War Iranian lawmaker declares Tehran obtained nuclear bombs - Guess who might have the atomic bomb now?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


Iranian lawmaker declares Tehran obtained nuclear bombs​

Biden faces criticism for failing to impose pressure campaign on Iran as it races toward nuclear weapon​

By Benjamin Weinthal ·Fox News
Published May 12, 2024 11:52am EDT





Fox News senior strategic analyst Ret. Gen. Jack Keane joins 'The Story with Martha MacCallum' to discuss U.S. State Secretary Antony Blinken's visit to Israel and the anti-Israel protests.
JERUSALEM – After the head of the United Nation’s atomic watchdog agency warned that Iran has enough uranium to produce "several" nuclear bombs, a firebrand Iranian lawmaker declared on Friday that the Islamic Republic of Iran possesses atomic weapons.
"In my opinion, we have achieved nuclear weapons, but we do not announce it. It means our policy is to possess nuclear bombs, but our declared policy is currently within the framework of the JCPOA," Ahmad Bakhshayesh Ardestani told the Iran-based outlet Rouydad 24 on Friday, according to an article published by the independent news organization Iran International in London.
The JCPOA is an abbreviation for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the formal name for the Iran nuclear deal. President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the JCPOA in 2018 because, his administration argued, the accord did not stop Iran’s drive to build atomic weapons.
The JCPOA provides massive economic sanctions relief to Iran in exchange for assurances it will not, within a limited time period, build a nuclear weapon.

Screenshot_1298.png

Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei addresses the media during parliamentary elections in Tehran on May 10, 2024. (Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Ardestani, who was re-elected to Iran’s quasi-parliament in March, added, "The reason is that when countries want to confront others, their capabilities must be compatible, and Iran's compatibility with America and Israel means that Iran must have nuclear weapons,"
The Iranian parliament member noted, "In a climate where Russia has attacked Ukraine and Israel has attacked Gaza, and Iran is a staunch supporter of the Resistance Front, it is natural for the containment system to require that Iran possess nuclear bombs. However, whether Iran declares it is another matter." Fox News Digital sent press queries to Iran’s Foreign Ministry in Tehran and its U.N. mission in New York.
Experts on Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program warned about the seemingly speculative comments made by Ardestani. Jason Brodsky, the policy director of the U.S.-based United Against a Nuclear Iran, told Fox News Digital that "Ardestani is only a member of parliament, and he’s not in the inner core of the regime’s nuclear decision-making circle, so while his comments are interesting, I think they have to be weighed properly given his access and standing."
Just two days before Ardestani’s announcement, the president of the Iranian Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Kamal Kharrazi, told Al-Jazeera Network Qatar, "I announced two years ago, in an interview with Al-Jazeera TV, that Iran had the absorptive capacity and the capability to produce a nuclear bomb. Iran still has that capability, but we have not made the decision to produce a nuclear bomb. However, if the Iranian interests are threatened in this manner, we may change this doctrine. The military officials in Iran have announced that if our nuclear facilities would be attacked, we may change our military doctrine, with regard to the nuclear facilities." The U.S.-based Middle East Media Institute (MEMRI) translated and published Kharrazi’s May 8 interview.

Screenshot_1299.png

Kamal Kharrazi speaks at a panel on March 27, 2022. (Karim Jaafar/AFP via Getty Images)
Brodsky said, "Kharrazi’s comments are part of an increasingly loud chorus of threats from Iranian officials that they will change Iran’s nuclear doctrine if Israel attacks them. The current advanced state of Iran’s nuclear program provides it with the luxury to make these threats as it hopes to deter Western policymakers from launching pressure campaigns on Tehran."
Critics of the Biden administration’s Iran policy argue the White House strategy of de-escalation and containment targeting Iran’s atomic program has backfired. Iran’s regime – the world’s worst state-sponsor of international terrorism – is moving at an astonishingly fast pace to secure an operational nuclear weapon.
Nuclear security alarm bells are ringing over Iran’s illicit atomic program in Europe. Fox News Digital obtained the April intelligence agency report for Germany’s most populous state, Nordrhein-Westfalen.
The German intelligence report notes, "The Islamic Republic's continued intensive procurement efforts by Iran in Germany continues" for its "nuclear and missile program." The German experts added "proliferation-relevant activities by Iran to circumvent existing sanctions in favor of Iran's nuclear and missile programs can still be assumed."
When approached by Fox News Digital, a U.S. State Department spokesperson referred to spokesperson Matthew Miller’s comments when he responded to Kamal Kharrazi's remarks on May 9: "Those comments are irresponsible, but as the President and Secretary have made clear, the United States will ensure one way or another that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. We continue to use a variety of weapon – or sorry – a variety of tools in pursuit of that goal and all options remain on the table. Ultimately, we believe that diplomacy is the best way to achieve a sustainable, effective solution, but given their escalation across the board – including their failure to cooperate with the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] – we are far from – far away from anything like that right now."
David Wurmser, a former senior adviser for nonproliferation and Middle East strategy for former Vice President Dick Cheney, told Fox News Digital, "The distance from where Iran is purported to be to an actual deliverable device is still a ways away, provided the information that we have in our operating from is correct. And that is quite a proviso. We know that North Koreans have been interacting with the Iranians, and we know relations with North Korea go back many, many years."
The communist state of North Korea previously aided Syria in building its illicit nuclear reactor. Israel’s air force knocked out the reactor in 2007.

Screenshot_1300.png

David Wurmser, former senior adviser for nonproliferation and Middle East strategy for former Vice President Dick Cheney, in Washington D.C. (David Howells/Corbis via Getty Images)
Wurmser warned, "As since intelligence is generally incomplete and is inherently seeking to discover that which is given to being opaque with much hidden, we have to assume surprises. I realize in the Iraq war we imagined there was more there than there actually was – and there was more than what is popularly understood – but Iraq is actually a very rare circumstance. The Pakistani, the Russian, the Chinese, the Indian, and even the South African programs all were ahead of what we had expected when they were exposed. For that matter, that was the case with Libya as well."
The non-proliferation expert noted, "So, on balance, I doubt Iran has a nuclear weapon yet, but I also doubt that the program is in a stable state, even a stable state regarding weaponization. I think Iran is pushing ahead and has every intention to go all the way. So time on this may still be there, but it is short and running out fast. And of course, the consequences of an Iranian bomb are catastrophic for the region, for Israel’s survival, and for the status of American power in the globe."
The recent saber-rattling over Iran’s nuclear weapons program from regime officials and lawmakers coincides with International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi’s May 8 statement that his organization was working "very hard with [Iran] to prevent [nuclear weaponization] from happening."
 
WMD2.0? Guess who’s getting liberated…time for a draft and to cull the surplus angry young men before they cull the government? All so tiresome
 
WMD2.0? Guess who’s getting liberated…time for a draft and to cull the surplus angry young men before they cull the government? All so tiresome
The heebs People have been calling for an invasion of Iran since the mid 2000s. No one is gonna do shit.
 
iirc isn't MEMRI is great for memes but somewhat questionable beyond that?
MEMRI is a translation service... that "happens" to pick and choose the most outlandish shit to translate. Hardly the best source on an accurate picture of Middle-Eastern politics. I suspect this is the same. They picked the most radical statement from an Iranian official, likely speaking outside the official Iranian position, and hope you only notice "...we have achieved nuclear weapons..." outside of the context.

I suspect the reality is one of two things: One, Iran doesn't have the bomb yet but is close, and we'll know when they have it when there's a new nuclear test detected. Or two, Iran has or will have the capability to rapidly produce a bomb, but won't field or test it until they feel the pressing need to. Think Israel's "strategic ambiguity;" this muddies the intelligence waters, avoids further sanctions, and yet still keeps a deterrent. I suspect the second is most likely, and what the official is referring to. They basically have it, but they technically don't.
 
"In my opinion, we have achieved nuclear weapons, but we do not announce it. It means our policy is to possess nuclear bombs, but our declared policy is currently within the framework of the JCPOA," Ahmad Bakhshayesh Ardestani told the Iran-based outlet Rouydad 24 on Friday, according to an article published by the independent news organization Iran International in London.
This is all you have to read. Wait for other confirmation before caring. JCPOA = Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
 
Oh I know. If I had a pound for every article I’ve read insisting that we simply must invade Iran I’d have enough for a decent meal out.
I'm speaking to the rafters. The people in the nosebleeds. Those young enough to not remember Dubya and Obama's admins. Or those that weren't paying attention back then.
 
Last edited:
that "happens" to pick and choose the most outlandish shit to translate.
tbf I really doubt anybody would give a fuck about the milquetoast crap of the islamic broadcasting world
like whatever their answer to Hugh Hewitt is
 
Stop seething about MEMRI because they are a Jew op

Their translations are accurate and funny as fuck

They are the ones who brought megastar FARFOUR to the West
oh yeah, I dig them for sure, I'm just trying to make sure I'm up to speed with where they are, in case there was some major change behind the scenes like Drudge Report had
 
Back
Top Bottom