All he had to do was not defend a sex attacker. Just that one little thing, and he would have come out of this with some credit. Unbelievable.
Sweet is even less likeable than CWC. With Chris, a lot of the really disgusting stuff like cakefarts or the zoophilia chats were tricked from him by sweethearting trolls. Nobody is even trolling Sweet Bro - he just pours out his twisted opinions of his own accord.
I've yet to see him mention a rapist or school shooter without trying to mitigate their awful crimes. It begs the question - does he in some way admire these people?
It's interesting that you say that, and I think I've got it when talking about the difference between those two: Both Jon and Chris are sociopathic. Both are paranoid, corrupt, juvenile, and whine when they don't get their way, even when getting their way entails succeeding at a crime or other morally objectionable activity. Both are lazy, dysfunctionally ignorant, and generally stupid.
The difference is that Jon is
hateful. You could argue that Chris is as well, but his hatefulness is circumstantial. He claims to hate men, but can actually get along with men face-to-face under the right circumstances. This is because Chris doesn't hate men so much as he hates the fact that he's perpetually alone with no solid (or comfortable) answer as to why. In addition, Chris knows that most guys could kick his behind, and it scares him. He hates(ed) homosexuals, but that's only because he was being accused of being one while never really having a solid means of identifying himself as a person, i.e., if you called Chris gay, it flew in the way of how he identified himself, which was already a challenge to begin with. It made him insecure. He hates the trolls because they've always tricked (and sometimes harassed) him.
With Jon, its different. Jon can't say anything about any group of people without saying something disgustingly, and unnecessarily, hateful. Women, blacks, Asians, gays, individuals who aren't him, his own mother, whomever. He always has to put someone in a box, then prop his feet on top of it.
I suspect that this is because of the primary difference between the Sweet and Chandler households. Chris was an only child who had all his own stuff, and never had to worry about sharing the spotlight, or one of his siblings embarrassing him. Jon had siblings who could outdo him, even beat him up (according to him). Chris could see himself as a superstar in his won room, Jon got beaten up outside the house and in. There was no place where he could be a hero, except his mind. Chris could be in a place where he was a special snowflake, Jon was in a position to get pushed around a lot. I wonder if people liked him as a child?
As far as his sickening regard for TreenBeen's attacker, that's a good question. Let me clarify that everything I write here is all conjecture:
I highly doubt that Jon has even had a first kiss, let alone sex. He's not a good-looking man by any reasonable measure. True, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but any reasonable woman would beholdin' a barf bag at the thought of getting intimate with Jon. He has no real friends (his words), is not invited to parties, is not in a social circle, and is homebound a lot of the time, unless his mother or brother drives him somewhere. This is a man who, much like Chris, cannot expect to attract a woman through his own means, and thus, probably feels he could only be with a woman via force (just look at the blog where he goes on about repeatedly calling "Ashleigh". Again, even
if she was real, Jon would not leave her alone). Therefore, it is not his fault that he can't get with a woman, it's women's fault. He probably feels for the attacker the same way he felt for the Virginia Tech shooter.
Props to HSMOF, Holdek and Treenbeen for calling him on his bullshit.
Thanks, Bound! And again, shout out to TreenBeen. She's got guts.
