He was dropped from the Herald due to plagiarizing. He couldn't take anymore classes and personally left since he sperged out on needing more therapy. He was banned because of his creepy stalking and letters.
I've noticed that Sweet doesn't really talk about religion that much, although I do recall him saying he doesn't believe in evolution.
As for the ban from ASU (or "AS(S)U", as Sweet calls it) - it was for something serious enough that Sweet can be charged with trespassing if he goes on the campus, and is threatened with legal action if he tries contacting them. To Sweet, these are the "punishments" for breaking the rules made by progressives, apparently.
e: I was still typing this while Adamska already posted his reply above. Also, just out of curiosity, I wonder what these forums look like on IE or whatever browser Sweet uses, on Windows 98?
Looks like I'll be here for a while. Let's go through the latest exploits by Jon Sweet, professional loser
Once again Cavity Creep, the Herald isn't a job; it's a resume builder designed to make it easier for you to have a job. Employers love people that are just starting out that already know the ropes. That way they don't have to train them or provide them with as good a salary. Your girl left because you begged her for pity sex by using your dead dad as a sob story, and you walking in looking even more ridiculous than Mr. Chandler pre-Tomgirl days doesn't help. And maybe? Dude, you likely came off like you were going to kill a bitch! I'm not shocked they wanted an evaluation.
As for "waiting" to fire someone, that usually happens when a person regularly shows themselves to be a problem. The employer then usually waits for an appropriate offense to let someone go, so they have "probable cause" and other such things.
Plus, last I checked, you plagiarized for one of your entries. It's bad enough you do it in a field that only ranks behind science in strictly dealing with plagiarists, but you do it in college. College fucking hates plagiarism and rewards that shit with zero points or occasionally kicks you out. Also, the time you were placed to do columns and when the staff started to get sick of your shit are likely reversed in reality; you probably got the spot first, then lost it due to spergery and psychosis.
Let me just use these two quotes to say everything I need to say:
But, really, when people look closely at what you're saying, it all falls apart: anecdotal evidence, huge leaps of logic, blatant misrepresentation, "blame the victim" arguments, and posts full of mindless cursing and gibbering.
"Dere nuh Sistim! Dere nuh Sistim!"
I could allude to how your angriest critics tend to be lean towards the right likely because what you do is an insult to their platform. But nope, we're all filthy Socialists out to turn the US into the USSR one bill at a time in your mind.
Let me explain why you are lucky you were just barely smart enough to not send that picture: You avoided a prison sentence that could've been up to ten years. This is just for possession Sweets. For a first time offender. Combine that with your phone sex games with a minor... you could've been in there for as long as most people who commit manslaughter.
Besides, you were fucktarded enough to indulge in the flesh. It doesn't matter the excuses you try to use you responsibility dodging piece of shit.
This reminds me so much of those restaurant owners in Restaurant Impossible or Kitchen Nightmares. Their denial that their food is shit is phrased almost exactly like this.
Besides, why should we take the word of a man who repeatedly alters the truth to make himself look better... including times where you tried to murder your own brother?
Noo... the thread would've remained dead if you weren't so goddamned stupid and arrogant to revive it to get the last word. That's the thing with you Sweets, and why you're the same as Chandler... you cannot take others getting the last word. So you barge into this dead as fuck thread, acting like a little shit who hates not getting the last word in. Your first post literally has you dismissing Holdek with this little quip: "Unsubstantiated claim. Pure blah-blah."
When the collective tenacity of this site focused on you and found you a terrible deluded little man, you ran away like a bitch and are now abusing the trust and bandwidth of people you dub "friend" to pot shot at us. You will keep this up until the day you die is my prediction. We're your tar-baby Sweets.
And again, you got caught plagiarizing; that's why they kicked you off the paper.
Sweets pls. We've had our top men look through your chicken scratch when you provided it. Their conclusion was that you did plagiarize quite a bit from the sketch in question. They assumed that you didn't mean to though and I can buy that too, since you seem to be nearly incapable of creative expression on your own. You can't do anything but cheaply copy others bro; I've had people show me this even though your comics are unreadable to me. It's in your books too; you lack that creative spark to create something free of what you've seen with your eyes.
And even if this was all true and you were wrongfully accused, I don't give a monkeys. You've never bothered to get back up and face the music after each fall. You've had 20 fucking years to do it, and you've never bothered to try any more than what your mom gives you. That alone sucks up any pity or sympathy I might have for this; your psychotic schemes and selfishness make me actively dislike you.
Well now, this is a new change, at least in my eyes. Now I'm really beginning to think you did plagiarize the piece willingly, since this detail on your confession differs a bit from prior incarnations. Like I said Sweet-tooth, liars tend to change details, even small ones... and you've done a lot of it since the Farms first met you.
Also, the fact that you never bothered to meet with the staff tells me a lot about how shit you are as an employee. Those motherfuckers, your coworkers, are your lifeline and bros. You have a good relation with them, they'll help you out hardcore. It also tends to make you look better to your employer, since they gets the vibe you actually care about your job.
Bollocks broski. You opened up a can of worms to people not exactly willing or expecting a group of us going over and chatting with you on the matter. On top of that, you foist off your decades long problems on them regularly, likely without helping or listening to them in turn.
As a filthy liberal, I kind of laughed at this one. Mostly because of how poorly you understand the left wing while you yourself serve as one of the best Leftist strawmen I've ever unintentionally seen. On top of that, I'm amused by your praise of obsolete, inefficient trash.
The truth can be best determined by how much it ties into reality. Since your comments rarely venture into the heart of the matter and change depending on what you want the others to hear, I think we're a bit better footed in this field old son.
My guess is because DA is a neutral ground where others aren't as easily affected by the exchange. Also I see the likelihood of Holdek being afraid of you in the same likelihood of Mr. Chandler successfully getting a job at Archie Comics producing Sonichu as a monthly feature. IE not very likely.
Nice try fucker. This runs counter to "blowing off" the meetings however, which implies you are a lazy fuck; something that I imagine we agree on collectively. And that's a classic Nice Guy moment you had; how you were so "helpful" and "obliging" and no one understood it. I call BS, especially since you acted snippy over little things like the flash of a camera bulb.
But you're not rebuilding your life. You're acting like a crazy man ready to mailbomb his former places of work. As for this return to the plagiarism, it doesn't goddamned matter regardless since it came off like it was plagiarized you fucking imbecile. The details behind the act only indicates the severity of the event; the event still happened no matter what you say.
This denial is the same shit I see in people who commit murders Sweet; they often try to play off the seriousness of the act if they too were caught.
*Facepalms*
Nice strawmanning on how a truthful tale works Sweets. But it's not the wording that determines if a person lies. It's in the detailing, which commonly chills out with @Satan along with some hookers and blow, that determines truthfulness. A liar's story often has details missing or change upon the retelling; this is something most police investigators look for when they are trying to find a suspect.
Nahh, your life is doing that for me.
The channels would not be "forbidden" if you were smart enough to do the upgrade correctly... or if you got your old lady to do it. She'd probably get it before you would.
Most people would still find it creepy regardless. And honestly, I really doubt you're that fucking accomplished. Your eyesores that you call comics does not show this "talent" in the slightest. Also bro, you previously mentioned your eyesight is a fucking wreck; how the hell can you say you can sketch people's faces with any accuracy?
Most non-autistic people (and even quite a few autistic ones), would still not be sympathetic about this. You were an adult by this point, and should've known better than to just blow up because of one little flash. Also this really does give me the impression that you are in fact afflicted with the 'tism Tanglepubes. It doesn't excuse your shitty behavior, but it explains the logic here.
You could've asked yourself or tampered with it until it did what you wanted. It's how I learned a variety of things myself, up to and including how to reset a router and how to strip malware from my rig one time. But nope, unless the knowledge is spoon fed to you, you won't bother. Hell, you usually shit talk people that do it.
Oh fuck this is a very strong sign of the 'tism if I've ever seen one. It really irritates a lot of people if people do barge into a conversation and interrupt them. That's not really being that helpful anyway, since the story/discussion could've probably went on without that insight. What I'm saying is that you did not read the atmosphere Sweets.
