🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Also, I note that Sweet apparently thinks that he has to educate us on what a cactus is (referring to the "Nazi cactus" allegations), and he still erroneously thinks we're all "feeble-minded."*

*And this is coming from a guy who admitted on the very first page of this thread that a university in Arkansas is the "one tiny corner of the world where [he understands] the rules."
 
What's even more dumb is that most of us already acknowledge that it was an unfortunate coincidence.
 
Sweet's delusion that his college days were some kind of golden age for him is really depressing, but not as depressing as his fervent belief that he'll somehow return to those days.
 
Right? It's like some weird cargo cult. If he had any skills at anything, I wouldn't be surprised to see a little model dorm, maybe balsa wood, on a table in his basement.
 
Sweet said that he has purchased a commemorative brick from "AS(S)U." Actually - 2 of them - one at ASU, and one in his room.
I wonder if he has a little shrine built around it, surrounded by the tatters of his Pamela Anderson poster, clippings of his Herald articles, and a chipped plastic plate he stole from the cafeteria.

And piss jars.
 
I'm reading Ted Kaczinksi's (AKA the Unibomber) psychological report, and this bit struck me as very reminiscent of you-know-who:

Mr. Kaczynski's judgment is viewed as being poor, both from the basis of review of collateral information and observations within The interviews. He was unable to modify the presentation of his responses within the interviews to present information in a less negative light.

Evident throughout the interviews was marked ambivalence and this was apparent throughout his writings. He clearly exhibited the capacity to hold opposite and conflicting feelings toward the same person or issue, and showed no insight into this. He frequently expressed both hatred and a wish for revenge and love and affection for the same individual. He did show the capacity for sadness in interviews and would frequently tear up when remembering fleeting relationships he had with individuals. In that regard, it was noted that he tends to form very rapid intense emotional attachments to women, but also men. [text didacted]. Historically, he has developed love relationships that were never reciprocated with individuals and maintained them for extended periods of time, idealizing them and at time devaluing them. An example is a relationship he wished he had developed with when he was a young student at Harvard. He was able to identify that even at the age of 43, he had tracked her down and written her regarding the details of that relationship, which had never actually developed. He expressed regret that he had not heard back from her. He also demonstrated a propensity to focus on passing comments in regard to his self-image and to utilize those comments and incorporate them in an unusual way into his thought processes. An example is referencing a comment made by an older Italian woman when he was 15, that he was beautiful boy, especially his eyes. It was not until 1994 at the age of 50, that he further explored this issue and asked another woman, whom he did not know well, whether he was physically attractive. He indicated she responded he was "run of the mill" and at that point in time he no longer wondered why he had never developed a successful relationship with a woman. As described, he had grappled with that issue for more than 30 years because he had been told he was physically attractive at the age of 15 and he held onto that belief; so he could never understand why women were not attracted. Having now been told by another female in 1994 that he was simply average in looks, it immediately provided him with an explanation for why he had never established a relationship with a woman.

Mr. Kaczynski was able to demonstrate a very detailed capacity to handle information, but showed little insight into the nature of his difficulties or the ways to approach current problem solving. Although when asked whether he could consider a variety of options, he would reply "yes," he would persist in demonstrating why he would not choose to do so, even if the explanation presented was inconsistent with available information.

Mr. Kaczynski is a prolific writer. There is much repetition in his writings, which he does not appear fully able to appreciate. He currently exhibits a preoccupation with a need to negatively portray his family, and has in the midst of trial preparations, spent over four months writing an angry accusatory manuscript to "set the record straight." This consists of a rehashing of all the perceived injustices and a detailed focus on descriptions of events and conversations-

(http://paulcooijmans.com/psychology/unabombreport2.html)

I suppose what led me to the connection is that both are opposed to change, "The System" and its rules, and have problems with technological advancement.
 
Last edited:
So someone remind me. Has Sweets undergoes psychological/psychiatric examination?
 
very reminiscent of you-know-who
Sweet had to wait for a "geek" from tech support in order to figure out a CD burner in a laptop. I doubt he could build a bomb even if he wanted to.

Has Sweets undergoes psychological/psychiatric examination?
Sweet underwent a preliminary thing as part of a mental health requirement for getting back into ASU, but then found out that another session would cost a large amount Sweet couldn't afford (the person sending him to the mental health thing didn't tell him about said price or free alternatives, apparently), so Sweet had no choice but to leave ASU, IIRC.

Also, the fact that Sweet had to go to a mental health thing in the first place should tell you something about how Sweet really behaved at ASU. However, Sweet interpreted the mental health thing as part of a "ploy" to get him kicked out.
 
Last edited:
I'm reading Ted Kaczinksi's (AKA the Unibomber) psychological report, and this bit struck me as very reminiscent of you-know-who:

"An example is a relationship he wished he had developed with when he was a young student at Harvard. He was able to identify that even at the age of 43, he had tracked her down and written her regarding the details of that relationship, which had never actually developed."

"Mr. Kaczynski was able to demonstrate a very detailed capacity to handle information, but showed little insight into the nature of his difficulties or the ways to approach current problem solving. "

"Mr. Kaczynski is a prolific writer. There is much repetition in his writings, which he does not appear fully able to appreciate. He currently exhibits a preoccupation with a need to negatively portray his family, and has in the midst of trial preparations, spent over four months writing an angry accusatory manuscript to "set the record straight." This consists of a rehashing of all the perceived injustices and a detailed focus on descriptions of events and conversations-"

Good lord. You're right, @Holdek, there's a considerable amount of similarity there. How much you want to bet that if Sweet reads your quote, he'll regard it as proof that we're scared of him, completely missing the point?
 
I'm also really curious about why he feels he isn't "free" now. What's holding you back, Belch, other than your own laziness, irresponsibility and ineptitude? Why were you so much more liberated at half-past 1997 than you are today?
And yet, only three months ago, upon learning of the death of the faculty advisor of his old college newspaper:
Sweet said:
All I can say is, after all these years, my prayers have been answered. I' m finally free.
 
I'm reading Ted Kaczinksi's (AKA the Unibomber) psychological report, and this bit struck me as very reminiscent of you-know-who:


(http://paulcooijmans.com/psychology/unabombreport2.html)

I suppose what led me to the connection is that both are opposed to change, "The System" and its rules, and have problems with technological advancement.

Good thing Sweets isn't enough of a self-starter to bomb anybody.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, Sweet was ordered to get a full psychological evaluation, and the consensus in this thread is that the preliminary session revealed so many issues that the person conducting the session decided on a full examination, and this would have apparently cost money Sweet didn't have. If that's true, that was a dick move on the part of the university, but I suspect there were alternatives available that Sweet didn't know about because no one told him, and he's shown he's very bad at seeking out information on his own. I wonder if at that point during Sweet's time at ASU he had become such a problem that were looking for a way to get rid of him that would make him stay gone. He did seem to indicate that having to pay $500 (I think) for a session was a deal breaker, so maybe that was the administration's plan to rid themselves of Sweet for good.

@Meowthkip blunt objects seem to be Sweet's weapon of choice.
 
so maybe that was the administration's plan to rid themselves of Sweet for good.
That's the kind of thing he would prefer to believe, but they didn't need a conspiracy. The university could have expelled him on the threats he made alone.

The offer to let him back in pending therapy was charitable on their part.
 
That's the kind of thing he would prefer to believe, but they didn't need a conspiracy. The university could have expelled him on the threats he made alone.

The offer to let him back in pending therapy was charitable on their part.
True. It's sad. If he had followed through, he might be a very different person today.
He's got a lot of potential. He's clearly above average in intelligence, but lacks the executive skills to make use of that intelligence. With proper therapy, he might have gone on to be a writer for the conservative press. He never would have been world famous, but he'd live on his own and might have even gotten a real girlfriend. The kicker is that it's not too late. He's only 39, which isn't old anymore. It would take a lot of work on his part, but he could rise above his present situation. But as long as he thinks the world wronged him and owes him something, he'll remind in his decaying house watching over-the-air TV and dreaming of a past that never was.
 
Last edited:
The offer to let him back in pending therapy was charitable on their part.
Speaking of that and since someone brought it up and I can't remember if anyone's ever answered it, but has he tried to get back to ASU since the faculty adviser he despised so much died? He strikes me as the type of person to believe that certain restrictions and limitations are only valid so long as the person that originally was the cause of them or had issued them was still in power.

I mean, no one told him that a ban could be permanent no matter who's in charge.
 
Speaking of that and since someone brought it up and I can't remember if anyone's ever answered it, but has he tried to get back to ASU since the faculty adviser he despised so much died? He strikes me as the type of person to believe that certain restrictions and limitations are only valid so long as the person that originally was the cause of them or had issued them was still in power.

I mean, no one told him that a ban could be permanent no matter who's in charge.
We talked about precisely that when he was gloating over her death, but he hasn't said anything about going, and I'm sure he'd post about it if he had. He lacks a means to get there right now from what I can tell. His family doubtless knows he's banned, and I doubt they'd go out of their way to help him get arrested again.
 
Speaking of that and since someone brought it up and I can't remember if anyone's ever answered it, but has he tried to get back to ASU since the faculty adviser he despised so much died? He strikes me as the type of person to believe that certain restrictions and limitations are only valid so long as the person that originally was the cause of them or had issued them was still in power.

I mean, no one told him that a ban could be permanent no matter who's in charge.
There's the whole conspiracy theory element of ASU as an institution trying to persecute him, though, which actually probably helps keep him from thinking that's an option.
 
We talked about precisely that when he was gloating over her death, but he hasn't said anything about going, and I'm sure he'd post about it if he had. He lacks a means to get there right now from what I can tell. His family doubtless knows he's banned, and I doubt they'd go out of their way to help him get arrested again.
I think it'd also be an important test to determine if he truly has self-awareness or not, let's say for a minute that there's nothing at all barring him from going except for his own inaction.
Would he really go for it as fervently as he leads everyone to believe, or would he sit and make up reasons that he couldn't possibly go back to school after all so that he doesn't have to face (nor admit to others) the reality/his hidden understanding that everything has changed completely and irreversibly since then?
 
Would he really go for it as fervently as he leads everyone to believe, or would he sit and make up reasons that he couldn't possibly go back to school after all so that he doesn't have to face (nor admit to others) the reality/his hidden understanding that everything has changed completely and irreversibly since then?
From what we've said about Sweets, it's unlikely he would be willing to return back to ASU unless he had the exact conditions he had before. If he didn't have a dorm room with a phone call to bug other girls into having phone sex with him with a position as a newspaperman at the Herald and the ability to do cringe-worthy stand-up comedy without everyone heckling him and telling him to piss the fuck off, he would leave in a week. It's not like he went to ASU to, you know, get an education or something. Going to a college to learn. Pffff. What rubbish.
 
Back
Top Bottom