🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ToroidalBoat said:
Sweet has to be told how to think and can't discern often thinks simple things are confusing, and he still thinks he's a "conservative genius" and that we "didn't even go to college."

Wow.

Is "mil gracias" something they say a lot in Arkansas, or is that just a Sweetish neologism?
Click to expand...

Sweet is doubtless now forced to watch children's cartoons in Spanish on his Obamacable. He probably thinks that tossing the occasional Spanish word or phrase into his illiterate rants will cause readers to mistake him for The Most Interesting Man in the World. ("I can't afford to drink beer, but if I could, my farts would cause sonic booms that would flatten buildings in St. Louis.")
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Sweet is doubtless now forced to watch children's cartoons in Spanish on his Obamacable. He probably thinks that tossing the occasional Spanish word or phrase into his illiterate rants will cause readers to mistake him for The Most Interesting Man in the World. ("I can't afford to drink beer, but if I could, my farts would cause sonic booms that would flatten buildings in St. Louis.")
Click to expand...

So, first of all, thank you for giving me the mental image of Sweet watching Dora the Explorer and angrily screaming at the screen whenever the "wetback bitch" or whatever he'd call her doesn't hear him the first time he screams along at the screen.

Secondly, I don't know if it's the half dozen or so shots I've had tonight speaking or not, but, reading the recent comments and reviews of his most recent ramblings... God fucking damn it is Jonny Boy one stupid son of a bitch. Just... good goddamn lord.
 
He Sets Me On Fire said:
Take your confusion over rabbit-chasing. The information that you said you've looked up is not confusing, it's simply that one side of the argument supports dogs chasing rabbits, and another doesn't. It should be noted here that Jon never posts any real examples of this contradiction; he merely whines that there are two sides to the argument and that he can't make up his own mind. Discernment would allow Jon to look at the sources of the argument, determine their scientific and medical legitimacy, then, based on that knowledge and his own experience with owning a dog that chases rabbits, come to his own conclusions.
Click to expand...

So, I've looked up what the internet has to say about domesticated dogs killing and eating wild rabbits. We will ignore the people who oppose the practice because they love little bunnies, although Sweet is probably unable to determine that they are offering opinions and not facts.

The others who oppose letting the family canine kill and eat wild rabbits -- and this group includes veterinarians and parasitologists -- do so because wild rabbits carry -- among other disease organisms -- tapeworms that can infect and kill dogs that are not up to date on their worm medications. The chances that Thumbskull's dog receives regular visits to a vet are 0.01 x 10 to the minus 127th power. It wouldn't surprise me if it hasn't been vaccinated against rabies.

The good news is that if The Stalking Horror's dog is killing and eating rabbits, it's probably killing and eating other wild animals -- and the neighbors' pets -- as well. This exposes the dog to a plethora of diseases, some of which can be passed on to its owners and sicken or even kill them, too.

(Note to Thumbskull: I just made all of that up. There's nothing to worry about. If Fido begins showing signs of hydrophobia, for example, don't worry. He'll be fine after a day or two, especially if you let him sleep inside. That ending to Old Yeller was just some unscientific, tearjerking Hollywood bullshit.)
 
Last edited:
Holdek said:
Ya know, this reminds me that Dr. Belch ran a couple of AJMers off the board once before because he was enraged that they were liberals. The man-baby flat-out said that he couldn't agree to disagree with their politics because they were part of "Da System" that ruined his life. I wonder how many have left that forum over the years because they just got tired of his nastiness?

Jon continues his pattern of making himself a churlish nuisance to any establishment he becomes a part of. Makes me feel bad for The Herald staff and Dale.
Click to expand...

He's just a collection of cartilage and self-destruction. In fact, your statement reminds me of one of the first things Thumbles said when he started posting here. Someone asked him why, in fact, do LOLcows come to the forum, and Sweet replied:

To get more ideas. I used all my best material here, and the liberal pinheads I usually debate at my fav forum haven't come around lately. I think I was too rough on them. So I looked for a new watering hole.
Click to expand...
[emphasis added]

Now we have recently seen how Jon will take the most minor of phenomena and escalate them to a level of significance far beyond that of what they actually demand. Take "all those" who'd favorited two of his recent comics, or his mistaken belief that attempts to penny him into his dorm was instead his fans attempting to reward him for his work. I think what we see above is another example of Jon blowing things out of proportion.

Jon fancies himself as a radio-show conservative, the type of thunder-and-brimstone champion of decency and righteousness the likes of which you could commonly hear on the AM dial for the last few decades. These people sell themselves and their philosophies with spiky rhetoric and insults - lots of insults. One of the most prevalent champions of talk both on radio and television is Bill O'Reilly, who has made a habit of referring to those whose intelligence he does not respect as "pinheads."

It has been made unavoidably clear that Jon, much like Christian Chandler, does not not understand creativity. He imitates - oh man how he imitates - but when it comes to actual creation, actually going his own direction when it comes to artistic choice, he's just as stymied as he'd be when handed a cell phone and told to make a call.

My memories of the AJM forum was that this was not a group that enjoyed friction. While I admit that I didn't look over many of the threads at all, I can tell you that, even when presented with inarguable evidence of Jon's terrible behavior, certain members of the group were not pleased by our presence. We could not defend ourselves to these people, but it didn't seem that they were dedicated to protecting Jon. Instead, it seemed largely that their irritation stemmed primarily from someone causing static on their boards. I mention this because it appears very unlikely that there were a spate of 'liberal pinheads' causing a stir with Jon on AJM all the time.

From what little I gleaned, it appeared as if two or three members may have had simple disagreements with Jon, and he came back with his typical inarguable logic (one cannot argue with a lobotomized rabbit, after all). Instead of wasting their time, the opposing members simply backed off their argument, and Jon, dumb enough to believe that their attempt at maintaining decorum was equal to their conceding the argument, saw it as a victory.

Flush from likely the only argument that he'd ever won in his adult life, it's possible that Jon elevated this debate to a successful destruction of the entire Democratic party, every single member of the NAACP, the San Fransisco Gay Men's Choir, and the cast and viewership of Will and Grace. Now that he was the bulletproof god of lib-killing conservatism, where else could he go to find more prey, to crush all of those who opposed him as they had on the AJM boards?

As if hearing a voice that had echoed through time, Jon found an entire thread about him, which had been untouched for more than a year. That voice was one voice, but uttered by many. And that voice said, "I'm your huckleberry."

Somebody asked if Jon had necro'd the thread because he lacked people to talk to. He smugly responded,

No, I was bored with my old forums and needed a good debate to sharpen my claws. I saw my name here, so I figured, well, this could be fun. And it is.
Click to expand...

After all that's transpired since that post (9 June 2014), I find myself in agreement. Yes, Jon, it is fun. It's a lot of fun indeed.
 
I decided to take a look at the new comics that Sweet uploaded. Page loading was a bit slow because of the millions of people viewing his dA site 24-7.

But it was worth the wait. On Page 5 of Issue No. 50, he has a black character make the following announcement about a missing woman:

"Last seen by a trafficam [sic] getting out of a car on Spade and Koone . . ."

I trust that the wit and sophistication the author demonstrates in the sentence from which I quote will put to rest any lingering notions that Jon Sweet is a member of the Klan. This is clearly the work of a literary genius and is absolutely not the feebleminded scribbling of an autistic racist with a mental age of eight and an IQ of 73.
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
I decided to take a look at the new comics that Sweet uploaded. Page loading was a bit slow because of the millions of people viewing his dA site 24-7.

But it was worth the wait. On Page 5 of Issue No. 50, he has a black character make the following announcement about a missing woman:

"Last seen by a trafficam [sic] getting out of a car on Spade and Koone . . ."

