Islamophiles / Regressive Left - Liberal non-Muslims who are desperate to protect the Religion of Peace

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Bec said:
Islamophilia has been really dying down recently, has there been any of it recently?
Click to expand...
Because rapefugees aren't in the media as much lately (except for the "south of the border" kind) so less need to go and defend them and their peaceful religion. But rest assured, look on any forum with a decent amount of leftists and you'll see plenty of people advocating for the tolerant people of the Gaza Strip or tossing out bans to anyone who points out that there may be a crime problem in certain European neighborhoods.
 
AnOminous said:
That whole thing itself generated some amazing lolcows.

That cunt Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche is probably personally responsible for poisoning the reputation of Nietzsche with her insane bullshit, and the deranged compound Nueva Germania in Paraguay.

The main semi-active lolcow associated with all this craziness today is a guy named David Woodard. I have no idea how to make a thread on this loon, though. Despite being mostly buried under other totally normal people unfortunate enough to have the same name, he has a page at the SPLC which isn't terribly useful as lolcow material.

He also did a "requiem" for Timothy McVeigh and called it a "prequiem" and that is pretty cringy but barely interesting enough for a thread.

His Wikipedia is also nearly useless: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Woodard

He was also indirectly associated with William S. Burroughs through Byron Gysin.

He would probably be threadworthy if he had any major Internet presence at the moment or chimped out.

Also there's this: "In 1990 Woodard invented a fictional psychoactive machine, the Feraliminal Lycanthropizer, effects of which are purportedly opposite those of a Dreamachine." Because wtf man.
Click to expand...
David Woodard manipulated his Wikipedia Article to remove all the interesting things from it. His talk page was wiped by a bot he created called “Dreamy Jazz Bot”. But you can still view the history of his talk page. He wrote an article for Vice Magazine called “Dreamy Cops” about police rape in Neuva Germania which got a lot of LOL comments, but Vice removed all the comments. You can still find a scaled down version of the article here.

Paraguay - Hanging Out With The Police

VICE is the definitive guide to enlightening information.
www.vice.com www.vice.com
He also scammed a bunch of old people to make Nueva Germania a Sister city to Juniper Hills California and he operated a scam website from 2004 to 2008 in which he pretended to be the Juniper Hills Town Council and they had to sue him to get him to stop. The page may still be online at https://juniperhills.net but he took all the interesting articles off of it. Read the details of his here https://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Rebuilding-a-pure-Aryan-home-in-the-Paraguayan-2723542.php at SF Gate. He claimed to be offering free tours of Nueva Germania but I doubt he ever went there. He made two websites for his “wife” who may not be a real person and if she is may not be married to him and invented two fictional children whom he named Ethel and John but he later removed their names from Wikipedia. You can still find them if you look back at the older copies of his Wikipedia pages and the one he made for his wife. There are saved copies of his pages on Archive Today if you look for them there. He also made a website for his daughter which can find here at https://meliaethelwoodard.com/. He also masquerades on Gab under the name Doug Provenzano. DagoDoug is his handle. He hates all non white people including Italians whom he considers to be non white, hence Dago. But his special interest in Wagner. He had a website at Davidwoodard.com, but he removed everything from it and made it private. Very few pages of it were saved on Wayback or Archive Today. He posted an entire essay about Wagner and the Jews on that website.
 
Imagine actually claiming to be pro-LGBT while at the same time, white knighting a religion that would have you brutally murdered for being pro-LGBT.
 
islamic1.png
islamic2.png
islamic3.png
islamic4.png
islamic5.png
islamic6.png
 
>The Chinese  let the English get them addicted to opium, I'm not racist you are!
I have a feeling she didn't think the arguments for her thesis through here and oversimplified the ebb and flow of geo-political power.
 
I'm surprised people like mohammed hijab and ali dawah dont have a thread on this site yet, they're islamist apologists and seem to be fine with their great and totally not creepy prophet having sex with a 9 year old.
 
I had a conversation with a white girl just the other day that seems relevant to the topic. She was ranting about some “Free Palestine” shit. So I went through the normal spiel about how in their country she wouldn’t have rights and could be beaten or stoned for voicing her own opinion or going outside without a male chaperone. Her response was hilarious to say the least. She started quoting Bible verses at me and said that women SHOULD be beaten and stoned because the Bible condones it. It should come as no surprise to any of you that her boyfriend was black.
 
Legoshi said:
View attachment 4518822View attachment 4518826View attachment 4518833View attachment 4518837View attachment 4518842View attachment 4518845
Click to expand...
I mean, there's also the obvious point that being physically located in the Middle East/around the Indian Ocean sort of physically excludes you from traveling around the Atlantic Ocean. To reach the Americas all Portugal/Spain/England/etc. had to do was just keep traveling west until they hit land. If the Ottomans tried the same thing they would have to travel through the Mediterranean first (and been blocked by the aforementioned Christian powers). Persia and Mughal India would have had to circumnavigate Arabia and Africa just to begin traveling across the Atlantic. Only Morocco would have been in a viable position to even try to colonize the Americas to begin with.
 
Beautiful Border said:
I mean, there's also the obvious point that being physically located in the Middle East/around the Indian Ocean sort of physically excludes you from traveling around the Atlantic Ocean. To reach the Americas all Portugal/Spain/England/etc. had to do was just keep traveling west until they hit land. If the Ottomans tried the same thing they would have to travel through the Mediterranean first (and been blocked by the aforementioned Christian powers). Persia and Mughal India would have had to circumnavigate Arabia and Africa just to begin traveling across the Atlantic. Only Morocco would have been in a viable position to even try to colonize the Americas to begin with.
Click to expand...
Indonesia and India could've island-hopped across the Pacific...
 
White Diamond said:
Indonesia and India could've island-hopped across the Pacific...
Click to expand...
But that's the thing, the Islamicization of India and Indonesia were directly analogous to the Christianization of the Americas. Muslims didn't need to try and reach the Americas to engage in a project of conversion when they were already preoccupied with their own.
 
Beautiful Border said:
But that's the thing, the Islamicization of India and Indonesia were directly analogous to the Christianization of the Americas. Muslims didn't need to try and reach the Americas to engage in a project of conversion when they were already preoccupied with their own.
Click to expand...
First section of this video is relevant, even the most severe abuses by the Europeans against the Native Americans never included state torture on this scale:


Sure you might argue that these stories could just be Sikh propaganda, but could we not say the same about the things that happened to the Native Americans?
 
Last edited:
Seafarer said:
First section of this video is relevant, even the most severe abuses by the Europeans against the Native Americans never included state torture on this scale:


Sure you might argue that these stories are just Sikh propaganda, but could we not say the same about the things that happened to the Native Americans?
Click to expand...
It also just makes sense on an intuitive level that Islam required more force/coercion to convert people than Christianity, since one demands that you give up bacon, alcohol, music, art, and your foreskin while the other will basically leave you alone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom