🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I guess we've been taken along for a cruise on the SS Ruse. :ruse:

I thought it went down the same way that someone else brought up here - Sweet posted a bunch of libel of people who supposedly wronged him, and AJM shut down instead of banning Sweet and/or deleting the offending posts.
 
Ah, screw it! I don't see any point in keeping it secret from you guys any longer. The AJM "shutdown" is a complete deception. A trick to get you guys to stop focusing on the forum.

Here's what AJM and the staff did: they stuck all the "undesirable" members (aka the members not going along with the "hugbox Belch" agenda) in a special member group that doesn't have the privilege to view the forum and its content. Members who are in this member group can only see the following page when they log in:
View attachment 34083

Other than that, we cannot view forums, but we can still view profiles of members. That is how me and Treenbeen were able to figure out the gig AJM was pulling on us.

All the Kiwi members are in this group and so are the AJM members who weren't holding back their opinion on Belch (including Trollis despite the fact he did not join the Farms). Below are pictures of the profiles of the members in this group, including me.

My Profile (sorry guys, for now I want to keep my AJM identity secret, but you'll probably find out soon enough):
View attachment 34084

Treenbeen:
View attachment 34085

Trollis:
View attachment 34086

Holdek:
View attachment 34087

HSMOF:
View attachment 34088

For comparison, below are a few profiles of the members who went along with the agenda to protect Belch from you mean nasty Kiwis. As you will notice, they weren't added to this "member" group.

CB:
View attachment 34090

Applejack:
View attachment 34091

Sweetness himself (note the activity):
View attachment 34093

If you need more proof, I can snap more pictures of the AJM profiles, but it is not a coincidence that every member calling out Belch got added to this "Member" group. There only five of us as you can see above. Me and Treenbeen have been keeping track of the members' post count too and they've gone up, but barely. Even though the forum is still technically up, it has been extremely dead so the AJMers are still playing the hiding game despite the extra protection measures to keep you guys from viewing the forum. Belch hasn't even posted anything since the AJM "shutdown", he just been logging in daily.

I know Treenbeen might not approve of me outing this secret, but really, I don't see any reason to keep it secret anymore. We figured out what AJM was pulling about two days after the "shutdown". It doesn't matter if you guys are ignorant on this or not, all of us against Belch can't view the AJM forum anymore except through Absinthe's archives. Also to any AJMers watching this thread: sorry to out you guys, but this is ridiculous. Your forum community is dead because you guys wanna keep Sweet happy. I still consider you all my friends, but this whole drama gone on for too long. I'm not mad over being unofficially banned. I understand you guys don't feel comfortable with the Kiwis and don't want to be honest with Belch. Do what gotta do.

It's like they're struggling really hard to untangle this perceived Gordian knot when it'd be easier to just cut it.

What on earth does Sweets even contribute that inspires this insane level of loyalty? Guy's a selfish, creepy, racist jack-off. He sure as fuck would never do the same for them.
 
Loyalty was the only reason why I kept this information hidden from you guys for so long. I won't lie, AJM has handled this situation like a complete idiot, but I consider the AJMers as my friends, minus Belch, so that is why I didn't speak up sooner.

Now this is interesting. AJM member Ubs, a person seen as very high in the AJM social hierarchy, was temporary put in the "Member" category. Just discovered this today.
ubsprofile.png
Three possible reasons for this:
1. A mistake on AJM's part.
2. AJM was using Ubs' account as a test.
3. Ubs actually had the balls to speak out against Belch to AJM and was temporary put in the "undesirable" group, but then recanted his statements.

According to Treenbeen, not all AJMers are cool with whats going on. She also mentioned that AJM might be engaging in a mass deletion of certain posts so he could be ridding the site of Belch's idiocy to protect the forum from legal action.
 
That is really something @AJMLurker. I agree with what was said above. Sweet must have some really damaging dirt on someone (AJM maybe) to get this kind of special treatment. Even if they agree with his politics, he's so unlikable that this level of loyalty is either bought or coerced, and he's broke all the time so that leaves him threatening someone with exposure of some dark secret. Either that or they just feel really, really sorry for this obviously broken human being and just can't bring themselves to do what needs to be done.
 
This has got to be the goofiest, hamfisted way of handling the situation I've seen. Why didn't they just ban us? What is wrong with these people?
 
Why go to all this trouble to protect Belch? Does he donate some of his disability check to the forum or something?
 
Ah, screw it! I don't see any point in keeping it secret from you guys any longer. The AJM "shutdown" is a complete deception. A trick to get you guys to stop focusing on the forum.

Here's what AJM and the staff did: they stuck all the "undesirable" members (aka the members not going along with the "hugbox Belch" agenda) in a special member group that doesn't have the privilege to view the forum and its content. Members who are in this member group can only see the following page when they log in:
View attachment 34083

Other than that, we cannot view forums, but we can still view profiles of members. That is how me and Treenbeen were able to figure out the gig AJM was pulling on us.

All the Kiwi members are in this group and so are the AJM members who weren't holding back their opinion on Belch (including Trollis despite the fact he did not join the Farms). Below are pictures of the profiles of the members in this group, including me.

My Profile (sorry guys, for now I want to keep my AJM identity secret, but you'll probably find out soon enough):
View attachment 34084

Treenbeen:
View attachment 34085

Trollis:
View attachment 34086

Holdek:
View attachment 34087

HSMOF:
View attachment 34088

For comparison, below are a few profiles of the members who went along with the agenda to protect Belch from you mean nasty Kiwis. As you will notice, they weren't added to this "member" group.

CB:
View attachment 34090

Applejack:
View attachment 34091

Sweetness himself (note the activity):
View attachment 34093

If you need more proof, I can snap more pictures of the AJM profiles, but it is not a coincidence that every member calling out Belch got added to this "Member" group. There only five of us as you can see above. Me and Treenbeen have been keeping track of the members' post count too and they've gone up, but barely. Even though the forum is still technically up, it has been extremely dead so the AJMers are still playing the hiding game despite the extra protection measures to keep you guys from viewing the forum. Belch hasn't even posted anything since the AJM "shutdown", he just been logging in daily.

I know Treenbeen might not approve of me outing this secret, but really, I don't see any reason to keep it secret anymore. We figured out what AJM was pulling about two days after the "shutdown". It doesn't matter if you guys are ignorant on this or not, all of us against Belch can't view the AJM forum anymore except through Absinthe's archives. Also to any AJMers watching this thread: sorry to out you guys, but this is ridiculous. Your forum community is dead because you guys wanna keep Sweet happy. I still consider you all my friends, but this whole drama gone on for too long. I'm not mad over being unofficially banned. I understand you guys don't feel comfortable with the Kiwis and don't want to be honest with Belch. Do what gotta do.

What a bunch of faggots.

No, seriously, this is the most chickenshit and dickish thing I've ever seen a forum do. And I have personal experience with things like mods personally rigging forum elections so that their opinions could stay in power. I know what I said ain't nice, but fuck this type of behavior. I'm just going to say this: http://usaspatriot.proboards38.com/index.cgi AKA AJM studios is willingly harboring and more willing to side with Jonathan Mack Sweet, aka The_Iconoclast, a netizen known for being into pedophilia, terrorist threats, and conspiracies to murder, blackmail, and use slander to get what he wants, then to keep their website clean. http://usaspatriot.proboards38.com/index.cgi AKA AJM studios is sheltering a known repeat offender and felon, and despite being a fairly conservative website, enable a welfare leech who has never worked an honest day in his life. All because he spouts extremely uneducated (he thinks that liberalism equates to communism for pete's sake) left-wing bashing rhetoric that seems to be liked over there. http://usaspatriot.proboards38.com/index.cgi AKA AJM studios are two-faced hypocrites that cannot and will not accept promises if they face minor amounts of dissent and trouble; http://usaspatriot.proboards38.com/index.cgi AKA AJM studios will prefer to silence dissent rather than face it.

I'm sorry, but this type of behavior is inexcusable in my opinion; I don't accept hypocrisy, and I doubly hate when people lie to your face, both of which these cats did.
 
I.... there are no words for this. The sheer level of mindboggling overcomplication involved. It's like faking your death to get out of a parking ticket. "Oh no people we would rather not have on the forum are on the forum! I know we'll pretend we've shut down the forum, but we'll secretly keep it open for the people we like! That way they'll think we're gone and go away! It's much easier than just IP banning."

I've been sort of lurking on this topic for a bit but this is by far the most hilarious, cringe worthy, and all around what the fuckery milk I've seen and it's glorious in its own special way. It's better than anything I could have hoped for.
 
It's one thing to ban the "Kiwi Invaders" but it's another to ban people that are suppose to be their friends.

I hope it's worth it, AJM!
 
It's one thing to ban the "Kiwi Invaders" but it's another to ban people that are suppose to be their friends.

I hope it's worth it, AJM!
Something the AJM crowd should keep in mind: it's really easy to admire the results of the purge when you're not the ones targeted. This pogrom has sent a message, all right, and the message is this: AJM and his ilk will do whatever it takes to stifle dissent.
Joe McStrawman said:
BUT ICE CREAM! Aren't they just protecting their domain from hostile invaders? Surely they're not suggesting that free speech has no place in their little corner of the internet...right?
Quite right, Mr. McStrawman...except in this case, they could have upheld the principles of the Founding Fathers and our great nation by simply banning us and perhaps our sympathizers. But instead of doing that, of cutting out the cancer, they had to try to fool us into thinking they had closed up shop. They wanted us gone, but were too spineless to make the hard calls, the tough choices.

My uncle had a saying he was fond of: "first time is the hardest." I didn't understand what he meant then, but now I can see what he's saying: the first time they passive-aggressively try to have their cake and eat it too is hard, but the next time it won't be. Who knows what silly tricks and convoluted reasoning they'll come up with to further their own goals, regardless of how petty and myopic they might be. I mean come ON! If you wanted us to fuckin leave you could have asked us nicely and I'm confident that to a man (and woman) we'd have complied. The whole point of us being there was because our desire to engage Knuckle Neck (bringin it back yall :cool:) was real strong and pushed us onward, because this cow's milk is delectably sweet, finer than any wine, tasting of entitlement and unwarranted self importance to a hilarious degree.

Make no mistake here: we will rebuild, and persevere. Our desire to make fun of the savage Mr. Sweet, that ruffian, that villainous cur, remains strong and unabated by such trickery as this. More to the point, I asked this a couple dozen posts ago but I really think it bears repeating: what was the endgame here, AJM and Co.? You've cut yourselves off at the knees: paranoia regarding our presence will prevent new members from signing up and old members aren't stupid, they see the writing on the wall here: either they're with you or against you, right? So what happens now?
 
I wonder how angry Sweets is about the ole' Stars n' Bars coming down across our Southland.
 
According to Treenbeen, not all AJMers are cool with whats going on. She also mentioned that AJM might be engaging in a mass deletion of certain posts so he could be ridding the site of Belch's idiocy to protect the forum from legal action.
I'm starting to believe that it's not just Belch's idiocy being scrubbed from history. This sort of extreme behavior kind of makes me think that some non-Belch people there have some skeletons they are trying to hide. Unfortunately, this is about the dumbest way to go about it.
 
She also mentioned that AJM might be engaging in a mass deletion of certain posts so he could be ridding the site of Belch's idiocy to protect the forum from legal action.

AJM is going to be a very busy man if he intends to examine every single post Mr. Sweet has made for the past many years and evaluate them in light of how his website will look if Mr. Sweet actually reoffends on any of the criminal counts he has already confessed to or actually commits any of the many crimes he has repeatedly threatened to carry out. AJM Studios is the web's largest repository of Mr. Sweet's confessions to having committed and threats to commit a wide range of misdemeanors and felonies. He's a ticking time bomb with the potential to utterly humiliate the site and its members.

I'll help AJM out by proposing a few of the more obvious questions for the flowchart he'll want to employ as he judges each and every one of Mr. Sweet's thousands of posts and how they will reflect on the USA Patriots should Mr. Sweet ever make regional or national news.

