🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Based on some of his comments, I suspect that by the time they're adolescents of 15, they might be a little long in the tooth for Mr. Sweet's tastes. To put it in his own words, with the emphasis on "lil'girl":

[The Southern sun makes] the girls’ breasts ripen faster, I think, like peaches somebody kept in the trunk of their car too long in the summer, or in a basement where ventilation is poor. Don’t know if it ripens the boys’ parts up early too--I don’t look, God, no--but I can safely say the sight of all that ripe and abundant lil’girl-flesh makes a lot of the older goats plain crazy with lust.

We all know that Mr. Sweet's bizarre scribblings and deranged comics never involve anything more than his unfiltered revenge fantasies and psychosexual obsessions. So when he writes about prematurely "ripe" breasts found on "lil'girl flesh" and the first similes that pop into his diseased mind involve automobile trunks and poorly ventilated basements, I think there's cause for concern. A lot of concern.
Click to expand...

Is he completely oblivious to how he comes across to other people? What in the nine hells could possibly make someone think that writing that is a good idea? This is a disturbing development. He's not doing this to be an edgelord. Sweet is bad at hiding his true feelings, so I sincerely hope he's landed on the radar of law enforcement. He's not a harmless goof. He's a threat to innocent people, especially kids.
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Based on some of his comments, I suspect that by the time they're adolescents of 15, they might be a little long in the tooth for Mr. Sweet's tastes. To put it in his own words, with the emphasis on "lil'girl":

[The Southern sun makes] the girls’ breasts ripen faster, I think, like peaches somebody kept in the trunk of their car too long in the summer, or in a basement where ventilation is poor. Don’t know if it ripens the boys’ parts up early too--I don’t look, God, no--but I can safely say the sight of all that ripe and abundant lil’girl-flesh makes a lot of the older goats plain crazy with lust.

We all know that Mr. Sweet's bizarre scribblings and deranged comics never involve anything more than his unfiltered revenge fantasies and psychosexual obsessions. So when he writes about prematurely "ripe" breasts found on "lil'girl flesh" and the first similes that pop into his diseased mind involve automobile trunks and poorly ventilated basements, I think there's cause for concern. A lot of concern.
Click to expand...

Very good catch re Sweet's mind going immediately from adolescent girls to trunks and basements. It's going to annoy me now, but somewhere in my AJM archives is one of Sweet's posts where he makes a similar observation about young girls "ripening early" in the South.

Elsewhere he mentioned that for one of his underage paramours, he actually kept a calendar where he counted off the days until her eighteenth birthday...
 
WWWWolf said:
Yup, IPv4 address blocks are just like any other type of property - some of them change hands frequently, some stay with same owner for a long time. There are still organisations that have whole Class A blocks all for themselves, for example. (There's a whole lot you can do with 16777216 distinct IP addresses, or 1/256th of the entire IPv4 address space. You can use it for the needs of a few medium-sized countries if you allocate it properly. Or use a fraction of it for your company while keeping the rest unused. Tough call.)
Click to expand...
What about IPv6?
 
Wasn't Sweet leading some kind of crusade on AJM to get the admins to just ban all the kiwis so Things Can Go Back To The Way They Were™? Sounds like he finally got his way, is all.
 
Absinthe said:
Very good catch re Sweet's mind going immediately from adolescent girls to trunks and basements. It's going to annoy me now, but somewhere in my AJM archives is one of Sweet's posts where he makes a similar observation about young girls "ripening early" in the South.

Elsewhere he mentioned that for one of his underage paramours, he actually kept a calendar where he counted off the days until her eighteenth birthday...
Click to expand...

Good lord. There's just no ground floor for this guy. He just keeps going lower and lower.
 
Holdek said:
What about IPv6?
Click to expand...
IPv6 address space is considerably larger. In theory, you can easily assign 16777216 distinct IPv6 addresses for the network for which your toaster acts as a gateway and still not run out of addresses in the foreseeable future of humanity. However, I vaguely hope that the address space is managed slightly more conservatively than that, or we'll just run out of addresses once again.
 
sonichuis44 said:
Wasn't Sweet leading some kind of crusade on AJM to get the admins to just ban all the kiwis so Things Can Go Back To The Way They Were™? Sounds like he finally got his way, is all.
Click to expand...
That's what he wanted, but we Kiwis who registered are still there.
 
DrJonesHat said:
Is he completely oblivious to how he comes across to other people? What in the nine hells could possibly make someone think that writing that is a good idea? This is a disturbing development. He's not doing this to be an edgelord. Sweet is bad at hiding his true feelings, so I sincerely hope he's landed on the radar of law enforcement. He's not a harmless goof. He's a threat to innocent people, especially kids.
Click to expand...

I'm conflicted on this. Sweet's a creep, a stalker, a revenge junky, perverted beyond even general internet standards and if he had any spine at all he'd be dangerous, yes. I think the real question is "does he actually have the capability (both emotionally and physically) to carry out any of this stuff?" and the answer I come up with is "Possibly". All it would take is some naive, confused 14 year old from NE Ark showing up on the AJM forums and falling for Sweets lies. It's pretty damn clear that no one at the AJM forums would do anything to prevent it. Of course, this is assuming he would be a predator. It's a lot to suggest that someone's a full-on potential kiddy fiddler based on them getting an occasional verbal boner for a 16 year old, but when you combine it with Sweets history of threatened violence and sexual dysfunction (both commonly associated with serial killers, from what I've read) and the fact that he's apparently not talking about 16 year olds, he's talking about pre-to just-starting-puberty aged girls (so, what, 12? 13?) it becomes a little more frightening. He specifically mentions them "developing younger", so hell, it might even mean girls younger than 12.

One thing I'll note is that, back when it was first posted here about him wanting to smear the Herald staff with child-porn, I believe someone pointed out that it suggested Sweet knew where to get CP, and even the potential for him to have already found some. This makes that suggestion seem a little more realistic, in retrospect.

Sweet's treading in dangerous waters here. If this type of shit were in my past, and people were posting about it openly and linking my irl name and location etc etc I would disappear from the internet completely, and immediately. I get the feeling he's waving a red flag in front of the internet, not realizing it's the biggest meanest bull that's ever been created. This whole thread was basically all fun and games and Dobson levels of silly before the stuff about kids came up. Now it's heading to Nick Bate territory. Iconoclast just became a shuddercow for me.

Edit: Also he'll see this as another progressive conspiracy against him. He'll try to say that liking pre-pubescent girls used to be acceptable in the (whatever time period) and that his great grandma so-and-so got married and knocked up at some ridiculous age. If he doesn't say this exactly, it'll be some other pedo-apologist crap that he picked up from the back of god knows what seedy magazine in his youth.
 
Last edited:
ASU said:
I'm conflicted on this. Sweet's a creep, a stalker, a revenge junky, perverted beyond even general internet standards and if he had any spine at all he'd be dangerous, yes. I think the real question is "does he actually have the capability (both emotionally and physically) to carry out any of this stuff?" and the answer I come up with is "Possibly". All it would take is some naive, confused 14 year old from NE Ark showing up on the AJM forums and falling for Sweets lies. It's pretty damn clear that no one at the AJM forums would do anything to prevent it. Of course, this is assuming he would be a predator. It's a lot to suggest that someone's a full-on potential kiddy fiddler based on them getting an occasional verbal boner for a 16 year old, but when you combine it with Sweets history of threatened violence and sexual dysfunction (both commonly associated with serial killers, from what I've read) and the fact that he's apparently not talking about 16 year olds, he's talking about pre-to just-starting-puberty aged girls (so, what, 12? 13?) it becomes a little more frightening. He specifically mentions them "developing younger", so hell, it might even mean girls younger than 12.

One thing I'll note is that, back when it was first posted here about him wanting to smear the Herald staff with child-porn, I believe someone pointed out that it suggested Sweet knew where to get CP, and even the potential for him to have already found some. This makes that suggestion seem a little more realistic, in retrospect.

Sweet's treading in dangerous waters here. If this type of shit were in my past, and people were posting about it openly and linking my irl name and location etc etc I would disappear from the internet completely, and immediately. I get the feeling he's waving a red flag in front of the internet, not realizing it's the biggest meanest bull that's ever been created. This whole thread was basically all fun and games and Dobson levels of silly before the stuff about kids came up. Now it's heading to Nick Bate territory. Iconoclast just became a shuddercow for me.

Edit: Also he'll see this as another progressive conspiracy against him. He'll try to say that liking pre-pubescent girls used to be acceptable in the (whatever time period) and that his great grandma so-and-so got married and knocked up at some ridiculous age. If he doesn't say this exactly, it'll be some other pedo-apologist crap that he picked up from the back of god knows what seedy magazine in his youth.
Click to expand...

"Back in my generation it was standard for a young, comely gal whose sumptuous peaches were growing to cause the mouth to water more than a three-course buffet with all the trimmings. But now thanks to the TV ratings system dictating what's age-appropriate it's 'No! You can not has that! Children is for children only!''"
 
Last edited:
Regarding the potential CP, this is a personal theory of mine, I haven't seen much to support it either way. But I believe Sweet said the picture would involve the ASU pres in bed with a kid. The picture could have just been a picture of a kid in a bed, like maybe with a parent, from a magazine or something. If he was actually able to manipulate the photo, a picture of a grown man in bed with a kid that isn't his would indeed look very bad without needing to be more graphic. So I don't think it's necessarily true that Sweet knows/knew where to get CP.
One of the less disturbing, but still disturbing, aspects of that plot that I can't get over is that Sweet believed he had the skills to digitally manipulate a photo to that extent in 1997. He couldn't even do that now, and I imagine in 1997 digital manipulation was 100x harder. Not only did he believe and still believes he had the skills to do that, but that he would be adept enough at it to actually cause a scandal.
The passage about girls "ripening" is indeed disturbing. I think I glossed over it the first time it showed up in this thread :(
 
I agree with melty, and if I may expand on it, the whole enterprise was just insane. Sweet had convinced himself that the editor would simply accept the photo as real and print it without so much as a second thought as to who sent it to him. The entire basis of the editor potentially getting in trouble hinged on the damage it would do to the reputation of an innocent person.

This was all basically the equivalent of Sweet thinking he could run up on campus and slice all his enemies in half with a flashlight that he declared was a lightsaber, which was bad enough, but then you realize where his mind went in order to frame the president of ASU. As melty said, he wanted a scandal. Pretty broad field there, right? You can go lots of places with scandal on a university campus, say, embezzlement, bribery, an elaborate cheating system for students paid for by money or illicit favors, drugs, etc. What does Sweet try to use? Sleeping with a child. Yeeesh.

@ASU BTW, just out of curiosity, can you show me where I can read about Sweet's dysfunction? I believe what you're saying, I'd just like to read more about it.
 
meltychocolate said:
I can't get over is that Sweet believed he had the skills to digitally manipulate a photo to that extent in 1997. He couldn't even do that now, and I imagine in 1997 digital manipulation was 100x harder.
Click to expand...

I've been retouching and manipulating photos since 2001 and professionally since around 2007. I doubt he could have even had access to the necessary tools in 1997. When I got started, the GIMP didn't really exist and it was pretty hard to get your hands on Photoshop if you didn't have the $700 to buy it (I think I traded some burned CDs with music or porn or something for a burned Photoshop CD from another kid who knew how to crack software.)

My first thought was that he literally cut and pasted the head of the guy onto another photo and then copied it, but then I remembered no one taught him how to use the copy machine. :lol:
 
I agree with the person who said Sweet is a shuddercow now. I suppose we should be glad he's a recluse and confined to his house mostly. I sincerely hope if he tries to escalate his behavior, someone in the real world is paying attention to him. It wouldn't take much to push him over the edge. If he tries to return to ASU in the mistaken belief that he's allowed on campus now that his nemesis is dead, and is arrested, that might do it. Or if there's fallout from his vile comments on her death. Does anyone think Sweet is projecting about his brother and it's really Jon who his mother and brother are afraid of?
 
I was reading through Sweets blog posts and came across this in his "college dating advice" post.
sweet said:
Dress for success. This means no loud shirts, no pants in bright or unusual colors (like purple), no flipover shades, no baseball caps with humorous slogans, no novelty pins, buttons, and no item in your wardrobe or immediate person which once belonged to a now-deceased relative.
Click to expand...
Of course rather than including general advice it's all ridiculously specific to him and only him. Since everything else listed is something he was known to wear, I think it's safe to assume in addition to everything else we knew he was wearing when he met ashlay, he was clearly also wearing some kind of hideous shirt. A minor detail but I felt it was worth mentioning anyway.
 
DrJonesHat said:
I agree with the person who said Sweet is a shuddercow now. I suppose we should be glad he's a recluse and confined to his house mostly. I sincerely hope if he tries to escalate his behavior, someone in the real world is paying attention to him. It wouldn't take much to push him over the edge. If he tries to return to ASU in the mistaken belief that he's allowed on campus now that his nemesis is dead, and is arrested, that might do it. Or if there's fallout from his vile comments on her death. Does anyone think Sweet is projecting about his brother and it's really Jon who his mother and brother are afraid of?
Click to expand...
I think they are disappointed in, and disgusted by, Jon, but not afraid of him. (IIRC, much to Jon's dismay, his brother didn't even hesitate to come back and live in their house after Jon brandished a pipe at him and they both got thrown in the pokey.)
 
Last edited:
29x3s8.png


Had it.
 
He Sets Me On Fire said:
@ASU BTW, just out of curiosity, can you show me where I can read about Sweet's dysfunction? I believe what you're saying, I'd just like to read more about it.
Click to expand...

By sexual dysfunction I was referring to his inability to find an appropriate sex partner (ever, apparently), not an inability to maintain an erection or anything like that. It's worrying to me because when combined with his violent threats and isolation it suggests someone who might decide to prey on the vulnerable since that's all that he can reasonably target and not be identified immediately as doing something inappropriate.

I looked up the definition of sexual dysfunction and I'm not actually sure if it includes "finding a partner" as part of sex. I'm a layman, so it wouldn't surprise me that there's a more appropriate term for Sweets "condition" that I'm unaware of.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom