UN Indonesia is moving is its capital - 'cuz Old Jakarta is sinking man and I don't wanna swim

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Indonesia's planning minister announces capital city move
8 hours ago

Indonesia is moving its capital city away from Jakarta, according to the country's planning minister.

Bambang Brodjonegoro said President Joko Widodo had chosen to relocate the capital in "an important decision".

The new location is not yet known. However state media reports one of the front runners is Palangkaraya, on the island of Borneo.

Jakarta, home to over 10 million people, is sinking at one of the fastest rates in the world.

The announcement comes after Mr Widodo declared victory in the country's general election earlier this month, though official results will not be announced until May 22.

Why move the capital?
The idea of moving the capital has been floated several times since the country gained independence from the Dutch in 1945.

In 2016, a survey found that the mega-city had the world's worst traffic congestion. Government ministers have to be escorted by police convoys to get to meetings on time.

The planning minister says snarl-ups in Jakarta costs the economy 100 trillion rupiah ($6.8bn, £5.4bn) a year.

There has also been a huge programme to decentralise government for the last two decades in a bid to give greater political power and financial resources to municipalities.

Jakarta metro to battle notorious traffic
Why Indonesia's capital Jakarta is sinking
Jakarta is also one of the fastest-sinking cities in the world.

Researchers say that large parts of the megacity could be entirely submerged by 2050. North Jakarta sunk 2.5m (eight feet) in 10 years and is continuing to sink an average of 1-15cm a year.

The city sits on the coast on swampy land, criss-crossed by 13 rivers.

Half of Jakarta is below sea level. One of the main causes of this is the extraction of groundwater which is used as drinking water and for bathing.

What are the options?
In a closed cabinet meeting, three options were reportedly discussed and presented to the president.

One involved making a special zone for government offices inside the current capital; another was to move it to just outside Jakarta and the third, the one the president preferred, was to build a brand new capital on another island.

The chief candidate is Palangkaraya, hundreds of kilometres to the north-east in central Kalimantan - the part of Borneo that belongs to Indonesia.

It is geographically close to the centre of the archipelago and Indonesia's founding father Sukarno proposed to make it the capital.

In Palangkaraya there is a mixed reaction to the idea of their sleepy city becoming the nation's capital.

One high school student told the BBC: "I hope the city will develop and the education will become as good as in Jakarta. But all the land and forest that's empty space now will be used. Kalimantan is the lungs of the world, and I am worried, we will lose the forest we have left."

Mr Brodjonegoro said that the process could take 10 years. He told reporters after the meeting that if other countries could achieve it, so could Indonesia.

"Brazil moved from Rio de Janeiro to Brasilia near the Amazon, and look at Canberra it's built between Sydney and Melbourne, and Kazakhstan moved their capital to closer to the centre of the country and also Myanmar moved to Naypyidaw," he said.

The announcement comes after Mr Widodo vowed to spread economic development more evenly around the country.

Image caption
North Jakarta is sinking by about 25cm every year
A powerful political message
By Rebecca Henschke, former editor, BBC Indonesian

Indonesians are sceptical about their capital ever moving. They have heard this before and none of Indonesia's six presidents have been able to pull it off.

But President Joko Widodo has achieved ambitious infrastructure building in his five years in office, so he may well be the man that finally does it.

Indonesia is an incredibly diverse nation made up of hundreds of ethnic groups living on thousands of islands. But economic development, national cultural identity and political power have always been dominated by the Javanese.

Indonesians have never elected a non-Javanese president and most of Indonesia's wealth is concentrated in Jakarta.

Indonesians living outside Java, particularly in the east, have long complained about being forgotten and neglected by the country's leaders sitting in the sprawling capital.

Moving the capital out of Java would send a powerful political message that this is changing, if it happens.

Related Topics

As the BBC video point out, the city has sunk a combined LeBron James and Micheal Jordan.


Hopefully, the new capital city will be as beloved and lively as other new capital cities like Washington, D.C., Ottawa, Canberra or Brasilia.
 
I understand that large parts of Jakarta will soon be uninhabitable, with or without rising oceans from melting icecaps, but I don't like the idea of moving the Indonesian capital to sparsely-populated Borneo, home to one of the largest relatively unspoiled rainforests in the world after the Amazon (itself under threat).

Borneo, at 743,330 sq km (287,000 sq mi), is over three and a half times the size of Great Britain and is even slightly larger than the state of Texas but has a combined population of only about 21.5 million people, mostly settled in coastal cities. It's home to some unique animal species like the proboscis monkey and the Borneo Pygmy Elephant.
 
The article does a poor job pointing out Jakarta is sinking because it’s heavily overpopulated (probably to shoddily infer global warming is at fault). It’s a major problem in every city, though, built in a swamp/marsh. Mexico City is also sinking for the same reason, built in a marsh and they’re consuming all the ground water.

I say sterilize the poor/homeless and tell everyone else to have 1 kid.
 
Hopefully, the new capital city will be as beloved and lively as other new capital cities like Washington, D.C., Ottawa, Canberra or Brasilia.
At least Washington D.C. and Ottawa are old enough to have matured and develop organically to an extent. Canberra could have if the government wasn't the only landlord.

The new Indonesian capital will probably be like Brasilia, Putrajaya, or Ashgabat. It might look cool at first sight, but in reality it's a sad place.
 
I bet we could fast forward 50 years and this still would not have happened. Shame though, I feel that moving the seat of government out of the metropole is typically good for the nations that do it.
 
Jakarta's problem sounds familiar...

hail-atlanta.jpg
 
is it really cheaper to move the entire capital somewhere else instead of building some levees
Unless you share the name of vacuum cleaner, levees don't say "muh legacy" like building a city from scratch you can dedicate to yourself.

I bet we could fast forward 50 years and this still would not have happened. Shame though, I feel that moving the seat of government out of the metropole is typically good for the nations that do it.
Right, because moving the capital of the U.K. to Milton Keynes 2.0 in the middle of nowhere is totally a great idea!

Something like the Netherlands with Amsterdam and The Hague sharing capital functions is the ideal format.
 
Right, because moving the capital of the U.K. to Milton Keynes 2.0 in the middle of nowhere is totally a great idea!
This, but unironically. The undue concentration of people and wealth in south-east England is bad for the rest of the country, it leads to fiscal policy having to account for the "north" doing poorly while the southeast is booming. If government moved two hundred miles northwest into the sticks it wouldn't be the sticks for long, it would be a booming city and magnet for capital investment. The Germans, for all intents and purposes, did this after reunification, though some functions are still in Frankfurt, I believe. And look at that, Berlin is an island of growth in the otherwise still underperforming East.
 
The Capital is just a couple buildings. They're not moving the population, just the politicians.

And, I don't think that a coastal city getting swelled up is suddenly going to destroy the rainforest.
 
Last edited:
As the BBC video point out, the city has sunk a combined LeBron James and Micheal Jordan.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3UomZkVgAo
Hopefully, the new capital city will be as beloved and lively as other new capital cities like Washington, D.C., Ottawa, Canberra or Brasilia.
I'm just commenting because the hip reference in the title made me really happy. That being said, :(
 
something like the Netherlands with Amsterdam and The Hague sharing capital functions is the ideal format.
I don't think Amsterdam and the Hague share any capital functions. The Dutch constitution names Amsterdam as the capital, but everything is run from The Hague.
The Germans, for all intents and purposes, did this after reunification, though some functions are still in Frankfurt, I believe. And look at that, Berlin is an island of growth in the otherwise still underperforming East.
Bonn served as the capital of West Germany from 1949 until the Reunification. Then there was a big debate on where the capital was going to be moving forward. For the most part, Berlin won and got most of the important federal state organs (e.g. Chancellery, Bundestag, etc.) and most federal ministries, but Bonn got to keep a few ministries. I would imagine even if the federal government remained in Bonn, Berlin would be doing just fine, given it is the country's largest city.
 
The only reason this isn't a problem for New York City is that that it was situated on some very favorable bedrock. You can build a shit ton of skyscrapers in lower Manhattan without pushing the whole city into the sea.
 
Back
Top Bottom