I trust that the wit and sophistication the author demonstrates in the sentence from which I quote will put to rest any lingering notions that Jon Sweet is a member of the Klan. This is clearly the work of a literary genius and is absolutely not the feebleminded scribbling of an autistic racist with a mental age of eight and an IQ of 73.
Click to expand...

Alf and many other copyrighted characters appear in this comic. I'd love for him to try and sell it.
 
Yeah, speaking of ish 50, this was on the very first page of the story, at the very top:

Jon caption.JPG


Jon, you can't even maintain the basic discipline to keep the text inside the caption box, yet you expect people to give you money for this? Seriously?
 
Ruin said:
Alf and many other copyrighted characters appear in this comic. I'd love for him to try and sell it.
Click to expand...

And that character on the cover of No. 50 was obviously not drawn by Sweet. I wonder where he copied it from.

I also like the fact that our professional cartoonist's work contains a clickable link to the freeware he used to create the pages. It looks pretty amateurish when the bottom of every page of your work contains something like the following:

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com
file://CMy%20Documents\Jon's%20Comic%20Files\BDC%20E-books\#19.htm 7/3/13

There is freeware out there that doesn't do this, but it's a secret only available to those privy to the arcane secrets of Google.

He Sets Me On Fire said:
Yeah, speaking of ish 50, this was on the very first page of the story, at the very top:

View attachment 158261

Jon, you can't even maintain the basic discipline to keep the text inside the caption box, yet you expect people to give you money for this? Seriously?
Click to expand...

And there's that random boldface lettering again. Damn those manual typewriters that destroyed the fine motor control of the greatest artist of our time!
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
And there's that random boldface lettering again. Damn those manual typewriters that destroyed the fine motor control of the greatest artist of our time!
Click to expand...

Exactly. "At least, IT IS AS far as anybody knows. ThaT's the name she WORKS under."

See, randomly emphasized words and letters within words tend to take away from the impact you're trying to make with the word you're trying to emphasize.
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
file://CMy%20Documents\Jon's%20Comic%20Files\BDC%20E-books\#19.htm 7/3/13
Click to expand...
It's also inadvertent evidence that Sweet is using a shared computer.

And there's that random boldface lettering again.
Click to expand...
I may have said it before, but I think Sweet is trying to imitate how typical American superhero comics use seemingly random bolding for emphasis.
 
Last edited:
Ruin said:
Why does his ten year old self insert have a pronounced five o clock shadow?
Click to expand...

(1) Nobody told him that 10-year-old boys don't have beards.

(2) He's too unobservant to have noticed that 10-year-old boys don't have beards.

(3) As part of being an all-round freak, Sweet -- his manly parts "ripened early by the Southern sun" --underwent precocious puberty at age 8 and thinks that all 10-year-old boys have beards.

(4) All of the above.

EDIT TO ADD:

And . . . he's blessed the world with a new post on his dA journal that includes his latest self-portrait. Aside from the left hand, which seems to be a prop from The Walking Dead, the image looks like an entry in a contest based on the question "What would President Taft have looked like if he were a nearsighted, clinically insane hobo?"

sweetchuck__s_scrapbook_by_haggismccrablice-daqdffc.jpg
 
Last edited:
He Sets Me On Fire said:
Instead of wasting their time, the opposing members simply backed off their argument, and Jon, dumb enough to believe that their attempt at maintaining decorum was equal to their conceding the argument, saw it as a victory.
Click to expand...
I believe you're right. And, to be fair, most people, when the crazy homeless man wanders in the restaurant barking crazy invective at anyone who makes eye contact, just look away and silently wait for the nuisance to leave or be escorted out by management.

But Sweet had the misfortune of next stumbling into the one place where the sacred oath is to humor the crazy, for we dine on the lulzmik of the unsuspecting. ;)
 
Sweets needs to grow a Grizzly Adams beard, not because I think he'll look good but because it will hide more of his incredibly ugly face.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom