Opinion Inflation Is Your Fault - If people are so mad about high prices, why do they keep buying so many expensive things?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1701566954285.png
Courtesy of Fu Meng / Art Labor Gallery

By Annie Lowrey
DECEMBER 1, 2023, 7:41 AM ET

You would think, with prices as high as they are, that Americans would have tempered their enthusiasm for shopping of late; that they would have pulled back spending on luxury items; that they would have sought out budget and basic options, bought smaller packages, fewer things.

This is not what has happened. Consumer spending rose 0.2 percent, after accounting for higher prices, in October, the most recent month for which the government has data. Online shopping jumped 7.8 percent over the Thanksgiving long weekend, more than analysts had anticipated. The sales of new cars, dishwashers, cruise vacations, jewelry—all things people tend to give up when they are watching their budget—remain strong. Consultants keep anticipating a recession precipitated by the “death of the consumer.” Thus far, the consumer is staying alive.

People hate inflation, just not enough to spend less: This is one of the central tensions of today’s economy, in which things are going great yet everyone is miserable. And in some ways, Americans have nobody to blame but themselves.

Three years ago, the pandemic gnarled supply chains around the world, leading to shortages of many consumer goods. At the same time, the American government transferred roughly $1.8 trillion to households in the form of generous unemployment-insurance benefits, an amped-up child tax credit, stimulus checks, and delayed or forgiven student-loan payments. Less supply, more demand—it was a recipe for higher costs.

Costs really rose. A dozen eggs went for $1.33 the summer after the pandemic hit; the price topped out at $4.83 last winter. Gas prices nearly tripled. Used cars started trading for as much as or even more than new cars. The cost of leasing an apartment surged. The cost of buying a house went up even more.

More recently, prices have been driven up, if more slowly, by the strong labor market. The unemployment rate is as low as it ever gets and has been for some time, with labor shortages in a number of sectors: air-traffic control, education, retail, trucking, police and public safety, nursing, plumbing, and electric. The tight labor market has forced employers to pay workers more, boosting wages, particularly at the lower end of the income spectrum. Real hourly earnings for workers in the tenth percentile of wage distribution went up more than 8 percent in the past three and a half years, the economists David Autor, Arindrajit Dube, and Annie McGrew found. And average wages have grown faster than average prices.

Sticker shock is real. And in surveys, people say that they are trading down because of cost pressures. But in fact they are spending more than they ever have, even after accounting for higher prices. They’re spending not just on the necessities, but on fun stuff—amusement parks, UberEats.

People just have a lot of money on hand. More broadly, they seem to be less likely to change their purchasing habits in response to price shifts—even when budgets are leaner. A raft of recent studies have found that American consumers have become less price-sensitive in recent decades. Households are using fewer coupons. People are spending less time mulling over what to buy when they’re shopping.

Why? Maybe because, although prices of many consumer goods are higher than they were a few years back, they’re still much, much more affordable than they were a few decades ago, thanks to globalized trade and manufacturing advances. (The price of a television has dropped more than 90 percent since the late 1990s.) Your grandparents might have gone to three different grocery stores to get the best deals. Would it really be worth it for you to do the same now? Maybe not. Especially not if you have a job. It used to be much more common for one partner in a marriage to make the money and the other to raise the kids and spend the cash. Today, working-age women are only a little less likely than men to be employed, giving them less time and energy to pinch pennies.

Another theory: Consumers might have become more brand-loyal, less willing to trade Coke for Squirt or Nike for Sketchers. Perhaps that is because companies have gotten better at tailoring products to people’s tastes. Perhaps it is just inertia: People get more stuck in their ways as they get older, as the average American has. You’ll pay more for Starbucks coffee because you always get Starbucks coffee.

It should be good news that Americans are better off than they were pre-pandemic. It should be good news that people can afford more, even if prices are high. But then why is everyone so mad about prices? Higher prices are just vexing, making people do mental math every time they shop. Economists point to other psychological factors too: People seem to think of their swelling bank accounts as a result of their own hard work, but consider cost increases someone else’s screw up. Nor do average consumers see inflation as something that might benefit them by, say, eating away at the value of their mortgage payments.

People want to blame Joe Biden for their bills. They want to accuse stores of gouging them (though the evidence for “greedflation” is scant). The strange truth is that most people really are in a more comfortable position, even if they’re not happy about it. It’s not like a weak economy, stagnant wages, crummy consumer spending, and cheaper stuff would be better, after all.

Source (Archive)
 
TJD.

View attachment 5538169


Personal life[edit]​

Lowrey attended Harvard University. While at Harvard, she wrote for the Harvard Crimson.[12]
Lowrey is married to Ezra Klein, the co-founder of Vox and currently a columnist and podcast host at the New York Times.[13][14] They have two children, the first born in February 2019 and the second in fall 2021.[15] In 2022, Lowrey wrote about how each of her pregnancies involved significant health complications.[16]
What is the Jew version of coal burner?
 
You know, I can't help but wonder if articles like this are all just part of a massive gay-op meant to enrage the common people enough that they'll "rise up" and start the next stage of the Revolution they all secretly want so much.
 
Gee I wonder how those people are paying for these things in this great economy...

1701612782996.png
The peak at around $870 bln in 2020 was the previous all-time high.
 
You know, I can't help but wonder if articles like this are all just part of a massive gay-op meant to enrage the common people enough that they'll "rise up" and start the next stage of the Revolution they all secretly want so much.
They are not smart enough to think that far ahead or that deeply about the motivations/consequences of normal people's actions.

The only plot they're following here is the usual regression when the public gives them low approval:

Look, it's not bad
Okay, it's bad, but not everywhere
Okay, it's bad, everywhere, but not to everyone
Okay, it's bad, everywhere, to everyone, but not all the time.
0kay, it's bad, everywhere, to everyone, all the time, but it's your fault not ours.
Okay, it's bad, everywhere, to everyone, all the time, and it might be our fault, but, what do you want? Replace us with HITLER!??!?!?!?!

When it gets to the end of the blame game, they will always default to "voting us out will make it worse"

This is nothing but a temper tantrum that you are holding them accountable for societal problems instead of just buckling down and dealing with them until they just naturally get better.

To them, the problem with Weimar Germany wasn't that things got so bad the public went with Hitler, the problem was the people were just too weak to tank eating sawdust for a few years to keep him out of power......

Its YOUR duty as a plebe to suffer the fallout of the elite's bad choices until they finally hit upon utopia.
 
Last edited:
This is the type of attitude that got people's heads separated from their bodies in 1791 France

Let them eat cake!
The thing is, cake is cheaper than ordinary, healthy eggs and milk. Seriously - for the price of half a dozen eggs at my local supermarket, I can buy a cheap, mass-produced cake. If I want to bake my own bread instead of buy some soya-flour loaf from the supermarket, God help me because just the flour costs the same or more.

Poor people are condemned for not eating healthily. At the same time, it's literally something you have to pay more to do. Cake, sweets, soda... these are now the same or cheaper than healthy staples. Throw in the time it takes to actually cook something...
 
This is such spiteful, infantile cope. Unreal. "These peasants, how dare they roundly reject Potato Biden for his litany of disastrous failures!" Cunt. Hope you have some juicy ulcers.
 
My attitude toward the pain and suffering of journos is the same as Descartes toward the suffering of the poor animals he tortured.
 
And now that most of the west has become a copy of Weimar Germany... what happens next will definitely be interesting.
what happens next will definitely be interesting.
Antisemitism normalized? ✅
Crippling debt and poverty? ✅
Mass discontent with the system? ✅
Weird tranny pedo porn everywhere? ✅
Kiddy touchers in politics? ✅
Private central bank got you down? ✅

Yep, it's gamer time.
italy+1936-4107966498.jpg
German_federal_election,_1933.svg.png

Me ne frego
 
Last edited:
I was the one that set the main interest rate at 0.25% for 21 years like the Federal Reserve did? I was the one that spent FIFTY-THREE TRILLION DOLLARS in the last 9 years like the federal government did?
 
When did our journalistic institutions get completely infected and perverted into corporate stenographers and political propagandists?
It's always had an element of this. However, there is a commonly held argument in recent decades that it has increasingly become a prestige field, and a jumping off/end-point for political aspirants. Here's the introduction to an article from the 70's about the CIA's control over media:
In 1953, Joseph Alsop, then one of America’s leading syndicated columnists, went to the Philippines to cover an election. He did not go because he was asked to do so by his syndicate. He did not go because he was asked to do so by the newspapers that printed his column. He went at the request of the CIA.
Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty‑five years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. Some of these journalists’ relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services—from simple intelligence gathering to serving as go‑betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without‑portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the derring‑do of the spy business as in filing articles; and, the smallest category, full‑time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of America’s leading news organizations.
The "news" field has methodically become syndicated and controlled by multi-national corporations, whose interest align with those of the intelligence agencies, as the legal barriers have been rescinded. The credentialist gatekeeping in journalism leaves only the people who can afford to take a gamble on their future, or those who can rely on nepotism, to pursue the field. In the past, journalism was largely done by blue-collar people, talking about the towns they live in, and and the newspapers were locally owned business.
 
It should be good news that people can afford more, even if prices are high.
Annie, why is consumer debt at record levels?

Oh, Annie you out of touch privileged leftist twat:
earlylifeyousay.png
In the event you do not know who Ezra Klein is:
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.png
 

Attachments

  • 1701637889210.png
    1701637889210.png
    331 KB · Views: 11
Not if I'm eating beans and rice.

Yes. Those brats could live comfortably in an Amazon box. You probably could if you lost weight.
Fuck no, I need to remain strong and heavy so I can beat the shit out of twig armed commies trying to push me into the pods. Seriously though, I'm going to continue eating what I want until the day I die just to spite these fucks.
 
US schools do not teach financial literacy.
They do constantly teach kids though from preschool to highschool that they immediately, before getting any experience in life or the workforce, NEED to take on tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in student debt ASAP and go to college. They teach that you need to go to indoctination daycare and become a debt slave or you'll never make any money. Just like how they teach that girls have penises.
 
The legitimacy of American governance is now derived from bread and circuses. You've eroded away shared culture, patriotism, and the possibility of a bright and hopeful future. The United States' sole remaining claim to sovereignty is its ability to furnish its client population with big macs, new cars, and hard CUMS.
It is NOT on the responsibility of American citizens to quit cooming and consooming. The onus is on you niggerfaggot corpo stooges and """President""" Biden apologists to make sure the wheel keeps turning.
 
Uh, I know we like to go on about how things got corrupted, but they've always been the mouthpiece of the government or spewing bullshit for money.
It's always had an element of this.
Yep.
1701642529612.png
Misc fun fact. US schools do not teach financial literacy.
again, I seem to be the odd one out. Financial literacy was taught at my school....as an elective. I thank God I took that class, because if I didn't, I wouldn't have been as successful as I am now.
 
Back
Top Bottom