Most of them seem just fine to me, and several of our board members have admitted to having journalist backgrounds and don't seem to be psychotic and crazy (...yet). Hell, one of my favorite Youtubers, Potholer54 was a journalist in Oz and East Asia for years on end and he's the chillest fucker I've ever seen. I think that all this did was prove why people don't like you Sweets.
I think that picture explains why we see what you type as fucking racist.
Most of us are amazed that a person can remain so entrenched in their misery and failure, and have tried to basically explain why the way you're living will only forever get worse from this point on if you don't get out of that cycle. Then as you got more entrenched and revealed just how ugly of a person you spiritually are, well... a lot of us are now just sitting here amused that you physically exist. We also have this thing that we often like to do, which is capture moments of stupidity in the desperate hope to teach others "Don't do this shit if you want to have a better life".
And don't try to go with the stalking angle Mr. "I stalked people because I'm Yandere for my Ex and my Job". It makes you look even more hypocritical than you already are.
And if you did create your apartment/bookshop idea with that building, I'd actually approve Johnny boy. I mean, the hooker thing is creepy and awful, but the other aspects are still an improvement.
But you weren't drawing while being a creepy little fuck. Artists do do that, but they do so when they are sketching out something. You weren't; you were just eyeballing this chick to the point where she was probably thinking you were going to jack it right there.
Three words: Po' Bunny Taxes.
Two more words: Jiggaboo Junction
You literally cannot shit talk Mr. Chandler dude. Chris has some actual disabilities, confirmed by science and everything. You are allegedly so much better than him and more functional, which means your fucktardery is magnitudes more hilarious and awful. I've also mentioned that Mr. Chandler is actually more competant than you. He has a college degree (you don't), can drive (you can't), has tried changing his life (you won't), has held a job (you never had one), has visited more places than you, and understands people a more than you. You are literally and figuratively dumber than OPL, and for that I laugh at you.
No, you just want an apartment, food, and sex for basically free. You do not give a shit for other people in the slightest, as your campaigns and motivations are purely around yourself.
Most of the ones you hate only remember you as the crazy fucker they don't want near them... if they even remember you.
Don't you fucking even. Of the three "jobs" you claimed you had, the last two were given to you by your mom. You don't fucking try, you want others to do that for you.
Now remember, we should give this cheating piece of shit sympathy and agree that his life was ruined by an evil conspiracy headed by such Freemason Alumni as Slick Willy Clinton and Barry O'.
Wow... you're a worse Christian than Mr. Chandler.
So I was reading the first few pages of the thread...
Sweet said:
So, Europe is switching from analog to DTV, huh? Big mistake. Wait until they realize they're going to lose most of their favorite channels. France will be on fire again.
I've never once called for censorship; I'm just saying a crucifix in a jar of urine isn't art. If it were, then I've got a goldmine on my windowsill (I use an empty soda bottle on occasion when the bathroom's full, or I'm watching a really good TV show and don't want to miss it).
@Treenbeen -- I am so sorry. A number of us here can, unfortunately, relate fairly directly, and the lack of reaction from Sweetums is kind of like the shit icing on the shit cake. You ever need an ear, drop me a PM.
Indeed. Mad props to Treenbeen. That was a gutsy thing to do, particularly in light the fact that you were trying to help an ungrateful, disrespectful pervert. Also, congratulations on your victories. THAT is how you triumph over your enemies.
Indeed. Mad props to Treenbeen. That was a gutsy thing to do, particularly in light the fact that you were trying to help an ungrateful, disrespectful pervert. Also, congratulations on your victories. THAT is how you triumph over your enemies.
Seriously though. Does he contribute something on this site so worthwhile that people feel like he's worth this undue attention to stand for him or is it just a matter of people feeling threatened by any contact from an outside force? I don't get it.
Seriously though. Does he contribute something on this site so worthwhile that people feel like he's worth this undue attention to stand for him or is it just a matter of people feeling threatened by any contact from an outside force? I don't get it.
I think it's probably just us vs. them mentality. A lot of groups would probably respond pretty similarly if a bunch of random strangers showed up to poke fun at one of their members. Sweets is so blatantly hateful, self-centered and delusional, though, it's a goddamn miracle he's still tolerated over there at all. I don't think I've ever been part of any community that wouldn't to some degree reject a person who continually made an ass of themselves the way Sweets does over at the brony forum.
Speaking of! Like the bad boy of newspapermanship he is, Sweets ignores the people saying things he doesn't like and posts more of his shitty art. He does deign to respond to Marty McFly's query as to why he insists on using MS Paint instead of a more flexible art program:
Dr. Belch: SERIOUS ARTIST said:
It works for me juuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuust fine. I don't need that newfangled blah-blah. If it didn't come included in my new laptop bundle, who needs it...?
This man wants to make a living off his artwork, folks. Like, I can understand being daunted by the idea of learning how to use something new when you're used to doing things a certain way, but whyyyy is he so adamant about not even trying?
That's a rhetorical question. I know the answer is "because he's Jonathan M. Sweet".
I think it's probably just us vs. them mentality. A lot of groups would probably respond pretty similarly if a bunch of random strangers showed up to poke fun at one of their members. Sweets is so blatantly hateful, self-centered and delusional, though, it's a goddamn miracle he's still tolerated over there at all. I don't think I've ever been part of any community that wouldn't to some degree reject a person who continually made an ass of themselves the way Sweets does over at the brony forum.
Speaking of! Like the bad boy of newspapermanship he is, Sweets ignores the people saying things he doesn't like and posts more of his shitty art. He does deign to respond to Marty McFly's query as to why he insists on using MS Paint instead of a more flexible art program:
This man wants to make a living off his artwork, folks. Like, I can understand being daunted by the idea of learning how to use something new when you're used to doing things a certain way, but whyyyy is he so adamant about not even trying?
That's a rhetorical question. I know the answer is "because he's Jonathan M. Sweet".
Part of it may be a combination of things, all of which culminate in a batch of sour grapes. Sweet is stunningly incompetent. The man bangs into doorjambs and can lose his glasses to up to weeks at a time. User-friendly machinery with big green buttons were a mystery to him, even when such machinery would be necessary to his work. GIMP and other such programs aren't really intuitive. He'd have to look up tutorials on how to use them, but likely he'd be too lazy and incurious to figure that out for himself.
In addition to that, Sweet doesn't seem to have a whole lot of self-respect, despite his baseless arrogance. There's probably a blunt, gruff voice in his head that tells him, "Forget it, loser" whenever he considers reaching outside his boundaries to try something new. Well aware of the fact that virtually every endeavor in his adult life has resulted in an embarrassing failure, he may also be too scared to try anything new.
Now, in a reasonable person, this would not inspire bitterness. Sadness, maybe. Determination to fix things, possibly. But Sweet is not reasonable. He's terribly immature, and as such cannot handle the situation without feeling bitter. Everybody else can use photocopiers, new computers, digital TV, GIMP, cell phones, and other new-fangled geegaws - but he can't. Be it for financial purposes, cognitive problems, or a basic lack of overall ability to handle life, Sweet don't get any. So, he's bitter. And because he lives in such a myopic bubble, he doesn't seem to care that readers don't buy his work, despite the fact that he thinks his work is juuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuust fine. It's just a comforting tool, like Sonichu. It's a place where Sweet can pose himself as the hero, whereas in real life, he doesn't even rank as an innocent bystander.
What is "blim-blim"? Like, ebonics? That you think I'm mocking black people with my "duhh" and "Them's our perks, you is not has that" tells me that there must be some subtle racism in you. It's supposed to be based on the speech patterns of a mentally-challenged person.
I love that he uses classic racism defense methods. Racists have moved beyond it but by god he sticks with the rudimentary shit.
Now @Iconoclast, this makes YOU racist. Seeing you obvious attempt at ebonics and old timey minstrel speak and calling it out isn't subtle racism. It's being a decent human being.
I've never once called for censorship; I'm just saying a crucifix in a jar of urine isn't art. If it were, then I've got a goldmine on my windowsill (I use an empty soda bottle on occasion when the bathroom's full, or I'm watching a really good TV show and don't want to miss it).