🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I guess I forgot about the distance from where Sweet lives to ASU. While it's not out of the question that he trespassed in a desperate attempt to slip past the flaming sword that turned every which way security in order to get back into the Garden of Eden ASU, I think stuff like violating restraining orders from afar may be more likely.

Early in the thread, Sweet lamented about progressives setting up excessive rules, and more rules to explain the first set of rules, with harsh penalties for violating them. As an example, he cited him trying to call people from college and getting threatened with legal action in return. Sweet probably thinks that getting kicked out of college for acting like an ass and then getting penalized for trying to sneak back in is "excessive rules and penalties" by a progressive conspiracy.

Good point. It's like he truly can't understand that people thought he was an asshole. Getting fired from the paper must have come out of the blue to him, and he truly couldn't see any rhyme or reason to it, which is why he had to come up with this insane liberal conspiracy theory to explain it. We already know his description of his time on the paper deviates significantly from reality - I wonder if he hadn't been officially sanctioned one or more times before the plagiarism incident. With how seriously plagiarism is taken on college campuses, I'm sure that would have been enough in itself, but I also can't believe no one took him aside and told him crunching food in people's ears is unacceptable, either. He keeps talking about his "mentor" - maybe it was actually an authority figure telling him to knock it off, which he took as friendly advice rather than official sanction?
I wonder what Sweet's opinion was about Mac OS? OS 8 was released in July of 1997.
Being the open minded, flexible, and intellectually curious young man he is, I'm sure he embraced it as the wave of the future.
 
Sweet's Horror Story said:
She’d had a hellacious crush on him back then, but of course she’d only been nine, and he’d been close to eight years her senior. It would have been improper, in so many ways, to act on such a feeling... for both of them.

Stopped reading, what the fucking shit!? Sweet exaggerates and overblows every perceived slight against him, but then says a relationship between a nine year old and a seventeen year old is merely "improper" instead of "gross" or "severely fucked up".

EDIT: I get that he's trying to be edgy and controversial, but that only works when you're a more or less well-adjusted person and a very talented writer, neither of which describes Jon.
 
Last edited:
Stopped reading, what the fucking shit!? Sweet exaggerates and overblows every perceived slight against him, but then says a relationship between a nine year old and a seventeen year old is merely "improper" instead of "gross" or "severely fucked up".
Jon Sweet said:
...for both of them.

Also, the nine-year-old would have been at fault too, in Sweet's mind, if she had had sex with a nearly-adult teenager.

(TFW I gloss over warped Sweet's thoughts because I'm already so far down the rabbit hole. *sigh*)
 
An update from Sequestria:

upload_2015-6-3_17-10-0.png


I thought the veiled jibe at Dr. Belch's age was a bit unsporting, but it's good to know that he's being properly handled.
 
FYI, over at AJM someone posted:
Hoomajocky said:
Recently over at KiwiFarms, a member posted this Search Quarry result, then quickly jumped on the bandwagon of various crimes a certain someone committed. After further research, this is nothing more then records to the state about personal identification, license tabs, and various vehicle updates. The family apparently uses his name. Nothing here is crime related. That website takes public records, which include people paying for their license tabs and various mundane government actions. The reason their are multiple listings if for multiple years of dealing with the government. Nearly anyone will find themselves on this website if they search.

The ones from out of his home county are related to college information provided to the county and nothing more.

I said I would run this by this thread to clear it up.
 
Last edited:
FYI, over at AJM someone posted:



I said I would run this by this thread to clear it up. I'm sure I speak for all of us when I say the Sweetstorical record should be as error-free as possible.
I ponied up the $3.00 to see the full records (I have a lot of free time right now), and all I got was personal information. No criminal records came up, so maybe this was a misfire. We know he's been arrested a few times, but details are sketchy in light of this new information. I know it says he has records in the criminal database on the free search, but no criminal records were found on the pay search, so the truth of the matter is very much up in the air now. I could try another records search site, but I'm disinclined to spend anymore money, and the official Arkansas court records search turned up nothing, so maybe he got everything expunged.
 
Last edited:
FYI, over at AJM someone posted:


I said I would run this by this thread to clear it up.
The good Dr M may have his own response, but my rebuttal is below:

upload_2015-6-3_20-10-43.png


That one particular website may have been a red herring, but I think it's been established beyond reasonable doubt that:

a) Jonathan Mack Sweet aka Dr. Belch aka @The_Iconoclast has been arrested and booked at least once for failure to appear - on 20th January 2014.
b) As implied by the above, he has been summonsed to at least one court date - to which he evidently failed to appear.
 
Last edited:
AJM have so far-
  • Locked down their forum and prevented new registrations
  • Belittled their users that associate with the farms
  • Provided defense for one of their users. A user that's caused nothing but trouble.
All to protect their hugbox

Awesome work guys! :semperfidelis:
 
I ponied up the $3.00 to see the full records (I have a lot of free time right now), and all I got was personal information. No criminal records came up, so maybe this was a misfire. We know he's been arrested a few times, but details are sketchy in light of this new information. I know it says he has records in the criminal database on the free search, but no criminal records were found on the pay search, so the truth of the matter is very much up in the air now. I could try another records search site, but I'm disinclined to spend anymore money, and the official Arkansas court records search turned up nothing, so maybe he got everything expunged.
If you are inclined to spend time but not money, there's apparently no fee for checking arrest warrants with the Jonesboro PD (who I believe cover Craighead County) - but it's only possible by phone.
 
AJM have so far-
  • Locked down their forum and prevented new registrations
  • Belittled their users that associate with the farms
  • Provided defense for one of their users. A user that's caused nothing but trouble.
All to protect their hugbox

Awesome work guys! :semperfidelis:
They can claim it's all about "friendliness" and "the status quo" all they want, but they're protecting a delusional 40-year-old borderline pedophile fart fetishist whose violent revenge fantasies against people he hasn't interacted with for 18 years have become so excessive that the police had to get involved.

What that indicates to me is that there's something about him they do like - my guess is his political rants about "da lib'ruls" and "moar liek obummer amirite!!!!!" They eat that shit up with a spoon.

Maybe we're going about this all wrong. AJM may be a hugbox, but it's also a self-imposed cage - if he's posting on AJM, he's not on TVTropes posting about Kim Possible shitting her drawers, or on DeviantArt grooming some teenage girl to record her farts for him. I say let him rot. If the libertarian horsefuckers love him so much, they can keep him.
 
Maybe we're going about this all wrong. AJM may be a hugbox, but it's also a self-imposed cage - if he's posting on AJM, he's not on TVTropes posting about Kim Possible shitting her drawers, or on DeviantArt grooming some teenage girl to record her farts for him. I say let him rot. If the libertarian horsefuckers love him so much, they can keep him.
Yeah, I have never been part of the "Sweet should get kicked off AJM" crew. I don't see much benefit to it. He's not a danger to the users, and I don't believe getting kicked off would help Sweet in any way. In the best case, it would be funny for us as he'd have to either come back here or find a new forum to sperg on and we'd get to see how new people respond to him, which could be funny.
In short, the only people hurt from Sweet posting on AJM are AJM, and they seem to want to keep him, so why not just let them?
 
Yeah, I have never been part of the "Sweet should get kicked off AJM" crew. I don't see much benefit to it. He's not a danger to the users, and I don't believe getting kicked off would help Sweet in any way. In the best case, it would be funny for us as he'd have to either come back here or find a new forum to sperg on and we'd get to see how new people respond to him, which could be funny.
In short, the only people hurt from Sweet posting on AJM are AJM, and they seem to want to keep him, so why not just let them?

I don't want sweets to leave AJM. I just don't approve of their handling of him. They have prioritized Sweets over the health of their webforum and its users.

He can stay for all i care. It just doesn't look good is all.
 
AJM have so far-
  • Locked down their forum and prevented new registrations
  • Belittled their users that associate with the farms
  • Provided defense for one of their users. A user that's caused nothing but trouble.
All to protect their hugbox

Awesome work guys! :semperfidelis:
Seriously? I know the people who have come over here from there have been pretty cool but what a bitch ass move. And talking shit about the people that come here every now and then? What kind of shit is that? #TheseHosAintLoyal
 
I do think that a lot of the issues with AJM come from a few of their members who are worried about whether we might start digging into their internet histories.

PROTIP: if we haven't already, chances are that we won't.

Also, it's really not that hard to get along with us. A guy who literally thinks he's a sanitary towel had a thread here, but because he took a polite, pleasant approach in his dealings with us he's now a friend of the Farms and his thread is closed.
 
It's sketchy as hell that they'll defend Farthuffer's antisocial behavior like it's just a bunch of cute, harmless little quirks, but leap to demonize anyone who objects or stands up to him. I thought groupthink and kowtowing to the hive-mind was all part of the filthy liberal ploy to destroy freedom!
I do think that a lot of the issues with AJM come from a few of their members who are worried about whether we might start digging into their internet histories.

PROTIP: if we haven't already, chances are that we won't.
It's not a huge deal if we do, anyway. The only people who have anything to worry about from our crack team of newspaperkoalas are deviants like Belch who seemingly go out of their way to be over-the-top noxious and hateful. If, as I assume is the case with most of the AJMers, you're just a run-of-the-mill sperg doing goofy shit on the internet, nobody here will care.
 
It's sketchy as hell that they'll defend Farthuffer's antisocial behavior like it's just a bunch of cute, harmless little quirks, but leap to demonize anyone who objects or stands up to him. I thought groupthink and kowtowing to the hive-mind was all part of the filthy liberal ploy to destroy freedom!

It's not a huge deal if we do, anyway. The only people who have anything to worry about from our crack team of newspaperkoalas are deviants like Belch who seemingly go out of their way to be over-the-top noxious and hateful. If, as I assume is the case with most of the AJMers, you're just a run-of-the-mill sperg doing goofy shit on the internet, nobody here will care.

Well, and.. not to beat a dead horse, but... it's the internet, so anything you put out there can and will be public for the rest of eternity. So what's it to them if someone reads it?
 
FYI, over at AJM someone posted:


I said I would run this by this thread to clear it up.

Where to start?

Compare the two searches. The star-spangled brony has done a search for driving records -- clearly stated at the top of the search -- and then gloats that all of the results are for driving records. What a surprise. (It's possible that SearchQuarry is returning all public records no matter what search parameters are entered; I'll check some other sources.)

From AJM: "After further research, this is nothing more then records to the state about personal identification, license tabs, and various vehicle updates. The family apparently uses his name. Nothing here is crime related."

I'll run a LexisNexis search later, but I find it hard to believe that Mr. Sweet's entire family is registering all of their vehicles in his name. Seems an odd thing to do when you consider that he's not allowed to control the money he receives from what he calls his "small government stipend" (aka, welfare payments). Vehicle inspection stickers, registration stickers and license plate tag documents are all entered in the name of the person who holds the vehicle's title; does anyone believe that Mr. Sweet's entire family lets him hold the titles to -- and the ability to sell -- their rides?

Mr. Sweet has admitted to being arrested, booked into jail, tried, convicted and sentenced in the attempted-skull-crushing "domestic disturbance" involving his brother. He has also admitted to being visited in Blytheville by police officers from Arkansas State University. He also admits to making terroristic threats and "conspiring to have carnal knowledge of a minor." I wonder which "driving record" or "vehicle update" covers those events. And according to the Jonesboro Police Department, he currently has or at one time had two outstanding warrants for failure to appear in court. Maybe he was caught jaywalking a couple of times. And why does Mr. Sweet, who doesn't drive, have "driving records" in a county where he doesn't live?

This Doubting Brony is either willfully blind to the numerous crimes to which Mr. Sweet has confessed or he is one of Mr. Sweet's sockpuppets.

More to come.
 
Last edited:
Well, and.. not to beat a dead horse, but... it's the internet, so anything you put out there can and will be public for the rest of eternity. So what's it to them if someone reads it?

"I always say if one doesn't wish to have their unfortunate or nasty comments redistributed and used freely for parody, don't say/post them on public forums."
 
Back
Top Bottom