(1) Mr. Sweet has confessed to conspiring to have carnal knowledge of a minor; he has referred to 15-year-old girls as "barely legal"; he has written "fiction" in which he breathlessly describes the insatiable lust felt by a nine-year-old girl for a 17-year-old man; he has written disturbing prose involving the Southern sun causing prepubescent girls to sexually "ripen" at an early age and he has then jarringly segued into a distressing, extended metaphor involving car trunks and basements. In light of these facts, should Post No. 1 of Many Thousands by Mr. Sweet be deleted?

If yes, delete. If no, go to step No. 2.

(2) Mr. Sweet is an ultra-conservative American patriot who hates welfare leeches. He is also a welfare leech who has never worked a single day during his entire life. If some newspaper or website decides to do a series on fanatical Republicans who live by sucking on the government teat, will this post make AJM Studios look like a collection of morons?

If yes, delete. If no. go to step No. 3.

(3) Mr. Sweet has confessed to making terroristic threats. Should he make additional terroristic threats or carry out his original ones, will this post cast the Brony Patriots Board in a bad light?

If yes, delete. If no, go to step No. 4.

(4) Mr. Sweet admits to keeping an ax under his bed for the purpose of chopping his brother "into kibble." He has also done time in jail for assaulting his brother with "a metal bar." Should Mr. Sweet carry out his confessed-in-advance plan to go all Lizzy Borden on his brother, will this post cause people to wonder what the hell is wrong with the members of AJM Studios who tolerated, coddled and protected him for many years?

If yes, delete. If no, go to step No. 5.

(5) On this site, Mr. Sweet has posted a multitude of horrific libels involving the faculty, staff and former students of Arkansas State University. Is this post likely to result in legal action against this forum, which could range from a cease-and-desist order to a lawsuit for damages?

If yes, delete. If no, go to step No. 6.

(6) Can the contents of this post be interpreted as an endorsement by AJM Studios of Mr. Sweet's all-consuming racism? Does it include any of the following words that feature prominently in Mr. Republican Party's writings elsewhere on the web: nigger, coon, spade or jigaboo?

If yes, delete. If no, go to step No. 7.

. . . Well, I think everyone gets the idea. Attempting to evaluate all of Mr. Sweet's posts will take AJM the rest of his life.

Might as well leave them all on the site.

What could possibly go wrong?

I wonder how angry Sweets is about the ole' Stars n' Bars coming down across our Southland.

Damned Yankees! That's not the Stars and Bars. The oblong flag in your image is the battle flag of the rebel Army of Tennessee. The square version of that flag, like the one that flies at the South Carolina Statehouse, is the battle flag of the rebel Army of Northern Virginia. The Star and Bars, the first national flag of the Confederate State of America is below:

us-csa1v.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Damned Yankees! That's not the Stars and Bars. The oblong flag in your image is the battle flag of the rebel Army of Tennessee. The square version of that flag, like the one that flies at the South Carolina Statehouse, is the battle flag of the rebel Army of Northern Virginia. The Star and Bars, the first national flag of the Confederate State of America is below:

us-csa1v.gif
Well aren't you the precocious Southern belle :tomgirl:
 
I bet Sweet calls it that. Everybody I saw defending the flag on the TV and Internet this week called it that. It's not just Yankees who don't know better.

As a vexillologist, I find it vexing.

Agree. Most of the Southern rednecks, racists and NASCAR fans who actually fly the so-called "Southern Cross" don't actually know dick about history. When you see someone flying the Bonnie Blue Flag or the first national flag of Confederacy, then you're in the presence of someone you can actually have a discussion with.

Edit: Since Mr. Sweet is notorious for never getting his facts straight about anything, you are correct: he certainly calls the ANV battle flag by any name other than the correct one. Considering his views on politics and race, he probably calls it "the glorious Klan flag."

Well aren't you the precocious Southern belle :tomgirl:

Not really. I had to research the topic for work several years ago when it was the flavor of the day for the SJW crowd.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom