Islam

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The staff of American Thinker posted an article about Islam and Islamophobia that was worth to share.
March 30, 2022

‘Islamophobia’ Is as Old as Islam​

By Raymond Ibrahim

The United Nations recently named March 15 -- also rather ominously known as the “Ides of March” -- as “the International Day to Combat Islamophobia.” In doing so, they have accepted and seek to mandate the idea that whatever fear (literally, phobia) non-Muslims have of Islam is unfounded and irrational, and therefore must be “combatted.”
In reality, aversion to Islam is not new or something that “just happened”; nor is it a byproduct of temporal circumstances (say, resentment towards Muslims due to the terror strikes of 9/11). Instead, it is something that all rational non-Muslims have felt from the very inception of Islam in the seventh century.

Western peoples, for instance, including many of their luminaries, have always portrayed Islam as a hostile and violent force -- often in terms that would make today’s “Islamophobe” blush. And that wasn’t because Europeans were “recasting the other” to “validate their imperial aspirations” (to use the tired terminology of Edward Said that has long dominated academia’s treatment of Western-Muslim interactions). Rather, it was because Islam has always treated the “infidel,” the non-Muslim, the same way ISIS treats the infidel: atrociously.
According to Muslim history, in 628 AD, Muhammad summoned the Roman (or “Byzantine”) emperor, Heraclius -- the symbolic head of “the West,” then known as “Christendom” -- to submit to Islam; when the emperor refused, a virulent jihad was unleashed against the Western world. Less than 100 years later, Islam had conquered more than two-thirds of Christendom, and was raiding deep into France. While these far-reaching conquests are often allotted a sanitized sentence, if that, in today’s textbooks, the chroniclers of the time make clear that these were cataclysmic events that had a traumatic impact on, and played no small part in forming, Europe proper, that is, the unconquered portion and final bastion of Christendom.

But it wasn’t just what they personally experienced at the hands of Muslims that developed this ancient “phobia” to Islam. As far back as the eighth century, Islam’s scriptures and histories -- the Koran, hadith, sira and maghazi literature -- became available to those Christian communities living adjacent to, or even under the authority of, the caliphates. Based solely on these primary sources of Islam, Christians concluded that Muhammad was a (possibly demon possessed) false prophet who had very obviously concocted a creed to justify the worst depravities of man -- for dominion, plunder, cruelty and carnality (see Sword and Scimitar for copious documentation, especially Chapter 2).

This view prevailed for well over a millennium throughout Europe; and it was augmented by the fact that Muslims were still, well over a millennium after Muhammad, invading Christian territories, plundering them, and abducting their women and children. The United States’ first brush with Islam -- its very first war as a nation, soon after its independence -- came by way of Muslim raids on American ships for booty and slaves in the name of Allah.
Click to expand...
 
I'm reading The Qu'ran, and it is very bad.

The 'god' is unmerciful, and it is said that he intentionally sealed the hearts of people so that they me be unable to have been saved.

"There will be those that pretend to be with the will of god, but act against. And god shall punish them!"

I thought that this quote was merely warning the followers of Allah that God-less elements will make themselves present within the Flock. It's not, however. Muhammad was merely speaking of pretendaby Muslims in Mecca that wished to kill him.

Muhammad were as bad as Joseph Smith, and Islam is a very perverted version of Christianity.
 
If Islam was a book, it would be like a good main arc with thousand shitty details that ultimatly make it garbage. Also, there a good marker of anything (anyone) being totally retarded - you are not allowed to openly criticise it. Be it trannies, islam, sjw crazies, if someone tells you that "you are not allowed to" question it, gg it's a garbage.
 
1655137746023.png

random but this mong(claims to be from kuwait but is born american), the one who I didnt redact, who thinks anyone who doesnt like his sand cult is a dumbass and "has never been to that country"
YourFriendlyLurker said:
If Islam was a book, it would be like a good main arc with thousand shitty details that ultimatly make it garbage. Also, there a good marker of anything (anyone) being totally retarded - you are not allowed to openly criticise it. Be it trannies, islam, sjw crazies, if someone tells you that "you are not allowed to" question it, gg it's a garbage.
Click to expand...
basically, yeah
also comes to mind how the sand cult opposes woketardisms like pride month but thats just a broken clock being right sometimes
 
Islam belongs in the trashcan of history. It's everything I despise about Christianity on steroids (with the sole exception of Prosperity Gospel but only because PG is more insidious and covert). Christianity in terms of civic behavior at least got it's act together for the most part.
 
Isaac said:
I'm reading The Qu'ran, and it is very bad.

The 'god' is unmerciful, and it is said that he intentionally sealed the hearts of people so that they me be unable to have been saved.

"There will be those that pretend to be with the will of god, but act against. And god shall punish them!"

I thought that this quote was merely warning the followers of Allah that God-less elements will make themselves present within the Flock. It's not, however. Muhammad was merely speaking of pretendaby Muslims in Mecca that wished to kill him.

Muhammad were as bad as Joseph Smith, and Islam is a very perverted version of Christianity.
Click to expand...
Just wait til you get to the part about how much your wife is worth at resale after she’s been raped.
 
PL and sperging inbound:
Growing up as a Libyan Islam was just something that people believed in back home. There were holidays, traditions, whatever. Some women chose to wear hijab, but it wasn’t the norm and often seen as oppressive and backwards. You could be very religious and think Shariah was bloody bonkers, many Libyans (including my namesake) were suspicious of, or outright rejected the Hadith. There were issues with extremists, but they were always portrayed as they were, insane.

Now when I started to move to other places for education and came into contact with Pakis and legit Arabs I was blown away. Imagine being raised in a normal Christian family and suddenly being surrounded by snake handlers and nut jobs mumbling in tongues. I 100% support Europeans kicking them out.

Why?

1.) THEY WILL NOT INTEGRATE. These people set up their own Islamic system in a host country, they are parasites who leach the government for benefits whilst actively trying to form their own government so they can kill and rape as they see fit. They do not care about or respect their host countries values, yet insist you respect theirs. It is sub-IQ behavior and all the leftists who think they’re so sweet are enabling their own genocide.

2.) THEY ARE NOT REFUGEES. They have absolutely no intention of being pulled from the west’s tit. These people aren’t coming to escape wars, they’re coming to demographically replace native populations and turn their host countries into the shitholes that they left. When you’re forced to leave your home country you don’t do so to leech off of whatever country is kind enough to accept you, no. You work your ass of to prove that you can be a functional member of society so that one day you can go home and make your country as great as it once was. Seeing Syrians evacuate vs Ukrainians puts into perspective how entitled these people are. My mother would beat the shit out of me if some kind person offered me food and I threw it back in their face because they couldn’t guarantee it’s halal, fuck off with that shit.
 
Hello everyone, muslim here.

Yes we're terrorists, yes we're violent, yes we want to destroy the west, yes we want to spread our religion, yes we support sharia law and yes we will blow up your house.
 

Attachments

  • 13f.gif
    13f.gif
    74.5 KB · Views: 155
Vitriol said:
dhimmi is not a pleasant or benign status- you will never find a muslim who would want to be considered that. There is a huge stigma attached to it that one will not find written down directly but can find evidence of fairly easily. The disgust many muslim appelates have expressed in various courts throughout history that the dhimmi have any rights at all is the easiest but suggest to any muslim immigrant that they should be dhimmi in a Christian country and you will find another.
Click to expand...
Dhimmi basically meant buck-broken paypig who could be milked for all their worth to increase the Emir's treasury. Umayyad and early Abbasid rulers didn't want their dhimmi to convert, they lusted after those sweet, sweet taxes more.

Furthermore, Caliphs such as Muawiyah, Yazid, Harun al-Rashid and As-Saffeh barely viewed non-Arabs as human, and much rather prefered them to remain Dhimmi instead of integrating with their pure-blooded, aryan, goat fucker race

Screenshot_20220628-125616_Brave.png


Electric Allahu
 
I thought of bringing back this thread from the dead about this article.

January 30, 2024

Only Islam Can Defeat Radical Islam​

By Alexander G. Markovsky


The Western world remains reluctant to acknowledge the ongoing threat posed by radical Islam. The conflict’s battleground, which initially unfolded in Israel, runs through Europe and has now extended its reach to the United States.
This war presents a new and unprecedented danger to the West. Americans and Europeans failed to recognize that radical Islam is not just a religion; it is also a political totalitarian movement akin to communism and fascism. The movement embraces a fanatical agenda that includes religious supremacy and a Marxist-type utopian/egalitarian standard of virtue. It’s sustained by an ideology embodied in unlimited human resources around the globe. It is not a nation-state and cannot be defeated militarily, nor can diplomatic solutions be found. Therefore, the war on Radical Islam is not limited to military confrontation; it is foremost an ideological and political affair.
Just as happened centuries ago, thanks to Europeans’ fatal error in allowing Muslim refugees to enter the continent, Islam has launched itself across Europe in an unrelenting wave of religious acclamation and territorial expansion. Entire areas of major European cities, including London, Paris, and Marseille, have been de facto annexed to the possession of Islam, and the sovereignty of the host states is no longer recognized in those sizable enclaves....

... Therefore, this monster first of all, must be defeated ideologically by superior principles advanced by Islam itself.

It is not a “mission impossible.” Some Muslim leaders are awakening to the realization that violence will not turn the clock (which the Arabs invented) back to their greatness. They find support among the Muslims who adhere to a peaceful and pluralistic interpretation of their faith.
Click to expand...
 
Trilby said:
Doesn't belong in North America either, but it's what it is.
Click to expand...
We in the "West" (Europe, NA, Aus, NZ etc.) have quite an issue on our hands here.
When Islam landed on our shores in the more modern times, without armies and overt desire to convert and create caliphates, we kinda underestimated it. We also consistently criticized it from a very liberal perspective, i.e. women rights, gay rights, anti-authoritarianism, anti-theocracy, which inherently puts the West in the position of a progressive liberal entity.
Which is VERY bad.
In the past, we dealt with Islam as you would deal with any other foreign ideology, promoted by alien, foreign peoples. Disagreements were theological, "they don't think Jesus is God" and so on, not from a progressive, liberal view. It was different, it was not ours, and it was dangerous and expansionist.
We kinda have to find a way to return to that "you do not belong here" attitude, regardless of the racial/xenophobic aspects and accusations that will follow. And we also need to stop bombing the ME if we're not directly attacked, and stop trying to destabilize them, or propping up Israel and so on. That way, we would have a clean conscience when we will need to say "NO, you WILL go back" at the border.
They can chill in their own lands, we can even be friends, have diplomacy and trade, cultural exchanges, learn from each other. But Europe is ours, NA is American, which must be implicitly European in clear too. The ME is theirs. Have fun with the deserts.
 
Islam is the worst thing to happen to humanity after the first Anglo has crawled out of a bog somewhere.

The most pathetic thing I've seen is westerners simping for Islam and being like "enemy of muh enemy" thinking that the Muslims can tell apart "good kaffirs" from "bad kaffirs" and won't just rape them to death when the time is right.

As for their great history (mostly consisting of murder and theft), I'd rather read about it in books than have it still exist in reality. Can even build a Museum of Islamic History, but Islam has to be history for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom