🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
AJMLurker said:
That is why the staff has not banned you guys. Sure they're uncomfortable by the Kiwi presence, but they understand you're only on the forum because of Belch's idiocy.

As for Belch, Belch loves the forum. Belch has no interest in trolling us so that is why he remains unbanned. I know it sounds crazy, but the AJM members always want to believe in the best in people. They don't want to turn their back on people, despite as insane or crazy as they may seem. Yes, I firmly believe they know Belch is a nutjob, but they realize AJM STUDIOS is all Belch has. Without our forum, Belch has nothing.

Of course, I don't represent the views of the majority. I'm done with defending Belch. I would ban him in a heartbeat if I were the admin. After seeing Belch's behavior in the last few months, he is beyond saving. You guys have offered him help and he continues to hide behind his insane delusions. You guys are good people, you really are, and Belch wants to play this smear campaign against you because you won't feed his bullshit.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the explanation. At this point he seems like more trouble than he's worth and was just disruptive. Glad to see not everyone is cool with his BS and hopefully more turn on the dude.
 
DrJonesHat said:
@AJMLurker does Sweet ever go with the flow of a conversation or does he always try to turn the topic to himself? I haven't read a lot of his threads or threads where he participates.
Click to expand...

As you probably suspect, Sweet does his own thing. In all the years I've known him, he has never gone with the flow of conversation or even taken part in an active discussion. What Sweetbro likes to do is find a post that interests him and then comment on it. Doesn't matter if said post is a day old or a month old. If he can, he'll turn the topic to himself, but usually he'll turn it to his interests or share some knowledge. It is harmless mostly unless he finds a way to get into his past or weird interests.

DrChristianTroy said:
At this point he seems like more trouble than he's worth and was just disruptive.
Click to expand...

Yep, that is how I feel. I lost respect for him since I realize his opinion about a person hinges on whether they go along with his beliefs or not. The only reason he gets along well on AJM is because most won't call him out on his insane views.


.
 
Last edited:
Absinthe said:
It's from here. Talking about his bann from ASU, Sweet said "In the law's eyes I am guilty of...terroristic threatening (I didn't take being let go well and I said some regrettable things)".

Admittedly, there's a lot that could come under "terroristic threatening". He could have outlined an earlier version of his threats to taser his enemies, throw them in a van and then burn them to death. Given his excretory obsession, maybe he threated to poo in the water supply or fart on every dorm pillow or something.

I assumed that bombing was the most likely flavour of threat because it's a common terrorist act, the Unabomber had recently been sent down at the time of Sweet's bann, and later in the post quoted above Sweet goes on to talk about a terrorist bomber. [Emphasis added.]

Even if it wasn't to do with bombing, Sweet still admits that he made "terroristic" threats. I do wonder what they were.
Click to expand...

When we consider that Mr. Sweet can't drive a car or repair a broken window or operate a photocopier or figure out how to use a computer or get broadcast signals on his TV, I'm not sure that attempting to build a bomb would be the best decision he ever made.
 
@AJMLurker , may I ask how are politics on your board? I notice that the majority of the users are conservative (from some poll) so I was wondering if there's any hostility between the two wings or it's really just Belch.

The_Iconoclast said:
You mean a place where I'll pay higher taxes, deal with crime and violence, can't turn on my lights at a certain hour because I might confuse a stupid sea turtle, can only have seven bullets in my gun, and am not allowed to have a large soft drink on the street or even get salt on the table in a restaurant? No, thanks.
Click to expand...
Today is World Turtle Day and I say, screw you Iconoclast.
tumblr_m7vfj71MoB1rxy94eo1_500.jpg
 
Now come on Sweets, your neighbors aren't allowed to have bright lights either because they might confuse John Sweet.
 
Last edited:
You got to be one cold dude to look at a bunch of harmless endangered sea turtles and be like "Hey, fuck you sea turtles! You never did nuffin for me!".
 
@AJMLurker, I don't know where you are in the hierarchy over there, but your leader really needs to read about the geek social fallacies. You may pride yourselves on being friendly, but everything can go too far. You are allowed to kick Cat Piss Man out of the group until such time as he stops reeking of cat piss, and you will be doing him a favor by making clear to him that reeking like cat piss is not acceptable.
 
Did Sweet do something to children????

(I'm sorry, I'm a bit tied-up with work today. would read through if i could)
 
Ass Manager 3000 said:
Did Sweet do something to children????

(I'm sorry, I'm a bit tied-up with work today. would read through if i could)
Click to expand...

He hasn't admitted anything as far as I know, but he's made statements that imply he'd do something to adolescent girls if the opportunity presented itself.
 
Ass Manager 3000 said:
Did Sweet do something to children????

(I'm sorry, I'm a bit tied-up with work today. would read through if i could)
Click to expand...

DrJonesHat said:
He hasn't admitted anything as far as I know, but he's made statements that imply he'd do something to adolescent girls if the opportunity presented itself.
Click to expand...

It was mentioned earlier that there's something else, possibly, Sweet brings it up himself here:

"In the law's eyes I am guilty of ... conspiracy to commit carnal knowledge of a minor (a separate incident that haunts me to this day)."

This kind of reminds me of the dirty crapped briefs incident. Sweet just volunteers information that damns him.
 
He said he kept harassing a man he thought was his heartsweet's father, even after it was clear that he wasn't connected at all. I wonder if dude just got sick of the daily "look, just let me talk to your non-existent teenage daughter and find out why she won't bang me!" e-mails and called the cops.
 
John Titor said:
@AJMLurker , may I ask how are politics on your board? I notice that the majority of the users are conservative (from some poll) so I was wondering if there's any hostility between the two wings or it's really just Belch.
Click to expand...

It's just Belch. The other members don't agree with liberal ideals, but they certainly don't share Sweet's unique views of liberals. At the same time though, they make no effort to call him out which gives off the impression to others that they actually agree with Sweet's nuttiness.

sonichuis44 said:
@AJMLurker, I don't know where you are in the hierarchy over there, but your leader really needs to read about the geek social fallacies. You may pride yourselves on being friendly, but everything can go too far. You are allowed to kick Cat Piss Man out of the group until such time as he stops reeking of cat piss, and you will be doing him a favor by making clear to him that reeking like cat piss is not acceptable.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately the AJM'ers don't think like that. Over these last few months, Sweet has proven what a liability he is to the forum and they still defend him. I understand they want to show the special snowflake kindness since nobody else will, but Sweet is responsible for all the hatred that he receives.
 
AJMLurker said:
At the same time though, they make no effort to call him out which gives off the impression to others that they actually agree with Sweet's nuttiness.
Click to expand...

@AJMLurker Do you think some of them actually agree with belch on some level?

I document a site called 'sluthate'. Not gonna get into the nitty-gritty, but the website basically has (loud) pedophiles on it. Some of the community dislike it but ultimately the user's accounts stay active and are tolerated by the website. I believe this has something to do with how consistently the said users preach the websites ideology. If everyone's clapping half the time then the users can get way with their perverted behavior in the other half.

Now, i'm not saying AJMstudios is Sluthate, but could a similar effect be occurring with belch in the forum- where's he's tolerated because he evangelizes conservatism?

Btw welcome to the farms! :)
 
Ass Manager 3000 said:
Btw welcome to the farms! :)
Click to expand...

Thank you.

Ass Manager 3000 said:
@AJMLurker Do you think some of them actually agree with belch on some level?

Now, i'm not saying AJMstudios is Sluthate, but could a similar effect be occurring with belch in the forum- where's he's tolerated because he evangelizes conservatism?
Click to expand...

Oh yes. Sweet's conservative views definitely play a part in why his less than desirable qualities are tolerated. If Sweetbro just happened to be an insane delusional liberal instead of an insane delusional conservative, he wouldn't of lasted on AJM STUDIOS. They're much more willing to tolerate his rants about liberals being the Great Satan because they themselves disagree with liberal views, but he would of been quickly banned if his rantings were about conservatives on the other hand. Mostly it is their friendliness though that keeps Sweetbro around.

DrJonesHat said:
He hasn't admitted anything as far as I know, but he's made statements that imply he'd do something to adolescent girls if the opportunity presented itself.
Click to expand...

This is why I'm not worried about Sweet going out and raping some poor underage girl. Sweet seems much too lazy and incompetent to do anything for himself, including indulging his criminal urges. Now if a 15 year old girl came up to him and offered sex, you know Sweet would definitely accept.
 
AJMLurker said:
Thank you.



Oh yes. Sweet's conservative views definitely play a part in why his less than desirable qualities are tolerated. If Sweetbro just happened to be an insane delusional liberal instead of an insane delusional conservative, he wouldn't of lasted on AJM STUDIOS. They're much more willing to tolerate his rants about liberals being the Great Satan because they themselves disagree with liberal views, but he would of been quickly banned if his rantings were about conservatives on the other hand. Mostly it is their friendliness though that keeps Sweetbro around.



This is why I'm not worried about Sweet going out and raping some poor underage girl. Sweet seems much too lazy and incompetent to do anything for himself, including indulging his criminal urges. Now if a 15 year old girl came up to him and offered sex, you know Sweet would definitely accept.
Click to expand...

Well, he probably doesn't have the means to go hunt down a victim in real life, but he's already shown he's willing to have inappropriate conversations with minors. It'd probably be online if he does anything. But if he get a girl willing to indulge his vile urges online, he might, and I emphasize might, try to take into the real world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom