons try to act like fundamentalist Christianity and fundamentalist Islam are the same thing, I want to pull out Salafi bullshit like this. Have you ever seen Christian women dress like this?

View attachment 245723

All religious fundamentalism sucks, but come on, there's no ideology that's more misogynistic than radical Islam. Women have to cover their faces in front of men. Women aren't allowed to talk to men. Women aren't allowed to shake hands with men. It's disgusting.



A lot of Muslims actually consider IslamQA to be a good source, at least some of the time. I did a search of IslamQA on the /r/Islam subreddit, and while a lot of people were thankfully like "No, don't use that website, it's disgusting," others considered it to be a reliable source. As they point out, it cites reputable Hadith and rulings by reputable scholars.



It's really important to point out that IslamQA isn't banned in Saudi Arabia because it's bad or too extreme. It's banned because it issues fatwas, and in Saudi Arabia only the approved council can issue fatwas. The Saudis probably agree with everything IslamQA says, it's just that they're not an approved authority.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I remember when I read that, I was "wow, way to be ungrateful little shits".
Just imagine the inverse: christian couple from sweden is given residence above a mosque and proceed to bitch about all the Allah mentions and muslim symbols. I bet they would be dead in ten seconds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom