Is the Great Replacement really a bad thing?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Neither good nor bad, just not feasible:

1710724657342.jpeg
 
Objectively, from an amoral perspective, no. It's just survival of the fittest, if white people want to win the Darwin award so be it.

Subjectively, from a moral perspective, yes. White people have a right to their own countries and should defend their homes by any means necessary.
 
Objectively, from an amoral perspective, no. It's just survival of the fittest, if white people want to win the Darwin award so be it.

Subjectively, from a moral perspective, yes. White people have a right to their own countries and should defend their homes by any means necessary.
faux atavism is fun
 
Objectively, from an amoral perspective, no. It's just survival of the fittest, if white people want to win the Darwin award so be it.

Subjectively, from a moral perspective, yes. White people have a right to their own countries and should defend their homes by any means necessary.
it was by Herbert Spencer btw
 
Back
Top Bottom