Islamophiles / Regressive Left - Liberal non-Muslims who are desperate to protect the Religion of Peace

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Romper Stomper is getting a TV adaptation for the streaming service Stan which paints Muslims, a demographic that overwhelmingly voted No to same-sex marriage in the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, as poor oppressed victims.


 
Last edited:
Romper Stomper is getting a TV adaptation for the streaming service Stan which paints Muslims, a demographic that overwhelmingly voted No to same-sex marriage in the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, as poor oppressed victims.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ac1U3g-isDU
[MEDIA=vidme]uWpAo[/MEDIA]

That's not even faithful to the original film. The people the neo Nazis attacked were Vietnamese and weren't Muslim.
 
upload_2017-11-17_8-24-16.png

upload_2017-11-17_8-25-19.png

https://archive.fo/GMGcm
They banned the guy posting Quran verses but not the guy who demanded he post Quran verses.:story:
 
That's not even faithful to the original film. The people the neo Nazis attacked were Vietnamese and weren't Muslim.
It can be debated, I've heard a lot of people saying that the immigration of Muslims right now in Aus is basically the Vietnamese mass immigration from the 80s and 90s, hell, romper stomper came out in 1992, so I guess it kinda makes sense from that sense.
 
It can be debated, I've heard a lot of people saying that the immigration of Muslims right now in Aus is basically the Vietnamese mass immigration from the 80s and 90s, hell, romper stomper came out in 1992, so I guess it kinda makes sense from that sense.

Most Vietnamese don't follow a holy book which justifies paedophilia and slavery, though.
 
Though the people who think Sikhism is damaging are morons.

Yeah, I really don't get that. Sikhs are some of the most well-integrated minorities in Canada. There's a reason why everyone you see in high government position that wears a turban in Canada is a Sikh. Occasionally there's a ruckus about them asking to wear kirpans in public (Which they're allowed to) or wearing a turban instead of a safety helmet at a dangerous job (Which they're not allowed to), but they usually deal with either outcome pretty calmly.

I honestly think even in that poll they're mixing them up with Islam, because I have a hard time believing there's that many that consider them damaging. Plenty of people here are racist against Indians, but Sikhs in particular are usually well liked.
 
Yeah, I really don't get that. Sikhs are some of the most well-integrated minorities in Canada. There's a reason why everyone you see in high government position that wears a turban in Canada is a Sikh. Occasionally there's a ruckus about them asking to wear kirpans in public (Which they're allowed to) or wearing a turban instead of a safety helmet at a dangerous job (Which they're not allowed to), but they usually deal with either outcome pretty calmly.

I honestly think even in that poll they're mixing them up with Islam, because I have a hard time believing there's that many that consider them damaging. Plenty of people here are racist against Indians, but Sikhs in particular are usually well liked.

I think it's like it is in the US. People see a turban and they freak out and think it's kebab time.
 
Is it really that common though? They are very different in accent and manners, have big moustache instead of big beard, and muslims don't even wear turbans, but hats thing that are similar to kippahs
 
Is it really that common though? They are very different in accent and manners, have big moustache instead of big beard, and muslims don't even wear turbans, but hats thing that are similar to kippahs

Eeh, to morons who don't know anything of the world "exotic and brown = kebab"
 
Not to interrupt the Sikh circlejerk, but there is good reason based on recent history to take a dim view on Sikhs that doesn't require being so ignorant as to mistake them for Muslims. Your average Sikh may be perfectly fine, but they have had a strong militant subset for decades, who notably have close relations with Pakistan's ISI, with whom they've cooperated to better enable their assorted terrorist efforts over the years.

In 1984 Sikh terrorists took over the Golden Temple, requiring military intervention by India (Operation Blue Star), the net cost being dozens of lives. Shortly thereafter and in response to India not giving in to the violent demands of the Sikhs, two Sikh bodyguards assassinated Indian PM Indira Gandhi. The next year, in 1985, Sikh terrorist group Babbar Khalsa blew up Air India Flight 182, killing all 329 people on board (with another bomb on the ground killing two more airport workers). The violence continued unabated but on a less visible scale into the early 1990s. By October 1991, they were killing 20 non-Sikhs a day by the various Sikh terrorist groups in the Punjab. India mostly crushed the major terrorist entities and curtailed the violence, but a number of Sikh terror groups exist in a weaker, more decentralized form to this day, and there has been increasing violence and separatist agitation in the past few years. Given their history, and the fact that much of the financial and logistical support for these terrorists came from Sikhs living in Canada and other Western nations, the unfriendly view some of us have of them is easily justified.

Now, I don't claim to be familiar enough with Sikh theology to speak on how it compares to Islam. It may well be the case that their violence is not religiously motivated, and that the real issue is with a nationalist political identity that is extremely violent and seems to be heavily interwoven with religious observance by a misguided minority. But Sikhs are certainly not the problem-free minority some here assume, whether because of theology or certain secular beliefs that've been woven into their identity.
 
Every culture/religion has its nutcases. Even christianity does, for how liberal the mosly christian countries have become
Extremism in sykh and christianity have become much weak though, you even bringed up an episode from 30 years ago; and we still can't say the same for islam.
 
Now, I don't claim to be familiar enough with Sikh theology to speak on how it compares to Islam. It may well be the case that their violence is not religiously motivated, and that the real issue is with a nationalist political identity that is extremely violent and seems to be heavily interwoven with religious observance by a misguided minority. But Sikhs are certainly not the problem-free minority some here assume, whether because of theology or certain secular beliefs that've been woven into their identity.

True, a lot of Sikh violence is nationalist motivated but these nationalist groups were/are like religious Zionists in that it's hard to separate the religion from the political factor.

However, Sikhs are akin to Muslims in that they can freak out over the slightest thing. Here's Wikipedia's account of what happened in India a while back when someone desecrated their holy book. A bunch of protests and violence, although for India it's very low on the severity scale as far as riots go.
 
True, a lot of Sikh violence is nationalist motivated but these nationalist groups were/are like religious Zionists in that it's hard to separate the religion from the political factor.

However, Sikhs are akin to Muslims in that they can freak out over the slightest thing. Here's Wikipedia's account of what happened in India a while back when someone desecrated their holy book. A bunch of protests and violence, although for India it's very low on the severity scale as far as riots go.

If you're going to bring up minor incidents like that, you might as well bring up the Sabra and Shatila massacre and the Central African anti-balaka for Christianity.
 
There has been a catastrophic bombing and shooting massacre in a Sufi mosque in Sinai. At least 200 people are now dead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bir_al-Abed_mosque_attack

Sufis are a mystical sect of Islam considered heretical by extremists.

The United States has issued a message of solidarity, saying they stand with Egypt against terrorism.

I expect the usual suspects on social media will be silent. For all they crow about "diversity", they're not usually very interested in African politics.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom