🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

[AJMLurker]

Well folks, here we go again.

This last poser also said that they already have places like this; they're called "strip clubs", and accuses me of using people to satisfy my own ends. What's sad is, she is someone I once considered a friend, and have even included in the comic. We had a falling-out last year after the whole silly Ferguson mess, and she went over to the dark side. She's so far out there I don't think we can ever retrieve her. Progressive ideology: poisoning minds and turning your friends into enemies since half-past 1997.

Sweet Bro, I'm actually really glad you went off on this little spergfest about Treen here. It allows me to bring up a certain aspect of your mindset I've picked up on since this whole fiasco started. Couldn't bring it up earlier since it would of been too random and derail the already great conversation going on here, but since you had to briiing up Treen...

Now Sweetness, you don't realize it, but your misogyny is showing again. I've (ok, everybody has) noticed how you hilariously react differently to females that criticize you from males that criticize you. Alright, a heads up, I'm gonna have to play armchair psychologist for the next part of this post. Let's see if I can take a crack at figuring out what's gonna on in that big ole head of Sweet Bro... shit, I'm probably gonna have to take six showers after this post too.

Spoiler: Playing armchair psychologist and other sperging

From Sweet's perspective, we men are evil progressive liberal masterminds with an elaborate agenda to take away everything that he loves and cherishes. Our criticism against Sweet is always motivated by a deep-seated fear of him and we work tirelessly to keep him down so he won't rise to his true potential as, wait for it, the conservative savior. OH NOES GAIZ, SWEET BRO HAS FIGURED US ALL OUT! PLAN B! PLAN B!

On the other hand, it shows in Sweet Bro's prose that he perceives the women criticizing him in a more innocent fashion, like they've been seduced by The System ran by us evil liberal men. With Treen, it is blatant, but with the Kiwi female members, it is more subtle, probably because he sees them as too far gone and ultimately, "lost causes". At the same time though, if he could, he would use his epic conservative powahs to convert them back to the light side so their eyes could also be opened to DA SYSTEM (and afterwards they'll be sex objects and baby-making machines for, you guessed it, Jonathan M. Sweet). Not to mention, we've all seen how he tries to impress da ladies online with his not so subtle attempts at flirting. Is he hoping they'll come over to his blog to cyber with him or better yet, fly out to Arkansas so they can hook up with his goofy ass in a broom closet?

What inspired this tangent is how Sweet Bro muses on @Treenbeen in the quote above. I know it can be easy to forget, but I'm also from AJM STUDIOS. Not only that, but I was there from the very beginning, one of the most active members, and considered very high in their social hierarchy. We have seen how Sweet Bro laments over Treenbeen no longer asspatting him and pleas for her to come back from the clutches of the evil liberal Kiwi ways multiple times, but how does he respond to me (scroll down till you see the AJMLurker post)? He immediately dubs my level-headed criticism of him as progressive liberal nonsense and effectively lumps me into the evul liberal camp.

I'm not offended at all of course. In fact, I consider it a compliment in its own weird Sweetness way. I'm just pointing this out as an example to highlight Sweet Bro's differing treatment of the sexes. This is simply speculation though. Who knows, Sweet Bro is pretty slow and simply might've not fully processed the fact that I'm Killerboy from AJM STUDIOS even though I admitted it months ago. Maybe, he thinks I'm a Kiwi impersonating him. At the same time, he might not give a shit about what I, Killerboy, think of him since 1) I'm not fully white and 2) don't have a vagina. Or if Sweet Bro is really delusional, he probably believes that I, Killerboy, was always a deep cover liberal from the beginning and infiltrated the conservative stronghold AJM STUDIOS during its infancy. Then when the time was right, I brainwashed Treenbeen, call in my Kiwi contacts to raid the forum, and blackmailed AJM to close down the forum. Hell, maybe @Dr. Merkwurdichliebe is the mastermind behind the grand Kiwi liberal conspiracy in Sweet's eyes. Sweet Bro loves sperging about him in his blog.

At the end of the day though, Sweet Bro sees anyone mocking him as living the perfect life from an ivory tower. He most likely believes all us Kiwis (well, the male ones) are typing our posts from super expensive laptops while chilling inside huge mansions, drinking champagne, reading the liberal playbook and surrounded by hot babes. Obviously that is not the case, but Sweetness has proven time and time again that he is an idiot and can't grasp the fact that we're not a hive mind of progressive liberals with a grand conspiracy against him.

Oh and Sweet, if you do respond to this post four months down the line, do not bother dismissing what I said here as "typical liberal feminist talk". Seriously, if you do that, I will reach my hand through the computer screen and slap that ugly mug of your's... actually, on second thought, I don't even wanna touch your face. But yeah, treating women as individuals and with respect, instead of sex objects, does not automatically make somebody a feminist that wants to emasculate men. Just because your autism prevents you from knowing how to interact with women doesn't mean that every guy out there who does know is a feminist.

Damn, that was a long post. I'm gonna go take a rest.

 

[Treenbeen]

Well folks, here we go again.

Sweet Bro, I'm actually really glad you went off on this little spergfest about Treen here. It allows me to bring up a certain aspect of your mindset I've picked up on since this whole fiasco started. Couldn't bring it up earlier since it would of been too random and derail the already great conversation going on here, but since you had to briiing up Treen...

Now Sweetness, you don't realize it, but your misogyny is showing again. I've (ok, everybody has) noticed how you hilariously react differently to females that criticize you from males that criticize you...

On the other hand, it shows in Sweet Bro's prose that he perceives the women criticizing him in a more innocent fashion, like they've been seduced by The System ran by us evil liberal men. With Treen, it is blatant, but with the Kiwi female members, it is more subtle, probably because he sees them as too far gone and ultimately, "lost causes". ..

What inspired this tangent is how Sweet Bro muses on @Treenbeen in the quote above. I know it can be easy to forget, but I'm also from AJM STUDIOS. Not only that, but I was there from the very beginning, one of the most active members, and considered very high in their social hierarchy. We have seen how Sweet Bro laments over Treenbeen no longer asspatting him and pleas for her to come back from the clutches of the evil liberal Kiwi ways multiple times, but how does he respond to me (scroll down till you see the AJMLurker post)? He immediately dubs my level-headed criticism of him as progressive liberal nonsense and effectively lumps me into the evul liberal camp...

...I, Killerboy, was always a deep cover liberal from the beginning and infiltrated the conservative stronghold AJM STUDIOS during its infancy. Then when the time was right, I brainwashed Treenbeen, call in my Kiwi contacts to raid the forum, and blackmailed AJM to close down the forum. Hell, maybe @Dr. Merkwurdichliebe is the mastermind behind the grand Kiwi liberal conspiracy in Sweet's eyes. Sweet Bro loves sperging about him in his blog.

Oh and Sweet, if you do respond to this post four months down the line, do not bother dismissing what I said here as "typical liberal feminist talk". Seriously, if you do that, I will reach my hand through the computer screen and slap that ugly mug of your's... actually, on second thought, I don't even wanna touch your face. But yeah, treating women as individuals and with respect, instead of sex objects, does not automatically make somebody a feminist that wants to emasculate men. Just because your autism prevents you from knowing how to interact with women doesn't mean that every guy out there who does know is a feminist.[/SPOILER]

Damn, that was a long post. I'm gonna go take a rest.

Just when I thought i was out...
First of all, I am dying over your "evil plan". How could you, friend?! You converted me to the evil liberal side!!! Oh wait... no, I'm an educated woman (I know, shocking, women can read and think for themselves, try not to have a heart attack) and I made my own educated decisions about things. I know... take your time.

And now, on to Dr. B's misogyny. Let's go...

First of all, notice the way he portrays most of the women in his comics? Very lewd, often stupid or incapable.. the list goes on and on. And I'm sure we all remember last year's final few posts on AJM in which the words "slut" and "tramp" were thrown about very (dare I say it) liberally indeed.

I don't have much to say that hasn't already been said, but Dr. B, if you have words for me, come share them here. Please don't make a blog post nearly a year down the line about how sad it is that I'm so "lost to the dark side" over the "silly Ferguson mess" (I know, how dare I be upset at the blatant loss of respect for human life in our country.) It's inconsiderate and disrespectful. Plus... if this is the dark side... I quite like it. I mean, for a lil' ol' girl like me (tee hee bats eyelashes) to have the ability to speak my mind, have an opinion, AND discuss with the MEN? Gracious sakes alive, I've never felt so privileged.

 

[Ruin]

It's fascinating how he doesn't seem to realize that grown men don't live in their college dorms for the rest of their lives.

 

[Shadow Fox]

This latest blog entry is basically Sweet screaming "LOOK AT HOW AUTISTIC I AM, GUYS! I AM REALLY, REALLY AUTISTIC AND HAVE EXTREME DIFFICULTY RELATING TO ORDINARY HUMAN BEINGS!"

KF: The character in that comic sure does look like he's dragging off an incapacitated woman to rape her. Why aren't any of the other characters doing anything?
JMS: It was based on an incident where some girl got plastered and her friends took her to the bathroom to throw up! Why would anyone call the cops about vomiting?!?! Gosh! Stupid commie liberals!

Now, as I said, Penny is a reporter, and probably morally, even legally, obligated to file this story. But she won't. She knows better. Two things will happen: Bimpson's buddies will go around the morning after that issue hits the stands and steal every copy on campus, thus protecting their friend by hiding or destroying the incriminating article. The paper eats thousands of dollars in printing costs, salaries, and labor. This will assure that future stories like this will go buried or unreported, because, hey, newsprint is expensive, right? Secondly, Penny would become the victim of relentless hazing for writing the story in the first place. It might be overt and open, such as vandalizing her room or a physical attack on her person, or the "velvet glove" brand-- they treat her nicely, win her trust and she never knows until some time later that it was all a ploy, and they used her. It's safest to not get involved. These things are best handled quietly.

So the college in the Belch Dimension is a shithole populated by pieces of shit who care about no one but themselves. The art does reflect the creator, I guess.

Now maybe in this Neo-Victorian age@ on campus we're all a little more safety-conscious, but remember, this was 1996. We didn't know better.

Sweet, of course, is right; rape and sexual assault weren't invented until after the turn of the 21st century. This explains why, when I was a freshman in 1996, I saw the posters @NobleGreyHorse talked about and got the speeches about campus safety and being aware of my surroundings and was encouraged to take self-defense classes.

In college you fairly exist surrounded by a bubble of unreality. I did, at least.

Nnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaawwww! Really? He's so well-adjusted I'd have never guessed.

Seriously? Did we just send 22-year-old adults back to frickin' kindergarten?

...says the manchild who obsesses over Kim Possible and My Little Pony.

That's a manly way to beat stress...

Jonathan M. Sweet wouldn't know manly if it carried him to bed and spent the evening plowing him with its turgid foot-long lovemuscle. (You're welcome for that mental image.)

Add to this "Mack Burke", who spent most of his time doing yeoman's work to keep me together@ in those days

As has already been pointed out, Sweetums is basically admitting he needed a tard wrangler in college. And from the sounds of things, either said wrangler didn't do a very good job (not that anyone could blame him for not wanting to waste his time babysitting a sped when he could actually be enjoying his time in college), or Jon Boy was so filled with weapons-grade autism he simply negated all attempts to keep him under control. Truly, Jonathan M. Sweet is the most exceptional of individuals.

Kiwi double-talk mania!....

KF: Your plans to return to AS(S)U and spend the rest of your life as a college student are at best unrealistic and at worst an incredible waste of time.
JMS: STAY MAD! I AM AUTISTIC AND CANNOT UNDERSTAND HUMAN EMOTION! YOU GUYS ARE SO MAD!!!

I've noticed often that many artists don't really draw dogs to look like any recognizable breed, even if it's outright stated.what breed they are. Take The Beagle Boys@, for example. One might wonder if Carl Barks had ever seen a beagle in his life.

Wait till someone tells him the Bloodhound Gang aren't even dogs.

I really want to tear apart his shitty-ass dog drawings for my own amusement. Maybe I'll do that after supper tonight.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Oh yes, I forgot about the "dogs in cartoons" diatribe -- how Buddy is a realistic dog and Charles Schulz would never have shown a dog peeing or blah blah etc. No shit? You think maybe? Perhaps he tackled other actually grown-up issues -- the nature of faith, for example; popularity in elementary school and the impact of bullies; unrequited love; injury and illness; mixed loyalty (the whole Snoopy, Come Home plot about Snoopy's being discovered by his former owner, Lila, and having to make the choice of whom to live with)... all without lewdness, crudity, misogyny (he never calls the Little Red-Haired Girl a "slut," for example), or anything you can't show and explain to your kids. And hell yes, people loved the upright, anthropomorphic version of Snoopy, whether he was a WWI flying ace, a world-famous heart surgeon, a tennis player squaring off against Billie Jean King, or any of his other amazing fantasy lives. Hell, his doghouse had the TARDIS quality of being bigger on the inside than the outside, containing as it did a pool table and several Andrew Wyeth paintings. So maybe not as "realistic" as what's-his-name draws Buddy. But inexplicably, several orders of magnitude more popular. How do we account for that, I wonder?

 

[AnOminous]

Spoiler: Playing armchair psychologist and other sperging

From Sweet's perspective, we men are evil progressive liberal masterminds with an elaborate agenda to take away everything that he loves and cherishes. Our criticism against Sweet is always motivated by a deep-seated fear of him and we work tirelessly to keep him down so he won't rise to his true potential as, wait for it, the conservative savior.

How does a cripplingly autistic retard like Sweet think he's going to do that in any possible world, with or without the Farms?

 

[Holdek]

Even if Sweet got the ban lifted (he won't).... Also, he never mentions going to another college, you know, one of the several thousand he's not banned from. I guess no one told him you could transfer.

Hell, he could have gone back to ASU...if he did the psychological counseling they mandated to begin with!

But now, even if he did do that, he would have to re-apply with no work history for the past 15 years, a criminal record, and the fact that he made the relationship between himself and the university exponentially worse by harassing current and former employees for years and even necessitating a visit by campus law enforcement.

Throw some ads on the site, sell merchandise, he might have some disposable income if he caters to the racist crowd.

Eh, there are actually better-drawn comics on the web that cater to that demographic already.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

And now, on to Dr. B's misogyny. Let's go...

First of all, notice the way he portrays most of the women in his comics? Very lewd, often stupid or incapable.. the list goes on and on.

Sexualization does not count as misogyny (dislike of women), per se. But given the other factors you mention, one could say that the portrayal of women in Belch Dimension is apparently misogynist. And like someone else said earlier - the apparent role of female students in Sweet's dream life is just for sex and chinaphone - I haven't seen him talk about female students doing anything else as far as I can recall.

I already know Sweet is obviously racist, so it shouldn't be a surprise if Sweet is sexist as well.

college dorms for the rest of their lives

The ideal college life to Sweet is clearly an endless party, with no real work or learning (other than the paper). I guess it's good that Sweet doesn't want to settle down and raise a family in his current state then - I don't think he's "father of the year" material...

How does [...] Sweet think he's going to do that[?]

With the help of the Teapot Domers*, of course! Sweet never really explained how that would work though from what I recall, except that "establishing a beachhead firmly in the past" is somehow involved.

*(which are, according to Sweet, a "more extreme version of the Tea Party")

 

[AJMLurker]

How does a cripplingly autistic exceptional individual like Sweet think he's going to do that in any possible world, with or without the Farms?

According to the weekly Autism Manifesto, by sitting on his ass and screaming at the Kiwi Farms, the glorious Jonathan M. Sweet will somehow usher in the half-past 1997 conservative kingdom where every autistic true & honest conservative shall receive their very own chinaphone, big screen TV to watch cartoons, and scrumptious buffet meal three times a day.

Once that occurs, all us evil progressives shall be banished to Sweet's toilet or something.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

every autistic true & honest conservative shall receive their very own chinaphone, big screen TV to watch cartoons, and scrumptious buffet meal three times a day.

That sounds very, you know, socialist.

 

[Shadow Fox]

It's fascinating how he doesn't seem to realize that grown men don't live in their college dorms for the rest of their lives.

I would honestly be very interested to hear what, if anything, he planned to do after his triumphant return to college. People go to college to learn, you know, and get a degree, so...after that, then what, Sweet? Or do you just expect to stay at college until you die, working your way through a succession of tard wranglers - sorry, """Cloudcuckoolander Minders""" - right up to the sorry son of a bitch who has to change your diapers and sponge-bathe your bedridden octogenarian ass in between classes and workstudy?

 

[AJMLurker]

That sounds very, you know, socialist.

And to think, that joke post was a nearly spot-on description of what he actually wants for the world. If he had the power and resources, his endgame would be to ensure that everyone is living the Sweetian version of college life. How does this relate to the conservative agenda again?

 

[Adamska]

Now, as I said, Penny is a reporter, and probably morally, even legally, obligated to file this story. But she won't. She knows better. Two things will happen: Bimpson's buddies will go around the morning after that issue hits the stands and steal every copy on campus, thus protecting their friend by hiding or destroying the incriminating article. The paper eats thousands of dollars in printing costs, salaries, and labor. This will assure that future stories like this will go buried or unreported, because, hey, newsprint is expensive, right? Secondly, Penny would become the victim of relentless hazing for writing the story in the first place. It might be overt and open, such as vandalizing her room or a physical attack on her person, or the "velvet glove" brand-- they treat her nicely, win her trust and she never knows until some time later that it was all a ploy, and they used her. It's safest to not get involved. These things are best handled quietly.

I find it ironic that Sweet, who went into college to become a journalist, is a chickenshit who would not ever want to blow the whistle.

That sounds very, you know, socialist.

Ironically, I think Obama signed or expanded bills around those very things. Although he meant it for the people of the US, namely the under and working class. Jonny Mindless here means it for just himself, the fuck.

And to think, that joke post was a nearly spot-on description of what he actually wants for the world. If he had the power and resources, his endgame would be to ensure that everyone is living the Sweetian version of college life. How does this relate to the conservative agenda again?

Because Bill Clinton or some shit.

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

You know, after reading so many of Sweet's posts, I do wonder if he ever actually spoke with people. Not like bragging to the Herald or AJM or trying to do shitty stand-up comedy in ASU, but legitimately speaking with others.

Sweets seems literally incapable of comprehending that there are differing opinions and interpretations of how the world works beyond his narrow minded view, to the point where it's almost Len levels of delusional. The Farms aren't just a place that laughs at him, but literally liberal conspiators trying to keep him down. His detractors in real life? Liberals or brainwashed students who are mindlessly following some blanket agenda. I mean for fuck's sake, he's still complaining about this poorly defined System despite the fact that he has never given any sort of tangible evidence or structure to how it works or how it even bloody exists. There are better supported 9/11 conspiracies.

This isn't like Chris or Striker or some of the more popular lolcows that simply view their attention as cyberbullying and harassment. They actively engage their audience to an extent, address these new things that are brought up to them, even add them into their list of grievances or interests, but Sweets? The dude has literally not budged an inch since his appearance besides moving from AJM to dA.

He is literally what would have happened if you took some paranoid nut from the Red Scare and put him down here. There are no new ideas, no changing world. There is just him and the wisps of progress that he delusionally believes all don the mask of liberalism.

In a way, he's already dead. His type of stagnation and willful disbelief is so severe he might as well not be living.

 

[John Titor]

You know, after reading so many of Sweet's posts, I do wonder if he ever actually spoke with people. Not like bragging to the Herald or AJM or trying to do shitty stand-up comedy in ASU, but legitimately speaking with others.

Sweets seems literally incapable of comprehending that there are differing opinions and interpretations of how the world works beyond his narrow minded view, to the point where it's almost Len levels of delusional. The Farms aren't just a place that laughs at him, but literally liberal conspiators trying to keep him down. His detractors in real life? Liberals or brainwashed students who are mindlessly following some blanket agenda. I mean for fuck's sake, he's still complaining about this poorly defined System despite the fact that he has never given any sort of tangible evidence or structure to how it works or how it even bloody exists. There are better supported 9/11 conspiracies.

This isn't like Chris or Striker or some of the more popular lolcows that simply view their attention as cyberbullying and harassment. They actively engage their audience to an extent, address these new things that are brought up to them, even add them into their list of grievances or interests, but Sweets? The dude has literally not budged an inch since his appearance besides moving from AJM to dA.

He is literally what would have happened if you took some paranoid nut from the Red Scare and put him down here. There are no new ideas, no changing world. There is just him and the wisps of progress that he delusionally believes all don the mask of liberalism.

In a way, he's already dead. His type of stagnation and willful disbelief is so severe he might as well not be living.

There really is no shortage of people who scream about the "evil libruhls who are murdering America by 'micromanaging'* people's lives" so it's a wonder why Sweet doesn't connect with them.

* I'm guessing this is some bullshit spouted by the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity?

 

[Adamska]

There really is no shortage of people who scream about the "evil libruhls who are murdering America by 'micromanaging'* people's lives" so it's a wonder why Sweet doesn't connect with them.

* I'm guessing this is some bullshit spouted by the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity?

Probably, or they are huge fanboys of like Ron Paul and some of the dumber libertarian mouth pieces.

Actually, I wonder what Sweet would think about the Libertarian movement if someone told him about it? I say told because he wouldn't bother to learn shit without it being given to him.

 

[Le Bateleur]

Sweet Bro is certainly a misogynist, of a particularly ugly stripe:

I just want to build a place where men who never had the money, the brains, or the time for school can live, work, and enjoy college-level amenities far cheaper than a campus would offer. Applicants to my college-living apartments will be carefully screened to keep out the freaks, weirdos, mutants, and barely-legal Bettys... far better monitored than A-State ever was. What they're really afraid of, I think, is placing the ASU business model, where the girls have become uppity, surly, and begun thinking they're a hell of a lot better than they are, and placing it in the hands of the smaller, sleeker, much-better run private sector.

Sift with me through this owl pellet of chauvinism:

I just want to build a place where men who never had the money, the brains, or the time for school can live, work, and enjoy college-level amenities far cheaper than a campus would offer.

Just the men. Sweetopia is a sausage-fest. It's not for the women who were too poor, dull or short of time to go to college. Jon Sweet doesn't care about female people. Maybe he can't imagine that they have any desires of their own. Maybe they scare him. Whatever the cause, any women who want to spend their twilight years in a recreation of a 90s frat house in Arkansas are out of luck.

barely-legal Bettys

"Barely-legal Betty" is Sweetspeak for "underage girl". The problem here is readily apparent. It is not "barely legal" to have sex with underage girls, it is "far from legal", "the opposite of legal", "illegal". "Barely legal" is a term used by the pornography industry to describe a subgenre of pornography featuring girls who look very young but are of legal age. The fact that Sweet repeatedly uses a pornography industry term to to describe underage girls is elucidating.

What they're really afraid of, I think, is placing the ASU business model, where the girls have become uppity, surly, and begun thinking they're a hell of a lot better than they are, and placing it in the hands of the smaller, sleeker, much-better run private sector.

Here's the real core of Sweet's misogyny. He thinks college girls are becoming "uppity" and "surly", and getting ideas above their station. It's not hard to deduce that the specific "uppity" behaviour of these women is their refusal to have sex with Sweet.

He blames the "ASU business model" for filling these girls' heads with liberal concepts like consent, and standards, and the idea that they have a right not to leap into bed with a wheezing, balding lecher in his 40s.

Sweet's ideal woman is vulnerable, ideally intoxicated, and with no self-esteem - but also beautiful and young and "upper-class". He feels like he missed out on BASICALLY PROMISED sex at ASU, and that he is entitled to be compensated now.

He could potentially find a romantic partner even in his current situation, but there is absolutely no way that it would be the lithe young aspiring underwar model of his virginal feverdreams. Such girls have standards, and to Sweet this is an affront. How dare they reject him! He wants them, and that's all that matters. In his mind, his only hope is to recreate the only environment he knows where there's an abundance of young women who are too drunk to be replled by him.

If he weren't so incompetent he'd be dangerous. As it is, he's stuck as a virgin with rage.

 

[Adamska]

You know the funniest thing about Sweet is to me? The fact that in spite of other massive tards coming here and overshadowing him at points for me (Shanetrain anyone?) he found ways to dig even deeper and make me remember his glorious failure of a life. From fully admitting he had a tard handler, to revealing that he's more reactionary than most Tea Partiers in hating everyone but WASPs, putting him on the same pedestal as those cross burners. It's like he tries to be a pathetic joke of a human being.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Sweet Bro is certainly a misogynist, of a particularly ugly stripe:

Sift with me through this owl pellet of chauvinism:

Just the men. Sweetopia is a sausage-fest. It's not for the women who were too poor, dull or short of time to go to college. Jon Sweet doesn't care about female people. Maybe he can't imagine that they have any desires of their own. Maybe they scare him. Whatever the cause, any women who want to spend their twilight years in a recreation of a 90s frat house in Arkansas are out of luck.

"Barely-legal Betty" is Sweetspeak for "underage girl". The problem here is readily apparent. It is not "barely legal" to have sex with underage girls, it is "far from legal", "the opposite of legal", "illegal". "Barely legal" is a term used by the pornography industry to describe a subgenre of pornography featuring girls who look very young but are of legal age. The fact that Sweet repeatedly uses a pornography industry term to to describe underage girls is elucidating.

Here's the real core of Sweet's misogyny. He thinks college girls are becoming "uppity" and "surly", and getting ideas above their station. It's not hard to deduce that the specific "uppity" behaviour of these women is their refusal to have sex with Sweet.

He blames the "ASU business model" for filling these girls' heads with liberal concepts like consent, and standards, and the idea that they have a right not to leap into bed with a wheezing, balding lecher in his 40s.

Sweet's ideal woman is vulnerable, ideally intoxicated, and with no self-esteem - but also beautiful and young and "upper-class". He feels like he missed out on BASICALLY PROMISED sex at ASU, and that he is entitled to be compensated now.

He could potentially find a romantic partner even in his current situation, but there is absolutely no way that it would be the lithe young aspiring underwar model of his virginal feverdreams. Such girls have standards, and to Sweet this is an affront. How dare they reject him! He wants them, and that's all that matters. In his mind, his only hope is to recreate the only environment he knows where there's an abundance of young women who are too drunk to be replled by him.

If he weren't so incompetent he'd be dangerous. As it is, he's stuck as a virgin with rage.

Sweet needs some intense therapy to deal with his skewed view of the world. At this point, he's more of a danger to himself than others, but if the right conditions presented themselves, he could conceivably be a threat to someone else. But I think the chances of that happening are unlikely.

 

[Chan the Wizard]

Based on his pictures, I doubt he could physically harm anyone unless he fell on them. He's 40, but easily looks at least 30 years older than that. He complains about his aches and pains like some geriatric. We've seen the pictures of his mother's home and yard. It's literally falling apart around them and yard is a tangled mess of overgrown plants. He doesn't have the mental capacity to control his own welfare check.

It's just pathetic. Too far gone to help. The only future for Sweets is in a group home or on the streets.